
Is China uninvestable or misunderstood? The INVESTING ANALYST
In this column, Josef Licsauer, Investment trust research analyst at Kepler Partners, explains why China could offer an opportunity for investors.
There was a time when China felt unstoppable.
After joining the World Trade Organization in 2001, it quickly became the world's factory floor, driving globalisation, ramping up exports, and fuelling a commodities supercycle with massive investment in infrastructure and real estate.
Between 2000 and 2010, its GDP grew by an average of 10.6 per cent, enriching emerging markets and powering global growth.
But that once-compelling growth story has since lost its shine.
In the decade that followed, momentum cooled as China tried to rebalance its economy away from exports and infrastructure toward domestic consumption.
Rising debt, industrial overcapacity and an ageing population began to weigh on the long-term outlook, even as headline GDP remained relatively strong.
A brief rally in 2021 offered some hope, but it was short-lived. Strict lockdowns, a spiralling property crisis, tech crackdowns, and rising tensions with the West reasserted themselves, knocking investor confidence and sending sentiment into retreat.
Since then, Chinese equity valuations have slumped to near historic lows and the country's index weighting has fallen from a peak of around 40 per cent to the low 20s.
But amid the disruption, opportunity is stirring. Valuations remain deeply discounted, stimulus is gaining traction, and internal growth drivers – from tech innovation and AI to rising healthcare demand and a push for self-sufficiency – are beginning to reassert themselves.
For investors willing to look again, investment trusts may offer one of the most effective routes back into China.
Return of the King (Consumer)
Just as The Return of the King brought Tolkien's epic Lord of the Rings trilogy to a triumphant close, and found a surprisingly devoted fanbase in China during its 2021 re-release, the consumer may now be stepping back into the spotlight in China's economic narrative.
While confidence remains fragile, early signs of recovery are visible in rising footfall, discretionary spending, and experience-led consumption.
A key driver? The $10trillion surge in household savings since 2020, a staggering sum exceeding the GDP of Japan or Germany.
As confidence continues to improve, that pool of capital could fuel a powerful cycle of consumption, hiring and reinvestment.
We're already seeing early evidence. Guming, a fast-growing teahouse chain, has seen its share price surge over 160 per cent since listing earlier this year on the back of consumers returning to the city and spending again.
Similarly, Haidilao, the hotpot giant, is benefitting from renewed appetite for social dining post-Covid, Luckin Coffee continues to dominate value-focused caffeine and for affluent consumers, and premium names like Kweichow Moutai remain in high-demand.
JPMorgan China Growth & Income (JCGI) has tapped into these trends with a portfolio tilted toward domestic-facing names.
The managers added Guming at IPO and have recently increased positions in other domestic-facing names they believe will benefit from experience-led recovery.
The opportunity, they argue, lies not in exports, but in China's internal engine.
Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust (BGCG) shares this domestic tilt and a focus that has supported its outperformance of the MSCI China All-Share Index over the past year. Managers Sophie Earnshaw and Linda Lin are targeting areas supported by stimulus and policy, alongside firms driving innovation in manufacturing and high-end tech.
On the consumer front, core holdings like Luckin Coffee and Kweichow Moutai reflect their belief these businesses are central to China's long-term transformation.
Policy support and stimulus
The Chinese government unveiled a wave of targeted support in September 2024, aimed at stabilising the property sector, boosting consumption and accelerating high-priority industries like AI, semiconductors and green tech.
The stimulus package was worth up to 7.5trillion yuan (around $1.07trillion), potentially the largest in the country's history in nominal terms, according to Deutsche Bank.
The measures, designed to shore up confidence in key areas of the economy, included mortgage relief, stock market support, local government bond issuance, and capital injections into state-owned banks.
The message is clear: policymakers are committed to restoring confidence and lifting domestic growth.
Fidelity Asian Values (FAS) is one trust with exposure here. Managers Nitin Bajaj and Ajinkya Dhavale have reduced exposure to India, where they now see stretched valuations and reallocated capital into undervalued Chinese companies tied to domestic demand.
Despite ongoing geopolitical and macro risks, they see 'caged upside': long-term growth potential yet to be realised in undervalued, well-capitalised, well-run businesses with limited exposure to global trade volatility.
One example is Full Truck Alliance, China's leading digital freight broker, which plays a pivotal role in modernising the country's logistics network.
FAS remains overweight China and the managers believe that the brief sentiment rally of late 2024, triggered by stimulus, could repeat.
With substantial capital still on the sidelines, a sustained improvement in earnings could spark a meaningful rebound.
For those after a more balanced approach, JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets (JMG) maintains a neutral China weighting but within that holds select domestic-facing stocks that could benefit from stimulus tailwinds.
It's another way to stay exposed to China's upside potential while remaining diversified across the broader EM landscape.
Innovation and independence
China's drive for technological self-sufficiency is another area drawing investor interest. With geopolitical tensions rising, the country is accelerating efforts in AI, software, advanced manufacturing and supply chain independence, all backed by targeted policy support.
It's a long game, but one that could help reduce reliance on foreign tech and reshape the country's economic future.
The launch of DeepSeek's AI model – viewed by many as China's answer to ChatGPT – reignited interest in alternative, homegrown productivity-enhancing technologies.
These companies may not yet rival US giants, but they're evolving fast, and often trade at a fraction of the price. Some are even partnering with or supporting global leaders like Nvidia, reinforcing their growing relevance.
JCGI has recently increased exposure to names aligned with this theme, including Kingsoft, a leader in office software and cloud computing. Baillie Gifford China Growth (BGCG) is following a similar path, uncovering value in firms like Horizon Robotics, which develops AI chips for autonomous vehicles and smart cities, and industrial champions like CATL and BYD, leaders in the EVs and battery tech.
For long-term investors, China's innovation drive could offer a multi-year growth runway. And with valuations near historic lows, it's fertile ground for active investors to uncover pricing anomalies and compelling entry points.
The trusts highlighted in this piece are all trading on discounts wider than their five-year averages, except for JMG, which is slightly narrower than its historical average but still wider than the Global Emerging Markets sector overall.
For investors, that could represent a double discount opportunity: accessing undervalued Chinese companies via investment trusts that are themselves trading at wider discounts relative to their long-term norms.
The playbook has changed
China's potential comes with caveats. Sentiment is fragile, and risks – from regulatory shifts to US trade restrictions – loom large. Confidence, especially among global investors, won't return overnight. But that's precisely why I think valuations look attractive.
Many high-quality businesses with strong fundamentals are trading at multi-year lows. Some deserve their discounts, but others have been swept up in broad-based pessimism and macro-driven sell-offs.
China continues to divide opinion. Some see structural decline; others, temporary growing pains. The reality is likely somewhere in between.
What is clear is that yesterday's playbook no longer fits, but for selective, long-term investors willing to look past the short-term noise, the long-term case is quietly rebuilding.
I'm not advocating a full-scale pivot. But with the world's second-largest economy priced for pessimism, having no exposure at all could prove just as risky, especially if sentiment quickly turns. Sometimes, the most compelling opportunities are the ones that feel the most uncomfortable.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Western Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
China and US ‘should be in toughest tier' of foreign influence scheme
The UK must also engage with Beijing economically 'even if this prompts retaliation' from the White House, the paper published by the Chatham House foreign affairs think tank concludes. Sir Keir Starmer's Government has sought to balance a revival of Chinese relations in its pursuit of growth with matters of national security amid concerns about Chinese interference in Britain. However, Beijing has been spared from the most stringent requirements of the UK's new Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (Firs), which would see anyone working for the state to declare influence activities in Britain. Under existing rules, China is in the lower tier of the scheme which requires the declaration of 'political' activity alone, while Iran and Russia have been placed in the higher 'enhanced' tier covering a wider range of activities. In its report, Chatham House called for both the US and Beijing to be placed in the enhanced tier 'as part of a wider move to build UK resilience to great power influence'. Report author William Matthews said: 'Including both China and the US on the enhanced tier of Firs need not entail casting them as threats, and should be considered in terms of a policy of adapting the UK to a world of great power competition. 'Inclusion of the US could offset the risk of antagonising China, though China would still likely respond angrily, and would almost certainly provoke an angry response from the US. 'However, in the long-term it would be better for this to happen now if the UK seeks to maintain an autonomous foreign policy in its own interests, rather than at a future point when… risks are amplified due to intensifying US-China competition, which would make it harder to diverge from Washington where interests do not align.' Foreign Secretary David Lammy welcomes China's foreign affairs minister Wang Yi ahead of a meeting at the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (James Manning/PA) Among the risks posed by great power rivalry are the likelihood that America will show more 'transactional' behaviour as its 'relative power' declines, and the potential for the UK to be 'targeted coercively' by Beijing if it is seen to act as a proxy for US interests, he said. Chinese dominance of supply chains for critical raw minerals, electric vehicles and green power means the UK cannot avoid economic engagement with the country, the report warns. In its recommendations, it urges against the UK taking sides in the rivalry between the US and China and calls on the Government to be prepared to diverge significantly from Washington in its approach to Beijing. 'The UK cannot afford to lock in dependence on the US at the expense of supply chains and technologies essential for economic prosperity,' it says. However, alongside maintaining economic ties it urges the Government to introduce key protections to guard against 'the risks of Chinese political interference'. Among its recommendations is a call to carry out safety checks on Chinese digital components entering UK markets, to be modelled on the previous Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre – nicknamed the Cell. Where the risks can be mitigated, Chinese technology investments should be considered – outside of projects involving Government procurement and critical national infrastructure, it says. The Government should also formally make permission for entities linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CPC) to operate in Britain conditional on their adherence to UK democratic norms and civil liberties, the report recommends. A 'coordination centre' bringing together policy-makers, business chiefs, academic experts and civil society should be established and meet regularly to share approaches to China-related issues, it says. A spokesperson for the Foreign Office said: 'This Government is taking a consistent, long-term and strategic approach to managing the UK's relations with China, rooted in UK and global interests. We will cooperate where we can, compete where we need to and challenge where we must. 'This includes supporting UK business to engage with the second largest economy in the world – one of our largest trading partners – while being open-eyed to any risks and ensuring security and resilience.'


Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE China's largest car exporter Chery is coming to the UK this summer - and its first SUV will be unveiled this week
China's largest car export is coming to the UK as its own brand, This is Money can exclusively reveal. This summer Chery International will enter the British car market under its own name as it continues its rampant expansion, after already launching its Omoda/Jaecoo sub-brands in the last year. Chery's first step of its ambitious plans includes launching two SUVs, which the Chinese car maker promise will be optimised for the local market in specification and pricing. Both will be on sale in the coming months through a UK-wide dealer network, and the first model will be unveiled at the Goodwood Festival of Speed later this week on the first glance stand. Chery UK Country Director, Farrell Hsu, says that Chery is 'recognised globally' for 'quality at a cost-effective' price so while we don't know the cost of the two SUVs yet, they will likely cost around the same as the Jaecoo and Omoda SUVs already on offer. In China, Chery has sold its Tiggo crossover SUV series since 2005. It launched with the Tiggo 3, and currently offers iterations of the 2, 4, 7, 8 and 9 to customers, covering everything from sub compact SUVs to seven-seater flagship SUVs. The Wuhu brand's global SUVs have three million drivers across 80 countries. It says it 'makes advanced features accessible to everyday families and urban explorers alike'. Speaking about Chery's stepping out under its own name, UK chief executive Gary Lan, who leads both Omodo and Jaecoo - and now Chery UK - said: 'Chery's introduction to the UK market this summer not only shows Chery's commitment to growth, but also reflects our confidence in the UK automotive sector, and the appeal of our vehicles to local buyers. 'Expect the same innovation, style, technology focus, and exceptional value.' Since Chery launched its Omoda and Jaecoo brands in August 2024 and January 2025, the sister companies have already gone on to have a combined market share of 2 per cent in just under a year. Both brands have quickly become known for offering cheap SUV alternatives to much more expensive European names including Audi, BMW, Mercedes and Volvo, while still delivering an impressive amount of tech, safety features, comfort and mpg for the low prices. In particular, both have caused a stir with their plug-in hybrid SUVs that have ranges of over 700 miles, thanks to their 'Super Hybrid System' which combine a 1.5-litre petrol engine with an EV battery. This is Money reviewed Jaecoo 7 SHS with its 745-mile combined range and 56-mile EV range back in March, and the flagship Omoda 9 SHS with its 700-mile combined range and class-leading 93-mile EV range last month. Both times we concluded that it would be silly for UK drivers to turn their noses up at these cheap offerings when motoring has never been more expensive and you'd struggle to find a European manufacturer offering you the same 'premium without the price premium'. Country Director Hsu said: 'We've been working behind the scenes, learning from our experience with other Chery International-derived brands in the UK, and have taken this time to refine and refresh our approach to this important market. 'We look forward to sharing more details on Chery's UK introduction soon.' Chery Automotive - a brief overview Chery is a rare one among the Chinese brands sweeping up on British shores because it started life as an automotive maker and not a tech company - or in the case of Geely a refrigerator producer. It was founded in 1996 by a group of government officials who realised that establishing an automotive company would reduced poverty in Anhui and drive wider economic development. The first Chery car launched in 1999 and mass production came a year later. It became the first passenger car company in China to export complete vehicles and as of 2024 it sold more cars last year than BMW: Chery shifted a whopping 2.6million units in 2024 - a 38.4 per cent increase on 2023. In recent years Chery's become synonymous with making intelligent, stylish and capable SUVs for drivers around the world.


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Britain should place China & US in toughest tier of its new foreign influence scheme, report finds
BRITAIN should place both China and the US in the toughest tier of its new foreign influence scheme, according to a new report. The UK must also engage with Beijing economically 'even if this prompts retaliation' from the White House, the Chatham House think tank said. Sir Keir Starmer's Government has been accused of cosying up to China despite concerns about its hostility to Britain. Beijing has been spared from the most stringent requirements of the UK's new Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (Firs), which would see anyone working for the state to declare influence activities in Britain. Under existing rules, China is in the lower tier of the scheme which requires the declaration of 'political' activity alone. Iran and Russia have been placed in the higher 'enhanced' tier covering a wider range of activities. Yet the decision to not put the strongest restraints on Chinese influence will be slammed by hawks including senior Tories. Former security minister Tom Tugendhat said last year: 'The advice from MI5 was very very clear. If China isn't in the enhanced tier it's not worth having.' The foreign influence register was first proposed by the Tories. But it was only adopted by Labour following the scandal over a suspected Chinese spy's links to Prince Andrew. At the time Mr Jarvis insisted: 'the Government would not hesitate to use 'every tool at our disposal' to keep Britain safe - and blamed the Tories for leaving the register plans in disarray. He said: 'Where there are individuals who pose a threat to our national security, we are committed to using the full range of powers available to disrupt them.'