Australia cancels Kanye West visa over 'Heil Hitler' song
The 48-year-old musician, who has legally changed his name to Ye, released "Heil Hitler" on May 8, the 80th anniversary of the defeat of Nazi Germany in World War II.
West whose wife Bianca Censori is Australian has been coming to Australia for some time because he has family in the country, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said.
"He's made a lot of offensive comments. But my officials looked at it again once he released the 'Heil Hitler' song and he no longer has a valid visa in Australia."
Burke said the rapper's cancelled visa was not intended for holding concerts.
"It was a lower level, and the officials still looked at the law and said: You're going to have a song and promote that sort of Nazism we don't need that in Australia," he told public broadcaster ABC.
Asked if it was sustainable to bar such a popular figure, the minister said: "I think what's not sustainable is to import hatred."
But he said immigration officials reassess each visa application.
- 'Importing bigotry' -
Australian citizens have freedom of speech, Burke added.
"But we have enough problems in this country already without deliberately importing bigotry."
Kanye West's "Heil Hitler" song stirred public opposition last week in Slovakia when it was announced he would be playing a concert there in July.
More than 3,000 people signed a petition against West's performance in the Slovak capital.
The rapper -- a vocal supporter of US President Donald Trump -- is "repeatedly and openly adhering to symbols and ideology connected with the darkest period of modern global history", two groups behind the petition said.
"Kanye West's concert in our city and our country is an insult to historic memory, a glorification of wartime violence and debasement of all victims of the Nazi regime," the petition read.
In the "Heil Hitler" clip, dozens of Black men wearing animal pelts and masks, and standing in a block formation chant the title of the song, as West raps about being misunderstood and about his custody battle with ex-wife Kim Kardashian.
The song ends with an extract of a speech by the Nazi dictator.
West has also publicly endorsed fellow rapper and music mogul Sean Combs, who has been tried in New York for alleged sex trafficking and racketeering. The jury in that case is considering its verdict.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Celebrating Mandela Day 2025: join Ladles of Love in feeding the future
Danny Diliberto, Founder/CEO, Ladles of Love, and Hans Bruechle making final preparations for the upcoming Mandela Day event at the DHL Stadium. Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers As South Africa prepares to celebrate Nelson Mandela's legacy on 18 July 2025, Ladles of Love has launched its latest Mandela Day campaign, urging people around the world to "Make Every Day a Mandela Day and Feed the Future'. This year, the NPO has partnered with acclaimed Australian street artist Hans Bruechle—also known as Handbrake—to deliver an inspiring and interactive art installation that highlights community spirit and support for early childhood development (ECD). Bruechle, a muralist known for his bold black outlines, tattoo-style aesthetic and vibrant cartoon energy, has worked with major global brands such as Porsche, Mercedes, Tesla, Harley Davidson, and Jack Daniel's. Now, he brings his unique style to Cape Town for a meaningful purpose. For the Mandela Day 2025 project, Hans will create a single cohesive mural design spread across 42 separate canvases—generously donated by Primeart. Once assembled, the full image will depict a detailed garden of South African native flowers, plants, and animals, surrounding a message of hope and love. At the Ladles of Love event on July 18th volunteers will have the opportunity to contribute to each canvas with either a colourful finger print or a personally written message of hope and support for the children of the ECDs. Each volunteer will be able to grab a paint marker and write a personal message on the painted canvases, becoming an integral part of the overall artwork. Once the event concludes, each of the canvases will be distributed to various ECD centres around Cape Town. The idea is to brighten the walls of these centres and to leave children with tangible, daily reminders that they are supported by a wider community. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading The mural forms part of Ladles of Love's broader Mandela Day campaign, now in its seventh year. The initiative focuses on tackling child food poverty in South Africa through volunteerism and purpose-driven partnerships. Founder and CEO Danny Diliberto explained the mission: 'At Ladles of Love, we believe that every plate of healthy food has the power to change a life. Mandela Day reminds us that we all have the ability to uplift our communities through volunteerism. This year, we're inviting people to buy tickets and through acts of kindness, make items that support early childhood development giving small children hope and a healthy start in life.' Bruechle added: 'I feel very lucky to be able to contribute to such a fantastic organisation. Having visited a few of the ECDs now I've seen firsthand just what a wonderful impact Ladles of Love has on these communities, and just how much further we have to go. The fact that I can use my skill set to hopefully help in some way puts a huge smile on my face. The team have been extremely welcoming to me and I can tell that they all genuinely believe in what they're doing. What could be better?' He said he had many 'aims' with this outreach: 'I wanted to create something colourful and local for the children in the ECDs to enjoy but I also wanted to work in a collaborative element to the work so that the generous volunteers at the event could take some ownership of it too. 'By including space for volunteers to write a heartfelt message of support or add their fingerprint not only are they adding to the overall artwork but hopefully it reminds the kids who see it that there are people out there who do care. Real people who want a better country and a better world and who hope for a bright future for every child. It might inspire them. 'Coming from Australia I didn't know the significance of Mandela Day until I got here but I think the collaborative nature of the mural fits right in with the notion of Ubuntu. The overall painting can only be seen when all of the canvases are together - just like a community. Each of us is our own canvas, but it's when we're together that the true meaning emerges.'
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Is Equating the Gaza Genocide to Auschwitz a Misrepresentation?
A woman mourns over the shrouded body of a Palestinian killed during a reported Israeli strike on a humanitarian aid distribution warehouse in the Sabra neighbourhood in Gaza City, in the central Gaza Strip on June 30, 2025. Despite misconceptions, Israel is not trying to starve the Gazan people, says the writer. Image: AFP Nicholas Woode-Smith Roberto Amaral's comparison of Gaza to Auschwitz is not just patently ahistorical but belies an ignorance of the realities of the Gaza conflict and the true human cost of the Holocaust (From Auschwitz to Gaza: The modern-day concentration camp, published in the Sunday Independent and IOL, 9 June 2025). To equate the systematic industrial genocide of six million Jews in Auschwitz with Israel's military campaign in Gaza is not only a gross distortion but a deeply offensive minimisation of the Holocaust. In five years, a patch of dirt approximately 346 acres large, guarded by 10 miles of barbed wire, became the last resting place of over 1.1 million innocents. The vast majority of those exterminated were Jews. Auschwitz was just one of the many concentration and death camps constructed by the Nazi regime to exterminate Jews and their perceived enemies. Six million Jews were systematically rounded up, put into hellish camps, and shot, gassed, brutalised, tortured and slaughtered. The global Jewish population only recovered from this genocide in recent years. The scale of the operation and its cold and calculated industrial efficiency were unlike anything that the world had ever seen before. Jakub Nowakowski, Director of Cape Town's Holocaust & Genocide Centre, poignantly highlights the intense and concentrated cruelty of the Nazi's final solution: 'Six camps... became centres of industrialised murder... In Bełżec alone, 500,000 Jews were killed in just ten months.' Amaral's use of the term 'Luciferian' to describe Israel reveals much of the underlying bigotry of his argument. Describing an entire state as satanic is not a political critique; it's dehumanisation. This language echoes some of the oldest antisemitic tropes in history, many of which fuelled genocidal ideologies in Europe. Amaral wishes to paint Israel as the fundamental antagonist in what is a tragic and complicated conflict. He fails to mention the October 7 massacre, one of the largest mass atrocities against Jews since the Holocaust, and the event that caused this war in the first place. As Nowakowski pertinently comments: 'It is worth keeping in mind that it was Hamas that sparked this latest cycle of violence with its attack on Israel on October 7, two years ago, not the Israeli army.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Further, Amaral refuses to call the conflict a war, stripping Gazans and Hamas of their agency and acting as if Palestinians are only passive victims who have not pulled a single trigger. It is this passivity that Amaral asserts is further evidence of Israel's genocide against the Gaza people. But there is a large difference between Gaza and Auschwitz. And genocide isn't just about the number of dead. As Nowakowski explains: 'The definition of genocide... turns on one thing above all else—intent. For an atrocity to be genocide, its defining objective must be the physical elimination of a group, or a part of that group.' In the case of the Holocaust: 'These six camps, including Bełżec, Auschwitz-Birkenau, and Treblinka, became centres of industrialised murder... Their deaths were not collateral; they were the objective.' Genocide is not Israel's objective in Gaza. Israel is not marching civilians into gas chambers or firing wantonly at innocents. And despite misconceptions, Israel is not trying to starve the Gazan people either. The vast majority of civilian deaths have occurred because of Hamas' strategy of embedding itself among civilians, using homes, hospitals, schools, and mosques to store weapons and launch attacks on Israeli civilians, attempting to kill them merely for being Jewish. The fact of the matter is that if Israel could achieve its military objective of saving its hostages and eliminating Hamas as a threat to its people without harming a single civilian, that is what they would choose. A true genocide would have no such discernment between combatants and noncombatants. The Jews of Europe, the Tutsis of Rwanda, the Armenians, and the Bosnian Muslims were targeted because of who they are. The aim was their extermination. Amaral and other writers risk overextending the term 'genocide' and dulling its moral edge. It risks confusing true genocide with what is already a tragic, albeit necessary, war. To call Gaza a modern Auschwitz is not only historically incoherent, but devalues the unique horror of the Holocaust, where genocide was not a side effect. It was the mission. Civilian deaths in Gaza must not be dismissed. But they must also not be mislabelled. If we are to prevent future genocides, we must first be honest about what they are and what they are not. Comparing Gaza to Auschwitz reveals a deeper moral confusion. The Jews of Europe were powerless civilians systematically rounded up and exterminated solely for who they were. In Gaza, Israel is targeting Hamas, a heavily armed terrorist group that governs Gaza, started this war, and uses its people as shields. There is no moral equivalence between mass murder and tragic collateral damage. To pretend otherwise is to insult the memory of Holocaust victims and obscure the reality of today's war. To call Gaza another Auschwitz is not just a mistake. It is a betrayal of memory and a barrier to truth and peace. * Nicholas Woode-Smith is the the Managing Editor of the Rational Standard and a Senior Associate of the Free Market Foundation. He writes in his personal capacity. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African. *** EDITOR'S NOTE: The claims made in this article reflect factually incorrect statements regarding Israel's ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people, as ruled by the International Court of Justice, the International Criminal Court's findings, and the ongoing and unfolding humanitarian crisis in Gaza.
The South African
a day ago
- The South African
Australia cancels Ye's visa over controversial song
Ye, formerly known as Kanye West. Image: Instagram via @yesblackballsy Australia has revoked the visa of American rapper Ye, formerly known as Kanye West, following the release of his controversial song Heil Hitler, which promotes Nazism. ADVERTISEMENT The decision was announced by Australia's Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke on Wednesday. YE'S CONTROVERSIAL SONG Ye released the song in May, coinciding with the 80th anniversary of Nazi Germany's defeat in World War II. The track glorifies Adolf Hitler and has been widely condemned for its antisemitic content. Burke explained that although Ye had made offensive comments previously, it was the release of the Heil Hitler song that prompted officials to reassess his visa status. The rapper held a lower-level visa, but officials concluded that allowing someone promoting such ideology was unacceptable. ADVERTISEMENT 'We have enough problems in this country already without deliberately importing bigotry,' Burke told Australia's ABC broadcaster. AUSTRALIA AGAINST HATE SPEECH He emphasised that Australia does not need to import hatred, even from popular figures, according to Reuters. Ye has family ties in Australia through his wife, Bianca Censori, an Australian architect, and has been a frequent visitor to the country. Despite this, the government decided to cancel his visa to uphold national values and security. Burke noted that Australian citizens enjoy freedom of speech, but the government must carefully assess visa applications to prevent the importation of extremist views. BANNING CONTROVERSIAL FIGURES The cancellation aligns with Australia's recent stance on barring entry to other controversial figures. This includes US conservative pundit Candace Owens and Israeli-American influencer Hillel Fuld. This move reflects the country's firm approach to protecting its social fabric from divisive rhetoric. This move highlights the global responsibility of nations to reject hate speech and extremist propaganda. It serves as a reminder of the importance of vigilance against the spread of bigotry, especially in multicultural societies like South Africa. The country also grapples with issues of racial and religious tolerance. YE AND NAZISM Tony Burke said, 'You're going to have a song and promote that sort of Nazism, we don't need that in Australia.' He added, 'Importing bigotry is not sustainable for any country.' This firm stance underscores the principle that popularity does not exempt individuals from accountability when their actions threaten social harmony. THE SONG The song Heil Hitler has been banned on several platforms and in countries like Germany. It features a disturbing tribute to Hitler, including samples of his speeches. It has sparked protests and petitions against Ye's performances internationally. This visa cancellation sends a clear message that nations must act decisively against hate speech, irrespective of the individual's fame or influence. It also reflects the broader challenges democracies face in balancing freedom of expression with protection against hate and extremism. WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON AUSTRALIA'S DECISION TO CANCEL YE'S VISA? Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
