logo
Ex-Dundee University principal says returning £150,000 ‘not in thought process'

Ex-Dundee University principal says returning £150,000 ‘not in thought process'

The former principal of the crisis-hit University of Dundee has told MSPs 'the buck stops with me' for its problems – but he refused to return the £150,000 payment he received after quitting last year.
Professor Iain Gillespie insisted it was 'not in my thought process' to hand back the cash.
He stepped down from his post at the university – which is looking to cut hundreds of posts as it tries to deal with a £35 million deficit – in December.
Holyrood's Education Committee is examining how the problems at the university arose, with convener Douglas Ross branding Prof Gillespie a 'coward' and accusing him of having 'created this mess and walked away into the sunset'.
His comments came after Prof Gillespie offered a 'heartfelt apology' to staff and students at Dundee – which is to receive an additional £40 million from the Scottish Government to help its financial situation.
Appearing before the committee on Thursday, he said: 'Let me start off with an apology to the staff and students.
'I think staff and students deserve better than they have had with the management and the governance of the University of Dundee over quite some time, but particularly over the period of 2024.
'It's a heartfelt apology for a university that I love, and a city that I hugely respect.
'I accept the buck stops with me. That is why at the end of last year I left.'
Prof Gillespie faced MSPs after being heavily criticised in a report last week into the university's financial difficulties by former Glasgow Caledonian University principal Professor Pamela Gillies.
Mr Ross said the report showed Prof Gillespie as having 'dangerous over self-confidence and complacency, often in combination or arrogance' and an 'overbearing leadership style'.
Prof Gillespie accepted the report was a 'forensic piece of work' that showed the 'challenges' Dundee was dealing with, but he added: 'As far as the way it has presented me and my management style, that is not something I recognise.'
But he later told the committee a complaint had been made against him in a previous job at the Natural Environment Research Council.
Prof Gillespie said one worker 'did make a complaint against me, that was about overbearing behaviour', adding this person had 'moved on to another job'.
He stepped down as principal at the University of Dundee in December, recalling how this happened after others at the institution told him they had 'no confidence' in his leadership.
Prof Gillespie said it is 'possible' he had then resigned by text – though he said he may instead have sent an email confirming his decision.
Mr Ross told him: 'The only thing I thought about you was you are a coward.
'You couldn't go back to the university and face the staff who were losing their jobs, face the students whose studies were so badly disrupted.
'You just created this mess and walked away into the sunset.'
As part of our scrutiny of the University of Dundee we're currently taking evidence from Professor Iain Gillespie the former Principal and Vice-Chancellor.
Watch live: https://t.co/xQScBY4buI pic.twitter.com/CrpJX8ABln
— Education, Children and Young People Committee (@SP_ECYP) June 26, 2025
Asked about the payoff he received, Prof Gillespie said it is a 'matter of public record' that his contract set out he should receive six months' basic salary on his resignation.
Mr Ross told him he had received 'over £150,000 to walk away from a university you almost destroyed'.
He asked the former principal: 'At any point have you considered paying that money back?'
Prof Gillespie said the university had a 'contractual obligation' to pay him the money, adding it was 'not in my thought process to repay a contractual obligation to me for my work at the university'.
While he said he took 'overall management responsibility for what happened at the University of Dundee', he told Mr Ross he would 'push back' against the claim that he 'almost destroyed it'.
Liberal Democrat MSP Willie Rennie also pushed for Prof Gillespie to give back the money.
He told the former principal: 'To hold on to that just seems astonishing with the pain other people are feeling.
'I just genuinely want you to think about that, because I think it would send an important message.
'It wouldn't repair the damage but it would send an important message.'
Joe Fitzpatrick, the SNP MSP for Dundee City West, told Prof Gillespie: 'You did apologise and you told us it was heartfelt, but I am still not sure it cuts it for the staff and students who will be watching.'
Prof Gillespie also hit back at claims from former Holyrood minister Wendy Alexander, who was vice-principal international at the university for almost a decade.
In a submission to the committee, Baroness Alexander had said she was 'frozen out' and then 'asked to leave' her post after raising concerns about university finances.
Prof Gillespie insisted he did 'not want to get into a slagging match about people's characters', he told MSPs: 'Wendy's performance in terms of delivering student numbers wasn't what we needed it to be.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Edinburgh Book Festival awarded £300k in taxpayer cash after Nicola Sturgeon ex-aide hired
Edinburgh Book Festival awarded £300k in taxpayer cash after Nicola Sturgeon ex-aide hired

Edinburgh Live

timean hour ago

  • Edinburgh Live

Edinburgh Book Festival awarded £300k in taxpayer cash after Nicola Sturgeon ex-aide hired

Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info The Edinburgh International Book Festival received £300,000 of taxpayer cash weeks after Nicola Sturgeon's ex-chief of staff was appointed as director. The former first minister, who is among the headliners for the event, will be promoting her new memoir - Frankly. Her former top adviser, Liz Lloyd, was hired as director of the festival in May, reports the Daily Record. A 'one-off' lifeline for the festival of £300,000 was announced by the Scottish Government in June. The event lost its chief sponsor Baillie Gifford last year, after campaigning from eco activists over fossil fuel ties. Lothian Tory MSP Sue Webber said: 'Taxpayers will be asking questions about how the SNP suddenly found this money a matter of weeks after Nicola Sturgeon's most senior former adviser was appointed a director of the festival. 'While the book festival is ­ultimately crucial for ­Scotland's culture and ­ Edinburgh's economy, many will be thinking this is not a mere coincidence. The SNP was only scrambling to find this funding because Baillie Gifford was hounded out from its long-held sponsorship by climate activists. Sign up for Edinburgh Live newsletters for more headlines straight to your inbox "SNP ministers should come clean on how this funding was awarded and if there was any lobbying from former colleagues who were once at the heart of the nationalist government." Lloyd worked for the Scottish Government for nearly a decade as ­Sturgeon's top aide, working closely with current FM Swinney who was then deputy FM. Lloyd was ­Sturgeon's chief of staff from 2014 until 2021 then a strategic adviser until the ex-FM quit in 2023, when Lloyd also left her post. The book festival said it would be 'spurious' and 'misleading' to suggest any link between Lloyd's appointment and the announcement of the cash, which it said had been planned for months. The event's ­government funding has more than doubled in the past year to a record £820,000. Announcing the £300,000 grant on Wednesday, SNP Business Minister Richard Lochhead said it would help schoolkids continue to access free literary events. Join Edinburgh Live's Whatsapp Community here and get the latest news sent straight to your messages. The book festival had previously warned its ability to deliver a successful event had been 'severely compromised' by the ending of its relationship with finance firm Baillie Gifford. The deal was cancelled after activists with the Fossil Free Books campaign targeted book festivals across Britain. The Scottish Government said: 'The Edinburgh International Book Festival is one the country's most significant cultural institutions. Its schools programme has been crucial in fostering literacy and cultural engagement among young people. 'Supported by the increase in funding for festivals announced in the 2025-26 Scottish Budget, this funding secures those benefits for young readers across Edinburgh, helping schools that might otherwise struggle with travel costs' Glasgow's Aye Write literary festival had to cancel last year's event after its bid for funding from government quango Creative Scotland was turned down. It is set to be revived.

SNP's policy of 'unarmed' Armed Forces is sheer madness
SNP's policy of 'unarmed' Armed Forces is sheer madness

Scotsman

time5 hours ago

  • Scotsman

SNP's policy of 'unarmed' Armed Forces is sheer madness

Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... As the UK yesterday marked Armed Forces Day – described as 'a chance to show your support' for the men and women in the military – SNP ministers will hopefully have been reflecting on their spectacularly bizarre stance on defence spending. While the nationalists have long opposed nuclear weapons, they are not a pacifist party. They support membership of Nato, pledging an independent Scotland would be a 'reliable and dedicated international partner' like Denmark and Norway. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad They also say our domestic defence industry 'will not just be welcome in an independent Scotland but will be a vital part of our ability to have a defence capability that matches an Independent Scotland's needs and threats' and criticise the UK Government for 'a failure to meet Scotland's specific defence needs'. Ukraine needs munitions and so does the British Army (Picture: Sergey Shestak) | AFP via Getty Images 'Russian threat is very real' So it is all the more difficult to understand why it is a 'long-standing position' of the SNP that government funding should not be provided for the 'direct manufacture of munitions'. So, for example, Scottish Enterprise and the Scottish National Investment Bank do not invest in companies that make weapons. Former SNP defence spokesperson Stewart McDonald has now rightly criticised the ban as 'a stupid policy' and called for a new debate. His comments followed a hint by John Swinney that the party's stance could change as 'we are living in a very different context today' and 'the Russian threat is very real'. However a Scottish Government source explained ministers were struggling with how to 'manage' the issue within the party. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But, with the UK set to increase defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP, now is not the time to tip-toe around the subject. Not only is the manufacturing of munitions and weapons vital to defend this country and to help Ukraine fight off the Russian invasion, it is also a major economic opportunity.

Why Scotland must press on with abortion law reform
Why Scotland must press on with abortion law reform

The Herald Scotland

time6 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Why Scotland must press on with abortion law reform

Yet that risk had existed for more than 160 years. Underpinned by the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 – a law passed by an all-male parliament before women had the right to vote – having an 'illegal' abortion outside of tightly controlled circumstances was a crime that carried with it a maximum life sentence. Despite decades of progress in both abortion provision and public opinion, the threat of prosecution remained. Last week's vote in Westminster is welcome progress, but as abortion law is devolved in Scotland, the change will only apply to women in England and Wales. This means that Scotland now stands as the only nation in the UK that has not moved to remove abortion from the criminal law. That must change. Read more: No qualified surgeons on panel to advise Scottish Government Minister criticised for backtracking on abortion care comments 'Only one Scottish doctor is trained in surgical care to legal limit' When I co-founded Back Off Scotland in 2020 to end protests outside abortion facilities, I was struck to learn how out-of-step our laws were with how abortion care is actually provided. Despite important innovations in abortion provision – such as the introduction of telemedical abortion – Scotland's legal framework remains stuck in the 20th Century. Our abortion law – the Abortion Act 1967 – is now almost 60 years old. Whilst this was revolutionary piece of legislation in the sixties, it is now no longer fit for purpose. Under this law, all abortions still require two doctors' signatures, and women must meet specific legal criteria to qualify for an abortion. In practice, this means that simply not wanting to be pregnant is not a valid reason to have an abortion. Despite this, Scotland has taken bold steps to improve abortion access in the past: for example, through the introduction of telemedicine during the pandemic. Introduced at pace by the Scottish Government to reduce the spread of the Coronavirus and ensure that those who needed an abortion were still able to access one during the pandemic, the temporary introduction of Early Medical Abortion at Home (EMAH) in March 2020 meant that women under 12 weeks' gestation were able to take both abortion medications – mifepristone and misoprostol – at home if strict criteria were met following a remote teleconsultation. Off the back of calls from various medical bodies and women's rights groups, as well as evidence from the largest study on telemedical abortion in the world which found this method of care to be 'safe, effective, and improves care', provisions were made permanent in Scotland in 2022. Whilst Scotland led the way in some areas, in others we've fallen far behind. Perhaps most notably in sending women to England for abortion beyond 20 weeks' gestation. One woman every four days has to travel from Scotland to a BPAS clinic in England to access abortion care because no health board provides care up to the legal limit of 24 weeks' gestation – a shameful stain on our pro-choice country. The reasons that women seek abortion after 20 weeks are complex and varied, but often involve devastating life changes, medical diagnoses, and delayed recognition of pregnancy. Yet the NHS in Scotland abandons these women, and over the years, thousands have had to make this journey despite being legally entitled to receive this care in Scotland. In 2014, government-commissioned research into Scottish womens' experiences of travelling to England for care was published. The findings were bleak and improving solutions to access these abortions were described by researchers as a 'necessity'. Despite warm words and countless commitments from the Scottish Government, this status-quo has gone unchanged for decades and caused untold levels of harm to the women who have had to make this journey. In 2023 when Humza Yousaf was standing to become leader of the SNP, Back Off Scotland wrote to him asking him to make three key pledges: to implement buffer zones, to stop the practice of sending women to England for abortion care by ensuring services can be accessed within Scotland, and to decriminalise abortion. He pledged to deliver all three, but only the first has been achieved. When Humza committed to decriminalising abortion, we seized the moment. Together with 18 pro-choice partners, such as Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, the Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, Engender, and the Humanist Society Scotland, we wrote to him calling for a full review of abortion law in Scotland, with a view to modernising it in the coming years. The government responded, and established an Expert Group in 2024. That group is now at work and is expected to deliver its findings and recommendations in the coming months. This review will bring much needed clarity to the status of abortion law in Scotland. As abortion in Scotland is governed by common law, there is widespread confusion and uncertainty over whether a woman could be prosecuted as they have been in England. This uncertainty was further exacerbated following the recent publication of guidance from the UK National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC), which suggested that women experiencing pregnancy loss should have their homes and digital devices checked, as well as their medical records and reproductive tracking devices investigated to see if any laws had been broken. Whilst there was rightly national outcry about this, it remains unclear whether the guidance applies to Scotland and whether Police Scotland would be prepared to use similar tactics to those used by English police forces who have criminalised women under abortion offences. A review into abortion law has never been more pressing or urgent. With public backing, political will, and expert consensus behind abortion law reform, the momentum is undeniable. After last week's historic vote in Westminster, the time for Scotland to reform our outdated abortion law is now. Lucy Grieve is Co-Founder of Back Off Scotland, and Policy and Engagement Manager at the British Pregnancy Advisory Service.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store