China urges caution - and speed - on assisted-driving technology
Yet, Beijing has a nuanced message for its rising stars: move fast - but be careful.
Regulators this week have been finalising new safety rules for driver-assistance systems as Beijing sharpens scrutiny of the technology following an accident involving a Xiaomi (1810.HK), opens new tab SU7 sedan in March. That incident killed three occupants when their car crashed seconds after the driver took control from the assisted-driving system.
While Chinese officials want to prevent carmakers from overselling the capabilities of such systems, they are also threading the needle between innovation and safety to ensure their automakers don't lose out to U.S. and European rivals.
Setting clear regulations for assisted-driving tech without slowing its advancement could give China's industry an edge over global competitors, analysts say. This approach is in stark contrast to the U.S. market, where companies pursuing autonomous cars have expressed frustration that the government has not implemented a regulatory system to validate and test the technology.
Markus Muessig, auto industry lead at Accenture Greater China, said China's regulators and industries have long followed former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping's "feel the stones to cross the river" philosophy. The expression means to steadily explore new, uncertain technologies, which "has proven very successful for this market," he said.
Current Chinese regulations allow systems that automatically steer, brake and accelerate under certain conditions while requiring the driver to stay engaged. For that reason, marketing terms such as "smart" and "autonomous" are banned.
The new rules will focus on hardware and software designs that monitor a driver's state of awareness and their capacity to take control in time.
To do this, regulators enlisted Chinese automaker Dongfeng and tech giant Huawei to help draft new rules and have sought public input over a month-long period, ending Friday.
At the same time, government officials are pressing Chinese automakers to rapidly deploy even more-advanced systems, known as Level 3 assisted-driving, which allow drivers to take their eyes off the road in certain situations. Level 3 is the midway point on the industry's autonomous-driving scale, from basic features like cruise control at Level 1, to self-driving capability under all conditions at Level 5.
The Chinese government had tapped state-owned Changan (000625.SZ), opens new tab to be the first automaker to begin Level 3 validation tests in April, but the plan was paused after the Xiaomi crash, said a source familiar with the regulatory planning process.
Beijing still hopes to resume such tests this year and approve the country's first Level 3 car in 2026, the source said.
China's Ministry of Industry of Information Technology and Changan did not respond to requests for comment. Xiaomi has said it is cooperating with a police investigation into the accident.
Driver-assistance systems are seen by industry analysts as the next big battleground in China's hyper-competitive car market.
Over the past decade, Level 2 systems have proliferated in China, including Tesla's Full Self Driving system, as well as the Xiaomi feature involved in the March crash. The capability ranges from basic vehicle following on highways to handling most tasks on busy urban roads, under driver supervision.
Automakers have pushed down hardware costs to levels that allow them to offer Level 2 features at little or no extra cost. China's No. 1 automaker BYD (002594.SZ), opens new tab has rolled out its "God's Eye" assisted-driving software for free across its entire product line-up. More than 60% of new cars sold in China this year will have Level 2 features, according to an estimate from research firm Canalys.
In its push for assisted-driving technology, and ultimately fully self-driving cars, Beijing is seeking to help homegrown carmakers just as it supported China's rapid rise to become the world's electric-car juggernaut.
Last year, China's government lined up nine automakers for public tests to advance the adoption of self-driving cars.
In their Level 3 push, Chinese regulators also are upping the regulatory ante by holding automakers and parts suppliers liable if their systems fail and cause an accident. Legislation passed in Britain last year adopted a similar approach to liability.
At the Shanghai auto show in April, several companies touted progress toward rolling out vehicles with Level 3 capability. Tech giant Huawei said it is ready to introduce a Level 3 system for highways after simulated testing of more than 600 million kilometers. It showed a video of drivers and passengers singing karaoke as the car drove itself.
Geely's (GEELY.UL) Zeekr brand debuted the luxury SUV 9X, featuring Level 3 software the automaker said is ready for mass production in the third quarter if regulations allow. Zeekr is also applying to be part of a second batch of automakers to undergo government Level 3 validation tests.
Meanwhile, traditional automakers at the Shanghai auto show such as Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen said they were pushing their most advanced assisted-driving features but stopped short of crossing the Level 3 liability line.
Getting there is a challenge as they are already at a cost disadvantage against their Chinese rivals, analysts say.
Mercedes-Benz CTO Markus Schaefer told Reuters that while chip and computing power prices have fallen, the additional safety required for Level 3 will cost much more.
"It's a moving target," Schaefer said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Is China uninvestable or misunderstood? The INVESTING ANALYST
After years plagued with economic issues, escalating geopolitical tensions and weak investor sentiment, is China's recent recovery an indication of brighter years ahead? In this column, Josef Licsauer, Investment trust research analyst at Kepler Partners, explains why China could offer an opportunity for investors. There was a time when China felt unstoppable. After joining the World Trade Organization in 2001, it quickly became the world's factory floor, driving globalisation, ramping up exports, and fuelling a commodities supercycle with massive investment in infrastructure and real estate. Between 2000 and 2010, its GDP grew by an average of 10.6 per cent, enriching emerging markets and powering global growth. But that once-compelling growth story has since lost its shine. In the decade that followed, momentum cooled as China tried to rebalance its economy away from exports and infrastructure toward domestic consumption. Rising debt, industrial overcapacity and an ageing population began to weigh on the long-term outlook, even as headline GDP remained relatively strong. A brief rally in 2021 offered some hope, but it was short-lived. Strict lockdowns, a spiralling property crisis, tech crackdowns, and rising tensions with the West reasserted themselves, knocking investor confidence and sending sentiment into retreat. Since then, Chinese equity valuations have slumped to near historic lows and the country's index weighting has fallen from a peak of around 40 per cent to the low 20s. But amid the disruption, opportunity is stirring. Valuations remain deeply discounted, stimulus is gaining traction, and internal growth drivers – from tech innovation and AI to rising healthcare demand and a push for self-sufficiency – are beginning to reassert themselves. For investors willing to look again, investment trusts may offer one of the most effective routes back into China. Return of the King (Consumer) Just as The Return of the King brought Tolkien's epic Lord of the Rings trilogy to a triumphant close, and found a surprisingly devoted fanbase in China during its 2021 re-release, the consumer may now be stepping back into the spotlight in China's economic narrative. While confidence remains fragile, early signs of recovery are visible in rising footfall, discretionary spending, and experience-led consumption. A key driver? The $10trillion surge in household savings since 2020, a staggering sum exceeding the GDP of Japan or Germany. As confidence continues to improve, that pool of capital could fuel a powerful cycle of consumption, hiring and reinvestment. We're already seeing early evidence. Guming, a fast-growing teahouse chain, has seen its share price surge over 160 per cent since listing earlier this year on the back of consumers returning to the city and spending again. Similarly, Haidilao, the hotpot giant, is benefitting from renewed appetite for social dining post-Covid, Luckin Coffee continues to dominate value-focused caffeine and for affluent consumers, and premium names like Kweichow Moutai remain in high-demand. JPMorgan China Growth & Income (JCGI) has tapped into these trends with a portfolio tilted toward domestic-facing names. The managers added Guming at IPO and have recently increased positions in other domestic-facing names they believe will benefit from experience-led recovery. The opportunity, they argue, lies not in exports, but in China's internal engine. Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (BGCG) shares this domestic tilt and a focus that has supported its outperformance of the MSCI China All-Share Index over the past year. Managers Sophie Earnshaw and Linda Lin are targeting areas supported by stimulus and policy, alongside firms driving innovation in manufacturing and high-end tech. On the consumer front, core holdings like Luckin Coffee and Kweichow Moutai reflect their belief these businesses are central to China's long-term transformation. Policy support and stimulus The Chinese government unveiled a wave of targeted support in September 2024, aimed at stabilising the property sector, boosting consumption and accelerating high-priority industries like AI, semiconductors and green tech. The stimulus package was worth up to 7.5trillion yuan (around $1.07trillion), potentially the largest in the country's history in nominal terms, according to Deutsche Bank. The measures, designed to shore up confidence in key areas of the economy, included mortgage relief, stock market support, local government bond issuance, and capital injections into state-owned banks. The message is clear: policymakers are committed to restoring confidence and lifting domestic growth. Fidelity Asian Values (FAS) is one trust with exposure here. Managers Nitin Bajaj and Ajinkya Dhavale have reduced exposure to India, where they now see stretched valuations and reallocated capital into undervalued Chinese companies tied to domestic demand. Despite ongoing geopolitical and macro risks, they see 'caged upside': long-term growth potential yet to be realised in undervalued, well-capitalised, well-run businesses with limited exposure to global trade volatility. One example is Full Truck Alliance, China's leading digital freight broker, which plays a pivotal role in modernising the country's logistics network. FAS remains overweight China and the managers believe that the brief sentiment rally of late 2024, triggered by stimulus, could repeat. With substantial capital still on the sidelines, a sustained improvement in earnings could spark a meaningful rebound. For those after a more balanced approach, JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets (JMG) maintains a neutral China weighting but within that holds select domestic-facing stocks that could benefit from stimulus tailwinds. It's another way to stay exposed to China's upside potential while remaining diversified across the broader EM landscape. Innovation and independence China's drive for technological self-sufficiency is another area drawing investor interest. With geopolitical tensions rising, the country is accelerating efforts in AI, software, advanced manufacturing and supply chain independence, all backed by targeted policy support. It's a long game, but one that could help reduce reliance on foreign tech and reshape the country's economic future. The launch of DeepSeek's AI model – viewed by many as China's answer to ChatGPT – reignited interest in alternative, homegrown productivity-enhancing technologies. These companies may not yet rival US giants, but they're evolving fast, and often trade at a fraction of the price. Some are even partnering with or supporting global leaders like Nvidia, reinforcing their growing relevance. JCGI has recently increased exposure to names aligned with this theme, including Kingsoft, a leader in office software and cloud computing. Baillie Gifford China Growth (BGCG) is following a similar path, uncovering value in firms like Horizon Robotics, which develops AI chips for autonomous vehicles and smart cities, and industrial champions like CATL and BYD, leaders in the EVs and battery tech. For long-term investors, China's innovation drive could offer a multi-year growth runway. And with valuations near historic lows, it's fertile ground for active investors to uncover pricing anomalies and compelling entry points. The trusts highlighted in this piece are all trading on discounts wider than their five-year averages, except for JMG, which is slightly narrower than its historical average but still wider than the Global Emerging Markets sector overall. For investors, that could represent a double discount opportunity: accessing undervalued Chinese companies via investment trusts that are themselves trading at wider discounts relative to their long-term norms. The playbook has changed China's potential comes with caveats. Sentiment is fragile, and risks – from regulatory shifts to US trade restrictions – loom large. Confidence, especially among global investors, won't return overnight. But that's precisely why I think valuations look attractive. Many high-quality businesses with strong fundamentals are trading at multi-year lows. Some deserve their discounts, but others have been swept up in broad-based pessimism and macro-driven sell-offs. China continues to divide opinion. Some see structural decline; others, temporary growing pains. The reality is likely somewhere in between. What is clear is that yesterday's playbook no longer fits, but for selective, long-term investors willing to look past the short-term noise, the long-term case is quietly rebuilding. I'm not advocating a full-scale pivot. But with the world's second-largest economy priced for pessimism, having no exposure at all could prove just as risky, especially if sentiment quickly turns. Sometimes, the most compelling opportunities are the ones that feel the most uncomfortable.
Reuters
20 minutes ago
- Reuters
EU holds back on signing climate action pledge with China, FT says
July 7 (Reuters) - The European Union is holding back on signing a joint climate action pledge with China at a summit this month to mark a half-century of diplomatic ties, a top climate official told the Financial Times in remarks published on Monday. The EU's climate targets are among the world's most ambitious, but they have been based entirely on domestic emissions cuts. Now the bloc faces a mid-September deadline to submit a new 2035 climate target to the United Nations. Brussels has refused Beijing's repeated requests for a mutual climate commitment after the summit of the world's second- and third-largest economies, unless China promises to do more to cut greenhouse gas emissions, EU officials said. "There is only merit in having a declaration from our perspective if there are also content nuts to be cracked and ambition to be displayed," Climate Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra told the paper. China has always been actively promoting green and low-carbon development, a foreign ministry spokesperson said in response to the comments. "We will continue to work with other countries to strengthen international cooperation on climate change, and contribute to the green transformation and sustainable development of humankind," the spokesperson, Mao Ning, told a regular briefing. China, which has been struggling to strike a balance between fostering economic growth and reaching environmental goals, is expected to miss a five-year goal for an 18% cut in carbon intensity by the end of this year. Reuters could not immediately verify the report, and the European Commission did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
How China tightened its grip over its rare earth sector
July 7 (Reuters) - When China restricted rare earth exports to Japan in 2010 during a diplomatic spat, a wild west domestic industry undermined Beijing with rampant smuggling. In a sharp shift that reflects how China has massively tightened control over the sector since then, when it imposed new restrictions in April this year, automakers worldwide faced shortages within two months leading some to pause production. Through consolidation and quotas, Beijing has turned a once-unruly sector, responsible for 90% of rare earth processing capacity, into a powerful source of diplomatic leverage. Here is a summary of how the world's number one rare earth producer has tightened its grip over the industry. When China began its crackdown on the sector some fifteen years ago, there were hundreds of miners and processors. By 2013 ten producers controlled almost all mining. Today, there are just two state-owned giants: China Rare Earth Group and China Northern Rare Earth Group High-Tech ( opens new tab. The decade-plus process of consolidation gave Beijing greater oversight while also curbing some of the environmental damage caused by illegal and reckless mining, according to David Abraham, affiliate professor at Boise State University, in Idaho. In the past an illegal supply chain of rogue miners delivered ore to unauthorised separation facilities, with the finished products then disguised and shipped abroad. Roughly 40,000 metric tons of rare earth oxides were estimated to have been smuggled overseas in 2014, half as much again as official exports. Magnet makers, however, have not consolidated in the same way as the upstream mining and refining sector, with dozens of producers and processors across China, including JL Mag Rare-Earth ( opens new tab and Ningbo Yunsheng ( opens new tab. However, China introduced a tracking system for its rare earth magnet sector from June, requiring companies to submit information including customer details and transaction volumes. It ultimately aims to track the entire supply chain. In conjunction with consolidation, China has also used its production quota system, introduced in 2006, to control supply. The quotas cover mining, smelting and separation. Typically issued twice a year, they are widely monitored as a barometer for global supply. Beijing has gradually narrowed access to quotas and in 2024, only the two state-owned groups were eligible, compared to six previously. China has dramatically slowed down supply growth from 2024 when the total mining output quota grew only 5.9% year-on-year, versus an annual rise of 21.4% in 2023. Analysts and traders expect mining output quotas this year to either stay flat or rise by up to 5% from 2024's level. Beijing also restricts exports of technology. The tools and means to extract and separate rare earths have long been banned. In late 2023 it extended that ban to the technology used to make rare earth magnets.
