SIT to probe alleged corruption at Nagpur APMC, report in 1 month
The three-member SIT will be chaired by district collector Vipin Itankar, along with superintendent of police, Nagpur rural, who will serve as a member, and divisional deputy registrar of cooperative societies, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, will function as member secretary.
The SIT was directed to probe not just procedural irregularities, but also potential criminal misconduct, with powers to recommend filing of criminal cases if offences are confirmed.
The decision was taken during the recently concluded Maharashtra Legislature session, following a question raised by MLA Krishna Khopde. During the discussion, the minister for marketing assured strict action if corruption or irregularities involving APMC's board of directors were proven.
The SIT's mandate includes investigating whether APMC Nagpur followed the Maharashtra agricultural produce marketing (development and regulation) Act, 1963, and its associated rules in its operations.
Allegations of irregularities in shop allotments by the board members are central to the inquiry. Importantly, the SIT was asked to examine charges of criminal misconduct, forgery, conspiracy, and other offences, and initiate criminal proceedings against board members and officials wherever offences are established.
The SIT will also scrutinise two earlier reports: PL Khandagale committee report on revenue losses to the govt, and 2017 inquiry report by AD Patil regarding shop allotment irregularities.
The SIT was directed to fix responsibility based on these findings and investigate whether corruption occurred during both current and previous tenures of board members and officials.
A comprehensive examination of APMC Nagpur's overall functioning forms part of the inquiry. The govt has granted special powers to the SIT, which was authorised to requisition staff from the offices of the divisional deputy registrar of cooperative societies at Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar and Nagpur to assist the investigation.
The SIT was given a strict deadline of 30 days to submit its final report to the state govt.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
27 minutes ago
- Mint
IT Act simplification to cut down litigation in a big way, to aid future reforms: Baijayant Panda
New Delhi: Simplification of the Income Tax Act for which a select committee of the Lok Sabha made over 330 recommendations will cut down tax litigation significantly and aid future tax reforms, the panel's chairperson Baijayant Panda told Mint in an interview. The select committee was set up for the purpose of scrutinizing the bill. The first draft of the bill tabled in the House in the Budget session of the House this year had sought to reduce the volume of words by nearly half while the Select Committee wanted to make sure the simplification exercise does not lead to wordings that are open to different interpretations, Panda said. The number of words has been lowered from over 500,000 to about 260,000. Override access code proposal accepted The chairperson said that the committee accepted the proposal in the draft bill regarding tax officials' powers to override access code in computers in the case of non-cooperating assesses under certain circumstances, as this did not entail any change in the law as it exists today, including judicial pronouncements and internal circulars of the Income Tax Department. The provision allowing tax officials to access computers and digital systems, even overriding their access code, when request for information is not complied with, in certain cases of undisclosed income or foreign assets, had caused concern among professionals. 'New India deserves a simple, easy-to-comprehend, easy-to-comply Income Tax Act and this is the first big step of simplifying the Act as it exists. The draft which the government had introduced in Parliament had already seen a huge simplification in terms of reduced word count, better clarity in language and removal of obsolete language in favour of more modern and concise wordings and tables and formulas to clarify certain aspects rather than describing them in words," Panda said. Also read | Income Tax Act revamp: Govt to set up panel to make law simpler for taxpayers Panda explained that the bill was not meant to make substantive changes to the law and the committee's mandate was to vet it for simplification. 'Our mandate was to make the Act as it exists, clear, simple and easy to comply," he said, adding that the committee received a lot of suggestions which were beyond the scope of its mandate and were seeking policy changes. Those could be taken up in different forums such as the annual Finance Bill every year. 'But what we have achieved is within our mandate." Panda explained that a lot of liberal and pro-taxpayer policy changes were being introduced from time to time by the government but many such measures were getting caught up in the complications of the tax law. 'Now, when this bill becomes a law and replaces the old Act, it will reduce ambiguity and it will reduce litigation dramatically because complexity is reduced vastly." 'The existing Act had become so complex that sometimes even very senior professionals with decades of experience could not give you a clear answer about the taxability of certain items. In the new bill, it becomes far simpler to understand what is taxable, what is not taxable and what is taxable at what rate," Panda said. 'Our mandate was to ensure that simplifying of the Act is internally consistent to avoid inadvertent errors that can creep in while language is changed." Examined extensively He explained that confusion about the search and seizure powers of tax officials as provided for in the bill was on account of 'misinformation". The committee had examined it extensively, he said. 'Let me make it very clear, there is no change in the law," Panda said, adding that some people were comparing the wordings in the existing law and the wording in the draft bill and thought there is a difference. 'The Income Tax Act dates back to 1961. On the issue of privacy and on the issue of search and seizure, there have been several judgments of High Courts and the Supreme Court. There have also been internal circulars about checks and balances; search and seizure cannot be subjective, cannot be whimsical. When you take the existing Act and court judgments leading to circulars--that is the existing law and that has been faithfully reproduced in the new bill." The law was written when there were no computers and when they came, accounts became electronic documents, Panda explained, adding that the same principle of search and seizure was extended and courts have ruled on it and the department has issued internal circulars on it. Also read | Redo the Income Tax Act not just to simplify but rationalize taxation Tax officials' powers to access documents of non-cooperating assessees under certain circumstances are the same whether these are digital or otherwise. 'To sum it up, the wording in the new draft bill faithfully reproduces the Act as it has been modified by court judgments and internal circulars. One thing is very clear, there is no policy change," said Panda. The committee held interactions with a wide range of stakeholders including large as well as small and medium enterprises, industry associations—not just the big ones, but even regional ones—lawyers and chartered accountants representing big and small firms and individual practitioners as well as taxpayers' associations and nonprofit organizations. "I will emphasize this point that this is a huge step for simplification, clarity, ease of compliance, reduced litigation, and it will make possible many more ongoing reforms in the years to come," Panda said. Also read | Nirmala Sitharaman reviews Income Tax Act 1961
Indian Express
27 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Three held for circulating old Pak video in bid to incite tension during Kanwar Yatra: UP Police
THE MUZAFFARNAGAR police have arrested three men for allegedly circulating a video that originated in Pakistan in the wake of a crime there a year ago with the intent to incite communal disharmony during the ongoing Kanwar Yatra. In a statement issued on Monday, police identified the accused as Nadeem (25), Mansher (45) and Rahees (35) – all from Muzaffarnagar. 'They work as a vegetable vendor, junk dealer and utensil seller,' said a police officer. 'They were circulating a video showing dead women and children soaked in blood, along with an audio message alleging that members of a particular outfit were attacking families belonging to another community in Moradabad district. Investigations revealed that the video actually originated from Muzaffargarh, Pakistan, where a man had murdered his wife and seven children in April 2024,' read the statement. Personnel at the Kakaroli police station received information that some individuals from the village were circulating a video and audio in a Whatsapp group. 'The intention behind this was to incite people of a particular community and instigate communal tension in western Uttar Pradesh during the ongoing Kanwar Yatra,' said the officials. According to the police, taking cognizance of this, a team was immediately constituted by the Kakaroli Police Station. 'We immediately identified the accused and arrested the three. We have also recovered three mobile phones,' said the police. The police have registered at Kakaroli Police Station under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and sections 55 (instigating certain crime) 61(2) (criminal conspiracy) 103(2) (murder committed by a group), 113(3) (terrorism), 147 (rioting),152 (sedition) 196 (promoting enmity) 197(spreading false information) 299 (outraging religious feeling) 351(3)(criminal intimidation) 353(2)(rumour) of Bharatiya Nyaya Samhita and the IT Act.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Cash-at-home row: Justice Varma removal notices handed; LS may initiate
MPs submit notices for removal of Justice Varma to LS Speaker NEW DELHI: Notices for the removal of Justice Yashwant Varma of Allahabad HC were submitted in both Houses of Parliament on Monday in what could potentially result in the first instance of a judge being benched for alleged misconduct. While 145 LS members, cutting across party lines, signed the notice, 63 members belonging to different parties made an identical move in RS. Sources said that both the Houses are on the same legal footing in this regard and proceedings are likely to be launched in Lok Sabha. 'Removal of judge will not be completed in current session' According to the Judges (Inquiry) Act, when notices of a motion are submitted on the same day in both Houses, a committee to examine the charges levelled against the judge will be constituted by LS Speaker and RS Chairman. The notable signatories to the LS notice, submitted to Speaker Om Birla, included leader of the opposition Rahul Gandhi, BJP MPs Ravi Shankar Prasad and Anurag Thakur, NCP-SP's Supriya Sule, Congress's K C Venugopal and K Suresh, DMK's T R Baalu, RSP member N K Premachandran and IUML member E T Mohammed Basheer. The notice signed by 63 opposition RS members was submitted to Upper House chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar who, before his shock resignation as vice-president, said he had received a notice for the removal of Justice Varma. 'It has been signed by more than 50 members of the council of states. Thus, it meets the numerical requirement of signing by MPs for setting in motion the process of removal of an HC judge,' Dhankhar said. On law minister Arjun Ram Meghwal's confirmation that a notice has also been submitted in LS, Dhankhar asked the RS secretary general to 'take necessary steps in this direction'. Hours after the opposition move, BJP also collected signatures of its RS members and those from its allies to file a notice. BJP sources said the opposition-sponsored notice in RS prompted the party to act as it did not want to be left out of the exercise in the Upper House. Party sources said they had no idea about the opposition's unilateral move as they cited their own bipartisan exercise in LS seeking signatures from all parties. Govt sources, however, confirmed that the matter will be taken up in LS first. Sources also confirmed that since the petition is set to be referred to a committee, the removal of the judge will not be completed in the current session. According to the Act, no committee shall be constituted unless the motion has been admitted in both Houses. The committee comprising a senior SC judge, a sitting HC chief justice and a distinguished jurist will then probe the charges levelled against Justice Varma and will be asked to come out with a report in three months. As sources indicated that LS is set to witness the motion first, this is the second time that a motion for the removal of a judge is being brought in the House after 32 years. In 1993, Justice V Ramaswami, an SC judge, faced a removal motion in LS.
