Key SALT Republicans reject latest offer from Senate GOP, White House
A trio of key moderate House Republicans say they are rejecting the latest offer from Senate Republicans and the White House on the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap, heightening the cross-chamber standoff over one of the thorniest issues in the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill.'
Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.) — who has been one of the most vocal members of the SALT Caucus — told The Hill that the Trump administration, on behalf of Senate Republicans, presented the group with a SALT proposal that was valued at $200 billion, far less than the $344 billion value in the House-passed bill. The Hill first reported on the offer.
'It's such a terrible offer that is nowhere near the realm of possibility,' LaLota said. 'If you all were buying a car and you were presented a number by a salesman like it was presented by those folks today you would never go back to the lot ever again. You'd be so humiliated, disgusted and you would never go back again. I'm close to that point. They need to get real in what they will present us or this bill ain't ever gonna happen.'
Shortly after, Rep. Young Kim (R-Calif.), a co-chair of the SALT Caucus, and Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), another key member of the group, also rejected the latest offer.
'We rejected that,' Lawler told reporters. 'We're continuing to dialogue with them and we'll see where it goes.'
The House-passed measure included a $40,000 deduction cap — quadruple the number in current law — for individuals making $500,000 or less. Senate Republicans, however, reverted the proposal back to $10,000 in their version of the legislation, sparking a fierce fight between the two camps.
In recent days, however, talks have zeroed in on keeping the $40,000 deduction cap in place but changing the income threshold and inflation index.
SALT Caucus members would not disclose the contours of the latest offer, but he said it included a lower income cap and lower indexing for inflation. LaLota said the latest offer is 58 percent of the value of the SALT provision in the House bill.
The rejection of the latest offer by the three SALT Caucus lawmakers deals a blow to ongoing negotiations over the deduction cap, which has emerged as one of the most difficult hangups in the party's sprawling tax cuts and spending package.
Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.), who has been the lead negotiator for Senate Republicans on SALT, brushed off LaLota's rebuff of the most-recent offer, exuding confidence that the two groups will reach consensus.
'We're still looking for a spot. We're gonna be good,' Mullin said. 'We'll make it work, we'll get to [a] landing spot.'
Time, however, is running out. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) is pushing to put the legislation on the floor for an initial vote on Friday, which would kick off the consideration process as Republicans race to meet their self-imposed July 4 deadline. After the Senate clears the bill, the House has to give it a final stamp of approval.
Aside from SALT, Senate Republicans are still grappling with a handful of disagreements, including Medicaid cuts and the rollback of green-energy tax credits. The Senate Parliamentarian delivered GOP lawmakers a significant setback Thursday morning when she shot down key Medicaid provisions in the bill, including a proposal to cap states' use of health care provider taxes to collect more federal Medicaid funding — a provision championed by conservatives that would have generated billions of dollars in savings to pay for President Trump's tax cuts.
Asked if he thinks the Senate will still be able to vote on the bill this weekend, despite the lingering hangups, Mullin responded: 'Yes.'
Al Weaver and Alex Bolton contributed.
Updated at 4:21 p.m.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Canada's new fast-track projects bill clears Senate
-- Prime Minister Mark Carney's landmark "nation-building" projects bill passed the Senate on Thursday, granting the federal government new powers to expedite initiatives aimed at boosting the economy amid ongoing trade tensions with the United States. Bill C-5 moved through Parliament at an unprecedented pace, taking just three weeks from its introduction in the House of Commons to Senate approval. The legislation received support from both Liberal and Conservative MPs, along with senators across the political spectrum. The new law allows Carney's cabinet to streamline approvals for certain projects by bypassing provisions of federal laws, including the Impact Assessment Act, which has faced criticism for delaying project approvals. While the bill doesn't specify which projects will be fast-tracked, Carney has indicated it could be used to approve new energy corridors in eastern and western Canada, including potential pipelines and electricity grids, as well as port expansions, mines, and other resource initiatives. The legislation states the government will recognize and respect Indigenous Peoples' constitutional rights when considering projects for expedited approval. However, some senators opposed the bill, primarily citing concerns about Indigenous rights. Several proposed amendments were ultimately voted down. Some Indigenous leaders have expressed concerns that the consultation process with First Nations, Métis, and Inuit communities might be inadequate, especially given Carney's campaign promise to make final decisions within a two-year timeframe. The bill was expected to receive royal assent on Thursday night, officially becoming law. Related articles Canada's new fast-track projects bill clears Senate Canada's job market shows mixed signals in April Fed's Barkin says tariffs will push inflation higher Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
San Francisco Chronicle
35 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Democrats wrestle with how to conduct oversight as Trump officials crack down
WASHINGTON (AP) — Just hours after she pleaded not guilty to federal charges brought by the Trump administration, New Jersey Rep. LaMonica McIver was surrounded by dozens of supportive Democratic colleagues in the halls of the Capitol. The case, they argued, strikes at the heart of congressional power. 'If they can break LaMonica, they can break the House of Representatives,' said New York Rep. Yvette Clarke, chair of the Congressional Black Caucus. Federal prosecutors allege that McIver interfered with law enforcement during a visit with two other House Democrats to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Newark, New Jersey. She calls the charges 'baseless.' It's far from the only clash between congressional Democrats and the Republican administration as officials ramp up deportations of immigrants around the country. Sen. Alex Padilla of California was forcibly removed by federal agents while attempting to speak at a news conference for Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. At least six groups of House Democrats have recently been denied entry to ICE detention centers. In early June, federal agents entered the district office of Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., and briefly detained a staffer. Congressional Republicans have largely dismissed Democrats' behavior as inflammatory and inappropriate, and some have publicly supported the prosecution of McIver. Often in the dark about the Trump administration's moves, congressional Democrats are wrestling with how to perform their oversight duties at a time of roiling tensions with the White House and new restrictions on lawmakers visiting federal facilities. 'We have the authority to conduct oversight business, and clearly, House Republicans are not doing that oversight here,' said New Jersey Rep. Rob Menendez, one of the House Democrats who went with McIver to the Newark ICE facility. 'It's our obligation to continue to do it on site at these detention facilities. And even if they don't want us to, we are going to continue to exert our right.' Democrats confront a stark new reality The prospect of facing charges for once routine oversight activity has alarmed many congressional Democrats who never expected to face criminal prosecution as elected officials. Lawmakers in both parties were also unnerved by the recent targeted shootings of two Minnesota lawmakers and the nation's tense political atmosphere. 'It's a moment that calls for personal courage of members of Congress,' said Rep. Summer Lee of Pennsylvania. 'I wish that we had more physical protection. I think that's one of those harsh realities that members of Congress who are not in leadership recognize: that oftentimes, we do this job at our own peril, and we do it anyway.' The arrests and detentions of lawmakers have led some Democrats to take precautionary measures. Several have consulted with the House general counsel about their right to conduct oversight. Multiple lawmakers also sought personal legal counsel, while others have called for a review of congressional rules to provide greater protections. 'The Capitol Police are the security force for members of Congress. We need them to travel with us, to go to facilities and events that the president may have us arrested for,' said Rep. Jonathan Jackson of Illinois. 'There's not a lot of transparency' As the minority party in the House, Democrats lack the subpoena power to force the White House to provide information. That's a problem, they say, because the Trump administration is unusually secretive about its actions. 'There's not a lot of transparency. From day to day, oftentimes, we're learning about what's happening at the same time as the rest of the nation,' said Rep. Lucy McBath, D-Ga., who led a prayer for McIver at the Capitol rally. Democrats, to amplify their concerns, have turned to public letters, confronted officials at congressional hearings and digital and media outreach to try to create public pressure. 'We've been very successful when they come in before committees,' said Rep. Lauren Underwood of Illinois, who added that she believed the public inquiries have 'one hundred percent' resonated with voters. Tapping into the information pipeline Congressional Democrats say they often rely on local lawmakers, business leaders and advocates to be their eyes and ears on the ground. A handful of Democrats say their best sources of information are across the political aisle, since Republicans typically have clearer lines of communication with the White House. 'I know who to call in Houston with the chamber. I think all of us do that,' said Texas Rep. Sylvia Garcia of how business leaders are keeping her updated. Garcia said Democrats 'need to put more pressure' on leading figures in the agriculture, restaurant and hospitality sectors to take their concerns about the immigrant crackdown to Trump's White House. 'They're the ones he'll listen to. They're the ones who can add the pressure. He's not going to listen to me, a Democrat who was an impeachment manager, who is on the bottom of his list, if I'm on it at all,' Garcia said. Rep. Jason Crow of Colorado, for instance, had a working relationship with a for-profit ICE facility in his district until DHS in February ended reports as part of an agency-wide policy change. A member of Crow's staff now regularly goes to the facility and waits, at times for hours, until staff at the Aurora facility respond to detailed questions posed by the office. Democrats say 'real oversight' requires winning elections Still, many House Democrats concede that they can conduct little of their desired oversight until they are back in the majority. Rep. Marc Veasey, D-Texas, said that 'real oversight power and muscle" only comes 'when you have a gavel." 'Nothing else matters. No rousing oratory, no tours, no speeches, no social media or entertainment, none of that stuff," Veasey said. "Because the thing that keeps Trump up at night more than anything else is the idea he's going to lose this House and there'll be real oversight pressure applied to him.'
Chicago Tribune
38 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Gary officials celebrate progress of Aetna home construction
As he stood outside a newly constructed home on 10th Avenue, Gary Mayor Eddie Melton said the structure represented much more. 'This is proof that Gary's plan and strategy in revitalizing neighborhoods is in the works,' Melton said Friday. 'This is more than just a city initiative — this is a collaborative effort with stakeholders and organizations that are extremely important.' Melton and other officials allowed the public to see progress on the first single-family home to be built in the Aetna neighborhood in decades. The home, located at 5544 E. 10th Ave., will be complete near the end of July. The development was spearheaded by Frederick Long and Laneé Nicole, local real estate professionals, and developer David Sutor. The Gary Redevelopment Commission opened a Requests for Proposals process in 2024, with the proposal selected during a June 5, 2024, commission meeting, according to a news release. 'Today is a celebration, not just of building homes, but of people, of partnerships, of promise and progress,' Nicole said. 'This isn't just a house — it's somebody's home. This isn't just a community — it's our community.' The single-family structure is part of 15 planned homes that will feature ranch-style and two-story options, modern amenities and new construction. All homes will be built on a slab without basements. Ranch properties will be about 1,400 square feet, starting at about $220,000, and two-story homes will be about 2,000 square feet and start at about $260,000, according to a news release. The remaining 14 homes are planned to be completed throughout the next couple of years. Christopher Harris, executive director of redevelopment for the city of Gary, said his goal is to see more than demolition in the city, and seeing the new home Friday gave him hope for the future. 'Think about it: 15 new construction homes in this neighborhood,' Harris said. 'It hasn't happened (in Aetna) in decades. That speaks to the demand, right?' The construction is part of the city's initiative to remove blighted structures throughout Gary. In March, the city began its second phase of the Aetna demolition, according to Post-Tribune archives. Blight elimination is one of Melton's focuses as mayor. As state senator, Melton created the Senate Bill 434, which established the blighted property demolition fund and allows the city to receive $6 million from the state of Indiana for blight elimination. The city had to match those funds, with half coming from American Rescue Plan Act funds and $3 million from the Hard Rock casino. On Friday, Melton said his goal was to start demolishing blighted homes in Aetna before moving to the rest of the city. Last year, Gary demolished about 40 blighted structures in the Aetna neighborhood, Melton said. 'We piloted this targeted approach to make a noticeable, meaningful and impactful difference, so residents can see (the change),' he said. 'Is it complete? Absolutely not. There's still a lot of work left to do.' Melton believes the Aetna neighborhood offers many opportunities to residents and future homeowners. He highlighted its proximity to the South Shore Line's Miller train station, a Gary Public Transportation Corporation route and major highways, including Interstates 65, 94, 90 and 80. He also highlighted the proximity to Miller's Lake Street offerings, the beachfront and Indiana Dunes National Park. Councilman Myles Tolliver, D-at large, spoke at Friday's press conference, saying he's excited about what the development means for Aetna's future. Tolliver shared Melton's sentiments about why Aetna is a prime location for new development. 'Here is the greatest city in Northwest Indiana,' Tolliver said. 'It's time for us to show it. We do that by building infrastructure and what will be homes.'
