How does Ireland's prison overcrowding crisis compare to other European countries?
According to analysis of the latest data from Eurostat, Europe's central statistics database, there was a 3.2% increase in the continent's prison population in 2023.
That year, 13 countries in Europe were experiencing overcrowding. Very high levels of incarcerations were also recorded between 1993 and 2023.
In Ireland, where prison capacity
on Friday was recorded at a level of 117%
, the issue with overcrowding has been deemed a crisis by legal experts, staff unions and senior sources within the Irish penal system.
An
increase in the number of judges
, changes to legislation and sentencing guidelines, as well as
underinvestment into the prison estate
in the country have been contributing factors to the crisis.
The Eurostat data shows, however, that this trend has been occurring across EU member states over a 30-year period. At its peak in 2012, prisons in Europe were accommodating 533,000 people.
Government has initiated an expansion plan for the construction of 1,500 new places – but industry associations like the Irish Prison Officers Association believe that 'building out' of the problem is not the solution.
Speaking at an event in May, President of the association Tony Power said that investments must be made into the existing system to provide more spaces.
Staff should not be 'expected' to work in overcrowded conditions, he added.
Mattresses on the floor in Europe
Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan has
pledged to find ways to accelerate the delivery of more prison spaces
.
Advertisement
A senior source at the service
previously told
The Journal
that building more spaces, given the timescale involved in capital projects, is not seen as an option.
This has led to
an increase in the number of people sleeping on the floor in Irish facilities
, something the Irish Penal Reform Trust deeply condemns.
These figures are so high that the service started recording them in official daily statistics this year. On Friday, 404 people were sleeping on mattresses the ground in Irish prisons.
French prison population levels reached record highs in March as a total of 82,152 people – roughly the same size of a full house at Croke Park – were in custody in French prisons that month. The official capacity is 62,539.
More than 4,500 people were sleeping on the floor at French facilities – 15 of which are at 200% capacity.
Deportations and releases
France's Justice Minister Gérald Darmanin has called for the deportation of foreign prisoners so that they can serve their sentences in their home nations.
In Ireland, however, the Irish Penal Reform Trust has
called for imprisonment to be regarded as a 'last resort' and for alternative measures
, such as community service or supervised temporary release, to be encouraged.
The Irish Prison Service has
increased the population of prisoners on temporary release
, which sees the supervised release of low-level, non-violent offenders serving sentences outside of prison under strict conditions.
The State has been criticised for allowing the temporary release scheme as a pressure valve to overcrowding, but sources in the prison management say the programme is the only way it can maintain safe population levels at facilities in the country.
In Austria, experts say prison sentences are still too common and, often, people are committed for minor offences. Facilities in the country are at 108% capacity, as of May.
Access to rehabilitative care
In Spain, the country has adopted a more rehabilitative approach. It allows prisoners a gradual transition to more open regimes, based on their behaviour and risk of re-offending.
Similar programmes are available in Ireland
. Data from Spain shows that 80% of people released from prison do not return to crime.
Related Reads
Court escorts for prisoners at risk due to overcrowding, Irish prisons boss warns
Fears within prison service that prison overcrowding increasing risk of violence and rioting
New ankle monitors could be an alternative to being held on remand, Irish prisons boss says
Overcrowding is
reducing the population's access to services in Ireland
. Sources have said that offenders placed on supervised release or short sentences are, sometimes, not provided with any rehabilitative care.
The head of the
Irish Prison Service told reporters last month
that up to 2,000 prisoners are currently on waiting lists to access psychology support services.
Director General Caron McCaffrey said there are also smaller waiting lists for other services, such as addiction therapy, education and training programmes.
She said a 'whole of government approach' is needed to boost services such as education, training and therapy in prisons.
Responding to questions by
The Journal
in May, she admitted that people are sometimes released before receiving care.
High levels of overcrowding at prisons in Austria is leading to similar issues to what is seen in Ireland, where prisoners outnumber support staff. The European Court of Auditors recently criticised Vienna's lack of investment.
Changes are being led from prison management, however, to boost rehabilitation resources in Irish prisons. Existing staff are being upskilled and trained on methods to provide and assist in the care of prisoners with mental health issues.
Additionally, a peer-led, pilot programme has been launched in Dublin's Mountjoy Prison which trains and educates prisoners on providing addiction care to others.
—
This article is part of PULSE, a European collaborative journalism project.
With reporting by
Maria Delaney
(The Journal Investigates, Ireland),
Davide Madeddu
(Il Sole 24 Ore, Italy),
Kim Son Hoang
(Der Standard, Austria) and
Ana Somavilla
(El Confidencial, Spain) as well as translation services by
Ciarán Lawless
(Voxeurop).
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Events to take place celebrating the birth of St Oliver Plunkett
A series of events will take place in Drogheda, Co Louth, over the coming days to mark the culmination of this year's Saint Oliver 400 celebrations. The 400th anniversary of the birth of St Oliver Plunkett is being marked in both Drogheda and the Oldcastle area of Co Meath this year. The iconic saint was born in Loughcrew in Co Meath on 1 November 1625 and was ordained to the priesthood in Rome in 1654, having studied at the Irish College in the city. He later became the Archbishop of Armagh and Primate of All Ireland and maintained his duties in the face of the Penal Laws when the Catholic Church was being suppressed. St Oliver Plunkett was eventually arrested and tried for treason in London. He was hanged, drawn and quartered at Tyburn on 1 July 1681. A group of his friends managed to rescue his head, which eventually made its way to St Peter's Church in Drogheda. The relic remains there to this day in a specially made shrine. One of the saint's thigh bones is also on display in the side altar of St Brigid's Church in Oldcastle. A series of events is under way this year to mark 400 years since St Oliver Plunkett's birth, and also the 50 years since his canonisation in 1975, when he became the first newly-made Irish saint for almost 700 years. Tomorrow will see an event titled the 'Plunkett Clan Gathering' take place at Loughcrew House and Gardens, the ancestral seat of the Plunkett family. An ecumenical service in the 17th-century church will be followed by historical talks, live music and refreshments, which organisers have said will be a "heartfelt tribute in a place of deep personal resonance for the saint's descendants". There will be an evening of music and reflection on Saturday with the St Oliver Concert taking place at St Peter's Church on West Street in Drogheda. Musical director Edward Holly will lead St Peter's Male Voice Choir, joined by soloists Seán Tester and Celine Byrne. However, the culmination of the anniversary year arrives on Sunday with the St Oliver Procession, a pageant of faith and remembrance that will see the community walk together in honour of the local saint. Starting from Holy Family Church in Ballsgrove, Drogheda at 3pm, the procession will make its way to St Peter's Church, the home of the shrine to St Oliver Plunkett, where a celebratory mass will be held. This weekend's closing events coincide with the end of an exhibition, which opened last month and includes a number of artefacts and memorabilia associated with the saint. The Saint Oliver 400 Commemorative Exhibition runs at 'The Exhibition Space' at Drogheda Civic Offices until Saturday.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Why the EU's plan to access our phones and data is daft
Precognition, an idea examined by Philip K Dick all the way back in 1956, is the latest misguided plan to make us all feel safer. In Dick's The Minority Report, better known for its Tom Cruise big-screen adaptation in 2002, crimes could be stopped before they happened. Dick's method was precogs, a psychic trio of people that could recognise when a crime was going to happen. The European Commission has a different approach, decryption through its Protect EU plan, which has noble motives. It aims to combat child sexual abuse material by giving law enforcement authorities access to encrypted data . The method would involve scanning private communications, including on platforms well-known for end-to-end encryption like WhatsApp or Signal. READ MORE [ Have EU laws to protect our privacy online worked? Opens in new window ] The way of doing this would be to scan messages on the client-side before they are encrypted, essentially checking what the user plans to send before it gets to the encryption stage that happens during the process of sending. For context, these are infinitesimally small amounts of time in which the actions would occur. This would make it easier for law enforcement authorities to access the communications of those that distribute illegal content. It rather feels like the European Commission missed the point of Dick's work. Well, maybe not everyone involved. The proposal was announced on April 1st after all. The methods outlined in ProtectEU undermine the strong cybersecurity stance the EU itself wishes to push There are layers of terrible to this awful idea, which is basically shielding itself in the argument that it's for the greater good. Before the matter of user privacy rights, there are obvious cybersecurity challenges. The backers of ProtectEU are missing the most obvious issue with their plan: any attempt to weaken encryption weakens everyone's security. While criminal actors benefit from it, it also impacts pretty much everyone else from journalists through doctors, law enforcement itself, businesses, whistleblowers and, rather importantly in this context, the victims of crime. [ How businesses can help protect themselves from cyber attack Opens in new window ] Any tool that would create a means to weaken encryption, even if the tool was created for the purposes of doing good, can be exploited by criminals and other bad actors. Even Lindsey Graham, the US senator and a noted hawk when it comes to anti-terror measures, agrees on this. Graham was one of the loudest calling for Apple to find a way to access the iPhones of the culprits in the San Bernardino terrorist attack in 2015. He changed his tune to the opposite when the risk this would create was made clear to him. As it happened, the phones in question were later accessed by targeting a zero-day vulnerability, or security flaw. The methods outlined in ProtectEU undermine the strong cybersecurity stance the EU itself wishes to push. Governments across the bloc, along with agencies within it, constantly push for greater digital resilience yet this measure would erode the strongest protection it has at the front line of security. Then there's the matter of the would-be good actors that would have access to such a system. Between the tech companies that would need to comply and the law enforcement agencies involved, the amount of people with potential legitimate access to such a backdoor would easily number in the tens of thousands. Simply assuming these would all be good actors, even with the most rigorous of vetting processes is laughable. That puts to bed the classic argument of 'if you have nothing to hide, you've nothing to fear.' ProtectEU would essentially be prosecuting the intent not the attempt We all have lots to hide, every one of us. Sadly, most of it isn't even that interesting. Personal information regarding our finances and the likes would be the most obvious example. That's why the privacy issue is so entangled with the cybersecurity one here. Even if encryption isn't removed, scanning before it acts nullifies its very purpose. This in turn would enable less democratic regimes to point to the EU – meant to be a bastion of democracy – as justification for their own efforts to outlaw or inhibit encryption. A successful implementation of ProtectEU would effectively have the Commission doing the hard work for totalitarian states in designing a mass surveillance system. Europe wouldn't use it, I think, but plenty of others would. Yes, it really is that bad an idea but it somehow gets worse. Let's assume the method for scanning pre-encryption, as ProtectEU plans, occurs and, implausibly, no cybercriminals or anyone else ever misuse the new means of attack. In that instance, when should law enforcement authorities act on the information? If they act the moment they know the person has illegal digital material in their possession then that actor has clearly got possession of illegal material and could probably be proven to have intent to distribute. Likewise the intended recipient could potentially be charged with intent to receive, where such laws exist. Yet they couldn't be charged with actually distributing it, while the would-be recipient would not yet have committed the crimes related to receipt and possession. If authorities act immediately, then they are limiting what they can charge and likely who they can charge as well. If they wait, then they get to add on more charges but have knowingly failed at preventing a criminal act. It's quite a dizzying moral puzzle. ProtectEU would essentially be prosecuting the intent not the attempt. The Minority Report was meant to be a warning not an instruction manual.
RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Irish women 'still not safe', say Plunkett sisters
The sisters of Dublin woman Elizabeth Plunkett believe that Irish women are "still not safe" almost 50 years after the murder that shocked Ireland. Kathleen Nolan and Bernie Plunkett claim nothing has been learned since their sister's murder in 1976 by Ireland's first serial killers - John Shaw and Geoffrey Evans. The Plunkett family are currently collaborating with RTÉ's seven-part podcast series Stolen Sister to raise awareness around Elizabeth Plunkett's case. Calling for stricter rules on bail conditions, Ms Plunkett said: "We're going on to 50 years, next year, 76 to 2026. How many women have been murdered in the meantime?" She added: "This is still happening all these years later. So, if anything, we want to draw attention to the fact women are not safe." Shaw and Evans were on £40 bail at the time of Elizabeth Plunkett's and later Mayo woman Mary Duffy's murder. Ms Plunkett said: "If they had held on to them at that time, our Elizabeth would be still alive and so would Mary Duffy. "But no, they obviously didn't take that seriously enough that two lives had to be lost." Both men were from the north of England and were arrested in Ireland before the murders for burglary and had a year-long stay in Irish prisons in Limerick and Mountjoy. When they murdered Elizabeth Plunkett and Mary Duffy, they were awaiting an extradition hearing back to the UK to face rape and sexual assault charges. Ms Nolan said too much time elapses between missing persons and murder investigations. She believes an elite team should be sent in promptly after a person goes missing "because they're losing too much information". The women mention the cases of Annie McCarrick and Tina Satchwell as examples of cases where there have been serious questions surrounding investigations. 'Like getting slapped in the face' Originally Shaw and Evans were charged with the murder, rape and false imprisonment of Elizabeth Plunkett and Mary Duffy. However, when Shaw applied for parole in 2023, it was revealed he had never been convicted for Elizabeth Plunkett's murder despite previous reports. The family also discovered that the State did not hold an inquest into the death of Elizabeth Plunkett, nor ever issued a death certificate in her name. As Shaw was never convicted of any charges relating to Elizabeth Plunkett, her family said they are no longer considered victims of a crime under the 2019 Parole Act and are not entitled to take part in the parole process. Evans died in 2012. According to Ms Plunkett, the shock she felt following the revelation from the Parole Board was "like getting slapped in the face". The collaboration between the family and the Stolen Sister podcast led to an inquest being held into Elizabeth Plunkett's death earlier this year. Ms Plunkett said the family hope new information gathered during the podcast, which to date includes 11 new witness statements, will also lead to a retrial. These statements include accounts from women who said they were approached by men they identified as Shaw and Evans. In late May, the family's solicitor James MacGuill SC wrote to the DPP, the Garda Commissioner and the Minister for Justice requesting a cold case review into her death and a renewed public appeal for evidence. Aside from an acknowledgement of receipt from the Minister, no further contact has been made. RTÉ's Documentary On One wrote to the Minister for Justice on 7 March looking for any records relating to Elizabeth Plunkett. They responded 16 weeks later and are still looking for the records. In a statement, the minister extended his "deepest condolences" to the family of Elizabeth Plunkett for her tragic death. The statement read: "While the minister is very much conscious of the case of Ms Plunkett, he is mindful that a number of matters referred to are under the remit of bodies who are independent in the performance of their functions." "The Department has undertaken a preliminary search of records to identify what is held on file related to this matter. "Work is ongoing to retrieve and review records on file. When this is complete, the Department will be able to consider the request related to the release of these records." Ms Plunkett said nearly 50 years ago, the authorities did not have the same access to information gathering, but that excuse is no longer valid in today's world. "Their investigations were kind of notebook and pen, you know, whereas it's not like that today. And still, the cases are happening." Her sisters described Elizabeth Plunkett as a social, fun-loving and independent young woman with big ambitions for her future. "We used to say she's full of notions. Because she wasn't going to just be in Ringsend, and a housewife. She wanted to be big time and style and fashion and go somewhere..." said Ms Plunkett. While taking part in the Stolen Sister podcast has been difficult for the sisters, Ms Plunkett said they are "prepared to take the punches to get the justice we want". If anyone has any information on John Shaw and Geoffrey Evans, the Plunkett family have asked that you contact the podcast makers through documentaries@
