The Hague Court Rejects India's Suspension of Indus Waters Treaty

See - Sada Elbalad

16 hours ago

By Ahmad El-Assasy
The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in The Hague has issued a supplemental award reaffirming its jurisdiction over the dispute between India and Pakistan under the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT). The tribunal concluded that India's unilateral attempt to suspend its participation in the treaty does not affect the ongoing arbitration proceedings.
This ruling delivers a significant blow to New Delhi's legal stance, as it had claimed that the treaty was 'in abeyance' and the court had no authority to proceed.
Treaty Cannot Be Unilaterally Suspended
The Court emphasized that under Article XII(4) of the Indus Waters Treaty, the agreement remains legally binding on both parties unless mutually modified or terminated. It categorically rejected the idea that one country can withdraw or suspend its obligations under the treaty unilaterally.
Legal experts say the ruling is a reaffirmation of the core principle of international law — pacta sunt servanda, or "agreements must be kept."
Neutral Expert and Tribunal Both Remain Valid
The PCA also clarified that both dispute resolution pathways under the treaty—the Neutral Expert and the Court of Arbitration—can proceed independently. India had argued that Pakistan's use of both mechanisms simultaneously violated the treaty.
However, the tribunal ruled that once arbitration is initiated, its authority is established and cannot be overridden by such objections.
Pakistan Welcomes the Decision
Pakistan's Foreign Office welcomed the supplemental award, calling it a legal victory that strengthens the framework of the 1960 treaty. Islamabad confirmed that the hearings on the merits of the case—relating to India's construction of the Kishenganga and Ratle hydropower projects—were held in July 2024 and a decision is expected in due course.
India Rejects the Ruling
In contrast, India's Ministry of External Affairs rejected the court's decision, calling the tribunal 'illegally constituted.' It maintained that the treaty remains in abeyance and insisted that it does not recognize the PCA's jurisdiction in this matter.
India has consistently argued that Pakistan's simultaneous recourse to both the Court and the Neutral Expert process created a procedural conflict under the treaty.
A Broader Implication for Water Diplomacy
This decision has wider implications beyond the India–Pakistan water dispute. It reaffirms the binding nature of international treaties and the authority of arbitration forums. Analysts view it as a victory for multilateralism and legal diplomacy in South Asia, particularly in a time of strained bilateral relations.
read more
Gold prices rise, 21 Karat at EGP 3685
NATO's Role in Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
US Expresses 'Strong Opposition' to New Turkish Military Operation in Syria
Shoukry Meets Director-General of FAO
Lavrov: confrontation bet. nuclear powers must be avoided
News
Iran Summons French Ambassador over Foreign Minister Remarks
News
Aboul Gheit Condemns Israeli Escalation in West Bank
News
Greek PM: Athens Plays Key Role in Improving Energy Security in Region
News
One Person Injured in Explosion at Ukrainian Embassy in Madrid
News
China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier
Sports
Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer
Videos & Features
Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall
Lifestyle
Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt
Business
Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War
Arts & Culture
Zahi Hawass: Claims of Columns Beneath the Pyramid of Khafre Are Lies
News
Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks
Videos & Features
Video: Trending Lifestyle TikToker Valeria Márquez Shot Dead during Live Stream
News
Shell Unveils Cost-Cutting, LNG Growth Plan
Technology
50-Year Soviet Spacecraft 'Kosmos 482' Crashes into Indian Ocean