HC interim stay on closure of Jan Aushadi centres welcome: LoP
Speaking at a press conference, he said the High Court has issued an interim stay order on the closure of Jan Aushadhi centres. 'The BJP had fought against this decision. The government closed Jan Aushadhi centres to favour private medical pharmacies. The government, which bowed to the private lobby, has now faced a setback. The Health and Medical Education Minister must now understand what people need and work accordingly'.
'Government hospitals are required to provide 260-270 medicines, but such a quantity is not available. Medicines are available at discounted rates at Jan Aushadhi centres. Recently, during a visit to Hassan hospital, I found only one cardiologist. In an emergency related to heart conditions, they administer an injection and send patients to Bengaluru.
Closing Jan Aushadhi centres in such a situation would cause significant problems', he said.
'Terrorists are being facilitated even in jails. The Home Department is completely defunct. The state government must immediately deport Bangladeshi and Pakistani citizens. A special task force should be formed for this purpose. Vote-bank politics should not be played here.
Steps must be taken to monitor prisoners' movements, and the use of mobile phones in jails should be prevented', he demanded.
'Rambhapuri Jagadguru has expressed his opinion. When lakhs of devotees visit, he expresses their sentiments. That's what Swamiji has conveyed.
The government is announcing guarantees every day, but there's no money to transport rice, leading to a lorry strike. Giving guarantees while keeping all bills pending is of no use.
Even though free bus services are provided, schoolchildren have to walk. Swamiji has said that people should be given a self-reliant life', he noted.
'B.K. Hariprasad has insulted the oppressed communities. In the BJP, we don't announce presidents based on hereditary succession.
Elections are not held in Congress, but the BJP follows democracy', he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
21 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Chirag cites 'law and order collapse' in NDA-led Bihar, says 'feel sorry to support failing government'
NEW DELHI: Union minister Chirag Paswan on July 26 said he felt "sorry to support" the Nitish Kumar government in Bihar, charging it with failure to control the law and order situation in the State. Paswan, who heads the LJP (Ram Vilas) -- a constituent of the BJP-led NDA, was talking to reporters in Patna before leaving for Gayaji, where he is scheduled to address a rally. "I have heard claims that the recent spurt in violent crimes is linked to the upcoming assembly polls, and there are attempts to defame this government. Still, it is the responsibility of the administration to keep the law and order situation under control. I feel sorry to support a government which is failing on this count," said the Hajipur MP.
The Hindu
21 minutes ago
- The Hindu
17 MPs honoured with Sansad Ratna Awards for Parliamentary performance
Seventeen Members of Parliament — including Supriya Sule (Nationalist Congress Party-Sharadchandra Pawar), Ravi Kishan (Bharatiya Janata Party), Nishikant Dubey (BJP) and Arvind Sawant (Shiv Sena-Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray) — have been selected for the Sansad Ratna Awards 2025 for their exemplary performance in the Lok Sabha. The honours also include four Special Jury Awards, recognising their consistent contributions to parliamentary democracy across three successive terms. The Special Awards have been conferred on Bhartruhari Mahtab (BJP, Odisha), N K Premachandran (Revolutionary Socialist Party, Kerala), Supriya Sule (NCP-SP, Maharashtra), and Shrirang Appa Barne (Shiv Sena, Maharashtra) -- all of whom have maintained top performance since the 16th Lok Sabha. Other award-winning MPs include Smita Uday Wagh (BJP), Naresh Mhaske (Shiv Sena), Varsha Gaikwad (Congress), Medha Kulkarni (BJP), Praveen Patel (BJP), Bidyut Baran Mahato (BJP), and Dilip Saikia (BJP), among others. In the committee category, the Standing Committee on Finance, chaired by Bhartruhari Mahtab, and the Standing Committee on Agriculture, chaired by Dr Charanjit Singh Channi (Congress), were recognised for the quality of their reports and contributions to legislative oversight.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
21 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Caste, feudal mindset persists in MP judiciary: HC on treatment of judge
In a strongly-worded order, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has deplored the "caste system" and the "feudal mindset" reflected in the judicial structure in the state where those in the high court are considered as "savarn" or privileged ones, while the district judges as "shudras" and "les misrables". It also likened the relationship between the judges of the high court and those of the district courts to that of "feudal lord and serf", adding that a sense of fear and inferiority is consciously instilled by one on the subconscious of the other. A division bench of the MP High Court comprising Justices Atul Sreedharan and D K Paliwali made these scathing remarks in its order passed on July 14 while setting aside the dismissal of a special court judge. Instances of the judges of the district judiciary personally attending to judges of the high court are commonplace as also the latter not offering a seat to the former, thereby "perpetuating a colonial decadence with a sense of entitlement", it said. "At a subliminal level, the penumbra of the caste system manifests in the judicial structure in this state where those in the High Court are the savarn and the shudras are the les Misrables of the District Judiciary," it said. "The dismal relationship between the judges of the High Court and the judges of the District Judiciary is one between a feudal lord and serf. The feudal state of mind that still exists in the State, results in its manifestation in the judiciary also," the bench said. The fear of the district judiciary is understandable, the court said. "The relationship between District Judiciary and the High Court in the State is not based on mutual respect for each other but one where a sense of fear and inferiority is consciously instilled by one on the subconscious of the other," it said. The court said this while allowing a petition filed by Jagat Mohan Chaturvedi challenging the order of August 1, 2016 that dismissed his appeal against his termination from services as a judge of a special court (SC/ST) on October 19, 2015. As per the procedure, the call to dismiss is taken by the full court of the high court chaired by the Chief Justice. But the proposal to remove him was sent to the state government for action. The division bench quashed the order terminating the services of the petitioner and imposed a cost of Rs 5 lakh on the state government through the principal secretary Law and Legislative Department and the MP High Court Registrar General, saying that Chaturvedi had to face humiliation in society, without an iota of material coming on record to establish corruption against him. It said, "The instant case reveals a malady that cannot be addressed effectively on account of the social structure existing in the State." "It is precisely cases like this that result in a large number of bail applications pending before the High Court as also the Criminal Appeals. Experience at Bar gives this Court the wisdom to arrive at the opinion that the District Judiciary functions under the perpetual fear of the High Court," the HC said. Like this case, where the petitioner was terminated from service on account of passing bail orders in favour of the applicants, the message that goes down to the district judiciary by such acts of the high court is that acquittals recorded in major cases or bails granted by the courts below the high court, can result in adverse action against judges passing such orders, though they are judicial orders, it said. "The body language of the Judges of the District Judiciary when they greet a Judge of the High Court stops short of grovelling before the High Court Judge, making the Judges of the District Judiciary the only identifiable species of invertebrate mammals," it said. There are instances of the judges of the district judiciary personally attending to judges of the high court (as desired by them) on railway platforms and waiting on them with refreshments, are commonplace, thus perpetuating a colonial decadence with a sense of entitlement, the court added. "Judges of the District Judiciary on deputation to the registry of the High Court are almost never offered a seat by the Judges of the High Court and on a rare occasion when they are, they are hesitant to sit down before the High Court Judge," the court said. The subjugation and enslavement of the psyche of the judges of the district judiciary is complete and irreversible, so it seems. All this in the name of saving their job, for which the petitioner in this case suffered, for thinking and doing differently, the court order said. "They have families, children who go to school, parents undergoing treatment, a home to be built, savings to be accumulated, and when the High Court terminates his service abruptly on account of a judicial order passed him, he and his entire family is out on the streets with no pension and the stigma of facing a society that suspects his integrity," the court said. On account of "gross injustice" suffered by him, the HC restored his pensionary benefits and also directed that he be given back wages from the date on which he was terminated till the date he would have otherwise superannuated with seven per cent interest. The same shall be complied within a period of 90 days from the date on which this order is uploaded on the web site of the High Court Registrar General, failing which the petitioner shall be entitled to file a contempt petition against the respondents, it said.
