Helen Zille warns Cyril Ramaphosa as things turn nasty
Democratic Alliance (DA) Federal Chair Helen Zille has issued a warning to President Cyril Ramaphosa, confirming that the party's recent threat to table a motion of no confidence is serious and could materialise if key issues remain unresolved.
The comments come amid growing friction within the Government of National Unity (GNU) and heightened discontent over the ANC's handling of corruption, which the DA claims undermines Cyril Ramaphosa's leadership and credibility.
Zille outlined what she called a 'three strikes' framework, stating that the president has now committed a second major offence by failing to act decisively against corruption within the ANC's ranks.
'We won't leave on a whim,' Zille said over the weekend.
'However, President Ramaphosa must not test us.'
The DA has stopped short of leaving the GNU, but the motion of no confidence remains a clear and present option, Helen Zille confirmed.
The tension was further inflamed by the removal of DA Eastern Cape leader Andrew Whitfield from his post as deputy minister, which Zille described as retaliation for his anti-corruption stance and opposition to harmful economic policies under the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition.
'This is a flagrant distortion,' Zille said, referring to Whitfield's dismissal, which she claims highlights the ANC's lack of commitment to clean governance.
While some within both the DA and ANC are calling for an end to the GNU arrangement, the DA's top brass have rejected any abrupt exits.
Helen Zille underscored the DA's commitment to principled governance, warning that remaining in a coalition with a president who appears aligned with the ANC's corrupt Radical Economic Transformation (RET) faction is untenable.
'If the president shows that he's indistinguishable from the corrupt RET faction in his party, there's no point in being in a coalition with him at all,' Zille was quoted as saying.
Although the DA's federal executive has opted not to pursue a no-confidence vote immediately, Zille made it clear that the party is prepared to act if Cyril Ramaphosa fails to course-correct.
The situation places additional pressure on Cyril Ramaphosa as he tries to maintain cohesion within a fragile coalition structure, all while fending off rising dissent from within his own ranks and coalition partners.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
24 minutes ago
- IOL News
Accusations of fraud: Charges laid against against Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane
Democratic Alliance (DA) federal council chairperson Helen Zille has accused President Cyril Ramaphosa of failing to act on corruption in Parliament. Image: Facebook/DA The Democratic Alliance (DA) has opened a criminal case against Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane, accusing her of lying to Parliament about the appointment of ANC-linked individuals to Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA) boards. On Tuesday morning, DA Federal Chairperson Helen Zille and DA MP Karabo Khakhau, who serves on the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Higher Education and Training, laid the charges at the Cape Town Central police station. Khakhau said the charges relate to Nkabane's alleged deliberate misrepresentation of the appointment process for SETA board members, during which she claimed an 'independent' evaluation panel was responsible for the selections. 'She falsely claimed an 'independent' panel made the appointments — including a chair who confirmed he wasn't involved,' said Khakhau. 'The DA has laid criminal charges against Minister Nkabane for lying to Parliament about ANC cadre appointments. We will vote against her department's budget and other budgets led by corrupt ANC ministers.' Khakhau accused Nkabane of facilitating 'fraudulent' appointments by misleading the Parliamentary committee, and said the so-called independent panel had included her own Chief of Staff and an ANC Youth League leader. 'Most damningly, she falsely named Advocate Terry Motau SC as the chair of this panel, a claim he has unequivocally denied in writing. He made it clear he had no knowledge of, nor participated in, the process,' she added. In a statement, the DA said: 'This is not a case of poor judgement; it is a flagrant and deliberate attempt to deceive Parliament and the South African people. Minister Nkabane has broken the law and violated her oath of office. The DA will not stand by while ministers who lie, manipulate processes, and protect ANC cronies remain in office.' The party said it would not support the Department of Higher Education and Training's budget while Nkabane remains in office and vowed to oppose all budgets led by ministers 'under criminal investigation for corruption or misconduct'. Zille said the party was taking this step because of President Cyril Ramaphosa's 'inaction' in the face of corruption within the executive. 'We're here today for the simple reason that President Ramaphosa refuses to be as good as his word and act against corruption, act against criminality in our Parliament,' Zille said. 'Serious fraud and the misleading of Parliament are somehow condoned by President Ramaphosa's government. That is an enormous double standard.' Zille described the SETA appointments as a 'blatant lie to a committee of Parliament,' and added that in previous cases, such acts were treated as both fraud and a criminal offence. She said an investigation by Khakhau had revealed that the people responsible for selecting board members included three senior employees from the Minister's department: 'We have the Minister's Chief of Staff, we had the Chief Director for the SETAs, accountable to the Minister, and we had the Director of Corporate Services who's very close to the Minister.' Zille also criticised the inclusion of known ANC deployees on the selection panel and said the Minister's conduct amounted to misleading Parliament. 'This matter concerns Minister Nkabane of Higher Education. She announced certain appointments to the SETA boards, which are crucially important in the higher education sector of South Africa,' Zille said. 'Far from being independent people who had come in as experts, it turns out several of them were either her employees or deployed ANC cadres from various positions. This was a blatant lie to a committee of Parliament, which is considered to be a lie to Parliament. Misleading Parliament and fraud are two criminal contraventions.' The DA called on Ramaphosa to act swiftly and remove Nkabane from office, warning that continued inaction would implicate him in enabling corruption. Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya and Nkabane's spokesperson Camagwini Mavovana had not responded to questions. This story will be updated when they comment.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
‘Nuclear Option': DA ready with no-confidence motion to oust Ramaphosa
DA's Helen Zille says the party does have a motion of no confidence against President Cyril Ramaphosa up their sleeve, however they are cautious about bringing the government down. Image: Supplied Democratic Alliance Federal Council Chairperson Helen Zille says the party has a motion of no confidence against President Cyril Ramaphosa ready, but is cautious about using it, warning it could collapse the government. 'I very much doubt it,' Zille said when asked whether the ANC could survive such a motion if the DA were to proceed. She was speaking to journalists outside the Cape Town Central police station, where the DA was filing criminal charges against Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane. Nkabane is accused of misleading Parliament and abusing her position by allegedly facilitating ANC cadre deployment in the appointment of Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA) board members. 'We certainly have a motion of no confidence against the president up our sleeve, but we always say that our action must be commensurate with the infringement,' Zille said. Zille called the motion 'the nuclear option.' 'We counted heads, and we think that we're going to have 196 or 197 votes out of 400. That's a lot of votes.' She also cast doubt on the ANC's ability to whip its full caucus into attending the vote. 'The ANC has never once yet in the history of our Parliament got all its parliamentarians into the House, even with a three-line whip,' she said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Her comments come after the DA, the second-largest party in the Government of National Unity (GNU), signaled its intent to consider a motion against Ramaphosa following the dismissal of Deputy Trade and Industry Minister Andrew Whitfield, a senior DA member. Whitfield was fired over an unauthorised international trip. In response, the DA withdrew from the National Dialogue process, a key inter-party consultation platform, but has not ruled out advancing the no-confidence motion. Zille said that if the vote were conducted via secret ballot, the outcome could be even more damaging to the ANC. 'If it's a secret ballot, that motion of no confidence would carry. But that would bring the government down. And then you have to think very carefully - Is the infringement commensurate with the action? Are there other mechanisms?' she said. She added that the court case was filed by the party in February this year, saying the party is confident that it would win the case. The party filed papers in the High Court to declare the act unconstitutional. 'With that, we could have done the same thing, but we did win in court,' she said. Zille emphasised that the DA is not eager to topple the government, despite holding the power to do so. 'So before we bring the government down, we try every other avenue, because that's what a responsible partner does. An irresponsible partner behaves like the ANC and carries on with corruption as if there's no tomorrow,' she said. 'A responsible partner like the DA finds every single way of combating that and exposing that. And we hold the card of bringing down the government, but we will not use it lightly. We will use it when all other options have failed.' Speaking with IOL News, political analyst Sitabonga Ntombela said ANC may send a delegation to engage with the DA in hopes of stopping its planned motion against President Cyril Ramaphosa, warning it could destabilise the Government of National Unity (GNU). 'I think they might resolve to send a task team that will engage the DA not to go ahead with the motion because that will destabilise the GNU,' said Ntombela. The ANC's National Working Committee (NWC) met on Monday afternoon to discuss the DA's recent threats, including its withdrawal from the National dialogue, and the controversy surrounding Nkabane and the appointment of the Services Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA) board. When asked whether he believed the DA's motion could succeed, Ntombela agreed without hesitation. 'I believe the motion has the potential to succeed if the DA is willing to accept what it called the 'doomsday coalition' - by either co-opting the EFF, IFP, FF Plus, UDM, and MK Party, or working with them solely on the basis of removing Ramaphosa,' Ntombela told IOL News. 'This is retaliation after their member was removed even after John (Steenhuisen) asked for 24 hours to handle the matter. It could also backfire and make the DA look opportunistic if their response to this is a motion that could cost South Africa millions.' On Wednesday, IOL News reported that a motion from the DA could mark the end of Ramaphosa's presidency. Political analyst Professor Bheki Mngomezulu said that during the sixth administration, Ramaphosa survived votes due to the ANC's majority in Parliament. However, the party no longer has a majority after the May 2024 general election. 'If the DA proceeds, it will likely find support from smaller parties including the MK Party, EFF, and ATM,' Mngomezulu said. 'Even if ActionSA votes against it, the rest could form the two-thirds majority needed - which would mean the end of Ramaphosa. But I don't think it will come to that, because the ANC and DA do discuss issues behind closed doors.' Independent political analyst Goodenough Mashego echoed that sentiment. 'If the DA brings the motion, it will succeed,' Mashego said. 'But they won't do it unless they are sure it will pass. They wouldn't risk breaking the coalition and end up with nothing.' He added that negotiating with the EFF and MK Party would be difficult, especially when it comes to agreeing on a successor. 'There is no scenario where the EFF or MK will let the DA appoint a president,' Mashego said. 'And if the DA agrees to an MK president, there's no way that president allows the DA into Cabinet.'
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Union leaders call out government mismanagement affecting agriculture workers
The recent split between South Africa's Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (DALRRD) has thrown the livelihoods of hundreds of civil servants, cooperatives, and farmers into disarray. Image: Phando Jikelo / Independent Newspapers The National Education, Health and Allied Workers Union (Nehawu) and the Public Servants Association of South Africa (PSASA) have both slammed the Department of Agriculture and its former ally, the Department of Land Reform and Rural Development, for their poor handling of the split between the two entities. This has resulted in stalled service delivery affecting civil servants, cooperatives, and farmers across the country. This comes as the administrative shake-up within South Africa's Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (DALRRD), announced by President Cyril Ramaphosa on June 30, 2024, regarding the establishment of the National Macro Organisation of Government (NMOG), resulted in the DALRRD undergoing a significant restructuring. This reform resulted in the demerger of the department into two distinct entities: the Department of Agriculture (DoA) and the Department of Land Reform and Rural Development (DLRRD), which has left scores of civil servants tasked with developmental work twiddling their thumbs with no work to do since the start of the new financial year. Ntombi Matjene, a poultry farmer based in Winterveld in Pretoria, whose farming has benefitted from hundreds of civil servants under the Cooperatives and Enterprise Development (CEDs), has revealed that due to the split and the withdrawal of funding, she has been forced to let go of 10 of her temporary workers while the 15 permanent staff members have now been turned into temp workers. "The split has been bad for us. I have had to let go of all of my temp workers as things have come to a standstill. Some of us, who are funded by the national department and not through the provinces, are now suffering... Departments should be measured on impact and not on what people think would work. Farmers know who is assisting them correctly, direct funds to those who do the work," she said. Relating their plight, the CED workers from across South Africa's nine provinces and directors tasked with helping farmers and cooperatives deliver on their mandate, who were previously housed under Rural Development and have now been moved to the Department of Agriculture, feel hard done by the split. They are also decrying the non-consultative manner in which the two departments handled the NMOG and now demand a return to rural development. One senior official has indicated that the situation on the ground is so dire that some of the equipment at some of the Agri parks and other cooperative sites has been left unattended while ministers and their DGs and DDGs take part in G20 talks, while they continue twiddling their thumbs. "It is so sad that some of us who have served the department for more than 20 years get this treatment. Since the start of the new financial year, we have never been engaged or given work by the DDG or the DG. Nobody has given us anything to do. We request that this matter be prioritised as we have received complaints from our farmers and councillors, as we no longer support them. The planting season is coming, and nothing is happening as everything has stopped." Another official said this has led to serious organisational and administrative issues affecting their lives. "Our case is an anomaly to them, whereas in the Department of Land Reform and Rural Development, where we come from, there is what is known as Provincial Shared Services Centres, which house all of us. "Currently, that is where we are stationed, and there is administrative support (like HR, Finance, and Supply Chain Management) for us to execute our work. In the case of Agriculture, this support doesn't exist. Then you ask yourself, why do they insist on keeping us in Agriculture, whereas they don't even have systems in place to cater for a good working environment for the welfare of officials to be able to execute their work," he said. Attempts to get a comment from the Ministry of Rural Development were unsuccessful at the time of going to print after departmental spokesperson, Linda Page, had promised to respond, but later referred the matter back to the Department of Agriculture. "The dispute by the Cooperatives and Enterprise Development (CED) is still not resolved at the General Public Service Sector Bargaining Council (GPSSBC), thus the matter is still sub judice. Notwithstanding, the department presented a draft settlement agreement to Nehawu. "Nehawu is to seek a mandate from its affected members prior to signing. Thus, the media questions cannot be responded to until the dispute is resolved," Moses Rannditsheni, the Department of Agriculture's director for media and external communication, said. However, on behalf of CED workers, Toka Nkofu from the Public Servants Association of South Africa (PSASA) union, accused both departments of failing to address the issues raised by CEDs following numerous efforts to engage the employer. Speaking on behalf of Nehawu, Zamo Mpekule echoed Nkofu's sentiments, stating: "Nehawu lodged a formal dispute as mandated by the CED employee. A conciliation part of the dispute failed last week as the employer proposed a sham offer of 70% Agriculture and 30% Land Reform. These employees demanded to be returned to Land Reform, all of them, as they know nothing about agriculture, and they do not even have qualifications related to agriculture." [email protected]
