
Meet the engineer hoping to be the first Palestinian-Scot MSP
Adam Al-khateb, who is currently running to be the list candidate for the Scottish Greens in Lothian, is hoping to make history by becoming the first Arab candidate elected to Holyrood.
The 32-year-old Edinburgh-born activist, who is standing for selection on the Scottish Green Party's regional list in Lothian, told The National he wants to give voice to underrepresented communities — particularly Palestinians and the wider Arab and Muslim population in Scotland.
Al-khateb is the co-convenor of the party's Palestine Solidarity Group and has been a member of the Greens since 2024, citing the party's strong stance on Gaza as a key reason for joining alongside his own environmental background.
READ MORE: Scottish Government responds to claims of 'Iranian pro-independence accounts'
"The Scottish Greens have never had a candidate from a Muslim or Arab background. In fact, no Arab has ever stood for Scottish Parliament. So if selected, it would be a historic milestone — not just for the Greens, but for Scottish politics," he said.
Al-khateb said he's never felt represented by the cohort of MSPs in Holyrood, adding: "That's one of the biggest reasons I'm standing — to give Palestinians and the wider Arab community a voice. We've had some great representation from other communities, particularly politicians with Asian heritage, but never from the Arab community."
Former first minister Humza Yousaf was the countries first Muslim leader, and Anas Sarwar is the first leader of the opposition who is also Muslim. Both have faced fierce discrimination, most recently from rising Reform UK in the form of campaign materials targeting Sarwar.
Al-khateb was born in the capital and attended Edinburgh Napier University where he studied energy and environmental engineering. Alongside his Scottish culture, he always remained in touch with his Palestinian heritage.
He shared: "My grandparents were 1948 Nakba survivors — they were forcibly displaced by the creation of Israel and settled in various Arab states. My mother came to Scotland in the 1980s to study, and that's how we ended up here. Most of my extended family are still in the Middle East.
"It's been hard on my family — being far from home, especially in times of crisis. But the sense of community here has helped. And yes, the current situation has absolutely inspired me to enter politics. I want our voices to be heard."
Al-khateb said in recent years, as Israel's genocide in Gaza has escalated, he and his family have felt Scotland's solidarity with the country grow from its already solid grassroots foundations.
"Growing up was quite difficult — there wasn't a large Arab or Palestinian community around me at the time. A lot of my friends and peers were Scottish or European, and I didn't have a strong sense of cultural community around me.
"But more recently, that's changed. Despite what's going on globally, we now have a stronger Arab and Palestinian presence here in Scotland, and that support makes a big difference. There's a sense of solidarity and connection that wasn't there before."
READ MORE: Scottish Enterprise to keep funding Israel-linked arms firms, Kate Forbes says
The engineer is currently campaigning for his fellow members to back him as their candidate in the region, adding: "I'm a qualified energy and environmental engineer, community leader, and have strong networks across public, private, and third sectors. I bring skills, credibility, and lived experience."
He also believes he can help the Greens grow their vote by using his strong ties with Muslim, Arab, Asian, and African communities in the Lothian region.
"These are communities who might vote Green for the first time if they see someone they trust and identify with."
The Greens are currently undertaking a two-week internal selection period. By mid-July, the party will have selected candidates.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Israel slams BBC for airing ‘death to IDF' chant during Bob Vylan's Glastonbury set – as calls grow to arrest singer
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) ISRAEL has blasted the BBC and Glastonbury for failing to cut off double-act Bob Vylan's "death to the IDF" chants during a live broadcast the festival. The singer from the pro-Palestine punk act, who keeps his identity secret, also shouted "from the river to the sea Palestine... will be free" - regarded by Jews as a call for Israel's elimination. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 8 Video posted on X heard the crowds chant along with Bob Vylan Credit: Shutterstock Editorial 8 Bob Vylan singer Bobby Vylan crowdsurfed off the West Holts Stage Credit: PA 8 The BBC has been criticised for not cutting the live broadcast Credit: PA IDF stands for Israel Defence Forces, the national military of the State of Israel, which is currently involved with the war in the Palestinian territory the Gaza Strip. Bob Vylan - which consists of singer Bobby Vylan and guitarist Bobbie Vylan - then shared a post on X of the former eating an ice-cream with the caption: "While Zionists are crying on socials, I've just had a late night (vegan) ice cream." The BBC later took down the broadcast on the iPlayer but has been criticised for not cutting it off immediately after the anti-Semitic chanting, with the live feed continuing for another 40 minutes. Avon and Somerset Police last night said they were examining video evidence and investigating if any offence had been committed. Sharren Haskel, Israel's deputy foreign minister, was among those to slam the performance. She told The Mail on Sunday: "I condemn the BBC for continuing to live-stream anti-Israel hate speech from Glastonbury. "What do you think the BBC would have done had a performer been shouting anti-Muslim or far-Right hate speech? They would have pulled the feed. "But because the target is Israel – let's be honest, because it's Jews – it's tolerated, even broadcast. This is clearly incitement." May Golan, Israel's minister for social equality, said: "Perhaps someone should tell that anti-Semitic band what happened to the hundreds of innocent people at Israel's Nova music festival who were murdered, raped, butchered, and kidnapped by savage monsters." Lord Ian Austin, the Government's trade envoy to Israel, said: "The police should investigate as a matter of urgency and, if necessary, arrest the band members." Lead singer from the group Kneecap arriving at Westminster magistrates court in London The Bob Vylan set came immediately before controversial group Kneecap, which the Beeb had refused to show live. Singer Liam Og O hAnnaidh was charged under the Terrorism Act last month after allegedly displaying a flag in support of proscribed terrorist group Hezbollah while saying "up Hamas, up Hezbollah" during a gig in Kentish Town, north London, in November. The band's X account posted a photo of member JJ O Dochartaigh in a t-shirt with the words "We Are All Palestine Action" an hour before they took to the stage. The British government is considering making membership of the anti-Israel activist group illegal. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has the power to proscribe any such group under the Terrorism Act of 2000 if she believes it is "concerned in terrorism". Kneecap - whose set is still available to stream - also chanted about Palestine, as well as making derogatory statements about PM Sir Keir Starmer, who last week said they should not be allowed to perform at the festival. Commenting on the chants about the IDF, a BBC spokesperson says: 'Some of the comments made during Bob Vylan's set were deeply offensive. "During this live stream on iPlayer, which reflected what was happening on stage, a warning was issued on screen about the very strong and discriminatory language," the response continues. "We have no plans to make the performance available on demand.' Bob Vylan, who formed eight years ago in London, refuse to reveal their real names because of what they call the "surveillance state". Addressing the crowd of around 30,000, Bobby said he had to be "careful" because their performance was "live on the BBC". He then, however, led the "free, free Palestine" chant, then changing it to "death, death to the IDF". "Hell, yeah, from the river to the sea Palestine must, will be, Inshallah, it will be free," he added. The singer also backed Kneecap by describing music executives who called for the group to be banned as "Zionists". He went on to use the highly offensive c-word. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch branded the comments "grotesque", adding: "Glorifying violence against Jews isn't edgy. "The cultural establishment needs to wake up to the fact this isn't protest, it's incitement." Danny Cohen, former director of BBC Television, said: "That something like this might happen could easily have been foreseen by the BBC and measures could have been taken to prevent its broadcast. "This is a very serious failure, and further evidence that BBC management are blind to their responsibility to Britain's Jewish community." Kneecap member Naoise Ó Caireallain called on the crowd to "riot" outside Westminster magistrates in August when bandmate O hAnnaidh's case returns to court. Kneecap started their performance by chanting "f*** Keir Starmer". They also spoke out in support of Palestine Action. Glastonbury had said while all are welcome at the festival but added it "does not condone hate speech or incitement to violence of any kind from its performers". Avon and Somerset Police posted on X: "We are aware of the comments made by acts on the West Holts Stage at Glastonbury Festival this afternoon. "Video evidence will be assessed by officers to determine whether any offences may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation." 8 Liam Og O hAnnaidh and Naoise O Caireallain of Kneecap during the Glastonbury set Credit: Getty 8 Kneecap member JJ O Dochartaigh in a 'We Are All Palestine Action' t-shirt ahead of the band's Glastonbury performance Credit: Instagram 8 Kneecap fans holding up the same T-shirts prior to the performance Credit: Getty 8 DJ Provaí during the performance Credit: Getty


The Herald Scotland
3 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
When it comes to Iran, failure isn't an option for Trump, US
Iran's long-standing quest for nuclear weapons was at least set back for many months, and probably several years. Many parties had much to gain from the ceasefire: For Israel, a relief from the imminent threat of Iran, and from the punishment of the Iranian missiles. For Iran, an end to Israeli efforts at regime change; for the neighbors in the region, a relief from the fear of a widening conflict. For Russia, the preservation of its strategic partner, Iran. For China, an end to the imminent threat to its fuel and gas transiting the Strait of Hormuz. For President Trump, a validation of his judgment that overwhelming American power could be effective in ending a conflict without embroiling us in a "forever war," an end to the split of his MAGA supporters, and wide acknowledgement of his personal role in creating the ceasefire. Crown prince of Iran: Israel weakened Iran regime. World must help finish the job | Opinion What happens now for Iran and the rest of the world? But now what? Israel has been highly successful in the use of military force over many decades in the region - from the 1948 war of independence, through the 1956 war in Sinai, the 1967 preemptive war against Egypt, Jordan and Syria, the 1973 war, the 1982 invasion of Lebanon, strikes against the PLO in Tunisia in 1985, and later operations in Lebanon and Gaza. U.S. military action in the Gulf War in 1991 and the invasion of Iraq in 2003 were also highly successful. At this time, Israel, with U.S. help, has stripped Iran of its protective shields of Hezbollah and Hamas, and Iran, without effective air defenses, is laid bare. But outstanding military operations are not sufficient - they must be followed by successful work to end the roots of the conflict. Not once has this happened in the Middle East. Hatred, resentment, anger, terrorism and war have become endemic to the region. This is the moment to end the pattern of continuing conflict. But that requires new appreciation among the leaders in the region of the realities underscored by this latest bout of conflict. Iran, you're not going to have a nuclear bomb, no matter what. And if you continue to seek it, your regime will be defeated along with the destruction of your country. Israel, you cannot continue to use force with impunity - even with the best technology, your own people are vulnerable. To others in the region: Israel and the Palestinians are both permanently in the region; and with all due respect to the different religion, sects, and ethnicities at play, and the pain of history, both must be accommodated, accepted, and, ultimately, embraced as part of a thriving and prosperous Middle East. If there was ever a moment for fundamental change within the region, this is it. The world has come face to face with the potential of a spiraling conflict. Many of the Gulf States have achieved unprecedented wealth and are on the path to world-leading economic, social and technical advances. The region is still and will likely remain the center of global energy production, distribution and investment. There is everything to gain from seizing this moment. Gen. Wesley Clark: Trump needs to push Putin hard to end war in Ukraine - now | Opinion This is the moment for American leadership But how to proceed? Based on the model followed by President Clinton in dealing with the Balkans in the 1990's, it is best to start with a set of principles agreed upon objectively, by those outside the conflict but with the influence and will to deal with the respective parties. The principles must be fair and practicable. It required many weeks of shuttle diplomacy for the much simpler issues in the Balkans, and then, ultimately a 78-day air campaign by NATO in parallel with Presidential-level mediation by outside parties. In all, it entailed more than five years of continuous effort by the United States. In this region, the issues are deeper and more complex, but certainly among the principles, Iran must renounce its efforts, overt and covert, to destroy the state of Israel, and Israel must respect the rights of the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza to govern and develop their own self-governing state. Terrorism against Israel must be halted. Countries in the region must participate in rebuilding the Palestinian homeland in the West Bank and Gaza. Sanctions against Iran will be lifted, and Iran will be provided the materials it needs for peaceful nuclear energy. Progress must be phased and accompanied by confidence-building measures. Perhaps the Abraham Accords will be fully implemented, and the U.S. will provide a security umbrella for all in the region. International organizations will no doubt remain part of the solution. Perhaps Russia and China, and other interested parties will be invited as observers. Iran today is a wounded tiger. Maybe 400 kilograms of highly enriched uranium is still available, maybe some other country will provide nuclear weapons or materials. Revenge will be sought. We cannot permit the next conflict - it could well go "nuclear." So neglect or failure are not options. This is the moment for American leadership. It is the moment for President Trump to exercise his broader vision for strategic realignment of the region, and in so doing, to end the Middle East as a cockpit for continuing conflict. Wesley K. Clark is a retired four-star general who served as commander of U.S. Southern Command and then as commander of U.S. European Command/Supreme Allied Commander, Europe.


Scotsman
4 hours ago
- Scotsman
Defence Scotland: SNP told to urgently rethink 'mad' strategy as internal fears grow
Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... As governments across the globe grapple with the most dangerous international landscape in a generation, John Swinney is under pressure to allow the SNP to have its first proper debate on where it stands on defence in more than a decade. The alternative risk is of his party 'falling behind' and Scotland potentially missing out on crucial investment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The defence, aerospace and security industry is estimated to be worth around £3.2 billion to Scotland. The Ministry of Defence spends more than £2bn each year with Scottish industry. The forward section of Type 26 Frigate HMS Cardiff is rolled out from the SBOH at BAE Systems Shipyard in Govan, Scotland. Picture: John Linton/BAE Systems/Royal Navy | John Linton Despite conflict still raging on the European continent and the situation in the Middle East still resulting in lives, including children, being lost every day, the SNP has not had a proper debate about where it stands on defence policy since 2012. Instead a position to block investments perceived to be linked to munitions and an unassailable opposition to the Trident nuclear weapons system, located on the Clyde, are the SNP's flagship defence policies. UK to boost defence spending With Sir Keir Starmer's UK government committing to spend 5 per cent of its GDP on defence by 2035, the SNP has come under intense pressure to shift its long-held opposition to spending public funds on the 'manufacture of weapons or munitions', with a perception Scottish ministers are turning their back on the wider defence industry. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It is understood Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes, who also holds the economy brief, is keen for a rethink on her government's and her party's position. The Prime Minister visited the BAE shipyard in Govan earlier this month to announce his strategic defence review, with an ambition to 'build a fighting force that is more integrated, more ready, more lethal than ever' and 'innovate and accelerate innovation to a wartime pace'. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer speaks during a visit to BAE Systems in Govan, Glasgow, to launch the strategic defence review. Picture: Andy Buchanan/PA Wire Sir Keir also stressed he was 'using this moment to drive jobs and investment', including six new munitions factories and 1,000 new jobs. The Faslane submarine facility on the Clyde will receive £250m of investment as part of a UK government boost announced in Chancellor Rachel Reeves's spending review. Row over welding investment Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Last month, it emerged the economic development agency, Scottish Enterprise, refused to support plans for a new specialist welding centre over fears it could be used to support the building of Royal Navy submarines. Ferguson Marine, which SNP ministers nationalised in 2019, has taken on contracts to construct Royal Navy vessels. The Scottish National Investment Bank, set up by SNP ministers in 2020, 'does not invest in organisations that are primarily engaged in the manufacture of munitions or weapons'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Former SNP MP Stewart McDonald, who spent almost five years as the party's defence spokesperson at Westminster from 2017 to 2022, has warned 'the party needs to have a defence debate again'. Speaking to The Scotsman, he said: 'It hasn't had a proper defence debate since 2012 when we changed the policy on Nato. 'All of this is moving at such pace. The entire international picture is moving at such a rapid pace and if we are a party that seeks to be an independent state - and an independent state in Nato and the EU - then we should have stuff to say on this.' Former SNP defence spokesperson Stewart McDonald Mr McDonald warned 'there is a risk the party falls behind in that debate'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He said: 'That's a debate that is going on in capitals all across Europe. And although Edinburgh is not a state capital, the Scottish Government has a role to play as a domestic partner. SNP's 'awkward' defence stance 'We have an industry in Scotland worth many billions of pounds, employs somewhere between 33,000 and 35,000 people and it has a very awkward relationship with the Scottish Government - it has done so for a very long time.' Mr McDonald has suggested Mr Swinney should gather the major and smaller defence employers in Scotland, 'get the defence procurement minister up from London and say 'how do I marshal the resources of the government, spending, policy, legislative, to better support this industry?'.' READ MORE: BAE Systems funding provides 300 jobs boost for Scottish shipyards Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The former SNP MP added: 'At a time of heightened international conflict, Scotland's defence industry has a part to play. 'I understand there's a bit of political balancing to be done here, but I think that can be over-thought and over-egged. We do live in much more dangerous times and there's a risk we are just saying the same stuff we've been saying for a long time - and that just would not be credible to stand still politically as the entire world changes around you.' Mr McDonald branded the Scottish Enterprise ban on investments relating to munitions 'a stupid policy' and hit out at the restrictions in place for the Scottish National Investment Bank. He said: 'Defence is the one industry that has enormous growth happening in it right now and that's not likely to end time soon. So why should our National Investment Bank not invest in it? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'It's entirely normal in every other country in Europe or the world for your national institutions to support your national interests, including your national security interests. So why is the Scottish National Investment Bank not doing that? I think that's mad.' Vanguard-class submarine HMS Vigilant, one of the UK's four nuclear warhead-carrying submarines, at HM Naval Base Clyde at Faslane | PA Asked whether the SNP needs to revisit whether it opposes Trident, Mr McDonald warned opening up that debate 'would just be self-indulgent' and 'would just say the same thing it's always said'. He said: 'I think it could better focus its attention on other parts of the defence discussion. The reality is it can't move Trident off the Clyde. 'There are areas they can focus on and have genuine positive consequences - working with industry around development of skills. The defence industry really felt that after Brexit.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Labour Glasgow MSP Paul Sweeney, who before entering politics was an arm reservist and Clyde shipbuilder, has branded the SNP's position "really frustrating'. Mr Sweeney first came up against a brick wall trying to encourage Rolls Royce to use Scotland to manufacture small modular nuclear reactors. There was opposition to such a move, even if the reactors weren't being used in Scotland where there is a de-facto ban on nuclear power stations being built due to the SNP's hostility to the technology. 'Bizarre' SNP position Mr Sweeney acknowledged the Scottish Government had previously supported defence industries in Scotland. But he has been left aghast at the decision to block investment in the welding facility. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He said: 'I found the decision of Scottish Enterprise to indicate to Rolls Royce that they would not be able to support grant funding for the naval welding facility extremely bizarre. Labour MSP Paul Sweeney | Supplied 'It's clearly on the back of pressure over comments made by the former first minister Humza Yousaf. There was a recent debate at the Scottish Parliament by the Greens on this stuff.' Mr Sweeney added: 'It's a misnomer to conflate foreign policy issues with domestic security and defence requirements. 'There is a logical absurdity of suggesting that this is about defence exports to unsavoury regimes, when it's primarily about our domestic national security and defence in the context of a pretty fraught geopolitical situation. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'I find the context of this somewhat delusional and frustrating. I think it's fair to say there's certainly a split within the SNP about this.' The MSP insisted that BAE Systems on the Clyde, where he previously worked, 'has no involvement with any regime suspected of human rights abuses', adding 'there's no association with the Israel-Palestine issue'. Protesters form a blockade outside BAE Systems in Govan Picture: Jane Barlow/PA Wire Mr Sweeney said: 'They do not issue vessels for export to those territories - they never have. There is no obvious connection. 'It's also deeply reckless rhetoric in the context of the need to expand the Royal Navy and expand our domestic shipbuilding programme.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Glasgow MSP warned the Scottish Government's opposition 'creates a problem for investment in Scotland that doesn't exist anywhere else in the UK'. He said: 'There's a nervousness about Scotland - there's a more volatile risk of being caught on the horns of a political argument.' Scottish Liberal Democrat MSP Jamie Greene has penned a letter to the Deputy First Minister, Ms Forbes, insisting 'the Scottish Government must also play its part in realising that economic potential' of the defence sector. Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes | PA He added: 'That means creating the right environment for jobs and investment as well as tackling obstacles that could otherwise dampen those opportunities. At the moment there are worrying gaps in Scotland's skills pipeline.' Norwegian potential Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad BAE Systems are building Type 26 frigates for the Royal Navy including HMS Belfast and HMS Birmingham in Govan. More investment could be on its way to the Govan shipyard, with the Norwegian government reportedly keen to purchase Type 26 frigates. Defence Secretary John Healey has told MPs he has 'been working hard to persuade the Norwegians' about taking on the frigates. In response to parliamentary questions, Ms Forbes, in an apparent acknowledgment of the benefits to the economy, has stressed the 'potential industrial and employment opportunities for Scotland are significant' if Norway does press ahead with Clyde-built frigates. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad She said: 'Officials from the UK and Scottish governments have held constructive informal discussions around how the bid might be best supported.' A Scottish Government source suggested SNP ministers 'want to move on it', but are wrestling with how to 'manage it within the party'. The insider added: 'Some people find it exasperating and peculiar. It's just a bit out of place now in the new reality we are in.' When the Scottish Enterprise row emerged earlier this month, Mr Swinney told journalists he was sticking to his guns. He said: 'We have a policy position on the use of Scottish public expenditure for the manufacture of munitions. We apply that consistently and that remains the Government's position.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But speaking on the Holyrood Sources podcast this week, he opened the door to a change of heart, stating that 'issues can be reconsidered'.