Desperate search for ‘heavily pregnant' woman last seen leaving hospital in floral dress as cops release CCTV
A CCTV image of the woman leaving the hospital in South West London has been released, as authorities sweep the area for leads.
1
Sarah left the hospital at 4.55pm on July 1 and has not been seen since.
She was last seen wearing a floral dress, white-framed sunglasses and sandals.
Metropolitan Police have urged the public to contact them with any information on 101, quoting 7141/2JUL.
Thesun.co.uk is your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures and must-see video.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
Pegswood 'bully' secretly bugged ex's home for five years
A "bully" who secretly bugged his ex-partner's home after tormenting her with domestic abuse during their relationship has been jailed for two years and nine Gauci, 53, hid seven listening devices in electrical sockets in the woman's home having made multiple threats to kill her during a campaign of controlling behaviour, Newcastle Crown Court woman said she had been living in "crippling" fear for years and felt "sick", paranoid and unsafe in her own of Pegswood in Northumberland, had admitted stalking but denied controlling and coercive behaviour, however jurors found him guilty of the second offence as well. Gauci was 30 and the woman 19 when they first got together in 2002, Judge Robert Spragg said, with the couple going on to have several lived separately with Gauci "like a yoyo" with his visits and in effect carrying on the life of a single man while she raised their children and waited for him, the judge she asked if would move in with her, Gauci, who ran a plumbing and heating business, refused and told her no man would want to be with her, the court heard. 'Check the sockets' In February 2016, the relationship ended and the woman started dating someone else, the court was Gauci, of Front Street, found out, he became "very jealous" and threatened to shoot her and bury her in the garden, the judge demanded the woman get back with him and then "forced" her to go to the supermarket where the other man worked and break up with him, the court judge said that was done to humiliate the woman and Gauci went on to threaten the and the woman resumed their relationship but his controlling behaviour become even worse, the court would search through her mobile phone when she was asleep, demand she video call him when she went to meet family so he could see who was there and would fly into rages, the judge relationship ended again in 2020 and two years later a friend advised her to check her electrical sockets, the courts were called and discovered listening devices in her kitchen, bedroom, living room and dining room which had been hidden there in 2017, the judge said. 'Shocking invasion' In a statement read to the court, Gauci's victim said she would "never be the same" and did not feel safe in her own said she lived in a "constant state of fear and stress" which was "crippling", adding it would always be an "open wound".The woman said she felt "sick and shocked" about the bugging and was unable to trust said Gauci had "taken everything" from her and would "bully and control" her. Judge Spragg said Gauci was "fuelled by jealousy" and sought to control every aspect of her life, culminating with the "sinister" planting of listening devices."It was a shocking invasion of her privacy," the judge said.A restraining order banning Gauci from contacting the woman was made to last indefinitely. Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Scottish Sun
28 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Tragic biker tourist mauled to death by brown bear moments after taking smiling selfie and vid with ferocious wild beast
A MOTORCYCLIST was mauled to death by a bear moments after taking a smiling selfie with the deadly wild beast. Omar Farang Zin, 48, was on holiday in Romania when he initiated the unwise encounter. 5 A selfie Omar took with the bear - just moments before it mauled him to death Credit: Omar Farang Zin 5 The large brown bear was reportedly with cubs Credit: Facebook 5 The beast mauled Omar to death just moments after he uploaded these images to Facebook Credit: Facebook The Italian was riding along the spectacular Transfagarasan road - famously crowned the "most beautiful in the world" by Jeremy Clarkson on Top Gear. He encountered a bear on the route, uploading a video of a shaggy beast peering onto the road, and returned the next day in hope of spotting another. Omar got what he was looking for when he met a bear with cubs wandering around a car park, and stopped to feed it. That turned out to be a terrible mistake. A photo found his mobile shows Omar, kitted out in sunnies a helmet for his pleasure ride, grinning and pointing to a brown bear who is standing just metres away. He also took a video of the predator as it prowled around the area, flicking menacing glares at the camera. The biker can be heard saying: "Here is the bear! How beautiful! It's coming towards me," in his native Italian. Omar uploaded the video to Facebook - but that would be the last thing he ever did. Just moments later, the bear charged him and unleashed a ferocious attack. The beast dragged Omar out of the car park and about 60 metres into a ravine, where it mauled him to death. Bloodthirsty bear leaves only woman's severed head behind in vicious attack as victim's last moments captured on CCTV Passing motorists witnessed the harrowing scene and immediately called the emergency services. Police officers, firefighters and forest rangers all rushed to the scene - but Omar could not be saved. The rescue teams managed to recover his body, which was covered in bite wounds, and took it away for a post-mortem. Armand Chiriloiu, director of the forest authority, told Romanian newspaper Cancan: 'He got off his motorbike and offered some food to the bear. 5 Omar spotted this bear the previous day - and returned to see more Credit: Facebook 5 The bear was shot dead by rangers following Omar's death Credit: Facebook 'The Italian tourist's phone was also found, which contained some photos taken before the attack. "As the bear approached, he approached. With photos, close-ups.' The area was cleared following the fatal encounter and the bear was later shot dead. He also took a video of the bear as he passed it on his bike. The clip shows a shaggy bear peering onto the road over a barrier as Zin trundles past on his bike.
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
It is time to release prisoners trapped by inhuman endless jail terms
The Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentence, introduced in 2005 under the Labour government, was intended to protect the public from serious offenders deemed too dangerous for a fixed-term release. But nearly two decades on, this law stands as one of the most egregious stains on Britain's criminal justice system. Abolished in 2012 for its inherent flaws, it nonetheless continues to trap thousands of people in a cruel legal limbo, as a debate in the House of Lords today will no doubt highlight. It is long past time that every person still serving an IPP sentence be resentenced. The continued use of this now-defunct punishment is both unjust and, arguably, inhumane. At its core, the IPP sentence allowed judges to hand out indeterminate prison terms for offences that did not justify life imprisonment but were deemed serious enough to warrant extended supervision. Offenders were given a 'tariff' – the minimum time they must serve before being considered for release. Many of these tariffs were shockingly short, some as low as two years. Yet thousands remain in prison long after these tariffs have expired. Why? Because release is dependent not on time served, but on proving to the Parole Board that they are no longer a danger to the public – a nebulous, subjective, and often unreachable standard. This flips the basic presumption of justice on its head. In a fair system, the state must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt to imprison a person. Under IPP, once the tariff is served, the burden of proof shifts unfairly to the prisoner. It is no longer the state's job to justify incarceration; it is the prisoner's burden to earn freedom. This is particularly problematic when access to rehabilitative programmes, often required for parole, is limited or unavailable – especially in overcrowded prisons. The system sets people up to fail and then blames them for not succeeding. Moreover, the psychological toll of such indefinite punishment is catastrophic. Suicide and self-harm rates among IPP prisoners are significantly higher than average. Many live in a state of constant uncertainty and despair, unsure if they will ever be released, even decades after their offence. It is not unusual to find individuals still imprisoned for minor crimes – such as theft or assault – that would today warrant only a few years behind bars, yet they languish without a release date. The punishment no longer fits the crime, if it ever did. The injustice of the IPP system has been widely recognised. The House of Commons justice committee labelled it "irredeemably flawed" and called for all remaining IPP prisoners to be resentenced. The European Court of Human Rights has also condemned aspects of the sentence as incompatible with human rights obligations. Yet the government has so far refused to act decisively, citing public safety and political sensitivity. This is a failure of courage and leadership. Protecting public safety does not require trampling basic rights or holding people indefinitely for crimes long past. Dangerous individuals can be managed through proper risk assessment and robust parole conditions – not through perpetual punishment without end. Resentencing every IPP prisoner is not only fair, it is necessary. It would give judges the opportunity to reconsider the nature and severity of each offence and impose a proportionate, fixed sentence with clear guidance for release. For many, this would mean immediate or imminent freedom; for others, it would offer clarity, rehabilitation goals, and hope – something the current system wholly lacks. Justice demands consistency, proportionality, and transparency. The IPP sentence undermines all three. Some argue that resentencing might release dangerous individuals back into society. But the risk can be responsibly managed without recourse to indeterminate detention. Modern sentencing tools, community supervision, mental health support, and parole frameworks are all capable of mitigating risk. Perpetual incarceration without due process is not a solution – it is a violation. Britain prides itself on the rule of law, but this chapter of penal policy betrays that principle. IPP sentences should not only be consigned to history – they must be actively undone. Every person still caught in this Kafkaesque trap deserves a proper sentence, a path to rehabilitation, and a chance at freedom. Anything less is a continuation of a deep and unforgivable wrong.
