EXCLUSIVE Bombshell twist as police charge the estranged husband of Mark Latham's porn star ex
Ross Matthews was due to appear in Sydney 's Downing Centre Local Court on Wednesday to face a charge of 'using a carriage service to menace/harass/offend'.
The charge is believed to relate to Latham's porn star ex, Nathalie Matthews. Further details are expected to be revealed in court later today.
Ms Matthews has also applied to the court for an apprehended violence (AVO) restraining order to be taken out for her protection against him.
The legal twist comes just a week after Matthews insisted he no longer had anything to do with his former wife since their split three years ago.
Matthews spoke out after Ms Matthews accused Latham of 'a sustained pattern' of psychological, financial and emotional abuse during their relationship.
'Please stop messaging me,' Ross Matthews posted on X after the scandal erupted. 'I don't speak to Nathalie and do not care. Thank you.'
The Matthews married in 2018 but the marriage reportedly ended in 2022, before Ms Matthews began dating former federal Labor Party leader, Latham.
Ms Matthews now also has a separate AVO application in court against Latham.
She claimed Latham proposed to her during their affair - but he has dismissed the relationship as just a 'situationship', despite explicit texts to her also now emerging.
'The big news is I had a private life. I had a sex life and I've got to say it was fantastic,' he said on Wednesday.
UK-born Mr Matthews had previously posted proudly about his marriage to his former wife on social media.
'Six months since I woke up with a killer hangover and still managed to make the best decision I have ever made!' he wrote in the wake of their wedding.
In another post he added: 'Happy one year! I cannot believe how fast a year can go!
'I would be lying if I said it's been the best year of my life - in fact it's easily been the worst but it is in bad times that picking the right life partner is of the most importance!
'I just could not imagine doing life without you, love you always and here's to many years to come!'
It's understood the pair, who were living in Cronulla in Sydney's south, were both Liberal Party members, and Ms Matthews stood as a candidate at the 2021 Sutherland Shire Council election.
On Wednesday, Latham alleged the couple were still actually married while he was seeing Ms Matthews.
'Now The Australian is 'reporting' that I proposed to Nathalie Matthews in May last year,' he posted to X.
'They missed the joke: she was still married to Ross Matthews, and maybe still is to this day.'
The former Labor leader has categorically denied he 'abuses women' and insisted all his dealings with Ms Matthews were entirely consensual.
In an interview with Chris Smith on 2SM, he did not deny sending lurid texts to Ms Matthews from the floor of state parliament.
But he added: 'If I'm the only person in Australia who in a work environment engaged in a bit of playful sex talk with their partner, then I'll buy everyone a lottery ticket tomorrow.'
He said the AVO case against him was being brought privately after NSW Police chose to not pursue the allegations.
'There is a court case pending because she's lodged a private AVO application,' he said.
'She tried to get an AVO with the police... I think that tells you a lot about the substance of the matter.
'But I can say in relation to that, just about all the things she's complaining about, she initiated in consensual arrangements.'
The domestic violence order filed in the NSW Local Court accuses Latham of subjecting his ex-partner to 'a sustained pattern' of psychological, financial, and emotional abuse over almost three years, according to details seen by The Australian.
The application alleges Latham engaged in vile acts, 'including defecating on me before sex and refusing to let me wash, forcing degrading sexual acts, pressuring me to engage in sexual acts with others, demanding I call him 'master', telling me I was his property, and repeatedly telling me that my only value to him was for sex to demean and control me'.
Leaked WhatsApp messages reported by The Daily Telegraph on Wednesday allegedly show interactions between Latham and his former partner.
Latham told Daily Mail Australia the outlet's reproduction of the messages was 'not accurate'. It is also not suggested the claims of abusive behaviour are substantiated, only that the allegations have been made.
The leaked WhatsApp messages include a series of lewd exchanges on February 20, 2025 during parliamentary sitting hours.
'Very hard thinking about you,' he wrote to Ms Matthews shortly after 11am, before following up with a series of suggestive emojis.
'Need badly to taste you,' he wrote that afternoon, alongside an emoji of a tongue.
'Made it back for first vote after dinner,' he said at 8.38pm.
Latham told the outlet the communications did not impact his work.
The tranche of leaked messages includes more explicit exchanges - too graphic to publish - spanning back as far as October last year.
On several occasions, Latham is referred to as 'master'.
He said Ms Matthews sent him images during parliamentary sittings, 'seeking a response', and that he could not describe them due to 'an abundance of caution about the revenge porn laws'.
'I don't think responding to a consensual partner on a private, intimate matter in any way has reduced my workload, which I would match up against any other member in the place,' he told The Daily Telegraph.
Ms Matthews' allegations against the politician were detailed in court documents filed with NSW Local Court.
Latham has denied the allegations which he described as 'comically false and ridiculous' in a post to X on Monday night.
He said he had 'scores of documents' to support his claims and that he would rely on those documents to defend himself.
'As the old saying goes, hell hath no fury like a woman scorned,' he wrote.
Ms Matthews, who runs an e-commerce global logistics firm based in Dubai, Perth and Sydney, has applied for an interim order barring Latham from coming within 100 metres of her.
She cited 'ongoing, reasonable fear of harassment, intimidation, and potential harm'.
Her application accuses the former Labor leader of throwing a dinner plate at her, forcing her to call him 'master', and pressuring her to have sex with others.
Ms Matthews' filing, reported by The Australian, also alleges Latham prevented her from cleaning up after defecating on her before sex and telling her she was 'property', and telling her that her only value to him was for sex to 'demean and control' her.
Latham claimed the texting did not impact his work
She also alleged 'physical violence' incidents, including pushing her against walls, forcing her out a door, throwing a plate at her during a row. She also claimed he drove at her with his car, hit her with the side mirror and caused a bruise.
Latham is further accused of 'systematically undermining' Ms Matthews to 'control and isolate' her by comparing her 'unfavourably to other women and acting as if he would 'harm himself' to manipulate her.
Ms Matthews accuses Latham of forcing her to cover the cost of holidays abroad 'under duress', making her purchase expensive goods, and coercing her regarding her father's will for his benefit.
She claims she experienced 'constant fear and hyper-vigilance' since her arrival home from a June trip abroad, alleging all past break-ups with Latham featured a repeated 'pattern of harassment and intimidation'.
She alleges: 'The defendant has held intimate photos and videos of me, and I have been afraid he would expose them to shame and control me if I attempted to leave or resist his demands.'
Latham denied all accusations to The Australian.
'Nothing has been served on me nor has anyone contacted me,' he told the newspaper.
'I haven't had anything to do with her (Ms Matthews) since 27 May, so nearly seven weeks ago. I ended the 'situationship' that night for very good reason.'
The matter will be heard at Downing Centre Local Court on July 30.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Warning to parents to stop kids accessing toxic content online amid surge in children being brainwashed for terror acts
SECURITY chiefs are calling on parents to stop children accessing toxic online material over the summer holidays. The unprecedented warning comes as it emerged a growing number of kids, some as young as 12, are being radicalised and brainwashed into committing acts of terrorism. 2 Around one in five people arrested for terrorist offences are aged under 18 and half of all referrals to the Government's Prevent anti-radicalisation programme are children. Appealing to parents yesterday, MI5 boss Sir Ken McCallum said: 'In a few clicks, young people can be speaking to terrorists online, consuming violent content. 'Terrorists are using slick propaganda to pull young people down a dangerous and potentially life-changing path.' He joined chiefs from the National Crime Agency and Counter Terrorism Policing to urge parents and carers to be vigilant about children's use of the internet. It was the first such warning ever issued and comes after heads of the 'Five Eyes' nations — the UK, US, Australia, New Zealand and Canada — last year called for action to combat the growing threat to kids posed by online extremism. Counter Terrorism Policing head Vicki Evans said: 'We encourage parents to activate parental controls on routers, devices and apps, and to start the conversation about online safety.' The NCA's Alexander Murray also warned of online toxic masculinity, as seen in Netflix hit Adolescence. He said: 'There is a fast-growing threat from sadistic and violent online gangs. . . including fraud, cyber, child sexual abuse, violence and extremism.' Stephen Graham and Ashley Walters' acclaimed drama Adolescence smashes huge Netflix record by DOUBLE after taking world by storm 2
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US judge orders deported migrant Abrego released ahead of trial
WASHINGTON, July 23 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge ordered on Wednesday that Kilmar Abrego be released on bail while awaiting trial on human smuggling charges, a legal victory for the migrant who was wrongly deported to El Salvador by the Trump administration, but one that likely sets the stage for him to be detained again by immigration authorities. U.S. District Judge Waverly Crenshaw in Nashville upheld a magistrate judge's ruling that prosecutors had not shown sufficient evidence that Abrego posed a public safety threat or was a flight risk. Simultaneously on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis in Greenbelt, Maryland, who is overseeing a civil lawsuit brought by Abrego, put a 72-hour pause on any further attempt by the Trump administration to deport Abrego. The ruling will likely not lead to Abrego's release from U.S. government custody and will trigger a renewed legal battle over whether he can be deported again. Abrego's lawyers have asked for the ruling to be paused for 30 days, keeping him in criminal detention as they weigh their next moves. President Donald Trump's administration has previously said if Abrego is freed from criminal custody, he will immediately be taken into immigration detention and face a second deportation to a country other than El Salvador. The immigration proceedings will begin immediately and could lead to Abrego's removal from the U.S. before a criminal trial, officials have said, despite the Trump administration's previous vow that Abrego would face justice in an American courtroom. Abrego, 29, a Salvadoran migrant who had been living in Maryland, was deported and imprisoned in El Salvador in March despite a 2019 judicial ruling that he could not be sent there because of a risk of gang persecution. Abrego's case has drawn widespread attention as the Trump administration moves aggressively to deport millions living illegally in the U.S., prompting criticism that the government is infringing on legal rights. The Trump administration brought Abrego back to the U.S. in June after securing an indictment accusing him of taking part in a smuggling ring as part of the MS-13 gang to transport migrants living in the country illegally. Abrego has pleaded not guilty and his lawyers have accused the Trump administration of bringing the charges to cover up violations of his rights. He has denied any gang ties. Federal prosecutors sought to convince two different judges to order Abrego be detained while awaiting a trial. They alleged that Abrego used children as cover during smuggling trips, faced complaints that he mistreated female passengers and lied about his activities when stopped by police in 2022. Lawyers for Abrego have argued that alleged co-conspirators cooperating with prosecutors cannot be trusted because they are seeking relief from their own criminal charges and deportations. The defense has argued that witnesses gave inconsistent statements to investigators, including about the government's core allegation that Abrego is a member of the MS-13 gang.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
‘I was followed home', says Unite boss as fraud inquiry deepens
The boss of Unite said that she was harassed and 'followed home' for trying to uncover the truth about Unite under the leadership of Len McCluskey. Sharon Graham, who took over in 2021 on a pledge to 'leave no stone unturned to get to the truth', said that she had endured 'horrendous personal attacks' as the process got 'ugly'. On Tuesday, a report about a scandal-hit hotel complex in Birmingham found that the union, which is funded by workers' fees, was overcharged by £30 million. The main contractor, the Flanagan Group, owned by men whom McCluskey called his 'good friends', paid for the former union boss to fly out to watch the Champions League final two years running, including in a private jet, the report found. The report said that the union believes that there is evidence to support criminal investigations into two 'very senior' former Unite officials. The case was passed to the Serious Fraud Office last year but no arrests have been made. Unite said that the 'reports are with the police'. The union's auditors found that there was a 'pervasive fraud environment' at Unite and that 'former members of senior management appear to have been motivated to commit fraud'. Ten suspects have also been identified in a separate investigation by South Wales police into bribery, money laundering and fraud relating to contracts for affiliated services offered by the union. Graham, who has struggled to pull the union from the shadow of its past, said that 'to get here has been an extremely difficult process and quite frankly an ugly one'. 'Those with much to lose, and their supporters inside and outside the union, have done all in their power to attack me,' she said in a foreword to the report. 'I have had to endure horrendous personal attacks over three years, both from vested interests and those with blind loyalty to factions. 'I expected turbulence of course, but even I was shocked at the lengths being gone to: despicable online abuse and being followed home.' She claims that her opponents operated a 'scorched earth strategy that was adopted by some supporters of a faction tied to the past' to 'lie' about Unite. • Unite leader Sharon Graham defends strategy of targeting bosses' families The union ultimately paid £112 million for a hotel and conference complex in Birmingham, £74.5 million more than it was worth. On Tuesday, Unite announced that it had wiped £66 million from its accounts as an 'impairment'. The profit mark-up was double the industry norm and the contracts were signed by McCluskey against the advice of lawyers, the report found. The Flanagan Group, a Liverpool-based construction firm, later arranged football tickets, hospitality and flights, including at least one private jet flight, for McCluskey, the report said. Two of the matches were the 2018 and 2019 Champions League finals in Kyiv and Madrid, the latter of which he travelled to by private jet. The owners of the Flanagan Group 'consistently organised and paid for' his tickets, and there is 'no indication' McCluskey reimbursed them. Lawyers for McCluskey have previously told the BBC that he paid for his own travel in full and did not recall attending all of the domestic matches in the Unite report. • Unite left fearing fraud squad's might A statement issued to The Times this week by Carter-Ruck, McCluskey's lawyers, said: 'Our client is deeply disappointed by the statements and report published today by Unite, which were issued without any prior reference to him, and he is considering his legal rights in this regard. 'As this matter is understood to remain the subject of ongoing police investigation, it would be inappropriate of McCluskey to comment in detail on it at this time. Suffice to say that such allegations as have been published regarding our client are categorically rejected by him as inaccurate, selective and highly misleading.' In interviews with a KC leading Unite's investigation, McCluskey denied that he overruled staff or lawyers over the contract, and instead said that he had delegated many key aspects of the project to Ed Sabisky, Unite's former finance director, who died in 2020. The Times called the Flanagan Group for comment on Tuesday. Their representative declined to answer questions or give an email address.
