Nashik city police to soon get two new forensic vans
Senior officers from both city and rural police have confirmed that each police division will get one forensic van.
These vehicles will enable forensic experts from the directorate of forensic science laboratory to reach crime scenes and gather crucial evidence.
In Dec 2023, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) replaced the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), and Indian Evidence Act, respectively.
The introduction of these new criminal laws has significantly changed policing practices.
Previously, in serious cases such as murder, the police conducted the panchanama (crime scene documentation) with assistance from forensic experts. Now, under section 23 of the BSA, a four-minute videography of the crime scene panchanama must be recorded and uploaded to the Crime and Criminal Tracking Network and Systems (CCTNS) directly from the scene.
In case there is a network issue at the crime spot, the officer at the crime spot can make a note of the same and upload the video from the police station.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You
Dubai villas | search ads
Get Deals
Undo
Hence, the need for forensic vans is felt in the city as well as in the rural area. Currently, there is one forensic van with the city police and two with the rural police that are insufficient.
In view of this, the forensic vans are being provided by the govt, which will enable swift panchanama and related legal procedures. DCP (HQ) Chandrakant Khandvi said the city police commissionerate would receive new forensic vans soon, which will be of great utility considering the city's expanding expanse.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
22 minutes ago
- Hans India
Manhole death: 4 held after labourer succumbs to toxic fumes
Bengaluru: A 31-year-old labourer died hours after allegedly developing breathing difficulties while cleaning a manhole here, with police on Tuesday confirming the arrest of four people in connection with the incident. The deceased, identified as Puttaswamy, a resident of RMC Yard, was engaged in the cleaning work along with another daily wager, Antony, at around 7 pm on July 20 at Akshaya Nagar. The task was assigned by a man named Nagaraju. According to police, neither of the workers was provided safety gear. Upon entering the manhole, both allegedly inhaled toxic gases and began experiencing breathing issues. Though they managed to exit the manhole, no medical assistance was offered despite their complaints of distress, police said. Puttaswamy was found dead at his residence the next morning, police added. Following a complaint from the deceased's father, a case was registered under Section 106 (causing death by negligence) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, and relevant provisions of the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act. Four individuals, including Nagaraju, have been arrested. The post-mortem report is awaited to determine the exact cause of death.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Chanda Kochhar-Videocon Scam: Inside The Rs 3,250 Cr Loan And Rs 64 Cr Bribery
Last Updated: Appellate Tribunal has found Chanda Kochhar guilty of accepting a Rs 64 cr bribe for sanctioning a Rs 300 cr loan to Videocon; Here's what happened Chanda Kochhar-Videocon Case: The ICICI Bank–Videocon loan fraud case took a decisive turn in July 2025 after the PMLA Appellate Tribunal held Chanda Kochhar, former MD and CEO of ICICI Bank, guilty of accepting a Rs 64 crore bribe in exchange for approving a Rs 300 crore loan to the Videocon Group. The ruling upheld charges filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED), calling it a 'clear case of quid pro quo." The case traces back to allegations by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) that ICICI Bank, under Kochhar's leadership, sanctioned loans totalling Rs 3,250 crore to Videocon Group firms promoted by Venugopal Dhoot. These sanctions allegedly violated the Banking Regulation Act, RBI norms, and ICICI's own internal credit policies. Among the disbursals, a pivotal transaction took place in September 2009 when ICICI Bank sanctioned Rs 300 crore to Videocon International Electronics Ltd (VIEL), a group subsidiary. Just one day later, Rs 64 crore was transferred from Supreme Energy Pvt Ltd (a Videocon-linked firm) to NuPower Renewables Pvt Ltd, a company effectively controlled by Chanda Kochhar's husband, Deepak Kochhar. The case spotlighted deeper issues of conflict of interest and corporate governance lapses, as Chanda Kochhar failed to disclose her husband's links to Videocon during her participation in loan sanctioning decisions. Early Red Flags & Chanda Kochhar's Exit Red flags were raised as early as 2016 by whistleblowers and media reports, which pointed to potential conflicts of interest in the ICICI-Videocon dealings. Following mounting scrutiny, the CBI launched a preliminary probe in March 2018. Kochhar resigned from her post in October 2018, citing personal reasons, but her exit coincided with growing internal and regulatory investigations. These probes sought to determine if she had breached ICICI Bank's code of conduct by concealing personal financial links that could influence lending decisions. FIR, ED Probe, and Asset Attachments The case intensified in January 2019 when the CBI filed a formal FIR against Chanda Kochhar, Deepak Kochhar, and Venugopal Dhoot, alleging criminal conspiracy, cheating, and misuse of official position under the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act. The Enforcement Directorate followed suit with a money laundering probe and provisionally attached Rs 78 crore worth of assets belonging to the Kochhars. However, in November 2020, the PMLA Adjudicating Authority ordered the release of these assets, stating the ED had not established a direct link between the funds and criminal activity at that point. In December 2022, the CBI arrested Chanda Kochhar, Deepak Kochhar, and Venugopal Dhoot, claiming to have conclusive evidence linking them to the illicit transactions. A month later, the Bombay High Court granted interim bail to the Kochhars, slamming the arrests as 'arbitrary" and lacking procedural rigour. The court criticised the CBI for making routine arrests 'without application of mind." The case regained national attention in September 2024 when the Supreme Court issued notices to Chanda and Deepak Kochhar in response to a CBI plea. The CBI challenged the interim bail, arguing that the Kochhars' release could hinder ongoing investigations. The ED, too, reiterated its stance before the Appellate Tribunal, emphasising the structured nature of the fund transfers and Kochhar's conflict of interest. July 2025 Tribunal Verdict: Bribery and Ethics Violation Confirmed On July 3, 2025, the PMLA Appellate Tribunal overturned the 2020 ruling and ruled in favour of the ED. The tribunal concluded that Chanda Kochhar was guilty of accepting a Rs 64 crore bribe in return for approving the Rs 300 crore loan to Videocon. It rejected claims that the payment to NuPower was a legitimate business transaction and called it a bribe, routed through Supreme Energy and NuPower, which was controlled by Deepak Kochhar. The tribunal emphasised that Chanda Kochhar, as a member of ICICI's credit committee, had a fiduciary duty to disclose any conflict of interest—something she failed to do. Citing evidence recorded under Section 50 of the PMLA Act, the tribunal also ruled that the earlier adjudicating authority had overlooked material facts and erred in releasing the attached assets. tags : chanda kochhar case view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: July 23, 2025, 08:30 IST News business » banking-finance Chanda Kochhar-Videocon Scam: Inside The Rs 3,250 Cr Loan And Rs 64 Cr Bribery Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Mumbai schoolteacher, accused of sexually abusing minor student, granted bail
A Mumbai court on Tuesday granted bail to a 40-year-old woman teacher from a reputed city school who had been arrested last month for allegedly sexually assaulting a 16-year-old male student on several Special Judge of Mumbai Sessions court, Sabina Altaf Malik, directed the teacher's release on the execution of a personal bond of Rs 50,000 with one or more solvent sureties of the same part of the bail conditions, the teacher has been ordered to submit proof of both permanent and temporary residence, along with identity proof and contact details of two known persons residing in Mumbai. The court has specifically restrained the teacher from meeting or contacting the student, or from threatening or inducing any witness or the complainant in any manner. She has also been directed to appear for trial on every date of hearing and has been barred from leaving Mumbai's jurisdiction without the court's teacher was booked under provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), and the Juvenile Justice her bail application, the teacher claimed the case was false and fabricated, alleging that it had been filed at the behest of the boy's mother, who was opposed to her son pursuing a relationship with presented handwritten notes and messages exchanged between her and the student, which her lawyer argued demonstrated the boy's deep affection for her. According to the defence, the boy used endearing nicknames, referred to the teacher as his wife in several communications, and even expressed a desire to get her name or nickname counsel contended that these exchanges showed there was no element of force, threat, or intimidation accused teacher, who is also a mother of two minor children, resigned from the school in April 2024, claiming she had made several attempts to distance herself from the boy's also argued that the FIR was registered when the student was a few months away from turning 18, implying that the complaint was timed to prevent him from continuing the relationship once he attained prosecution, however, opposed her bail plea.- Ends
