Kate Ritchie fails to show up to annual Singles Party as she all but confirms her departure from Nova radio gig
The 46-year-old was absent from the event which was hosted by her co-hosts Ryan 'Fitzy' Fitzgerald and Michael 'Wippa' Wipfli.
Kate did not feature in a video posted to the radio station's Instagram page recapping the event.
She has not been mentioned in the lead up to the event although her name was still featured on station promos.
There has been ongoing speculation over when she'll return to co-host Fitzy & Wippa with Kate Ritchie on Nova 96.9 following her sudden departure in January after a troubling public incident in a Sydney park.
From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop.
Last month, Fitzy and Wippa shared some details about their Singles Party but made no mention if their absent co-star Kate would be attending.
'It's back, Fitzy, Wippa and Kate Ritchie's Singles Party returns! One night, one room, 100 chances to find the one,' a promo played on the station said.
Wippa then chatted to Kate's fill-in presenter Chrissie Swan about the event and told her it was going to be a great night aboard a luxurious yacht on the Sydney Harbour.
'Chrissie, last year you weren't even there! You are not going to believe it, before the Slow Dance took place, a couple already held hands and wandered off because they were having such a good time together,' Wippa began.
'This is the power of the Singles Party and it is back again for 2025, bigger and better!'
Fitzy then jumped it to discuss how diverse the event would be - but failed to mention if Kate would be attending.
'It was such an eclectic group of people we had [at last year's event]. A weird mix, ladies who had been unlucky in love, older men, private school boys, it was all over the ship and an amazing night,' Fitzy said.
An excited Chrissie then said she needed to 'get in on this' and asked if she could attend, to which Fitzy responded: 'Yes... we need you here.'
The radio network first shared the news of the event on June 1st, alongside a promo image featuring Fitzy, Wippa and Kate, who had been absent from the show for several months.
Confused listeners demanded to know if Kate will be returning to the radio program after appearing on the event poster.
'Where is Kate? She has been absent all year and nothing has been mentioned about her coming back, is she returning or not?' one person asked.
'Hope Kate is going well, will she be returning this year?' another concerned fan said.
Kate's Instagram bio doesn't mention Nova anymore; instead she is simply 'actor, radio and broadcaster' which may point to her making a quiet exit.
Kate has been receiving ongoing support at a rehabilitation facility since the incident, which saw her photographed in tears and appearing visibly distressed shortly after picking up daughter Mae from school.
At the time, Kate released a heartfelt statement on social media explaining her decision to step away from the show.
'I struggle with mental health issues at times, which are deeply personal. This has proven to be a bigger challenge than I imagined,' she began.
'So I have decided to take a break from the show and the team who I love to focus on my health. I want to thank all of those who are helping me through this very difficult time. Thank you Nova for being there when I need you.'
At the time, Nova's co-hosts had promised their audience that the absent Kate would return after one day off, but that timeline was soon dropped.
Nova has remained tight-lipped on any potential comeback date and did not respond to questions about whether the embattled star had continued to receive pay during her absence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Aussie consumers issued urgent warning about viral Labubu toys
An urgent warning about a cult toy craze that's sweeping the globe has been issued to Aussies, as eager buyers lineup for hours to get their hands on the in demand item. NSW Fair Trading took to social media on Wednesday to alert consumers to a spike in fake Labubu toys being sold online. They warn that scammers are cashing in on the hype by flogging off counterfeit 'Lafufu' products or failing to deliver on orders altogether. Fair Trading shared a visual guide to help buyers spot the difference between genuine Labubu figures and some of the knock-offs that are making their way into the country. Key details include matte packaging for the real toys versus shiny packaging for the fakes, along with design differences. Authentic Labubus have ears that sit closer together and feature nine distinct pointed teeth. Authorities are urging shoppers to only buy from reputable retailers, steer clear of suspiciously cheap listings on overseas websites, and always check seller reviews before purchasing. The official toys, sold by PopMart, retail for about $32 but are often snapped up by resellers who hike the price to well over $100. NSW Fair Trading has encouraged consumers who have been scammed or have not received their item to report it immediately. Labubus, which originated in Hong Kong, first gained popularity in Asia through 'blind-box' collectible culture and social media hype. Its quirky design and limited releases quickly turned them into a sensation among collectors around the globe. The toys are a popular fashion accessory, and have been seen attached to the handbags and clothing of a number of celebrities and social media personalities. PopMart's valuation has skyrocketed on the back of Labubu's global success. The company is now estimated to be worth $68.47 billion, surpassing major toy giants like Hasbro and Hello Kitty creator Sanrio.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Bachelor star gets her happily ever after as she announces engagement after failing to find love with Sam Wood
Nina Rolleston has found love after striking out with Sam Wood on The Bachelor back in 2015. The former reality star shared the good news of her engagement in an Instagram post this week. Posing alongside her partner in photos taken in Fiji, Nina did not reveal her fiancé's name. Nina had kept her budding romance under wraps before revealing her engagement. She added the caption 'hard launch' alongside the festive images, in which she showed off her diamond engagement ring. From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop. The happy couple cuddled up and shared kisses in the series of images which were taken against the gorgeous Fijian backdrop. After appearing on The Bachelor, Nina went on to also star on a season of Bachelor in Paradise in 2018. She has since left the limelight and now works for SILK Laser Clinics. It comes after Nina exposed the truth behind life in the famous Hunter's Hill mansion. In a tell-all interview, she claimed that the 25 women were forced to live in 'asylum-style' accommodation and shared just one washing machine between them. Speaking on the Confessions of a Twenty Something Train Wreck podcast, Nina added that filming took place 'five days a week' and rose ceremonies would often last until 3am. 'We filmed five days per week with a two-day break, which wasn't always a Saturday or Sunday but it was always two consecutive days,' Nina said. She also revealed that the limited laundry facilities put a strain on the girls, who were often struggling to find clean clothes to wear. 'We had to do our own laundry and stuff like that. We only had one washing machine between 20-odd women. It's a lot of laundry,' she said. Nina explained that the frequent 'outfit changes' demanded by producers turned the laundry problem into a full-blown nightmare. She also spoke about the living arrangements during The Bachelor's third season. 'So if you think of, like, school camp crossed with a psychiatric asylum, that's what it feels like!' she laughed. Nina added: 'In my season, in the Hunter's Hill mansion, we had three bedrooms between 25 women. In my room, we had five girls: two bunk beds and a single bed.' She claimed that one of the other bedrooms actually housed '10 people'. Elsewhere in the interview, Nina addressed the insufficient number of bathrooms in the mansion, saying: 'Then we had four bathrooms between 25 girls.' She also explained why the female contestants would often look 'bleary eyed' and 'tired' during the rose ceremonies. 'People always say we look really tired in rose ceremonies. You have to understand that we've done a cocktail party and you have to wait for the sun to go down [for that]. You've never seen a cocktail party during daylight,' she said. 'We're in Sydney with daylight savings, so the sun doesn't go down completely until 9pm and we're sitting around literally waiting for the sun to go down. 'Then we have to do a cocktail party, where the Bachelor [Sam Wood] has to go around and speak to everybody. Then all the drama...' Nina estimated that the rose ceremony wouldn't usually begin until after midnight, after all the cocktail party footage had been captured. 'By the time we actually get to a rose ceremony. It's probably between 1am to 3am,' she explained. 'We've been in these outfits all day. So if you were the first person to go through to hair and makeup at 10am, you've actually had that on for all day, all night! 'Then you have those shoes and your feet are killing you. So you would be standing there on those stairs after you've just been filming, say, five or six hours at a cocktail party and then you're standing there.' Nina claimed that some departments would often halt filming if the shooting conditions weren't perfect. She said: 'You have to take into consideration, if one candle blows out, you've got the art department saying, "Stop! We have to re-light that candle". If a plane flies over, you've got the sound guys saying, "Stop!" 'If one of the girls' hair is out of place, or The Bachelor's tie is out of place, then wardrobe say, "Stop!" So everything takes so long.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
‘AI doesn't know what an orgasm sounds like': audiobook actors grapple with the rise of robot narrators
When we think about what makes an audiobook memorable, it's always the most human moments: a catch in the throat when tears are near, or words spoken through a real smile. A Melbourne actor and audiobook narrator, Annabelle Tudor, says it's the instinct we have as storytellers that makes narration such a primal, and precious, skill. 'The voice betrays how we're feeling really easily,' she says. But as an art form it may be under threat. In May the Amazon-owned audiobook provider Audible announced it would allow authors and publishers to choose from more than 100 voices created by artificial intelligence to narrate audiobooks in English, Spanish, French and Italian, with AI translation of audiobooks expected to be available later in the year – news that was met with criticism and curiosity across the publishing industry. In Australia, where there are fewer audiobook companies and where emerging actors like Tudor rely on the work to supplement their incomes, there is growing concern about job losses, transparency and quality. While Tudor, who has narrated 48 books, isn't convinced that AI can do what she does just yet, she is worried that the poor quality may turn people away from the medium. 'I've narrated really raunchy sex scenes – AI doesn't know what an orgasm sounds like,' she says. 'Birth scenes as well – I'd love to know how they plan on getting around that.' According to a 2024 report by NielsenIQ Bookdata, more than half of Australian audiobook consumers increased their listening over the past five years. Internationally there was a 13% increase in US audiobook sales between 2023 and 2024; in the UK audiobook revenue shot up to a new high of £268m, a 31% increase on 2023, the Publishers Association said. As demand for audio content grows, companies are looking for faster – and cheaper – ways to make it. In January 2023 Apple launched a new audiobook catalogue of audiobooks narrated by AI. Later that year Amazon announced that self-published, US-based authors with works on Kindle could turn their ebooks into audiobooks using AI 'virtual voice' technology – and there are now tens of thousands of these computer-generated audiobooks available through Audible. And in February this year, as part of a more general shift towards audiobooks, Spotify said it would be accepting AI audiobooks to 'lower the barrier to entry' for authors hoping to find more readers. Sign up for the fun stuff with our rundown of must-reads, pop culture and tips for the weekend, every Saturday morning Audible says its aims are similar: to complement, not replace, human narration, allowing more authors and more titles to reach bigger audiences. In the US Audible is also testing a voice replica for audiobook narrators, to create dupes of their own voices that will 'empower participants to expand their production capabilities for high-quality audiobooks'. 'In 2023 and 2024, Audible Studios hired more [human] narrators than ever before,' an Audible spokesperson told the Guardian. 'We continue to hear from creators who want to make their work available in audio, reaching new audiences across languages.' But robot narrators will always be cheaper than humans – and people in the voice acting and book industries fear a move to AI could pose a threat to workers. Dorje Swallow's career as a narrator took off after he began voicing novels by the Australian bestselling crime author Chris Hammer – and the actor has now narrated about 70 audiobooks. Swallow believes AI narration is a tool created by people who 'don't understand the value, technique and skills' required to produce quality audiobooks. 'We've done the hard yards and then some to get where we are, and to think you can just press a button and you're going to get something of similar, or good enough quality, is kind of laughable,' he says. Simon Kennedy, the president of the Australian Association of Voice Actors, says there has always been a battle over how much a narrator deserves to be paid in Australia. For every finished hour of an audiobook, a narrator might spend double or triple that time recording it – and that doesn't include an initial read to understand the book and its characters. Sign up to Bookmarks Discover new books and learn more about your favourite authors with our expert reviews, interviews and news stories. Literary delights delivered direct to you after newsletter promotion 'My personal opinion is that [introducing AI narrators] is going for volume over quality – and it's looking to cheapen the process,' he says. Kennedy founded the Australian Association of Voice Actors in 2024 in response to the threat being posed by AI. In a submission to a parliamentary committee last year the organisation said 5,000 Australian voice acting jobs were at risk. He was hardly surprised about Audible's announcement but says he thinks it's a 'pretty dumb move'. 'An audiobook narrator has such a special and intimate relationship with the listener that to try and do anything that is less connective is a foolish move,' he says. As for the opportunity to clone their own voices, he says voice actors should have the right to engage – but they shouldn't expect 'any near the same pay rate, and they risk turning their unique timbre – their vocal brand – into a mass-produced robot voice that listeners get sick of listening to pretty quickly.'. 'If an emotionless narration at a consistent volume is all you need for 'high-quality', then sure,' he says. 'But if engaging, gripping, edge-of-your-seat storytelling is your version of high-quality, then don't hold your breath for AI to give you that.' Another major concern is Australia's lack of AI regulation. While the EU has its own AI Act, and China and Spain have labelling laws for AI-generated content, Australia is falling behind. 'There are no laws to prevent data scraping or non-consenting cloning of voices, or of creating deepfakes of people,' Kennedy says. 'There are also no labelling laws or laws to mandate watermarking of AI-generated content and its origins; no laws to mandate transparency of training data; and no laws to dictate the appropriate use of AI-generated deepfakes, voice clones or text.' This year the Burial Rites and Devotion author, Hannah Kent, was one of many acclaimed Australian writers shocked to discover their pirated work had been used to train Meta's AI systems. She says while her initial reaction to the introduction of AI into creative spaces tends to be 'refusal and outrage', she's curious about Audible's AI announcement – specifically its plans to roll out beta testing for AI to translate text into different languages. 'I think it's fairly obvious that the main reason to use AI would be for costs, and I think that's going to cheapen things in a literal sense and cheapen things in a creative sense – in that sense of us honouring the storytelling, artistic and creative impulse,' Kent says. Tudor and Swallow believe big companies will struggle to replace human narration completely, partly because many Australian authors will oppose it. But whether or not listeners will be able to tell the difference remains to be seen. 'The foot is on the pedal to drive straight into dystopia,' Tudor says. 'Can we just listen to people instead of robots?'
