ECHR must be reformed to restore ‘fraying' public confidence
Shabana Mahmood told the Council of Europe in a speech in Strasbourg the ECHR 'must evolve' to respond to new realities.
It comes as the Government also seeks to tighten the interpretation of the human rights laws in the UK.
On Wednesday, the Lord Chancellor said: 'Across Europe, public confidence in the rule of law is fraying
'There is a growing perception – sometimes mistaken, sometimes grounded in reality – that human rights are no longer a shield for the vulnerable, but a tool for criminals to avoid responsibility.
'That the law too often protects those who break the rules, rather than those who follow them.'
'This tension is not new. But in today's world, the threats to justice and liberty are more complex. They can come from technology, transnational crime, uncontrolled migration, or legal systems that drift away from public consent.'
Ms Mahmood told European ambassadors the UK was committed to the ECHR, but that was 'not the same as complacency'.
She added that when the application of rights 'begins to feel out of step with common sense', that is where trust begins to erode.
Her call for change comes as the Government plans to tighten the use of Article 8 of the ECHR, the right to private and family life, in immigration cases in the UK.
This includes cases involving foreign criminals.
Under the plans unveiled in the immigration White Paper last month, the Home Office will bring forward legislation to try to reduce the number of people claiming 'exceptional circumstances' under Article 8 to stay in the UK.
Ms Mahmood said: 'The right to family life is fundamental. But it has too often been used in ways that frustrate deportation, even where there are serious concerns about credibility, fairness, and risk to the public.
'We're bringing clarity back to the distinction between what the law protects and what policy permits.'
She also said judges cannot be asked to solve political problems and so reform must be a 'shared political endeavour' among member states.
The Lord Chancellor added: 'The European Convention on Human Rights is one of the great achievements of post-war politics. It has endured because it has evolved. Now, it must do so again.'
Following Ms Mahmood's speech, a No 10 spokesman said it should be for Parliament and the Government to decide who has the right to remain in the country.
'We want to ensure the right balance is made in migration cases in relation to the national interest,' the spokesman said.
The Lord Chancellor was making a broader point that 'now is the time for countries to work together to ensure the ECHR can evolve to meet the challenges facing modern democracies'.
But, he added: 'The Government has been clear that Britain will remain a member of the ECHR, it underpins key international agreements on trade, security, on migration, on the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement.'
A Tory spokesman said Kemi Badenoch had been clear that 'we would do whatever is necessary to ensure the supremacy of UK laws, and set a number of clear tests, including the deportation test, and made clear that if necessary, we would leave the ECHR'.
But responding to the speech Sacha Deshmukh, chief executive of Amnesty International UK, said that any reform of the ECHR must 'shore up universal protections, not chip away at them'.
He said: 'If the UK starts picking and choosing who merits protection from torture, family separation or arbitrary removal, it will undermine not just its moral authority but the rule of law itself, weakening its hand when speaking out against rights abuses abroad.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Government condemns Glastonbury chants aired live on BBC
The government has "strongly condemned" chants at Glastonbury Festival from rap punk duo Bob Vylan calling for "death" to the Israeli military and broadcast live on the Bobby Vylan led chants of "free, free Palestine" and "death, death to the IDF [Israel Defense Forces]" during their set, which came just before Belfast rap trio Kneecap.A BBC spokesperson said some of the comments were "deeply offensive", adding it had issued a warning on screen about "very strong and discriminatory language". The set will not be available to rewatch on BBC said they were reviewing videos of comments made by Bob Vylan and Kneecap to decide whether any offences had been committed. Follow the latest updates from Glastonbury Festival After Bob Vylan's performance, a government spokesperson said Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy had spoken to BBC director general Tim Davie to seek an "urgent explanation about what due diligence" the broadcaster carried out ahead of airing the government added that it welcomed the decision not to re-broadcast the performance on BBC Vylan's set on the festival's West Holts stage came ahead of Irish-language rap group group have made headlines in recent months after rapper Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, who performs under the name Mo Chara, was charged with a terrorism offence for allegedly displaying the flag of proscribed terrorist organisation Hezbollah at a gig last year. He has denied the highly-charged performance on Saturday was watched by thousands and hit back at Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer with expletive-laden chants, after he previously called the band's Glastonbury appearance "not appropriate".Mr Ó hAnnaidh is on bail after a court hearing in London two weeks the sets from Bob Vylan and Kneecap, Avon and Somerset Police said it would review footage of comments made by acts on the West Holts force said footage "will be assessed by officers to determine whether any offences may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation".
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Inside Labour's identity crisis as party members and MPs speak their mind
More than two-thirds of Labour members want the party to shift to the left - as Prime Minister Keir Starmer faces calls for a reset of the direction of his Government More than two-thirds of Labour members want the party to shift to the left - as Keir Starmer faces calls for a reset. Polling by LabourList, shared with The Mirror, shows 64.5% of Labour members back a move to the left, with just 1.6% calling for a rightwards shift. Next weekend will mark a year since Keir Starmer won a landslide election victory. But now, the PM is battling flagging poll ratings, rebellious Labour MPs and the surge of Nigel Farage 's Reform UK. After last week's U-turn on welfare cuts, Mr Starmer's former political director Luke Sullivan warned the Government it must 'use this as a moment for a reset'. Some Labour MPs have grown uneasy over the direction of the Government, culminating in a major rebellion over welfare cuts. Keir Starmer was forced into a climbdown over plans to cut Personal Independent Payments to avoid a humiliating defeat in the Commons. He had faced losing a crunch vote on his welfare legislation next week after 126 backbenchers signed a rebel amendment. It came after the PM last month announced a U-turn on cuts to winter fuel payments. The policy sparked a backlash and was blamed for a difficult set of local election results for Labour, while Reform UK took control of a number of English councils. There have been signs that Labour has been spooked by the success of the rightwing outfit. The Home Office has published pictures and video of migrants being deported, sparking criticism from refugee charities. Mr Starmer also came under fire when he said Britain was at risk of becoming an 'island of strangers' in a speech on immigration, which drew comparisons to Enoch Powell's infamously racist Rivers of Blood speech. The PM has since admitted he 'deeply regrets' using the phrase. Labour MP Nadia Whittome said: "While this government has taken some crucial steps towards undoing this, there's a growing sense across the country that the scale of change just isn't matching the urgency of the moment, while other policies, like the proposals to cut disability benefits, feel like a repeat of the austerity era. At a time when the far-right is gaining ground both at home and abroad, Labour must also show bold, principled leadership. We cannot abandon our progressive values in pursuit of Reform voters." One Labour MP, who asked to speak anonymously, told The Mirror: 'Personally, I don't think you can ever out-Reform Reform, or the right, on issues like immigration. That isn't who we are. 'We are an internationalist party and that's what our values should remain rooted in. We're haemorrhaging votes to progressive left-wing parties, not to the right.' They said the series of U-turns over winter fuel cuts and disability benefits showed the Government 'did not have a clear plan'. Criticising the welfare reforms appearing to be born out of a need to save money, the MP continued: 'When you start from a position of wanting to just make cuts, inevitably, you are going to hurt the most vulnerable. 'And that's a political choice, and it was the wrong choice, morally and economically, and it was moving us away from our Labour values: Equality, social justice and fairness. We've just got to remember who we are as a party… We shouldn't be tacking anywhere to the right on any of these issues.' Another Labour MP said party members want the party to return to its 'core values' and just be more 'Labour'. 'The Labour Party was set up in the first place to be a voice for working people, to stand up for equality and social justice, and therefore they won't recognise the party today and some of the decisions it's making,' they said. They said ensuring people had vital support, as opposed to withdrawing it, trying to lift children out of poverty, and trying to clamp down on corporate greed should be at the heart of Labour values. They said 'there are so many positive things' the Government are doing, from renationalising the railway, building more social homes, improving employment rights, or expanding free school meals for kids. 'But when it comes to these crunch issues, they're just missing the point. Not engaging with people that policies are impacting is not how the Labour Party should behave. So I just call on the Labour Party to be more Labour.' But not all Labour MPs agree with party members' plea to move to the left. MP Gurinder Singh Josan said: "When it comes to winning elections, how the voters see things has to be more important than just our members' views. "And recent elections, including the catastrophic 2019 general election defeat under a markedly more left wing leader, shows voters are more often in the centre and are more interested in practical solutions to everyday problems rather than an ideological fixation." Another Labour MP, who also did not want to be named, said moving left was not the solution and the Government must continue to be 'country first, and party second'. 'I'm a big fan of solutions-based politics where you don't always have to be entrenched in a left or right view,' they said. 'It's about what will deliver the change that's needed for the country. So we've got our manifesto, that's what's being voted on, and then in terms of the policy that we push through, it's to deliver that. Left, right, centre is completely irrelevant.' The MP said, immigration issues such as the small boats crisis should be looked at from a humanity, security, economic and infrastructure perspective. 'It's about then finding solutions that some might perceive as being more to the right, but actually it's about delivering them within Labour values, so you're not demonising and creating that horrible rhetoric that we see from some parties,' they added.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
A rise in defence spending will kick-start the industrial future
The decision at the Nato summit this week to increase defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP by 2035 is a seismic shift for all of us and will have massive implications for the budgets of every government department over the next decade. When we consider in the high levels of debt and tax, this raises fundamental questions for government in allocating resources at a time when the growth of tax receipts is constrained by the paucity of economic growth. Right across western Europe the challenge caused by the financial crisis of 2008 led to a step change in the long-term trajectory of financial growth. Put simply we have come up short. The challenge for us is how we strengthen the economy in the midst of the challenges we face? A failure to move the needle on this will result in living standards continuing to be squeezed and the impossibility of funding the growth of defence spending, resulting in painful cuts elsewhere. • Ageing and sick population will lead to £16bn annual tax rise Events have conspired to leverage massive costs on to the public purse: Covid, the cost of living crisis, largely as a knock-on effect of the Ukrainian conflict, have led to levels of fiscal debt typically only seen at times of war. Time of war is an apt phrase as politicians and wider society have a growing realisation that times have changed. Global instability and the threat of war is very real. Though in these islands we have excellence in many aspects of our armed forces, to a large extent our military capability has been hollowed out. The need to enhance defence capability and at pace is stark. There is now a race to invest and if we take last year's defence spending of £53.9 billion as our base, we are going to have to find by 2035 an extra £60 billion plus a year to invest in defence. Where is this to come from? Starmer's government are for now, silent on the source of the majority of this funding. Difficult choices are going to have to be made. • SNP ban on 'munitions' funds puts Scottish shipbuilding on the line Short of a sustained increase in economic growth there is going to be a squeeze elsewhere on spending. Austerity will be a price to be paid as a consequence of having to invest in our national security. Investment in defence, though, can be a lever and transformative in itself in generating economic growth. With the increase in defence spending requiring £60 billion-plus, it is beyond doubt that we need to make sure that Scotland gets its fair share, and I know the Scottish government will be standing up for Scotland's interest in making it happen. There is a long history of the SNP doing just that. From Nicola Sturgeon making the case for shipbuilding jobs at Govan and numerous MPs making the case for defence spending in Scotland, most notably Angus Robertson and Stewart MacDonald, who championed the industry and in particular defended Scotland's historic regiments — a campaign led by Annabelle Ewing. It is therefore of no surprise — and consistent with the long-term position of the SNP — to read John Swinney being quoted in The Times this week that he had no objections if a company came to Scotland to set up a munitions factory, while making the point that the Russian threat is very real. We speak of our support for Ukraine. We speak of their right to defend their sovereignty. There is a need to replenish munitions in support of the defence of Ukraine. In doing this, though, there are red lines and that means munitions supplied in the needs of strategic defence interests and never in situations such as Gaza where civilians are targeted. Indeed, the SNP website makes the point that 'defence manufacturing infrastructure in Scotland is fundamental to our national engineering and manufacturing sector'. Today in Scotland we have excellence in aerospace, defence, security and space. The challenge is leveraging in investment and accelerating economic growth that is critical to our financial security as a consequence of the need to invest in our national security. ADS, the umbrella body for the industry, points out that the sector today employs 33,500 workers and delivers a value added of £3.2 billion, with an output per worker of £95,000. These figures make it self-evident that there is an economic prize in attracting defence investment into Scotland. We all want high growth, high wage, high productivity Scotland. A society that drives investment in skills and innovation. Think for a minute of our industrial past and leading-edge electrical engineering businesses such as Ferranti, (now Leonardo). Scotland is at the forefront of innovation in both defence and in civil applications. We need to re-engineer to capture that pioneering spirit, not just for defence capabilities but to use that opportunity as a lever through defence diversification to create a broader and deeper industrial and advanced manufacturing base. John Swinney is right to demonstrate that Scotland is open for investment. An increase in defence spending is coming. We should seize the opportunities out of this to kick-start investment in advanced manufacturing through, among other things, utilising our world-class academic base to develop the technologies and businesses for the future. Investment in defence, will kick-start the delivery of an industrial future for Scotland. Ian Blackford was the SNP leader in the House of Commons from 2017 to 2022, and an MP for Ross, Skye and Lochaber from 2015 to 2024.
