Senate Republican : ‘I would retire, too, if I voted against' GOP megabill
'I would retire too if I voted against this bill because everyone in Indiana is counting on it. Tillis voted against it anyway, so that's a moot point,' Banks said during a Fox & Friends appearance.
Tillis was one of two Republicans to vote against advancing the bill on Saturday, and vowed to vote against final passage as well over concerns about the impact Medicaid cuts would have on North Carolina.
Tillis announced Sunday that he would not run again, opening up a closely contested seat that the Democrats have attempted to flip for years.
Tillis' opposition to the bill earned him the ire of the president, with Trump suggesting that he would back a primary challenge against the two-term lawmaker. And Banks pushed back on Tillis' concerns about the megabill's cuts to Medicaid in another Fox & Friends appearance Sunday.
In his Fox & Friends appearance on Monday, Banks maintained the GOP line that the bill would create significant tax cuts that would benefit working families.
'This bill is so good and so strong. It's a common sense vote,' Banks said.
After a long weekend of negotiations that included a Democratic move to force the chamber's clerks to read the entire 940 pages of the bill out loud, Senate Republicans are grinding towards a final vote. Senators are currently in a 'vote-a-rama,' where they can propose unlimited amendments to the legislation.
While Banks took aim at Tillis, other GOP senators reacted more warmly to the lawmaker's exit.
Sen. Mitch McConnell (Ky.), the former Republican leader, wrote Monday morning that Tillis was 'one of the most effective and collegial members that I have ever served with in the United States Senate.'
'His announcement is a big setback for the Senate and the Republican Conference,' McConnell wrote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
13 minutes ago
- USA Today
President Trump orders firing of Labor statistics chief after weak jobs report
Trump ordered the firing of Erika McEntarfer, the U.S. commissioner of Labor Statistics, accusing her without evidence of manipulating jobs figures. WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump said he's ordered the firing of Erika McEntarfer, the U.S. commissioner of Labor Statistics, accusing her without evidence of manipulating figures for "political purposes" after the Labor Department reported the U.S. added a disappointing 73,000 jobs in July. Trump on Aug. 1 announced the move in a post on his social media app Truth Social, writing that he was "just informed that our Country's 'Jobs Numbers' are being produced by a Biden Appointee, Dr. Erika McEntarfer." "We need accurate Jobs Numbers. I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY. She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified," Trump said. "Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes." More: July jobs report reveals employers added 73,000 jobs; unemployment rises The Senate in January 2024 confirmed McEntarfer, an appointment of former President Joe Biden. A labor economist, McEntarfer has worked 20 years in the federal government, including previous stints at the U.S. Census Bureau and Treasury Department. In addition to the July jobs report ‒ below the 105,000 new jobs that were estimated ‒ the Labor Department's job gains for May and June were revised down by 258,000, portraying a much weaker labor market than believed in late spring and early summer. More: In historic move, Trump escalates trade battles with sweeping new tariffs around the world "McEntarfer said there were only 73,000 Jobs added (a shock!) but, more importantly, that a major mistake was made by them, 258,000 Jobs downward, in the prior two months," Trump said. "Similar things happened in the first part of the year, always to the negative." Trump also accused McEntarfer of "faking the jobs numbers before the (2024) election" to help Democratic nominee Kamala Harris. Trump pointed to jobs reports in March, August and September of 2024 that were later revised lower. Contributing: Paul Davidson of USA TODAY Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.
USA Today
13 minutes ago
- USA Today
Smithsonian explains why a Trump reference was removed from impeachment exhibit
The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History in Washington, D.C., has removed references to President Donald Trump in a display about impeachments, despite Trump being the first and only president in American history to be impeached twice. But the museum says the move is temporary. The Washington Post first reported the change on Thursday, July 31. On Friday, Aug. 1, the Smithsonian clarified the museum's removal. Here's what we know. Smithsonian: Display restored to 2008 appearance The "impeachment" display is housed within the larger, permanent gallery called "The American Presidency," which opened in 2000, according to an emailed statement from the Smithsonian. It features information and artifacts about Andrew Johnson, Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon, according to the display's companion website. Nixon resigned before he could be formally impeached. In September 2021, a "temporary label on content concerning the impeachments of Donald J. Trump" was added, according to the Smithsonian's statement. "It was intended to be a short-term measure to address current events at the time, however, the label remained in place until July 2025." The display has since been returned to how it appeared nearly 20 years ago, according to the Smithsonian statement and the Washington Post's report, which also noted that the exhibit now says, "only three presidents have seriously faced removal," omitting Trump. 'In reviewing our legacy content recently, it became clear that the 'Limits of Presidential Power' section in 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden' exhibition needed to be addressed," the museum's statement said. "Because the other topics in this section had not been updated since 2008, the decision was made to restore the 'Impeachment' case back to its 2008 appearance." Website highlights other impeached presidents The companion website for the display does not include a dedicated section for the Trump impeachments but notes in an introductory sentence, "The House of Representatives impeached Andrew Johnson in 1868, William J. Clinton in 1998, and Donald Trump in 2019 and again in 2021. In all four cases the Senate voted to acquit." It includes sections about Johnson's impeachment, including tickets and newspaper clips from the time; Nixon's Senate hearing and resignation, including testimony papers and photos from the proceedings; and Clinton's trial, with tickets and Senate question cards. 'All impeachments' coming in the future "A future and updated exhibit will include all impeachments," the Smithsonian statement said, noting that updating and renewing permanent galleries"requires a significant amount of time and funding." The Smithsonian declined to answer further questions about the change and the timeline for an updated exhibit. The controversy around the Smithsonian's change to the display comes after the White House in May pushed for the removal of art director Kim Sajet from her role as director of the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery, citing her "strong support" of "DEI." In March, Trump also signed an executive order demanding the removal of "anti-American ideology" from the Smithsonian and other cultural institutions.
The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
Thune: Deal on nominees up to Democrats and White House
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said Friday afternoon that whether a deal is reached on 160 stalled nominees hinges on talks between the White House and Senate Democrats, and didn't sound confident that an agreement could be reached before the weekend. Thune said 'a number of people involved' from the White House are in discussions with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), who is under heavy pressure from the Democratic base to draw out the floor proceedings on Trump's nominees as long as possible. 'That will be up to the discussions between White House and Schumer and the Democrats,' Thune said when asked about the prospect of getting a deal on nominees to allow senators to begin the four-week August recess, which is scheduled to begin Saturday. Republican senators are growing increasingly pessimistic about reaching a deal to avoid working over the weekend. They spent Friday churning through lower-level nominees who would ordinarily get confirmed by unanimous consent or voice vote. The Senate voted earlier in the day to end debate on Brian Nesvik to serve as director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and to confirm Casey Mulligan to serve as chief counsel for advocacy for the Small Business Administration. Senate Republican Whip John Barrasso (Wyo.) blasted Democrats on the floor for 'unprecedented obstruction of the Senate nomination process.' 'President Trump is the only president in modern history not to have a single nominee confirmed by voice vote or unanimous consent. Not a single one. Even the most routine nominees are being filibustered,' he said. 'Positions that used to fly through by voice vote or unanimous consent are now treated and taken as political hostages. This isn't normal. This is petty partisan politics at its worst,' he said.
