
Map Shows 11 States Where Older Americans Outnumber Children
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The number of states where older adults outnumber children has increased in recent years, according to new data from the Vintage 2024 Population Estimates released today by the U.S. Census Bureau.
In 2024, there were a total of 11 states where older adults outnumbered children, up from just three in 2020.
Why It Matters
A falling birth rate, and aging population, are causing concern. People's decisions around having children reflect wider anxieties about the economy, given the expense required to have and raise children, as well as social changes, as couples are choosing to have smaller families or have children later.
As a result, the issue has been at the forefront of the Trump administration's political agenda—with President Donald Trump giving women a "baby bonus" of $5,000 to encourage them to have more children, expanding access to in vitro fertilization (IVF) for Americans, and the Department of Transportation being directed to give precedence to "communities with marriage and birth rates higher than the national average."
What To Know
In 2020, there were just three states where older adults outnumbered children—Maine, Vermont and Florida.
By 2024, this number had increased to 11 after the three states were joined by Delaware, Hawaii, Montana, New Hampshire, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and West Virginia.
Explaining why these states have more older adults than children, Mindy Marks, a professor of economics at Northeastern University, Massachusetts, told Newsweek "one reason is immigration," or more precisely, a lack of it.
"Immigrants tend to be younger and have higher fertility rates than natives," she said. "West Virginia has the smallest percentage of foreign-born residents among all U.S. states."
"Internal migration plays a similar role," she added. "Parts of the country are booming with easy access to employment and amenities and young people are moving to areas like Texas and Colorado away from places like Delaware and Pennsylvania."
Another reason is differences in life expectancy.
"A recent study led by researchers at the Yale School of Public Health found that states in the Northeast and West, along with the District of Columbia (D.C.), recorded the greatest gains in life expectancy," she said.
According to the 2024 Census Bureau data, the number of U.S. metro areas with more older adults than children also increased—from 58 to 112 between 2020 to 2024. This represented nearly 30 percent of the nation's 387 metro areas.
There were also three metro areas with at least 1 million people that had more older people than younger people for the first time. These included Cleveland, Ohio, Providence-Warwick, Rhode Island-Massachusetts and Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, Connecticut.
In 2020, 31.3 percent, so 983, of the nation's 3,144 counties had more older adults than children. However, in 2024, this figure increased to almost 45 percent—i.e. 1,411 counties.
"There have been increases in life expectancy in the U.S. over time due to increased insurance coverage and medical improvements," Marks said.
"For an individual born in 1900, the life expectancy conditional on reaching age 30 was an additional 39 years. For the cohort born in 1950 that number jumped to 47 years. Increased life expectancy implies more older adults," she added.
These factors, and others, coupled with the falling birth rate are shifting the demographic of America's population.
Reasons for the decline in birth rate could include the increased cost of having children, mainly through housing and higher education, and the increased time commitments of having children, Marks said.
There are also changing social perceptions of "ideal family size" and "if one needs to have children to live a 'good life,'" Marks added.
"The rising female labor force participation combined with men's failure to equally contribute to domestic tasks, combined with limited assistance for working families" could also be at play, she said.
Something that has "played a big role in the decline in teen pregnancy," she added, was access to better and cheaper contraceptives meaning "there are fewer unwanted pregnancies."
What People Are Saying
Mindy Marks, a professor of economics at Northeastern University, Massachusetts, told Newsweek: "Declining fertility will impact society in many ways. Many government programs such as Social Security and Medicare are structured such that current payments for retirees are funded by current workers. As the ratio of retiree to workers changes these programs become financially insolvent. Relatedly, there are workforce issues especially in sectors like health care and nursing homes where demand for labor will outstrip supply resulting in shortages or higher prices. Fewer workers will also reduce economic growth. As the age structure changes companies will have an incentive to market consumer goods and entertainment to an older client-base and we will see more innovation in products targeted to older demographics."
What Happens Next
Birth rates are forecast to continue being an issue. The Congressional Budget Office recently predicted that fertility rates could average 1.6 births per woman over the next three decades, which is significantly below the level of 2.1 births per woman required to maintain a stable population without immigration.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Military veteran gets a life sentence for plotting an FBI attack after his Jan. 6 arrest
WASHINGTON (AP) — A military veteran was sentenced Wednesday to life in prison for plotting to attack an FBI office and assassinate law enforcement officers in retaliation for his arrest on charges that he was part of the mob that stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, court records show. Edward Kelley was one of the first rioters to breach the Capitol. Nearly two years later, Kelley made plans with another man to attack the FBI office in Knoxville, Tennessee, using improvised explosive devices attached to vehicles and drones, according to prosecutors. Last November, a jury convicted Kelley of conspiring to murder federal employees, solicitation to commit a crime of violence and influencing federal officials by threat. Kelley, 36, received a pardon from President Donald Trump for his Jan. 6 convictions, but a judge agreed with prosecutors that Trump's action did not extend to Kelley's Tennessee case. That makes Kelley, who is from Maryvale, Tennessee, one of only a few Capitol riot defendants remaining in prison after the Republican president's sweeping act of clemency. U.S. District Judge Thomas Varlan handed down Kelley's life sentence during a hearing in Knoxville, according to court records. The judge denied a request for Kelley to be released pending the outcome of an appeal. Prosecutors had recommended a life sentence for Kelley, saying he was remorseless and incapable of rehabilitation. 'On the contrary, Kelley not only believes the actions for which he was convicted were justified but that his duty as a self-styled 'patriot' compelled him to target East Tennessee law enforcement for assassination,' they wrote. Kelley served in the Marine Corps for eight years. He was deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan before his 2015 discharge from the military. On Jan. 6, 2021, Kelley was captured on video helping two other rioters throw a Capitol Police officer onto the ground and using a piece of wood to damage a window, according to the FBI. He was the fourth person to enter the Capitol through a broken window, the FBI said. After a trial without a jury, a federal judge in Washington convicted Kelley last November of 11 counts stemming from the riot. Before Kelley could be sentenced, Trump pardoned him and hundreds of other convicted Capitol rioters. Kelley argued that his pardon was broad enough to cover his conduct in the Tennessee case, but the judge disagreed. Varlan said Kelley's crimes in the Tennessee case were separated from Kelley's conduct on Jan. 6 'by years and miles.' Prosecutors reached the same conclusion. In other Jan. 6 cases, however, Trump's Justice Department has argued that the pardons apply to separate convictions. For instance, prosecutors concluded that a Kentucky man's pardon for storming the Capitol also covered his conviction for illegally possessing guns when FBI agents searched his home for the Jan. 6 investigation. Kelley has been jailed since December 2022. His lawyer, Mark Brown, said Kelley did not hurt anybody or directly threaten anybody with violence. Brown urged the judge to reject prosecutors' request to apply a 'terrorism enhancement' in calculating his client's sentence. 'Kelley does not deserve the same sentence as an actual 'terrorist' who injured or killed hundreds or thousands of America citizens,' Brown wrote. Kelley's co-defendant, Austin Carter, pleaded guilty to a conspiracy charge in January 2024. He is scheduled to be sentenced on Aug. 4. Kelley created a list of 36 law-enforcement officers to target for assassination and shared it with Carter, calling it their first 'mission,' according to prosecutors. All the officers were involved in Kelley's May 2022 arrest on Capitol riot charges and the FBI's search of his home. 'The proof at trial established that Kelley targeted law enforcement because of their anticipated role in the civil war that Kelley hoped to initiate and because of his animus towards those who participated in his May 2022 arrest and search of his home,' prosecutors wrote. Kelley, Carter and a third man used an encrypted messaging platform to discuss plans, prosecutors said. Carter testified that he met with Kelley to conduct military-style training in November 2022. 'Carter's testimony was unequivocal — he had no doubts that, had he and Kelley not been arrested, the law enforcement personnel included on Kelley's list would have been murdered,' prosecutors wrote. Kelley's attorney said the case involved 'little to no planning.' 'Discussions did not lead to action," Brown wrote. "And while people may not like what Mr. Kelley had to say, he stands behind his position that he has a First Amendment right to free speech.'


The Hill
29 minutes ago
- The Hill
House GOP advances Trump megabill after Johnson calls conservative holdouts' bluff
House Republicans advanced their 'big, beautiful bill' full of President Trump's legislative priorities early Thursday morning, overcoming a key procedural hurdle after GOP leaders left the vote open for hours to quell an internal revolt. The chamber voted 219-213 to adopt a rule governing debate on Trump's domestic agenda, opening up discussion on the megabill and teeing up a final vote on the package. The vote was something of a gamble for Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), who has faced opposition to the legislation from various corners of his ideologically diverse conference. Heading into the rule vote, conservatives had warned that they would sink the procedural measure unless it was delayed beyond Wednesday. Johnson called their bluff, held the vote open for more than five hours, and then adopted the rule after winning just enough support — an effort that got a big boost from Trump, who spoke with some of the holdouts during the long, midnight impasse. Adoption of the rule sets the stage for Johnson and his leadership team to pass the legislation later Thursday morning, well ahead of their self-imposed July 4 deadline. The Senate had passed the same bill on Tuesday, so the legislation will head directly to Trump's desk, where he's expected to sign it with a ceremonial flourish on Independence Day. The chamber adopted the rule after a whirlwind of an afternoon on Capitol Hill, which saw a different procedural vote stall for more than seven hours as holdouts huddled with Johnson and White House aides behind closed doors. It marked the longest vote in House history. Hardline conservatives have hammered the 'big, beautiful bill,' wary that it cuts too little in federal spending and piles too much onto the national debt. Those concerns only grew after the package returned from the Senate, which had altered the initial House bill in ways that increased deficit spending. On Wednesday morning, a number of hardline conservatives had vowed to vote against the rule if it came to the floor. By Wednesday evening, those warnings had softened slightly. But shortly before the House rule hit the floor, several spending hawks told reporters that if Johnson called the vote they would abstain, requesting more time to learn the details of the Senate-passed bill. The Speaker called the vote anyway, successfully calling their bluff and allowing the tenuous process to move forward. Leadership called the vote minutes after Trump urged Republicans to approve the megabill Wednesday night. 'It looks like the House is ready to vote tonight. We had GREAT conversations all day, and the Republican House Majority is UNITED, for the Good of our Country, delivering the Biggest Tax Cuts in History and MASSIVE Growth. Let's go Republicans, and everyone else – MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' Trump wrote on Truth Social. But then leaders were forced to again hold a vote open for more than five hours to solidify support. For several hours, it stalled at four GOP 'no' votes and 10 Republicans withholding their vote. Eventually, two of the holdouts voted to advance the measure, but Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) flipped his 'yes' vote to 'no,' putting the tally at 207 to 217. Several hours later, the president spoke directly with some of the holdouts, including Reps. Victoria Spartz (R-Ind.) Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) and Massie. Not long afterward, Johnson announced that he'd secured the votes to pass the rule. The House will now proceed to debate on the 'big, beautiful bill' and then a vote on final passage, which Johnson said he expected around 8 or 8:30 a.m.


Bloomberg
41 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
House GOP Struggles to Find Final Votes for Trump's Tax Bill
House Republican leaders struggled to find the final votes to advance Donald Trump's massive tax and spending package, holding a key vote open for hours as the president and his allies worked to win them over but expressing confidence the legislation would eventually pass. They're just not quite there yet.