My Journalistic "Experiment" With Bal Thackeray Never Took Off: Sharad Pawar
NCP (SP) president Sharad Pawar on Wednesday recalled his "experiment" with journalism, sharing that he and Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray had once tried to launch a monthly magazine, but the venture did not succeed.
The octogenarian leader was speaking at a function organised by the Akhil Bharatiya Marathi Patrakar Parishad to honour journalists for their contribution to the field.
"I have had some connection with journalism. Had our experiment succeeded, we might have probably been worthy of the honours of the Akhil Bharatiya Marathi Patrakar Parishad today," he said.
"The late Balasaheb Thackeray, myself and a few friends had once started a magazine, each investing Rs 5,000. The idea was to launch it on the lines of the English 'Time' magazine. We released our first issue, expecting it to be so popular that it would not be seen anywhere. And that issue has never been seen since," Pawar quipped.
He said journalism in a democracy is incredibly challenging.
"I hope that you will continue to make significant contributions to democracy by preserving journalistic values," he said, referring to the award winners.
The 'Balshastri Jambhekar Lifetime Achievement Award' was conferred upon senior journalist Madhukar Bhave, while Bharat Jadhav was given the 'Special Honour'.
Journalists Mahesh Mhatre, Abhijit Karande, Amey Tirodkar, Pandurang Patil, Sarvottam Gavaskar, Dinesh Keluskar, Seema Marathe, Balasaheb Patil, Sharmila Kalgutkar and Bharat Nigde were honoured with various awards.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
8 minutes ago
- Hans India
Study abroad: Redefining education for students
Studying abroad has transformed from a niche aspiration to a mainstream ambition for millions of Indian students in recent decades. However, in 2025, Indian students' dreams are facing the toughest test. As countries tighten immigration policies, introduce financial restrictions, and prioritize local labour markets, the once-straightforward path to a foreign degree is now a complex maze. Despite these headwinds, international education continues to thrive, but has not diminished. Shifting policies, shrinking access? Several study destinations have undergone drastic visa and policy changes over the last year, which have put students and institutions scrambling to adjust. Canada, which was the preferred destination for Indian students, was slated to introduce a study permit cap of 437,000 for 2025, while increasing the requirement for proof of financial means to CAD 20,635, an increase of over 100% from the usual upward adjustment witnessed in previous years. Furthermore, Canadian authorities have tightened the criteria of the Post-Graduation Work Permit (PGWP), with higher requirements of English language proficiency being imposed: CLB 7 for university graduates and CLB 5 for college graduates. Whereas in the UK, the Graduate Route visa is still there, which allows international students to work for two years post-graduation (three for PhDs), the money-proof requirements were raised. Australia, well known for being a state with many privileges to students, has increased the financial requirement to AUD 29,710 and has made things hard with its English language assessments. The country is considering an enrollment cap for international students, but in parallel, it is granting extended work rights in priority sectors such as healthcare and engineering. The US, with fewer structural changes, remains good at maintaining the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program, through which STEM graduates get up to 36 months of work experience. However, increased scrutiny on visas and growing concerns on the possible H-1B routes continue to shadow the long-term outlook for some students. A diversifying map of destinations Amidst the tightening grip of traditional education hubs, emerging contenders are claiming their spots. Germany, Ireland, Finland, and New Zealand are gaining attention for their student centric visa policies, high-quality education systems and increasing opportunities for post-study work. There has particularly been a 26% spike in Indian student enrollment in Germany in the past academic year alone, courtesy of no tuition fees, public universities and strong STEM reputation. The diversification of destinations is yet another example of something getting a little stranger: a change in the mindset of students. It is no longer just about a university's rank or a country's prestige has to be about long-term ROI, work rights, safety, and living costs. The rising role of education loans As financial barriers grow, the relevance of education loans has become more pronounced. According to a Shiksha study in 2024, 49% of Indian students relied on education loans to fund their international education. The average cost of studying in countries like the U.S., Canada, or Australia now ranges between INR 25 to 50 Lakh, depending on the course and institution. In 2025, that number is projected to rise further as parent's savings alone can no longer meet the steep financial requirements set by many countries. Traditional banks still hold a strong position; however, NBFCs and FinTechs have managed to enter the market by way of offering tailor-made loans without collateral and with faster turnaround times. Such institutions are critical for students of Tier-II and Tier-III cities who may not have, at least, property to offer or a strong credit history, but do have academic skills. Apart from that, the financial advice is being actively sought by students before their initiation on their roads. Platforms that offer loan comparisons, EMI calculators, and amortization simulations have slowly but surely become a relevant aspect of the actual decision-making process. Reinvention, not retreat The narrative around international education in 2025 isn't one of decline but of reinvention. Yes, there are more hoops to jump through, but those who do, arrive better informed and better financially planned. The value of an international education is still strong for individuals, communities and economies alike. For Indian students, the key lies in strategic planning, early financial preparedness, and a willingness to explore new global frontiers. And for stakeholders, governments, lenders, and universities, it is imperative to keep the system equitable and aspirational.
News18
14 minutes ago
- News18
'Young Indian, A Congress Front, Made Wrongful Gains': ED's Charge Against Gandhis In AJL Case
Last Updated: The Enforcement Directorate told the court that the Gandhis committed a massive fraud by wrongfully transferring 99% of AJL's shares to Young Indian, sidelining major shareholders. The not-for-profit company Young Indian (YI), controlled by Gandhis, was created to distract attention from a national party, it is just another face of the Congress, and made wrongful gains, the Enforcement Directorate told Delhi's Rouse Avenue Court in connection with a money laundering complaint in the National Herald case. The ED also said that there cannot be a bigger fraud, adding, the Gandhis took a fraudulent decision which resulted in wrongful loss to major shareholders of the Associated Journals Limited (AJL). The directors at Young Indian were the bosses of the Congress party, the ED told the court, as Additional Solicitor General (ASG) SV Raju reiterated Young Indian was nothing more than another face of the Congress party. As per the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, anyone owning more than 25 per cent shares controls the interest in the firm, the ED said. In its argument, the probe agency further said that the Gandhi family shunned out major shareholders, and that not only the AJL, but the All India Congress Committee (AICC) was also cheated. Responding to the court on why the Congress was not a shareholder in the AJL, the ED said the trust belonging to Priyanka Gandhi had certain shares, but not 50 per cent. The probe agency also revealed that the AJL also had other shareholders. The Enforcement Directorate said that a meeting was held in Lucknow on January 21, 2011, in which it was decided to increase the shareholding of the AJL and to issue Rs 9.02 crore shares to Young Indian, in lieu of the Rs 90.2 crore loan. However, the majority of AJL shareholders were not present in the meeting, the ED said, adding, it was evident that a crucial decision of vesting 99 per cent shareholding of AJL with Young Indian was made with only the presence of seven members, including two accused in the case. The probe agency also said that no reasonable efforts were made to call the majority of shareholders for the meeting. On Wednesday, while hearing the ED's arguments on the case, Delhi's Rouse Avenue Court raised certain queries to the ED about the shareholding of the AJL and whether the Congress party was a victim, as it had provided a loan to AJL. ASG Raju submitted that there was a conspiracy to siphon off the assets of AJL, a company with assets worth Rs 2,000 crore, a fact known to Congress leaders. Special Judge Vishal Gogne heard the arguments at length for nearly three hours and listed the matter for further hearing on July 3. The ED filed a prosecution complaint (charge sheet) against seven persons – Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Suman Dubey, Sam Pitroda, Young Indian, Dotex, and Sunil Bhandari. The Congress provided a loan of Rs 90.25 crore to the AJL, which had no means to repay despite holding assets worth Rs 2,000 crores, ASG Raju submitted. He alleged that the accused aimed to usurp AJL, with its Rs 2,000 crore assets, by creating Young Indian. The ED argued that Young Indian acquired AJL for just Rs 50 lakh in exchange for the Rs 90 crore loan provided by the Congress. The ED further stated that the accused firm, Dotex, gave a Rs 1 crore loan to Young Indian, out of which Rs 50 lakh was paid to the AICC. Consequently, Young Indian became the owner of AJL for Rs 50 lakh.
Hans India
24 minutes ago
- Hans India
Surjewala in town to ‘prepare grounds' for CM's resignation: BJP
Bengaluru: BJP president B Y Vijayendra on Wednesday claimed that senior Congress leader Randeep Singh Surjewala arrived in the state to 'prepare grounds' for Chief Minister Siddaramaiah's resignation. The state's administrative machinery has collapsed and governance is in disarray. Infighting among Congress legislators is worsening, and development work has come to a standstill, he alleged. 'Congress leader Randeep Surjewala is in Bengaluru for the past few days. Why is he here? He is not bothered about the downturn of the corrupt Congress government,' Vijayendra told reporters here. The AICC president is gathering MLAs' views and is preparing grounds to remove Siddaramaiah from the CM's post. The fight for the top post has intensified due to which horse trading would happen in the state, he claimed. Referring to Ramnagar MLA Iqbal Ansari's recent statement that Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar enjoys the support of 100 MLAs and should be made as the CM, the BJP state chief said several senior Congress leaders, including B R Patil and Raju Kage, have also spoken against Siddaramaiah. This shows that the CM has lost the confidence of his own legislators, he said, and urged the Governor to take note of the situation. He blamed the Congress government for the rising prices of essential commodities and accused it of 'rampant corruption and administrative breakdown'. He further stated that the government's failure has led to a spate of suicides among farmers, officials and contractors. Even Congress MLAs privately acknowledge this dysfunction, he added. On the Karnataka High Court's decision to hand over the Valmiki Development Corporation scam to the CBI, Vijayendra termed it as a significant victory for the BJP. He alleged that the Rs 187 crore meant for the welfare of Scheduled Tribes was diverted to neighbouring Telangana and misused to purchase properties, jewellery and election expenses. Thousands of fake bank accounts were created for this purpose, he said and referred to the suicide of officer Chandrashekhar, who had reportedly detailed the scam in his death note. Siddaramaiah was compelled to drop Minister B Nagendra from the Cabinet under pressure from the BJP, but efforts are still being made to reinstate him, he claimed. Nagendra, facing allegations in connection with an illegal money transfer case involving a state-run corporation resigned from the Ministry last June. Vijayendra alleged that the CM himself is involved in the scam and said no money could have moved out of the state without the approval of the Finance Department, a portfolio held by the CM himself.
