Princess Cruises passengers warn of chaos at in-demand port
Many cruise passengers know that there's always a chance that their cruise itinerary can change, causing them to miss one of their planned ports of call.
Usually this happens when weather conditions are unfavorable, but other factors can also contribute to unexpected changes to cruise port plans.And even when your cruise itinerary doesn't change, the port experience might sometimes not turn out like you expected.
Staying flexible and open to the idea that plans could change usually leads to a better cruise experience no matter where you sail, but missing a port or activity you were looking forward to experiencing can still be frustrating.
Some Princess Cruises passengers unfortunately found out what that's like as they missed planned shore excursions in one sought-after port due to a situation outside of their control — a situation that can happen on any busy day in this destination.
Even though their ship was docked in port and they were ready to disembark at their assigned time, the process of getting passengers off the ship and into the port experienced an hours-long delay.According to Princess Cruises passenger posts on Reddit, some cruisers have experienced a chaotic disembarkation situation in Skagway, Alaska, on recent days with multiple cruise ships visiting the port simultaneously.
'Currently on an Alaskan Cruise with Princess, and unfortunately we missed our morning excursion (White Pass Scenic Train) in Skagway because Princess absolutely fumbled the de-boarding progress,' pingypongypangy posted in the Princess Cruises community on Reddit.
The cruiser's ship was required to transport passengers to shore via tender boats during its visit to Skagway, and the process got really backed up. This sometimes happens with tendering, especially when weather conditions aren't ideal.Another Princess passenger chimed in on the thread to note that rough weather conditions caused a similar backup for their ship's tendering process on the day before.
'We are on the Royal Princess right now, and were in Skagway yesterday. We were late getting on land as well because of the tender situation," Rstuart11 noted. "But, to add an extra point in, they had to stop the tender boats altogether for almost an hour because of the weather.'
Not every cruise ship that visits Skagway has to deal with the hassle of tendering, however. Tendering is only required at one dock location in the port, which is only used on busier days when there are multiple ships in Skagway.Because of safety concerns related to a past rockslide from the hill above Skagway's Railroad Dock, cruise passengers can't walk the pier closest to the hill. If your ship is assigned to one particular berth by the hill (Railroad Forward, or RRF), you'll be shuttled from the ship to shore via a tender boat.
'Since the landslide a few years ago, they tender you a few hundred feet from the cruise ship pier to a typical tender pier as a legal/safety issue if the ship is parked at that pier,' Cuedon explained in the Reddit thread.
Sometimes, a cruise ship's crew doesn't know in advance if they will be assigned to the tendering berth in Skagway.'Based on some of my trips last season, the ships themselves don't always know which pier they're going to be at until the day before or day of,' Cuedon added. 'Sapphire got the walk-off yesterday (and the week before), Royal got to suffer the tender.'
The Skagway Visitor Department posted a 2025 cruise ship arrival schedule with each ship's dock assignment on its website, but all dock locations are subject to change.
If your cruise is scheduled to visit Skagway on a busy day, your port experience can vary based on your ship's dock location. If you do find out that your ship will be the unlucky one required to tender, be prepared to get up early to get off the ship as soon as possible and avoid potential tendering delays and even missed excursions.
(The Arena Group will earn a commission if you book a cruise.)
, or email Amy Post at or call or text her at 386-383-2472.
This story was originally reported by Come Cruise With Me on Jun 1, 2025, where it first appeared.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
4 hours ago
- New York Post
NJ dateless wonders whine they can't land love — because New Yorkers are stuck up about traveling there: ‘Five subway stop limit'
He lives near Montclair, but to New York ladies — it might as well be another time zone. Frustrated with his local dating scene, one New Jerseyan took to Reddit to discuss his dating difficulties. He explained that a majority of his matches on dating apps come from women based in the boroughs of NYC, and he suspects that often, women reject him because of his location. Advertisement 'Once they find out I'm in Jersey, a lot of them just lose interest,' he bemoaned. 'Some even say it straight up: 'Oh, you're in Jersey?' Like I live in a different country or something.' The Redditor said he's based in North Caldwell, N.J., and has a car, so he's willing to drive the 20 or so miles or meet potential paramours halfway — if they're willing. The trouble is, they're usually not. Advertisement 4 'I should be able to take a cheap relatively quick Uber home if not ideally an extremely simple and short subway ride,' one New Yorker wrote. Christopher Sadowski Jessica, a 24-year-old living in Crown Heights, told The Post that she routinely swipes left on New Jerseyans she encounters on the apps. 'It's just too far,' she says. And she's not alone. Hundreds of women chimed in under the Reddit post, looking to give the daydreaming dater a much-needed reality check about the actuality of the NYC dating scene. Advertisement 'People barely want to travel neighborhoods for a relationship, let alone to another state,' one commenter said. 'No one wants a 'long-distance' relationship, especially when there are so many eligible people a subway ride or walk away,' agreed another. 'When I first moved to New York, I lived in Washington Heights,' shared another still-traumatized single. 'I made the mistake of going on one date in Bay Ridge. Never again. The subway trip back took me longer than the drive between Baltimore and Philadelphia. From that moment forward, I held a 5 subway stops limit for dates.' Advertisement 4 The original poster said he lives in North Caldwell, near Montclair, which can be an hour drive one-way to or from Manhattan on a good day. ungvar – 'I'm not going to NJ. It's not an 'ew, Jersey' thing, it's a logistics thing,' one woman said. Countless commenters also added that for many women, trekking out to New Jersey means taking public transportation, which can sometimes be dangerous or emotionally draining. While some New Jerseyans like this romantically-ruined Redditor face what he called 'geo-filtering,' AKA women rejecting too-remote matches, others find a way to win out and meet their dates in the middle — but make no mistake, they're still guarded about dating New Yorkers. The Post has reached out to the original Redditor for comment. Vinayak, a 24-year-old from Paramus who's currently dating a New Yorker, told The Post that initially, he was cautious, simply because of the time, cost and effort associated with traveling to the city. 'Dating in New York worried me at first because there's a huge time cost when it comes to dating in and around NYC, specifically from Jersey. I also feel like people in New York are more judgmental, and knowing that, I was a little more wary,' he said. Advertisement 'The time commitment to dating in New York has definitely stopped me from seeing other people on Hinge before.' 4 Many New Yorkers are even ditching dating one another online, citing chronic app fatigue as the culprit. AFP via Getty Images The New Jerseyan added that when he was first dating his current girlfriend, who was living in Yonkers at the time, they often met in the middle in Manhattan at first, so they each faced the hour-ish commute — pick your poison, Metro North trains or Port Authority-bound buses? 'Crossing the Hudson just sucks. I always did it for the right person, but I understand if someone would prefer to look in their more immediate vicinity,' vouched a Jersey girl, who also lamented the pricy, unpredictable nature of trains, buses and George Washington Bridge traffic. Advertisement 4 The Redditor said that he's tried pursuing more local women, but often, they don't share the same values he does, which is why he looks to New York ladies instead. Kaspars Grinvalds – 'Unfortunately I think Jersey has the same reputation as a green text coming from an Android phone. Nothing wrong with it, commute could sometimes be FASTER from parts of NJ than other parts of NYC, but it's just got a shadow over it that can't be shaken,' wrote one wise commenter. 'I don't think the problem is always the mileage. It's the mindset.' the lovelorn New Jerseyan said, simultaneously standing up for all of the snubbed Staten Island and Long Island men out there.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
New Goes on Week-Long Trip with Her In-Laws. Now She Feels 'Broken' After Receiving No Help With the Baby
The woman says her newborn's sleeping habits weren't taken into consideration on a family vacationNEED TO KNOW A woman says a week-long family vacation left her feeling "broken" after no one offered to help her with her newborn In a post shared to Reddit, she writes that she brought her 3-month-old baby along on the trip But in the end, she was left out of the group activities — mostly due to her baby's sleeping habitsA woman says she's feeling "broken" after taking a week-long trip with her in-laws. In a post shared to Reddit, the woman writes that she brought her 3-month-old baby along on the trip, which was meant to celebrate her mother-in-law's 75th birthday. "I really wish we hadn't gone," she writes, adding that there were "many people with [child-rearing] experience" on the trip, but none of them offered to hold the baby or give her a break. "They went out to dinner without us every night. It would be like 'oh let's go to nice restaurant! At 7:30!' Well, baby goes to sleep at 7pm and the restaurant is 45 min away….one night they offered to bring us back some food, but then said oh sorry we lost track of time and the kitchen is closing now. Every other night we just fended for ourselves or ate the leftovers they brought home," she writes. She adds that she, her husband and her child weren't included in group photos — which always took place while the baby was napping — and she wasn't asked to join on group outings. "They didn't want to have to plan, they wanted to do things spontaneously, which is practically impossible with an infant," she adds. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Many on Reddit are urging the woman to speak to a professional, with one writing, "Three months is SO little and they are still figuring out life. At that stage I was still in survival mode and I can't imagine traveling where I don't have any of my normal tools or routines. You're are totally justified in being totally spent!" Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
Fox News
16 hours ago
- Fox News
Air travel's 'golden age' featured steak dinners, cocktails and formal attire for sophisticated travelers
Conversations about flying today are sparking memories of nostalgic times in the skies and the ways in which travel has changed over the years. A Reddit user recently posted a message in the "r/aviation" forum, asking, "So were the airlines of the 'golden ages' operating at a massive loss?" "Pan Am, for example, lasted 64 years (1927-1991)," the person went on. "Pan Am and similar airlines offered spacious seating arrangements, proper cutlery and fine dining. Not to mention [that] being an airline crew [member] was prestigious, and I'm to assume that meant [a] competitive and subsequently high-paid profession." The user added, "These amenities and circumstances are extremely cost-intensive … Today it is so far from the luxury it once was, [given that] cost-cutting and corporate culture reign supreme." Fox News Digital reached out to travel experts for insights as Redditors took to the comments section to discuss with passion the evolution of flying over the years — with many fawning over the old days and others calling out the high prices. "Look how the passengers are dressed," commented one user. Another user wrote, "Flights [were] mainly for wealthy people. Tickets were really expensive." "Old guy here," one man reflected. "Went on my first flight at 6 years old in 1970 from Chicago to Florida. Each ticket cost $500 (equivalent of maybe $2,500 now). We went out and bought special 'airplane clothes,' the equivalent of church attire. I remember eating steak on the plane. Different days indeed," he added. Another Redditor claimed, "In the '50s, airlines started doing 'themed' flights with a menu to match, and some Scandinavian airlines would even carve a whole ham in front of you. The '50s-'70s was really the Golden Age for travel where the food became a huge selling point of flying." "The meals [were] served on china, cutlery, the actual food, drinks … [the] majority [of it] served by hand … [There was] no 'cart hauling,'" said a user. "It was an experience." Former flight attendant and Florida-based etiquette expert Jacqueline Whitmore also emphasized that flying was once a luxury experience. "Flight attendants served real food on real plates." "Passengers dressed in their Sunday best," she told Fox News Digital. "Flight attendants served real food on real plates." She said flight attendants were "held in high regard," were well-groomed and well-mannered, and were "treated like celebrities." She said that "now, flying is about getting from point A to B. Budgets are tight and air travel is about quantity, not quality. More seats were added, and meals were cut. Personal space is now at a premium." Whitmore added, "Many passengers lack civility and common courtesy. Some treat the cabin crew like servants. Passengers eat whatever they want, regardless of whether it smells or not." She also said, "Seats are getting smaller and are more uncomfortable, giving passengers less leg and arm room. If you want anything special (early boarding, more leg room), you have to pay for it. Everything is now 'extra.'" Gary Leff, a Texas-based travel industry expert and author of the blog "View From the Wing," told Fox News Digital it's easy to look back at the early days of air travel "through rose-colored glasses." "There are many ways in which flying is better now than it's ever been," he said. "Flying is safer than it used to be. Long-haul business class usually means flat beds, and often even with privacy doors. Lounges in airports are far more elevated." He also pointed out that technological advances allow passengers to be entertained while in the air with personal TVs in their seats. Many Reddit users said the changes in flying experiences are due to airline regulation. "You didn't have federally controlled mandates and high taxes," commented one user. Another user wrote, "The airline deregulation act made those days go away. It made travel cheaper and more accessible for the average traveler." "Most people misunderstand the regulated era of airlines," said Leff. "It wasn't about consumer protection. It was about ensuring airline profitability! There was a mistaken belief that airlines would compromise safety if they didn't earn consistent profits …We saw continued strong safety records throughout the bankruptcies most major airlines have been through." He added, "Since fares were so high and airlines weren't allowed to compete by lowering them, they still tried to attract passengers (since each additional passenger was so profitable) — and the way they did it was by investing in services and amenities."
