Public finances on ‘unsustainable' path due to spending promises, says OBR
It came as the Office for Budget Responsibility said public finances are in a 'relatively vulnerable position' amid pressure from recent U-turns on planned spending cuts.
State finances are facing 'mounting risks' but recent governments have had only limited success in improving the fiscal outlook, the OBR said.
Richard Hughes, chairman of the organisation, indicated that governments will need to adjust spending plans in the longer term to avoid national debt ballooning.
2025 Fiscal risks and sustainability report published – more highlights and charts to follow 📗 #OBRfiscalrisks
Data and supporting documents now available on our website: https://t.co/1IoAo8tfnG pic.twitter.com/txRROLLxCr
— Office for Budget Responsibility (@OBR_UK) July 8, 2025
Downing Street however rejected suggestions that the Government is failing to heed warnings about the future of the public finances.
Mr Hughes told a briefing in Liverpool that the projected rise in state pension spending linked to the triple lock commitment for annual increases was contributing to growth in national debt.
He said the triple lock 'is one of a series of age-related pressures that pushes public spending upwards steadily over a number of years and, as you saw in our previous report, when you project trends in both pension spending and health and other age-related spending forward, the UK public finances are in an unsustainable position in the long-run.
'The UK cannot afford the array of promises that are displayed to the public if you just leave those unchanged, based on a reasonable assumption about growth rates in the economy and in tax revenues.'
The triple-lock, which means state pensions increase by the highest of inflation, earnings growth of 2.5%, and a larger number of people above the pension age have caused a surge in spending on state pensions.
The forecaster said the cost of the state pension has 'risen steadily over the past eight decades', from around 2% of GDP in the mid-20th century to the current 5% of GDP, or £138 billion, and is estimated to rise to 7.7% of GDP in the early 2070s.
It added: 'Due to inflation and earnings volatility over its first two decades in operation, the triple lock has cost around three times more than initial expectations.'
The OBR's annual fiscal risks and sustainability report suggested reversals of planned tax increases and spending reductions, such as the recently proposed welfare Bill and winter fuel allowance cuts, contributed to a continued rise in Government debt.
The report said: 'Efforts to put the UK's public finances on a more sustainable footing have met with only limited and temporary success in recent years in the aftermath of the shocks, debt has also continued to rise and borrowing remained elevated because governments have reversed plans to consolidate the public finances.
'Planned tax rises have been reversed, and, more significantly, planned spending reductions have been abandoned.'
UK public sector debt stood at 96.4% of GDP (gross domestic product) in May, according to latest figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
The OBR said its annual fiscal risks and sustainability report that debt is projected to be 'above 270% of GDP by the early 2070s'.
The forecaster added that recent rises in debts have led to 'a substantial erosion of the UK's capacity to respond to future shocks and growing pressures on the public finances'.
The report also indicated that the state finances are likely to come under pressure in the longer-term from issues including significant growth in the cost of state pensions and climate-related factors.
The OBR report also highlighted that the UK's finances faces 'daunting' risks in the near term, such as challenging conditions across the global economy, which have pushed up borrowing costs for governments.
The yield on long-term UK Government bonds, called gilts, currently sits near to record highs, making it more costly for the Treasury to pay down its debt bill.
By the early 2070s, climate-related damage could reduce UK GDP by 8% in a scenario where global temperatures rise to just below 3°C.
The impact on GDP is 3 percentage points more than estimated in the 2024 FRS. #OBRfiscalrisks pic.twitter.com/ZFr4gWA3wE
— Office for Budget Responsibility (@OBR_UK) July 8, 2025
It also highlighted that commitments for increased defence spending also pose another risk to the sustainability of public finances.
Meeting the new Nato target that countries should spend 3.5% of GDP on core defence by 2035 will increase spending by a further £38.6 billion, the report said.
Another major risk highlighted is potential cyber attacks, in light of recent assaults on the Legal Aid Agency, HMRC and Marks & Spencer.
It predicted that a cyberattack on critical national infrastructure has the potential to temporarily increase borrowing by 1.1% of GDP.
Climate change also 'poses significant risks to economic and fiscal outcomes in the UK'.
There is 'an increasing likelihood of more severe impacts of climate change on economies', the OBR said, as the latest analysis now accounted for 'the impacts of higher precipitation and temperature variability'.
As a result, the OBR has updated its estimates for the economic damage caused by climate change in both its best case scenario, 2C of warming, and its worst case, an increase of 3C.
GDP could fall by 3.3% by 2060 in the event of 2C warming, the watchdog said, and 7.8% by 2060 in the 3C scenario.
A Number 10 spokesman said: 'We recognise the realities set out in the OBR's report and we're taking the decisions needed to provide stability to the public finances.'
Asked whether the Government was failing to heed alarm bells being sounded by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the official said: 'No, I don't accept that.
'We have non-negotiable fiscal rules. Stability is the bedrock of growth as we've always said and that is why those fiscal rules are in place.
'But we recognise the long-standing economic realities the OBR sets out in its report.'
The Conservatives criticised Labour's handling of the economy amid warnings from the OBR about the unsustainable future of public finances.
Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: 'While working families are tightening their belts, Labour have lost control of the public finances.
'The OBR's report lays bare the damage: Britain now has the third-highest deficit and the fourth-highest debt burden in Europe, with borrowing costs among the highest in the developed world.
'Under Rachel Reeves' economic mismanagement and Keir Starmer's weak leadership, our public finances have become dangerously exposed – vulnerable to future shocks, welfare spending rising unsustainably, taxes rising to record highs and crippling levels of debt interest.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
What is Yvette Cooper's plan to fast-track asylum claims?
As tensions flare up in the UK over migration, with protests taking place in Newcastle, Manchester and north London, the government is pursuing a new plan to reduce the asylum backlog. The home secretary has said she plans to introduce a fast-track scheme to turn around asylum decisions within weeks, via a 'major overhaul' of the appeal process. The plan is part of a wider attempt to crack down on the number of people crossing the Channel, with Ms Cooper announcing a 'one-in-one-out' returns deal with France earlier this year. But despite their efforts, last week it was revealed that the number of migrants arriving in the UK after crossing the English Channel topped 25,000 in record time, piling pressure on the government to take further action. It is hoped that the new plan will make a dent in the backlog and return people to safe countries faster, reducing the number of asylum seekers who are housed in hotels while awaiting the outcome of a claim or appeal. Here, The Independent takes a look at everything we know about the plan so far and how it will work in practice. How would the fast-track system work? Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation, including hotels, if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. But Yvette Cooper has now promised a 'major overhaul' of the appeal process, speeding up the time it takes for decisions on claims and appeals to be made. There are currently limited details on how this system would work, but sources told the Sunday Times it would allow decisions to be taken within weeks, rather than months or even years. Once a decision has been taken, those who have been rejected will be returned to their home country – reducing the number of people housed in temporary accommodation. 'If we speed up the decision-making appeal system and also then keep increasing returns, we hope to be able to make quite a big reduction in the overall numbers in the asylum system, because that is the best way to actually restore order and control,' Ms Cooper said. When will it be implemented? The home secretary has said she will legislate for the changes in autumn, when MPs return from their summer break. But it could take months for any legislation to pass through parliament, meaning we are unlikely to see the fast-track system implemented until the new year. How big is the asylum backlog and why is tackling it a priority? As of the end of March 2025, there were 78,745 asylum applications awaiting an initial decision – an 8 per cent decrease from the end of June 2024 and a 13 per cent decrease compared to the end of December 2024, official immigration statistics show. These outstanding cases related to 109,536 people, including both main applicants and their dependents. Labour has put a pledge to fix the 'broken' asylum system and crack down on the number of people coming to the UK on small boats at the centre of its plan for government. But with boat crossings at a record high, and the asylum backlog still above 75,000, there is mounting pressure on ministers to take more drastic action, a pressure exacerbated by the success of Reform UK in the polls. The government has also promised to end the use of asylum hotels before the end of this parliament, a promise it is unlikely to meet unless the backlog is reduced. Tensions over asylum hotels have flared up in recent weeks, with a protest and counter-protest taking place on Saturday outside the Thistle City Barbican Hotel in north London, and also in Newcastle and Manchester.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Andrew Bailey risks making Reeves's Budget nightmare even worse
As the Parliamentary summer break is now in full flow, most ministers will be attempting to switch off temporarily from the daily grind of governing. The Chancellor will, however, be keeping a close eye on the Bank of England's next Monetary Policy Committee meeting this Thursday. That is because interest rates, inflation and UK gilt yields are all key components, or 'conditioning assumptions' as they are referred to in the Office for Budget Responsibility's (OBR) economic and fiscal forecast. This is the key forecast that determines what fiscal headroom the Chancellor will have in the autumn Budget. At the moment, economists are expecting Rachel Reeves to miss her rules by somewhere between £10bn to £30bn. Everyone is therefore braced for further tax rises. But this figure could move significantly either up or down depending on what the Bank of England says and does on Thursday. The market is expecting another interest rate cut this week, and one more later in the year. So unless there is a big surprise, the Treasury will obviously be hoping for, and then welcoming, some rare good news. Most attention will therefore be on what is said about the pace of future cuts, and the Bank's forecasts for inflation, GDP and unemployment. But the most useful comparison we can make for determining how the Budget might look is not really assessing what the Bank says versus the market's expectations. Instead, we should look at how the Bank's actions on Thursday match up to the OBR's forecasts published alongside the Spring Statement back in March. At that point, the OBR thought that Bank Rate would average 4pc this year and then fall slightly to 3.8pc for the rest of the forecast. This would be in line with what markets are now expecting, and the interest rate cut likely on Thursday would bring the forecasts into line. So far so good for the Chancellor. Inflation tells a different story. The OBR forecasts the consumer prices index (CPI) measure of inflation to be 3.2pc this year, and then fall to 1.9pc next year before drifting back up to target for the rest of the Parliament. The latest figures published by the Office for National Statistics show inflation to be higher than this at 3.6pc at the moment. It is this upward pressure on inflation that would be worrying me most if I were still in the Treasury. While it will not be enough to stop this week's rate cut, if it persists over the next few months, it may bring into doubt further cuts. In May, the Bank predicted CPI would reach 3.7pc this year, so around about what we're at now. It will be interesting to see what they say in this week's policy report. Alongside inflation forecasts and what that might mean for future interest rate levels, Treasury officials will be watching gilt yields closely. I developed a bit of an obsession with these when I worked there, monitoring the daily and weekly updates provided to the Chancellor on how yields compared to the OBR forecast. If they are even slightly out, this can drive up government debt interest payments, and cost billions of pounds in fiscal headroom. Reflecting the significant amount of additional borrowing the Government has undertaken, the OBR has baked in average market gilt rates of 4.5pc this year rising to 5pc by 2028-29. In actual fact, if you look at 10-year gilts since the February window the OBR used in their last forecast, yields have been higher than 4.5pc, reaching 4.75pc in recent months. If the market reacts to whatever the Bank says on Thursday by increasing yields still further, the Chancellor could have a major problem on her hands. Once the formal Budget process has kicked off by the Chancellor commissioning the OBR for their economic and fiscal forecast, a window is set for various market determinants to be taken from to inform this forecast. If yields are elevated when this window happens, then the public finances will be impacted significantly. An obvious point to state is that things can move in the opposite direction. If there are hints of a third cut to interest rates this year, then some of the fiscal issues the Chancellor is facing will be eased considerably. But with inflation remaining higher than hoped, and the Government demonstrating a complete inability to deliver any welfare or spending cuts, the pressure on gilt yields seems pretty one way to me. There remains a chance then that the Bank throws the Government's economic and fiscal plans into further disarray on Thursday. The short-term welcome of a rate cut could quickly be overtaken by increased worries about what else the Bank has said. With the OBR getting ready to produce its judgment, that might be enough to spoil the Chancellor's summer holiday.
The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scotch whisky: 'No sign' US tariffs will increase to 25%
The US President has so far agreed a 10% tariffs on UK exports and 15% on EU ones. Across the Scotch whisky sector, there are concerns that this deal - which is believed to be costing the industry £4m a week - will lead to significant harm for businesses. READ MORE: Scotch whisky hopes rise after Trump pledges to talk tariffs Trump talks of 'great love' for Scotland during visit 'Scotland must switch whisky exports from America to Canada' The Secretary of State is currently leading a UK Government delegation to Germany this week to 'increase economic ties' with the EU. Mr Murray said it was important to point out that trade deals with the likes of EU and India, the largest growing economy in the world, will provide a 'great opportunity' for Scotch whisky. Yet, earlier on the programme, Scotland's public finance minister Ivan McKee warned that 25% tariffs could be imposed next year as a deal previously reached with America on temporary duty reliefs could be lifted. Between October 2019 and March 2021, the tariff imposed as a result of the Boeing dispute resulted in £600 million in lost Scotch whisky exports. A deal was eventually reached in 2021 to take the 25% tariff off the industry. However, Mr McKee said: 'That was done on a temporary basis and that runs out next year so it's really important that it is taken out of the picture permanently because when that was in place, that was a significant hamper to Scotch whisky exports. 'As the UK Government concludes the deal with the US Government, we would expect it to be 10% tariffs on whisky which is clearly something we wish wasn't there.' Mr McKee said he would hope this was not re-imposed but added: 'There's nothing but unpredictability when it comes to Donald Trump and tariffs so who knows what's happening.' However, Mr Murray insisted it is unlikely this would happen. Asked how likely it would be for 25% tariffs to be re-imposed on Scotch whisky, Mr Murray said: 'There is no sign of that at the moment.' He added: 'It's 10% tariffs on Scottish whisky. Yes, we would rather that was as close to zero as possible but ten percent is as low as anybody else in the world right now." Mr Murray said the Prime Minister Keir Starmer has been able to 'reset international relationships' to do a deal with the US on tariffs. He said: 'Many, including the First Minister, wanted us to walk away from the US president but it was really important in the national interest and in the Scottish national interest for us to have that relationship to do that deal. '10% is the lowest tariff in the world. We did the first trade deal it saved the steel industry, the car industry. 'Yes, 10% tariffs on Scotch whisky is disappointing and we will continue to champion the cause for the really unique position of whisky. "We don't want it to be subject to historic trade wars as it has been in the past. It is a really thriving industry.' Speaking about the US president's visit to Scotland, Mr Murray said it was a 'great privilege' to when he landed in the country last week. He said he was in 'no doubt' of Mr Trump's 'great love of Scotland', adding: 'That is something we should exploit in the national interest.' During his visit to Scotland, President Trump promised to 'take a look' at tariffs on Scotch whisky during his meeting with Starmer as he said he wanted Scotland "to thrive". Since then, however, no changes have been made to the current arrangement. Speaking on the radio today, the Secretary of State also said Mr Trump suggested he should join him at the press conference beside Air Force One when he arrived in the country, however, the Secretary of State declined. Mr Murray said: 'He did tap me on the shoulder and said, 'let's go and do this press conference together' which I declined…because it's not for me to do so. 'I don't think it was for me to speak to the American press pack who is travelling on Air Force One with the President of the United States.'
