New age verification rules for online platforms in place
Social media sites such as Instagram, Facebook, TikTok and X will be legally obliged to protect users from harmful content under the Online Safety Code.
Companies will face fines for breaches of up to €20 million or 10% of a platform's annual turnover, whichever is greater.
From today, the rules cover content such as cyberbullying, the promotion of self-harm, suicide, eating disorders or dangerous challenges, as well as pornography and violence.
Platforms must also have age assurance systems and parental controls in place.
The media regulator Coimisiún na Meán formally adopted the Online Safety Code in October 2024, but platforms were given nine months before the more detailed provisions of the code came into force to allow time for any IT changes that may have been needed.
Age verification
Under the rules, platforms hosting pornographic or violent material must ensure such content is not accessible without robust age checks.
The code does not mandate specific technology but states that age assurance measures based solely on self-declaration by users, are not considered to be effective.
The Online Safety Commissioner Niamh Hodnett has previously said that age verification measures must be "robust, privacy-respecting, and holding data for no longer than it is necessary".
Examples of age checks might include facial recognition, cognitive skills test or uploading IDs such as passports or driving licenses.
Privacy campaigners have expressed concerns about the storage of sensitive personal information used for age verification.
Video-sharing platforms
The Online Safety Code applies to video-sharing platforms that have their EU headquarters in Ireland.
In December 2023, Coimisiún na Meán designated ten platforms that would be covered.
They were Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Udemy, TikTok, LinkedIn, X, Pinterest, Tumblr and Reddit.
Tumblr and Reddit both took unsuccessful High Court actions against Coimisiún na Meán, arguing that they should not be designated as video-sharing platforms.
In May, Coimisiún na Meán de-designated Reddit as a platform under its remit, stating that the company's service to users in the EU is now provided by a Dutch entity.
Although Snapchat is incredibly popular among young people, it is not included on the list of designated platforms.
This is because it does not have its EU headquarters in Ireland.
Asked about regulating Snapchat, Coimisiún na Meán has said it will be working closely with its regulatory counterparts in other EU member states to hold platforms to account for how they keep their users safe.
Recommender systems not covered
Recommender systems are algorithms that determine what social media users see based on personal data such as search history, past purchases, age and location.
Campaign groups and researchers have warned that these algorithms can be "toxic" and often result in inappropriate content appearing in users' feeds, promoting things like hate, extremism, eating disorders and self-harm.
These algorithms are not covered by the Online Safety Code.
Coimisiún na Meán has said that while it recognises that recommender systems can have harmful impacts on users, especially children, it will be best able to tackle the potential dangers of these systems through its implementation of the EU's set of online safety rules, the Digital Services Act (DSA).
The Online Safety Code will run alongside the DSA and form part of Ireland's overall internet safety framework.
Ireland's code does not specifically cover disinformation, but Coimisiún na Meán has said that when disinformation crosses the threshold of being illegal content covered by the DSA, or regulated content under the code, platforms must prevent it being uploaded or shared.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
2 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Week ahead in business: Budget 2026, investment plans and online safety
Tomorrow, we will see publication of the summer economic statement, which sets out the Government's budgetary strategy and outlines the fiscal parameters for Budget 2026. Typically, the Finance Minister will announce the date of Budget Day. There will be lots of big numbers in the statement – the key one being the size of the package to be presented to the Dáil by Paschal Donohoe in October. Last year it was €8.3bn, with additional public spending of €6.9bn and tax measures of €1.4bn. That was one month before a general election, however, so the numbers might be smaller this year. Also tomorrow, we expect Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers will publish a review of the National Development Plan by his department. This covers all public capital investment to 2035. There should be plenty of money to spend here – given that both the proceeds of the Apple tax settlement and the sale of the State's share in AIB are in the kitty. The list of priorities set out by Mr Chambers is worth watching. So, too, will be figures published on Thursday by the Central Statistics Office in relation to house completions in the second quarter. The figure for the first quarter – January to March – was 5,938 dwelling completions, which was only 2pc up on the same period last year. From today, Coimisiún na Meán begins enforcement of the Online Safety Code for video-sharing platforms, which must verify users' ages before they access adult content. Niamh Hodnett, the Online Safety Commissioner, has said platforms will be checked to see what measures have they put in place. The governing council of the European Central Bank has a monetary policy meeting this week, and we will discover at its press conference on Thursday if interest rates are being changed. Breaking a long sequence of cuts, the expectation is that rates will stay the same.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Tariffs an unwelcome shock to a German economy already battling an exports slowdown
Everyone in Germany knows to beware the so-called enkeltrick or grandchild trick: phone calls from a panicked grandchild warning of looming disaster unless their beloved grandparent plunders their savings. It's a scam that can have an expensive outcome. Since Monday, Europe's largest economy has been bracing itself for the biggest enkeltrick of all time: the incalculable cost of US tariffs of 30 per cent threatened on European Union products by US president Donald Trump , grandson of a German emigrant. Like Ireland, Germany is particularly exposed to threats as the US is its largest export market. Last year it sold goods worth €161 billion to the US, nearly 10 per cent of the EU's total, running up a trade surplus of nearly €70 billion. Many German blue-chip companies are already feeling the squeeze of previous Trump administration tariffs on the vehicle, automotive components and pharmaceuticals sectors. Mercedes-Benz and Porsche sell every fourth luxury vehicle in the US, but have reported a slide of 12 and 6 per cent respectively – despite a rush to sell pre-tariff inventory. READ MORE No one knows what next month, let alone next year, will bring, not even chancellor Friedrich Merz . The 69 year-old German leader, in office just 10 weeks, had been hopeful he had struck the right, pragmatic note in his first Oval Office meeting last month with Trump. The two exchanged mobile numbers and last spoke by phone just over a week ago. In that call, Merz said in a subsequent interview, Trump gave no indication of what he would announce one day later. If implemented as threatened, Merz said the tariffs would 'strike at the German export industry's bone marrow'. And not just that: two months after taking office, Merz conceded: 'We would have to put large parts of our economic policy on hold because it would overshadow everything else.' Exports make up 42 per cent of German gross domestic product but they have been in decline for more than two years, falling last year by 1.7 per cent and 0.9 per cent a year earlier. The economy is in an unprecedented third year of recession and the exports outlook for next year looks grim. Even before last Saturday's threat, Germany's leading economic institutes predicted a decline in exports of 4.1 per cent this year. Behind the boos and hissing however, many analysts in Germany concede the Trump trade war threats have merely exposed and exacerbated a long-term and home-made German economic decline. Despite a general bounce in post-pandemic global trade, the tide is no longer lifting the German boat. Decline set in during Trump 1.0, according to a stark study this week from the Bundesbank as it laid out in black and white how much export weakness is hitting the wider German economy. According to the central bank, in the three years to 2024 German GDP would have risen 2.4 percentage points more than it actually did if German exporters had merely maintained their global market share. Its economists points to four key causes: weak demand in customer countries; a drop in the attraction of German products; supply shocks on foreign markets caused by sharp tariff increases; and, most urgently, the rise of competition and a decline in German exporters' price-performance ratio. [ Donald Trump pushes for 15%-20% minimum tariff on all EU goods Opens in new window ] This last factor – not Trump – is why, Bundesbank economists say, German exporters have been losing global market share. No less than three-quarters of the decline, its economists' calculations suggest, can be attributed to a deteriorating price-performance ratio of German exports and exporters. Among the reasons, the Bundesbank says, are an interplay of a skills shortage and steep pay hikes that are not matched by rises in productivity. Unit labour costs are rising more sharply in Germany than elsewhere, with costs rising sharper still further thanks to a rising tide of bureaucracy that is dampening corporate investment. All of that is proving a toxic cocktail with no immediate antidote in sight. Regardless of what the US does, German exporters have consistently lost post-pandemic market share in markets where China have gained. Chinese companies are taking ever-larger bites out of growing sectors – including those long dominated by Germany. Take cars and car parts, a key pillar of the German economy accounting for 17.2 per cent of all exports. This has stagnated for almost a decade and, has been in decline since 2019. The days of relying on growth in the Chinese market has left German car makers dangerously exposed now as Chinese motorists abandon foreign-owned brands such as Volkswagen and turn to domestic companies. Those Chinese companies are now moving into the European electric car market. The Bundesbank report has no magic solution, only proposals similar to those that have been circulating in Berlin for years. Two months after taking office, the Merz Coalition has already begun work cutting bureaucracy, backed a new wave of tax write-offs and other sweeteners for companies to invest. Merz promises an ambitious 'autumn of decisions' on the ticking demographic time bombs of pension and welfare reform – but a trade war could throw those plans into disarray. What Germany urgently needs is young people with bright new ideas to counter its export slide and demographic decline. To this end, the Bundesbank report calls for an end to Germany's schizophrenic practice of attracting in-demand skilled workers only to strangle them on arrival in red tape. That could be as effective a shot in the arm as Germany's embrace – after years of abstinence – of debt-financed investment, some central bank analysts think. The Bundesbank board has given its thin-lipped approval for plans to borrow €500 billion for investment in the next decade, and allow effectively limitless defence spending. A new and more flexible approach to public finances will see Germany's debt pile grow by an additional €847 billion to 2029. The hope is it will boost the economy's growth potential. Bundesbank board member Michael Theurer says his institution understands that 'there are certainly good reasons to make a temporary use of [fiscal] space and it's important that catch-up required is addressed precisely in infrastructure and defence'. 'We assume that the debt ratio will increase to 66 per cent in 2027 and is likely to continue to grow in the years that follow, which is all reasonable in international comparison,' he told the Stuttgarter Zeitung daily this week. 'There is no cause for concern regarding the stability of German finances ... on the other hand, it will be important how the additional financial scope is used.' But not everyone in Frankfurt is elated about taking on extra debt – and interest repayment obligations – at what Bundesbank president Joachim Nagel has called an 'extremely uncertain' geopolitical environment. 'Tariff uncertainty is putting a strain on the financial markets and harming economic development,' said Nagel to the Handelsblatt business daily this week He said Merz and his EU allies needed a 'steady hand' to help bring about a 'swift' agreement with the US – 'but not at any price'.
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
What US economic madness means for the rest of the world
Tariffs are a major own goal for the US – and also bad for the rest of the world. Tearing up previous agreements on trade casts doubt on whether any new agreement with the US administration will stick. The EU will still try to reach a settlement with Donald Trump by the end of the month, but there is no certainty that reason will prevail. If there is no agreement, we will face a very disruptive and damaging period of trade wars. Even if there is a deal, it will represent a significantly worse outcome for the EU and the US economies than the status quo. Naturally, all our attention is focused on the trade issue, as it will have an immediate impact on both sides of the Atlantic. However, the US budget, passed by the US Congress earlier this month, referred to as the 'One Big Beautiful Act', has even more serious long-term implications for the US economy. First, the US budget provides for a huge tax give-away for the better-off. Second, it plans to cut healthcare for many millions of Americans in 2027, just after the next congressional elections. Third, the combined effect of the changes in tax and expenditure mean the US government deficit will remain at about 6 per cent of GDP for the next decade, even under optimistic growth assumptions. READ MORE The independent Congressional Budget Office forecast that the US debt, currently at 120 per cent of GDP, will as a result rise to rise to about 140 per cent over the coming decade. In the OECD area, only Italy, Greece and Japan are currently experiencing this level of indebtedness. David McWilliams on how 'big incentives' to build could save Dublin city Listen | 36:51 The White House, akin to the short-lived regime of Liz Truss in the UK, proclaims a different reality, asserting that economic growth will solve the budgetary problems, keeping the debt in check. All serious economists in the US indicate that this is a fairy tale. We have learned the hard way that if debt reaches current US levels, stopping a slide into insolvency is very painful. There is no prospect of the US getting out of the debt mess by defaulting – they can just print dollars. Trying to square the circle of continuing to borrow big, while paying rising interest bills, can only be achieved in one of two ways – through inflation, or by what is termed financial repression. While the latter is less likely, it would involve the US government forcing the rest of the US economy to lend to it. However, if the US government hoovered up all national savings, this would severely impact on investment and growth, as has happened in Japan. [ Will Donald Trump fire Jerome Powell? 'I don't rule out anything. But it's unlikely. Unless …' Opens in new window ] The US budgetary problems matter for the rest of the world because most countries, including China, hold much of their financial reserves in the form of US government debt. In the early 1970s under Richard Nixon , when US borrowing was out of control, inflation was allowed to dramatically increase, peaking at 11 per cent in 1974. This very rapidly eroded the value of the US debt, which also represented much of the financial reserves held by the rest of the world. In response to reproaches from US creditors, the then US treasury secretary John Connally responded with Trump-like arrogance: 'Our money, your problem'. This pattern was repeated under Ronald Reagan , and it is highly likely that under Trump a burst of inflation will again be needed to erode the US government debt, much of which represents foreigners' reserves. Already, worry about this has led to a fall of 10 per cent in the value of the dollar compared to the euro since Trump took office. For our exports to the US, the 10 per cent increase in their cost in dollars comes as a double whammy on top of the 10 per cent tariff rate already imposed. [ 'It's Maga, baby': Trump's 50% tariff threat on Brazil marks unprecedented interference in foreign courts Opens in new window ] Other countries won't be as ready to lend to the US when the value of their bond holdings are being eroded. To date, the interest rate paid by the US government for long-term borrowing has not risen significantly, but it is likely to do so over coming years, given the growing risk that the inflation solution will be adopted. With rapidly rising debt, there's increasing temptation for the US to allow inflation by persuading the US central bank, the 'Fed' , to reduce short-term interest rates, rather than choking off inflation through higher interest rates. To date, Trump's threats to force the Fed to reduce interest rates have fallen on deaf ears. Trump may continue to try to strong-arm current Fed chairman Jerome Powell , but will doubtless replace him at the end of his term next year with a less independent, more pliant, nominee.
