Glasgow Airport strikes to go ahead at end of July
These are the first summer holidays since the airport was bought over by AviAlliance.The company completed a deal to buy AGS - the owners of Glasgow, Aberdeen and Southampton airports - in January for £1.53bn.
Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: "Summer strike action is now inevitable unless Glasgow Airport's owners come to their senses. "We will support our members every step of the way in their fight for better jobs, pay and conditions."A further 350 security and ground handling staff, who are not directly employed by the airport, have also been involved in separate pay disputes.Untie said that 250 of these workers - who deal with passengers in the security search area and are employed by a firm called ICTS - have now accepted a 5% pay offer.A further 100 ground handling workers, employed by Swissport, are considering a new pay deal.
A spokesperson for AGS Airports, which owns and manages Glasgow Airport, said: "We are extremely disappointed with Unite's decision to serve notice of industrial action. "We have been in talks with Unite since March during which time we have made several improved and fair offers against a backdrop of a challenging operating environment."We will now proceed with our contingency plans to ensure we minimise any disruption for our airlines and passengers."The spokesperson said its latest 4% pay offer was rejected by 75 members of staff at the airport.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
What to expect from Modi's visit to UK
Indian prime minister Narendra Modi is travelling to the UK to formally sign a free trade agreement amid global trade tensions sparked by Donald Trump 's tariffs. The long-awaited signing of the India-UK Free Trade Agreement, agreed in May after three years of negotiations and described variously as 'landmark' and 'historic', is the centrepiece of the visit. Mr Modi's two-day state visit, starting Wednesday, is his fourth to the UK and comes at a pivotal moment for both nations. For India, it offers a chance to diversify trade and diplomatic partnerships. For the UK, still grappling with post-Brexit trade issues, the deal represents a rare economic breakthrough. Mr Modi's trade minister, Piyush Goyal, is accompanying him for the formal signing, an Indian commerce ministry official said. 'This is a significant agreement," Vikram Misri, India's foreign secretary, told reporters on Tuesday, adding that legal vetting of the deal was near completion. Mr Modi is meeting his counterpart Keir Starmer for 'wide-ranging' talks on trade, defence, security and technological cooperation as well as climate. He is likely to meet King Charles as well. While the trade deal remains the focal point, the trip is also aimed at resetting bilateral ties, deepening strategic cooperation, and amplifying people-to-people links. The agreement, expected to boost a £42.6bn trading relationship, was finalised after 14 formal rounds of negotiations. Mr Goyal earlier called the deal 'a turning point in India's outward economic engagement and a win-win for both economies'. Mr Starmer hailed it as 'a bold step forward for Global Britain', projecting it to boost GDP by £4.8bn annually and potentially support over 30,000 new jobs. Under the deal, the UK agreed to eliminate or phase out tariffs on over 99 per cent of Indian exports, including textiles, auto parts, leather goods, pharmaceuticals, and agricultural products. India in turn agreed to cut tariffs on 90 per cent of British goods. It agreed to significantly lower levies on British exports like Scotch whisky, Jaguar and Land Rover vehicles, luxury cosmetics, and certain high-tech goods. British cars, which currently attract tariffs of over 100 per cent in India, will see duties reduced to 10 per cent. The deal also offers tariff concessions on medical devices, pharmaceuticals, aircraft components, and electronic goods. In return, Indian manufacturers are expected to gain access to the UK market for electric and hybrid vehicles, the commerce ministry official said. 'The UK is an important market for Indian exporters," said Ajay Sahai, director general of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations, adding the pact would boost trade and provide access for Indian sectors like textiles, footwear, marine and engineering products. Beyond trade, Mr Modi and Mr Starmer are likely to discuss bolstering the India-UK Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, originally launched in 2021. Mr Modi is also scheduled to meet leaders of the Indian diaspora, estimated at over 1.7m. The free trade deal had to undergo parliamentary scrutiny in the UK and a review by the Indian cabinet before it could come into force. The Indian cabinet approved the deal on Tuesday after a legal scrubbing of its text. The British parliament is yet to approve it. Sensitivities remain around issues that are either unresolved or that have been quietly sidestepped for now. India has firmly excluded agriculture from the scope of the deal, a politically and economically sensitive sector that sustains more than 40 per cent of the country's workforce. This longstanding red line reflects New Delhi's resistance to exposing its farmers to foreign competition and has complicated talks with other major partners, including the US. Among the more controversial provisions is India's commitment to gradually lower tariffs on certain British imports such as Scotch whisky and luxury vehicles. While these sectors are crucial for the UK, Indian manufacturers, particularly in the alcohol industry, have warned a flood of high-end imports could affect the market and harm homegrown brands. Mr Modi's trip to the UK is part of a two-nation tour. From the UK, he will visit the Maldives for his third trip to the island nation and first since Mohamed Muizzu, known for his pro-China leanings, became president in November 2023.
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
M&S ad banned for featuring ‘unhealthily thin' model
A Marks & Spencer advertisement has been banned by the UK's advertising watchdog after featuring a model who appeared to be "unhealthily thin". The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) ruled it was "irresponsible" for the high street retailer to use the image, which appeared on its mobile app, to promote clothing. The ASA noted the model, dressed in slim-fit trousers and a white top, "appeared thin and she wore large pointed shoes which emphasised the slenderness of her legs". Furthermore, the ruling highlighted that camera angles distorted the model's head, making it appear out of proportion and "highlighted her small frame". 'Therefore, we considered that the pose of the model and the choice of clothing meant the ad gave the impression that the model was unhealthily thin,' the ASA said. M&S has apologised for any offence caused and removed the image from the app. 'Our womenswear sizing ranges from size 8 to 24 and we always want to reflect that in our advertising,' a company spokeswoman said. 'The product images on our website feature models of varying sizes so we can appeal to all our customers, however following the ASA guidance, we have removed this particular image from our website and apologise for any offence caused.' Three more images were reported to the ASA by consumers, but the watchdog said there was no breach and did not ban them. In February, an ad for the high street retailer Next was also banned by the ASA for using an 'unhealthily thin' model. The ad, a product listing for denim leggings on the Next website, was deemed 'irresponsible'. The ASA said the retailer had used specific styling and a particular camera angle and pose to highlight the slimness of the model's legs. Next said the ad was created with a 'strong sense of responsibility to both consumers and society'. It said the model, while slim, had a healthy and toned physique that aligned with the nature of its product.
Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
iPhone users' privacy at risk under competition crackdown, Apple warns
Apple has lashed out at the competition regulator over a fresh crackdown aimed at breaking the US tech giant's grip on smartphone apps. The $3tn (£2.2tn) business has said that new measures unveiled by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) will threaten the 'privacy and security' of iPhone users by forcing Apple to open up its platforms and release more data to rival tech companies. Not only will this 'undermine' the protection of customers, according to Apple, but it will also mean it will have to 'give away our technology for free'. The criticism comes after the CMA confirmed plans to label Apple and Google as having 'strategic market status' over their respective iPhone and Android smartphone systems, arguing that they have unfair power over the market for smartphone apps and services. The watchdog will now consult on measures requiring Apple to share more data with rivals. It will also allow app makers to offer alternative ways for customers to pay for services, giving them an opportunity to avoid the 30pc fees that Apple charges for purchases through its App Store. It will also consider allowing digital wallet developers greater access to Apple's data. However, Apple has argued the measures will force it to release sensitive user data to rival technology giants such as Facebook, putting the privacy of millions of iPhone customers at risk. Home Office battle The clash with the CMA threatens to escalate tensions between Apple and British officials, as the tech giant is also battling the Home Office over access to encrypted user data. The request from the Home Office has triggered scrutiny from US officials. Donald Trump described the request as 'something you hear about with China'. The CMA's latest crackdown threatens to attract similar complaints from the White House, with the president having already criticised the imposition of European red tape on America's most successful companies. As part of the CMA review, both Apple and Google will be required to introduce a more transparent process for approving new apps, while also bringing in clear app store rankings for developers. Will Hayter, the CMA's director for digital markets, said Apple's App Store threatened to 'disadvantage UK app developers and mean UK users miss out on innovations, as well as facing fewer choices and higher costs'. An Apple spokesman said: 'We're concerned the rules the UK is now considering would undermine the privacy and security protections that our users have come to expect, hamper our ability to innovate, and force us to give away our technology for free to foreign competitors. 'We will continue to engage with the regulator to make sure they fully understand these risks.' 'Disappointing and unwarranted' Google, meanwhile, said the CMA's decision was 'disappointing and unwarranted'. Executives at Apple are understood to be concerned that the UK risks following the European Union into an assault on the technology sector, which could block the release of new products and slow innovation. After the EU introduced rules requiring Apple to unlock its App Store to rivals, the company is understood to have received 150 requests for information on its App Store, including from Facebook-owner Meta. Requests have included demands to share Wi-Fi data on users and all information on message and email notifications. The moves against Apple and Google come as the regulator faces pressure from Labour to prioritise growth and cut red tape for businesses. In January, Marcus Bokkerink, the CMA's former chairman, was ousted amid concerns from ministers that the watchdog had not been focused on boosting growth.
