logo
The Surprising Reason Your Groceries Are More Expensive

The Surprising Reason Your Groceries Are More Expensive

There's a connection between what you are seeing outside your window and what you are seeing in your grocery store, experts say.
Both extreme weather and food costs have been on the rise in recent years. The Consumer Price Index, or CPI, showed, inflation overall rose 2.7% in June from a year earlier, as tomatoes, eggs, and coffee have all seen significant increases. During the same period, the country has battled record heat, hurricanes, and dangerous flooding.
Research suggests it's more than just coincidence that the price increases and weather extremes are coming together. A report published Monday in the journal Environmental Research Letters shows how extreme weather events is correlated to specific food price spikes in the immediate aftermath.
Food yield being affected by weather is a tale as old as agriculture, but researchers in the study map how climate change has exacerbated extreme weather events, and is directly correlated to specific food price surges. In fact, researchers name food prices as the second-biggest way climate change is currently being felt across the globe, second to only extreme heat itself.
The results of these food price spikes can be devastating, especially for lower-income consumers who spend more of their income on food than the average consumer. Increasing grocery prices have been a major issue on consumers' minds, and were a significant factor in the 2024 election. Two-thirds of Americans say they are very concerned about these costs, according to an April Pew Research Center survey.
Though experts say there are other compounding factors related to the rising prices, the report notes that unexpected extreme climate conditions and their effects on crop yield cannot be understated.
'The unprecedented nature of many of the climate conditions behind recent food price spikes highlights the ongoing threats to food security as climate change continues to push societies towards ever less familiar climate conditions,' write the researchers, led by Maximilian Kotz, Postdoctoral Research Fellow at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. 'While the 2023/24 El Ninõ likely played a role in amplifying a number of these extremes, their increased intensity and frequency is in line with the expected and observed effects of climate change.'
Unprecedented weather affects crop yields
The study maps 16 specific extreme weather events since 2022 that have impacted food yields, immediately raising the prices of crops that were not able to be harvested.
In 2022, for example, droughts across California and Arizona contributed to a 80% year-on-year increase in U.S. vegetable prices by the end of the year, the study found—an impact compounded by the fact that California accounts for over 40% of the country's vegetable production.
Weather extremes outside the country have also affected prices: 2023 droughts in Mexico, it showed, contributed to a 20% price increase in vegetables the following January; droughts in Brazil have raised coffee prices 55% globally; and heatwaves in Japan contributed to a 48% raise in rice prices in the fall of 2024. These heatwaves and droughts were 'unprecedented' researchers say, and were felt deeply.
David Ortega, food economist and professor at Michigan State University, says it is important to note that climate change does not just impact weather via heat and drought, though.
'It's not just drought, it's floods, it's hurricanes. It can be even colder temperatures that disrupt crops or freeze and frost that are earlier or later than the normal that affect agricultural production,' Ortega, who is not connected to the study, tells TIME. He points to citrus production in Florida, which was heavily impacted by the major hurricanes that hit the state hard in 2024.
The study specifically cites the United Kingdom as an example, in which 'wet winters' contributed to an over 22% increase in potato prices.
'[Price increases are] being felt right away, because food is perishable. You can store some—a lot of the fruits and vegetables in Mexico tend to be frozen—but a lot of stuff is shipped fresh, and the stuff that is shipped fresh is going to be reflected in the price right away,' says Marc Bellemare, professor of economics at the University of Minnesota. 'Food markets are reasonably integrated.'
Andrew Hultgren, assistant professor of agricultural and consumer economics at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, says that these extreme weather events particularly impact farmers in 'small locations that grow a majority of the world's supply of some crop,' as the study also notes. He points specifically to the study's example of Ghana and the Ivory Coast, where 60 percent of the world's cocoa is produced. The study links 'unprecedented' temperatures in the region in February 2024 to an increase in global market prices of cocoa of around 300% by that April.
'Corn has grown all over the world, right? So if you have a bad corn season somewhere … it'll be smoothed by somewhere else that will probably be having a relatively good season,' Hultgren says. 'If most of your production is in one location, you don't get that spatial smoothing,' he continues, noting the intensity of particular price increases in these instances.
Exacerbating inequalities and inflation
The research also notes that food instability and extreme weather could stoke more political instability and inflation, with the world's poor bearing most of the economic pain and health impacts.
Bellemare emphasizes that these food price spikes will be felt most by low-income people, who spend a more significant portion of their income on food than the average American.
'The average U.S. household spends about 10% of its budget on food. It is much higher for low income households,' he says. 'I worry more about the distributional consequences than I worry about the geographic consequences.'
Hultgren stresses that shifting food prices change the value of the aid low-income Americans receive through programs like SNAP as well.
'That means that the value of food aid, if it's noted in monetary terms, is fluctuating for you as a family, and that does add unpredictability in the finances of a poor family and that variability can just make decisions on other expenditures more difficult,' he says.
Hultgren also points out that these inequalities will be felt differently in different countries. For those in Europe and America, the price increases will feel like inflation, he says, but they will be 'an even bigger problem in developing and poorer parts of the world.'
Experts note that climate change is just one of a confluence of factors that are all coalescing to affect both supply and demand of food products, and leading to rising food prices. Ortega specifically points to 2022, when he says there was 'the highest increase in food prices in a generation.' He says that the impact of the war in Ukraine must be noted—but the effect of climate change compounded supply chain disruptions and inflation problems.
The research paper also notes that food price increases are leading to increased headline inflation.
'Central bank mandates for price stability may become increasingly challenging to deliver if more frequent extreme weather events make food prices less stable domestically and in global markets,' the paper observes. 'These challenges may be magnified if persistent temperature increases cause a sustained upward pressure on inflation or inflation volatility results in lower credibility and a de-anchoring of inflation expectation.'
Looking at the future
Ortega conducts research on how 'shocks,' like the COVID-19 pandemic or Russia's invasion of Ukraine, affect the agri-food business and impact consumers. Many of these shocks are temporary, Ortega says, though their effects may be intensely felt. The impacts of climate change, however, have only just begun.
'Work like this that shows the impact of climate change on food prices really brings to the surface what I see as one of the significant threats that our food system faces going into the future,' Ortega. 'Climate events and adverse weather that are driven by climate change are increasing in frequency, and that's only going to continue going into the future.'
The researchers note in the study that their work is a 'a reminder of the urgency to enact policies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and limit global warming in line with globally agreed targets.' Further, though, they state that mitigations like early warning systems and "timely information on climate conditions' can help farmers limit their exposure and impact to certain extreme events.
'We're not unresponsive in the face of climate change,' Bellemare says. 'There's a lot of adaptation going on. There's insurance products that are being rolled out to those farmers. Everyone's adapting either in terms of production or in terms of financial instruments to kind of insure themselves or hedge against those things.'
Some of this adaptation can also be done in farmers' decision-making, Hultgren says, noting farmers can choose to plant more if they know prices are rising, can 'think about what the price history has been for the crops that they can plant,' and can consider the forecast for the coming season. But to make those decisions, he says, information must be available and research conducted.
'If we cut information out of the picture, if we don't provide information about how weather distributions are shifting, how we think they're going to shift in the future, what they think the seasonal forecast for farmers [is] ... that potentially has negative consequences for the ability to for agents to just adapt,' Hultgren says.
Ortega notes that weather can be extremely hard to predict, especially fast-moving weather events like floods or hurricanes. And on that front, Ortega says that the government does not seem to be moving in the direction of progress.
'That's one area that I'm highly concerned about, given a lot of the funding cuts at the federal level in the United States, at the moment,' he says. 'We need to be investing to ensure that we have the best science and technology in order to develop those drought resistant varieties, solvent varieties of crops, and ensure that our producers and producers around the world have the best tools needed in order to mitigate the impacts of climate change on their operations.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Summer break is costing parents more than just time—here's how debt is becoming the new normal for child care
Summer break is costing parents more than just time—here's how debt is becoming the new normal for child care

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Summer break is costing parents more than just time—here's how debt is becoming the new normal for child care

With five kids, paying for summer camp is one of the biggest items in our annual budget. I'm constantly shifting schedules, looking for more affordable ways to cover my kids' time out of school. And beyond the logistics of getting our family to multiple locations each day, the strain of paying for camp has been equally real over the years. In a world not built for modern parenthood (seriously—why do we still accept a 9-month school year designed for an agrarian society?), summer can feel like the peak of institutional abandonment. Between bosses who pretend the season doesn't exist and a government that acts like every parent has backup child care on call, it's hard not to ask: Why does no one seem to care that summer is such a massive source of strain for families? Turns out, the numbers back up the burnout. Families are spending big and still falling short A new LendingTree survey of more than 600 parents found that 62% of those who used summer child care or camps have gone into debt to cover the cost. On average, they're spending nearly $900 per child. Two-thirds of parents—66%—said paying for summer care is a financial struggle. Nearly half cut back on nonessentials, while 19% reported reducing spending on basic needs like food and utilities. And that pain sticks around: A quarter of parents took up to a year to pay off the debt, while some are still carrying last summer's balance even as the next one rolls in. 'Many parents don't have any other option but to pay for child care,' said Matt Schulz, chief consumer finance analyst at LendingTree. 'As much as they'd love to take a bunch of time off during the summer to spend with their kids, that just isn't a realistic thing for most Americans, so they're forced to shell out for child care. That extra cost often requires sacrifice.' Related: Child care costs over 50% of income in some states—and moms are done staying quiet Parents know the value but can't afford more Even amid the financial stress, most parents still believe summer care is important. A full 91% of parents surveyed said summer programs are worth the investment for their children's development and well-being. Still, 86% wish they could afford to enroll their kids in more camps or activities, and 36% say affordable options simply don't exist where they live. While nearly half of respondents receive some form of tuition assistance, the patchwork system doesn't meet the scale of the need—especially when families are already stretched thin the rest of the year. The emotional load is constant The money is one thing. The planning, coordination, and constant hustle? That's another beast entirely. Each summer brings a logistical obstacle course of drop-offs, pickups, sibling schedules, and desperate group chats about carpooling. For many moms, that mental labor is relentless. And it doesn't pause when the budget is tight or your inbox is overflowing. Support systems that could ease the burden—affordable child care, flexible work schedules, equitable co-parenting—are still the exception, not the rule. Which means summer ends up landing hardest on the very people already maxed out. The reality for single parents is even more pressing The math becomes even more unforgiving in single-parent households. According to WalletHub, single parents in New York are spending up to 45% of their median income on childcare. In New Mexico, it's as high as 36%, compounded by some of the lowest household incomes in the country. And that's just for care during the academic year—summer often adds extra weeks of uncovered time and an additional layer of debt. It's time to rethink the system We are long overdue for a national reckoning on what child care actually is: not a private family issue, but a public infrastructure need. Without summer care, many parents—especially mothers—can't work. Yet every year, we treat the cost and logistics of camp like an individual puzzle that families should just 'figure out.' Parents need a system that fully supports child care as a core part of family life—especially in the summer months. That includes public investment in summer programming, employer flexibility, and school calendars and community options designed for the actual lives we live—not the ones we were expected to live in 1955. Because surviving every summer shouldn't be a parenting badge of honor. It should be a policy failure we're finally ready to fix. Related: A push to pay parents to stay home is gaining traction—but moms say what they really need is child care they can afford Sources: 62% of parents using summer child care go into debt. June 2024. LendingTree. 62% of parents using summer child care go into debt. Best and worst states for working moms. May 2024. WalletHub. Best and worst states for working moms. Solve the daily Crossword

Social Security recipients set to face an $18,000 benefit cut in just seven years
Social Security recipients set to face an $18,000 benefit cut in just seven years

Axios

time18 minutes ago

  • Axios

Social Security recipients set to face an $18,000 benefit cut in just seven years

Retirees are facing the prospect of substantial Social Security cuts in just seven years, sooner than projected, due to the "big, beautiful bill," per an analysis out Thursday from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Why it matters: If policymakers don't stop this from happening, it would at least double the poverty rate of America's seniors, per several estimates. By the numbers: The new analysis projects a 24% cut to benefits by late 2032. That's equal to an $18,000 annual benefit cut for a dual-earning couple who both retire in 2033. They also might experience reduced healthcare access, per the analysis, due to an 11% cut in Medicare hospital payments. The percentages would grow over time, as the population ages and fewer young Americans are paying into the system. How it works: The trust fund is effectively the money the federal government takes in from Social Security taxes. For decades, the system took in more in taxes than it paid out, the Treasury department then invested the surplus. In 2021, it started tapping reserves to keep paying benefits. Once the reserves are depleted, benefits would be "pay-as-you-go," paying out money as taxes come in. That the trust fund would be depleted in the 2030s has long been known. Zoom in: The tax cuts in the big bill and the increase in the deduction for seniors, specifically, would reduce Social Security's incoming tax revenue — and speed up depletion by about a year, per the CRFB. The big picture: Social Security is arguably the most popular government benefit — most Americans either receive benefits or know someone who does — the vast majority of Americans believe in its importance, according to recent polling. The bottom line: Most policy wonks and Social Security advocates believe that it's highly unlikely that Congress would sit back and watch benefits get cut like this.

Social Security: Young Americans May Lose $110,000 to Keep Program Afloat
Social Security: Young Americans May Lose $110,000 to Keep Program Afloat

Newsweek

time19 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Social Security: Young Americans May Lose $110,000 to Keep Program Afloat

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Social Security, a foundational program for U.S. retirees and disabled Americans, has come under renewed scrutiny as funding shortfalls loom. A new report by the Cato Institute warned that today's young workers might lose up to $110,000 in lifetime earnings to keep the program afloat. Why It Matters With the Social Security Trust Fund projected to reach insolvency in the next decade, younger workers now face the possibility of significant financial sacrifices to maintain the system for current and future beneficiaries. More than 60 million Americans receive benefits every month. And according to Justice in Aging, Social Security lifts more than 22 million people out of poverty, including over 16 million older adults and almost 1 million children. he Social Security Administration office in Brownsville. he Social Security Administration office in Brownsville. Robert Daemmrich Photography Inc/Corbis via Getty Images What To Know Social Security faces a potential crisis as its trust fund is predicted to be depleted by the mid-2030s, according to recent projections. The primary driver is an aging population, particularly as Baby Boomers retire and a shrinking base of younger workers are paying into the program. As a result, the Social Security Administration would only be able to pay about 80 percent of scheduled benefits unless funding solutions are enacted. The Cato Institute reported that keeping Social Security solvent in its current form would require today's young workers—those just entering the labor market—to contribute significantly more over the course of their careers. If changes are not made, these workers could see a reduction equivalent to $110,000 of their lifetime earnings due to higher taxes and/or reduced benefits, according to the Cato Institute. That figure is based on the latest report from the Social Security Trustees, which said Congress would need to hike the payroll tax rate immediately and permanently by 3.65 percentage points, from 12.4 to 16.05 percent, to close the program's $25 trillion funding gap and continue to send out scheduled payments. "That means less discretionary income in each paycheck, which could have ripple effects on their day-to-day finances and long-term savings," Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9 innings podcast, told Newsweek. "A tax increase would be a hit to growth as less discretionary spending means less in corporate earnings." According to the Cato Institute, this cut would be equivalent to giving up 20 months of pay at the worker's average monthly wage. "There are endless variables affecting Social Security, but in the end, the math does not lie," Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek. "To keep the program going, there will be adjustments in the current payroll taxes, income caps, and full retirement age. We could see a return of the Retirement Earnings Test and may even see means testing for the highest income retirees." This could cause outrage across the general public, which has generally favored targeting higher earners rather than taking away from future retirees' payments. A University of Maryland Program for Public Consultation survey showed that 53 percent of American adults considered it acceptable to reduce Social Security benefits exclusively for the Top 40 percent of income earners. This targeted reduction would address approximately 23 percent of the program's projected funding shortfall. There was also bipartisan support for raising the retirement age, which could close an additional 15 percent of the funding gap. What People Are Saying Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek: "Younger workers, especially the youngest of the Millennials and all of Gen Z and beyond, should expect Social Security to look different for them than it does now. Adjustments to Social Security are rarely popular, but in the past Congress has been willing to act in the face of dire circumstances, such as in 1983 when the Full Retirement Age was extended." Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9 innings podcast, told Newsweek: "While such an increase would extend the solvency of Social Security by about 75 years, it's not a complete solution. The real fix would likely require both raising the payroll tax and removing the income cap. But let's be honest—that kind of proposal is a tough sell politically. Running on a platform to raise taxes rarely gains traction, even when it's tied to securing the future of Social Security." Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "There's been an assumption made by Americans for decades now, and that is regardless of warnings and political posturing, Social Security will always be there to provide for retirees. The reality is there's a tremendous shortfall coming in the next decade, and if Congress doesn't act, beneficiaries will see their monthly payments dramatically reduced." What Happens Next With Social Security's financial future uncertain, Congress and the public are set to debate possible reforms, including benefit reductions for higher earners, payroll tax increases, and changes to the retirement age. The conversation will likely intensify as insolvency draws nearer in the next decade, with any enacted policy changes affecting both current retirees and younger generations entering the workforce. No official policy changes have yet been passed, but the heightened awareness and survey support for targeted reform suggest continued bipartisan attention to the problem in upcoming legislative sessions. "There are obviously different solutions to the shortfall that don't involve raising that percentage, but it does present a grim prediction for the American workforce if Congress doesn't act on a more efficient solution," Beene said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store