Shane Osborn Appointed Chief Operating Officer of Ocean Thermal Energy Corporation
Shane Osborn brings an exceptional track record of leadership and operational excellence, having previously served as Program Manager for Federal and Commercial Partnerships at OTE Corp. His extensive experience encompasses high-level roles in the military, government, finance, and renewable energy sectors. A decorated U.S. Navy veteran, Osborn earned international acclaim for his courageous leadership when he successfully landed a severely damaged U.S. Navy EP-3 aircraft after a mid-air collision in 2001 and led his crew through 12 days of imprisonment by the Chinese government, earning the Distinguished Flying Cross and the Meritorious Service Medal for his heroism. Following his military career, Osborn served as Nebraska State Treasurer, managing over 27 billion dollars in pension assets and earning recognition for transparency initiatives. Additionally, he founded and led RWH Energy, a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) recognized as an approved Energy Service Company (ESCO) by the U.S. Department of Energy.
In his new role as COO, Osborn will oversee all operational aspects of OTE Corp, driving efficiency, innovation, and strategic growth initiatives. He will play a critical role in scaling OTE's infrastructure projects, strengthening partnerships, and ensuring operational excellence across all company activities, including pivotal contracts with the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S. Department of Defense, and commercial partners.
Jeremy P. Feakins, Chairman and CEO of OTE Corp, stated, 'We are thrilled to announce Shane Osborn's appointment as Chief Operating Officer. Shane's extraordinary leadership skills, organizational expertise, and unwavering commitment to excellence have already significantly advanced our mission. His elevation to COO ensures our continued operational success and positions us for substantial future growth."Osborn's leadership and operational capabilities will enhance OTE Corp's ability to deliver innovative, sustainable solutions that promote energy independence and resiliency, particularly for remote and mission-critical military installations and global communities facing energy and freshwater challenges.
About Ocean Thermal Energy Corporation (OTE Corp)
OTE Corp is a U.S.-based energy company specializing in Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) and Seawater Air Conditioning (SWAC) systems. OTEC harnesses ocean temperature differentials to produce sustainable, continuous, 24/7 power, vital for U.S. military bases and coastal communities in tropical regions. SWAC systems utilize deep seawater to provide efficient cooling solutions, significantly reducing energy consumption.
Safe Harbor Statement
Except for historical information contained herein, this release contains forward-looking statements made under the 'safe harbor' provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially due to risks and uncertainties detailed in OTE's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Contact
Jeremy P. Feakins
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
[email protected]
+1 917 679 2005
SOURCE: Ocean Thermal Energy Corp.
press release
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
TikTok's message to managers: Don't 'be nice' during performance reviews
Tech CEOs are in their extremely hardcore, "No More Mr. Nice Guy" era. At TikTok and its owner, ByteDance, the idea of prioritizing performance over being "nice" has long been part of its DNA. ByteDance founder Zhang Yiming once said that "people who always try to be nice aren't really moral," according to company materials. He was discussing differentiating performance, and said that trying to make everyone happy by giving low and high performers equal grades could harm TikTok's best workers. Zhang left the company in 2021, but his line on niceness remains in updated materials for managers, BI has learned. TikTok did not respond to requests for comment. TikTok sets quotas on how many workers can receive high or low scores in each cycle, and the company tells team leaders to avoid grading everyone at the mid-point, even if their instinct is "to avoid conflict," according to documentation viewed by BI. In its reviews, the company uses eight different ratings, ranging from "F" for failed to "O" for outstanding. In one division, the company said managers had to limit the three highest scores to no more than 5% of team members, and dole out the top four ratings to 10% or fewer employees, BI previously reported. TikTok staffers are preparing for mid-year performance reviews this month. The reviews can be stressful for workers who have watched the company cull head count in previous cycles. In March, TikTok gave low scores to a wave of e-commerce workers, offering some a choice between a performance-improvement plan (PIP) or a severance package. It executed a similar process on other teams a year earlier. Tech's performance push TikTok and ByteDance's approach mirrors a broader push in Silicon Valley to better identify top and low performers. Microsoft tweaked its policies in April to help managers address lower performers, and Meta made it a priority in May to rate more workers as underperformers. The ByteDance approach also reflects a culture of high expectations and long work hours characteristic of the China tech scene, where the company was founded. "It's generally accepted that Chinese companies are quite aggressive about marking non-performers and basically asking them to leave," said Rui Ma, founder of the media and consulting firm TechBuzz China. While Big Tech's management principles may seem harsh, direct feedback is a critical component of good management, said Deborah Grayson Riegel, an executive coach who writes about leadership communication. "Often what we find is that when somebody wants to be liked, they don't give direct feedback," Riegel said. "Higher performers pay the cost because then their job is to manage the lower performers who don't want to be there or shouldn't be there, and so that drags them down as well." Current and former TikTok staffers said the scoring curve can seem arbitrary, however. "More and more leaders were being pushed to rate people at the extremes," one TikTok manager who left the company last year told BI. "Either exceptional, and doing really well, or doing really poorly and giving them these low scores that will eventually push them out of the company." The company asks managers to consider each worker's self-evaluation and coworker feedback when assigning review scores, and department heads may later tweak ratings to meet distribution goals, one staffer said. The score distributions are set based on business priorities, though leaders are instructed not to share those details with reports to avoid the appearance of "forced distribution," BI first reported. The rating curve can breed some competitive animosity among teammates, one TikTok staffer said. "It's very internally competitive," a former staffer said. "You can't co-own a project really in most instances and claim joint results."
Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
The tech woes of America's tech cops
With help from Alfred Ng and Aaron Mak Frustration is brewing around the government office whose job is to track the most exquisite, cutting-edge American technology as it moves around the world. Though a wonky agency known mostly to trade and tech insiders, the Bureau of Industry and Security at the Commerce Department operates at the cutting edge of the $600 billion global semiconductor industry. It polices American export controls by approving or rejecting export licenses and pursuing enforcement actions. You might think the BIS would have sophisticated tools to deploy — but in fact, America's global tech cop is hobbled by software that in some cases hasn't been updated in two decades. In a series of hearings and interviews, insiders have described an agency struggling to cope with creaking software even as its workload has ballooned in recent years. Last year, then-undersecretary of Commerce Alan Estevez, who led BIS, told Congress licensing applications had doubled to 40,000 since 2012 while some of its 'antiquated' software dated back to 2006. The state of affairs has shocked tech policy experts. 'The IT infrastructure at the Bureau of Industry and Security is a legitimate national security threat to the U.S.,' said a senior Republican aide on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, which oversees BIS. (The aide requested anonymity to speak about ongoing discussions in Congress.) A Democratic House staffer said BIS under the Biden administration responded at a glacial pace to requests for information, including important questions on applications for export licenses to Chinese tech companies. 'It took them over a year to get back to Congress with licensing data about SMIC and Huawei,' said the aide, who was not authorized to speak to the press. The BIS did not respond to DFD's questions on its software. Its current leader, Commerce Department undersecretary Jeffrey Kessler, told lawmakers in June that the president's budget requested $303 million for the agency, 'the single largest investment in BIS history, and one that will significantly bolster our ability to protect national security.' The House and Senate are also making efforts to shore up the agency. The House has suggested appropriating $303 million for BIS, while the Senate has suggested $211 million. Either would be an increase from the current $191 million. But it's not clear if that would cover the full software overhaul insiders say is needed — and Congress might not manage to pass appropriations bills before an Oct. 1 shutdown, which could mean flat funding for the near term. The BIS has become increasingly important in American policy over its four decades of existence, as the U.S. has expanded its use of export controls for foreign policy. During President Donald Trump's first term, he placed Huawei and SMIC on the 'Entity List' of blacklisted companies. His administration used the Foreign Direct Product Rule to extend U.S. export controls to goods made with U.S. components, even if the products were manufactured outside the U.S. Both of those are policed by the BIS. Biden built on those controls, both by enacting new restrictions on the export of advanced AI chips, and by adding Russian companies to the 'Entity List' over Moscow's invasion of Ukraine. As BIS was handling a bigger slice of the global tech trade, its systems struggled to keep up. Speaking to HFAC last year, Estevez said his agency was using 'manual pulls' of data for Congress. The Democratic House aide said BIS brought staffers in for a demonstration. 'It was very distressing,' the aide said. 'Mostly I felt really really bad for the people who work at Commerce.' The staffer pointed to frustrations at all levels, from disconnected systems handling major BIS responsibilities to character limits that made it hard to search accurately for company names. 'The search functions are alarmingly inadequate,' the staffer said. In an effort to modernize, the agency awarded Palantir $3.5 million in 2024 for data center services. However, that was far from the scale of overhaul a database would require. Even if lawmakers increase BIS's budget, the ancient tech is only one part of its problem. The agency staff has been in turmoil since Trump took office, with top leaders on chip export controls departing. David Feith, who handled technology at the National Security Council, was dismissed in April. A bipartisan bill HFAC lawmakers introduced last week would require the bureau to nearly double the ranks of BIS export control officers around the world to 20, from 11 today. Kessler told lawmakers last month that extra BIS money would enable the agency to hire nearly 200 special agents across the U.S. as well as 30 officers overseas. Michael Sobolik, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute who previously worked as an aide to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), said ramping up BIS staff could come at the expense of a tech reboot. 'If that money is going to have to go to cover new hires, and if the tech is really as old as it seems like it is, that may not be enough,' said Sobolik. Jessie Blaeser contributed to this report. AI pricing argument hits the airlines Some lawmakers want to know how Delta Airlines is using artificial intelligence to set 'individualized fares' for customers — an emerging industry practice that critics fear abuses people's privacy and creates higher costs. The letter, sent by Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) and joined by Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Mark Warner (D-Va.) on Monday and exclusively provided to POLITICO, asks Delta CEO Ed Bastian to disclose what data the company uses to train its algorithm for setting prices, how many customers are paying for prices determined by AI and what steps the company is taking to evaluate the potential impact of AI on its pricing. Unlike discounts for broad groups such as teachers, veterans and senior citizens, individualized pricing sets specific prices for different people, with critics saying the goal is to set the highest price that people are willing to pay. It also uses more personal information, such as a person's web browsing behavior, social media activity, financial status and location, the Federal Trade Commission said in a January report. Delta did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Delta told investors on a July 10 earnings call that it plans to use AI to set pricing for 20 percent of its domestic flights by the end of 2025. The company expects to eventually personalize all flight prices. The practice of using people's data to set individualized prices, which the FTC calls 'surveillance pricing,' has been a concern among state lawmakers who worry it will lead to higher prices. Business lobbyists have pushed back against regulations, arguing that individual pricing can bring discounts to consumers. Delta has until Aug. 4 to respond to the senators' letter. Incoming: Trump's AI Action Plan Trump is set to release his long-awaited AI Action Plan on Wednesday — and POLITICO's Mohar Chatterjee reports that it will center on cutting regulation, competing with China and suppressing 'woke AI.' The president called on his AI and crypto czar, David Sacks, and other White House tech advisers to develop the action plan in a January executive order. The order rolled back AI safety guardrails that President Joe Biden put into place through his own EO. Mohar obtained an overview of the action plan on Friday, and reports that it will include provisions for streamlining permitting for data center construction, ensuring that federal AI systems are not ideologically biased, promoting AI exports and withholding funds from states with restrictive AI laws. Many of these aims align with the administration's light-touch approach to AI — for example, it backed a state AI law moratorium in the spending bill. That provision was cut, and members of Congress are now trying to get bipartisan support for AI regulations in statehouses. Yet, as POLITICO's Morning Tech team points out, using this action plan to push for state AI deregulation could be a potential workaround to Congress' rejection of the moratorium. post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS Stay in touch with the whole team: Aaron Mak (amak@ Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@ Steve Heuser (sheuser@ Nate Robson (nrobson@ and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@
CNBC
3 hours ago
- CNBC
This big bank stock still has upside ahead despite its 20% year-to-date rally, investor says
JPMorgan Chase may still be positioned for more gains in 2025 despite its impressive year-to-date run, according to Eddie Ghabour of Key Advisors Wealth Management. The firm's co-founder and CEO joined CNBC's " Power Lunch " on Monday to offer his take on the stock, as well as a pair of other market movers. Here is what Ghabour said during the "Three-Stock Lunch" segment. JPMorgan Chase Shares of JPMorgan Chase have already rallied 22% this year, with the big bank's trading desk benefiting from an especially volatile market lately. On Monday, CNBC reported that JPMorgan was overhauling the leadership of its internal quantum computing research group and had poached an executive from State Street. Despite this impressive year-to-date runup, Ghabour believes that there's further upside ahead, and remains a buyer of the stock at this time. "We think the environment over the next 12 months is going to be a perfect storm for a bull market in financials, and JPMorgan has one of the best CEOs on the planet. And we think the market still has 20% more upside, which means their wealth management side — the revenue is also going to increase," he said. "So deregulation, tax cuts and the economy reaccelerating and booming over the next 12 months is going to bode real well for this name." Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund Ghabour also voiced his support for the broader materials sector, specifically in the form of the Materials Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLB) . Shares of the exchange-traded fund have popped 8% in 2025. As a catalyst for the sector, Ghabour pointed to an expected increase in defense spending that could drive upside in the stocks over the next 12 months. Members of NATO recently pledged to spend 5% of gross domestic product on defense, up from 2% previously. "So that's going to do really well for this sector," he said. General Motors On the other hand, Ghabour was not a fan of General Motors . The automaker will report its second-quarter earnings before the opening bell on Tuesday. Shares of General Motors were trading slightly higher on Monday after Benchmark Equity Research initiated coverage of the stock at a buy rating. Analyst Mickey Legg said that the automaker offered "underappreciated upside" and had a "notably more disciplined" electric vehicle strategy than its peers. But Ghabour disagreed with this take. He said he expects GM will struggle in the EV space, particularly in the Chinese market. "There are more and more people getting into the marketplace at lower price points, so we think they're going to continue to be challenged," he said. "The other problem is we're worried about the consumer maybe frontloading car sales in the first quarter to get ahead of tariffs, so that could hurt their sales here in the second quarter." Shares of General Motors are trading fractionally higher on a year-to-date basis.
