Rahul Jacob: Alcohol isn't what it used to be but maybe that's alright
Rahul Jacob Younger folk aren't drinking much in the rich world, a trend that could catch on elsewhere too, but that doesn't mean this industry is staring at doom. As volumes fall, prices are going premium. Young people seem to be discovering cocktails and are not part of the developed world's shift away from alcohol. Gift this article
On few subjects is there a greater generational divide in the developed world than on the merits of having a cocktail. In the past couple of decades in the US, sales of alcohol to those between 65 and 74 years of age rose by half, even after adjusting for inflation.
On few subjects is there a greater generational divide in the developed world than on the merits of having a cocktail. In the past couple of decades in the US, sales of alcohol to those between 65 and 74 years of age rose by half, even after adjusting for inflation.
By contrast, sales declined by 60% to those aged 25 and under. Japan, whose work culture and push for 'total quality management' were once known for long work days and hard drinking by the 'salaryman,' has seen a decline in overall per capita consumption by more than a quarter in the past three decades. In France, of all places, wine consumption, especially of red wines, faces what an analyst calls an 'existential" decline.
Alcohol stocks on developed-world stock markets have been pummelled because it is seen as a sunset industry that is also in the sights of regulators. Diageo's shares have fallen by a third since 2020, according to an article last month by the Financial Times, which quoted its chief executive officer Debra Crew as saying that 'people want to drink better, not more."
This push towards the premium end of the scale is working to an extent. Notwithstanding the doom and gloom surrounding the industry, data company International Wine and Spirit Research (WSR) estimated that in 2023, revenues from alcohol sales actually increased by 2% even as volumes declined by 1%.
Younger people drinking less alcohol or switching to alcohol-free drinks implies that this strategy of raising prices leaves the industry dependent on wealthy but ageing baby boomers. While the industry has not been forced to use anything in the league of health warnings about smoking that tobacco companies must place on cigarette packs, health concerns may be catching up with it.
Also Read: Why classic cocktails will never go out of style
At the beginning of this year, outgoing US surgeon general Vivek Murthy called for the labelling of cancer risks from alcohol consumption on alcohol cans and bottles. This gave a whole new meaning to 'Dry January,' the annual month for resolutions to abstain from alcohol. The World Health Organization, meanwhile, is ramping up warnings that there is no 'safe level' of alcohol consumption.
'Alcohol is the third leading preventable cause of cancer behind tobacco and obesity," Dr Murthy told a medical columnist of USA Today, adding that it causes 20,000 cancer deaths in the US alone. 'We now know there are seven cancers that are caused by alcohol consumption—breast cancer, colorectal cancer, mouth cancer, throat cancer, voice box (larynx) cancer, oesophageal cancer and liver cancer."
Dr Murthy's declaration sparked several articles on the subject. Last month, one in the New York Times quoted Timothy Stockwell, an alcohol researcher at the University of Victoria in Canada, as saying that 'when you have a drink, your body turns the ethanol that's present in the alcoholic beverage into a really nasty substance" called acetaldehyde, which can damage your DNA.
Given the increasing frequency of these warnings, it will be no surprise if we all—and not just young people—start drinking less. And yet, there is a case for moderation and being a social drinker.
The Economist, in a contrarian column this May, issued some warnings of its own. It argued that the restaurant industry would be devastated if people drastically reduced drinking. Further, the publication claimed that alcohol has a positive impact on creativity and sometimes helps get couples together, dubiously or jokingly linking an observed drop in productivity growth to greater abstinence from alcohol.
The chief executive officer of Asahi has blamed excessive screen time and gaming for reduced alcohol consumption, but it may simply be that people entertain differently and that health warnings are being taken more seriously.
Alcohol's global giants are looking to markets such as China, India and Brazil to boost sales. But even in the developing world, consumption growth is not as bubbly as it used to be.
While the compound annual growth rate of the per capita consumption of pure alcohol was about 15% for India and China between 2005 and 2010, according to an analysis by Technopak, a consulting company, it is expected to grow just 1.2% annually between 2023 and 2028 for India. Alcohol consumption is declining even faster in China than in the West.
Also Read: Sip on Bengaluru: Cocktails inspired by the city's scents
But the regulatory framework in India is also a dampener on sales. Hardly a month or two goes by before a major state levies additional excise duties or raises the cost of liquor licences for restaurants and bars or booze outlets. But India at least offers a demographic dividend of a different kind. Young people seem to be discovering cocktails and are not part of the developed world's shift away from alcohol.
In Bengaluru, synonymous with pubs, cocktail bars are opening all the time, reports Rohil Kalita, head bartender of Bar Spirit Forward in the city. He adds that about 60% of Spirit Forward's customers are aged between 25 and 40.
I am a good bit older than that, but part of the trend. Having been disciplined during the first covid lockdown, during the second, I re-watched Mad Men, the television series about an American advertising agency set in the 1960s, in which cocktails have a central role.
Don't take my word for it, but in the annus horribilis that is 2025, a cocktail or three a week with friends seems preferable to doom scrolling.
The author is a Mint columnist and a former Financial Times foreign correspondent. Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
3 days ago
- Mint
Rahul Jacob: High rich-world debt is a worry we must all confront
Next Story Rahul Jacob The OECD's latest 'Global Debt Report' has flagged the global risks of a debt spike in developed economies. With fiscal responsibility faltering in many of them, the whole world may be staring at volatile times ahead. That central banks are reducing their exposure to government debt even as corporate debt in the OECD is rising has the makings of a debt funding impasse. Gift this article Policy reports from multilateral institutions are often an antidote to insomnia. But not the Global Debt Report 2025 released by the OECD in March. It has characteristics that compare favourably with a cliff-hanging pulp thriller. Factoid-after-factoid of growing developed-world indebtedness leaves the reader almost numb with worry. OECD sovereign debt has climbed from $5 trillion before the global financial crisis (GFC) in 2007 to $15.7 trillion last year. Policy reports from multilateral institutions are often an antidote to insomnia. But not the Global Debt Report 2025 released by the OECD in March. It has characteristics that compare favourably with a cliff-hanging pulp thriller. Factoid-after-factoid of growing developed-world indebtedness leaves the reader almost numb with worry. OECD sovereign debt has climbed from $5 trillion before the global financial crisis (GFC) in 2007 to $15.7 trillion last year. The culprit in part has been quantitative easing, when central banks increased money supply after the GFC. But the rise in debt at the government and corporate levels seems unyielding more than a decade-and-a-half later. This opening salvo from the report's summary sets things in context: 'Sovereign bond issuance in OECD countries is projected to reach a record $17 trillion in 2025, up from $14 trillion in 2023. Emerging markets and developing economies borrowing from debt markets has also grown significantly, from around $1 trillion in 2007 to over $3 trillion in 2024." Also Read: DOGE can't really help the US dodge its debt overload problem Add to it the fact that central banks are reducing their exposure to government debt even as corporate debt in the OECD is rising and you have the makings of a debt funding impasse that could easily spiral into a crisis. Also, pension funds in the West have less aggregate exposure to government bonds. As Philip Coggan observes in a recent article for the Financial Times, this is because employees in the West increasingly use defined contribution plans to fund pensions in which the responsibility to make investment decisions is on them. Unlike large pension funds, they tend not to invest in government bonds as much. This leaves developed-world countries increasingly dependent on foreign investors; the OECD report says that foreigners own more than a third of their government bonds. As many developing economies know from experience, foreign investors tend to take flight quicker when things turn tough. What makes things more volatile is that while the low-interest rate environment has led to excess issuances, in a couple of years, a lot of these bonds will mature and will need to be refinanced at higher interest rates. But the bigger problem is that sensible economic policies, including debt reduction, are much harder to pursue with many populist and nativist parties ever more prominent and able to increase their support bases via outlandish claims on social media. In early July, the UK served as an early chronicle of bond market turbulence. After a revolt against planned welfare reform from its own members, the Labour Party government backed down, forgoing what would have been £5 billion in savings by the end of the decade. Facing hostile questioning from the opposition, Prime Minister Keir Starmer appeared not to give his chancellor of the exchequer Rachel Reeves full backing. Reeves was distressed and seemed to tear up. The following day, UK bond yields bounced up as markets speculated that Reeves was on her way out. It took a renewed statement of support from the prime minister for calm to be restored. There are broader lessons. The Starmer government is hemmed in by local election results in May that showed rapidly increasing support for the Reform Party and its anti-immigrant rhetoric. Against such a backdrop, making necessary changes to the UK's National Health Service (NHS), for example, or welfare benefits becomes harder. Sensible centrist leaders could seem dull in comparison with firebrands on the right who are economical with the truth on immigration as well as the need to bring down public debt. Last week, the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) annual report on the British economy said Reeves' rules to bring down the fiscal deficit were credible, but warned that 'in an uncertain global environment and with limited fiscal headroom, fiscal rules could easily be breached if growth disappoints or interest rate shocks materialise." These conditions apply to a host of developed economies, not just the UK. If this were not a daunting enough backdrop, low interest rates since the GFC till recently have encouraged strange behaviour by OECD companies. 'Corporates used the low-rate era to prioritise financial operations, partly severing the link between corporate investment and borrowing," the report notes. This anodyne statement understates the excessive financialization of developed-world economies where companies have been lured into corporate buyouts and shareholder payouts because the cost of money had been so low. 'Corporates… partly severed the link between corporate investment and borrowing. This impacts the ability to meet upcoming refinancing needs," the report said. Also Read: Another IMF loan for Argentina? Its fallout could be ugly Meanwhile, ageing populations across the developed world add to health and pension costs. Last week, the IMF called upon the UK government to curb pension benefits and make higher income earners pay for medical care when using the NHS. In Japan, where the Bank of Japan (BoJ) has been the last central bank to exit quantitative easing, demand for government bonds has weakened among domestic banks. The BoJ has had to step in to buy government bonds. Yields have gone up markedly, but Japanese banks are uncertain where interest rates are headed, while those overseas who hitherto borrowed cheaply in yen to invest elsewhere are now unsure about this 'carry trade'. These are inherently volatile conditions for the world economy. Pity developing economies that need to finance high levels of debt amid such stormy weather. The author is a Mint columnist and a former Financial Times foreign correspondent. Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.
News18
4 days ago
- News18
Chinese Whispers: Is Taiwan Trump's New Bargaining Chip With Beijing?
Donald Trump prioritises America First, and Taiwan's independence is no longer a priority Is the United States distancing itself from Taiwan? This at a time when, in Taipei, civilians are rehearsing responses to potential attacks from China in city streets. This raises questions: will Washington step in to defend Taipei if a Chinese invasion becomes imminent? Is the US President using Taiwan as a negotiating tool with China? These are likely concerns for Taiwanese President William Lai Ching-te. Recently, Lai cancelled his trip to Paraguay, Guatemala, and Belize—Taiwan's three allies in the Americas. The reason? Donald Trump. Why, you might ask? Lai's trip, planned for early August, included a stopover in the United States, which was blocked by Trump's administration. Trump is currently seeking a summit with China's President Xi Jinping. The Financial Times reported that China raised objections with Washington about Lai's visit, leading to the US denying him permission to stop in New York. Interestingly, Lai's office never formally announced his trip to Latin America. On Monday, Taiwan confirmed that Lai's overseas travel was cancelled to focus on tariff negotiations with the US and to manage a cleanup operation following a typhoon in southern Taiwan. Trump's social media rant coincides with a meeting between top US and Chinese economic officials in Stockholm, aiming to resolve longstanding economic disputes at the heart of a trade war between the world's two largest economies. The US and China are considering extending a tariff truce by three months, with China seeking reductions in US tariffs and tech export controls. Analysts believe a Trump-Xi meeting could ease trade tensions at this critical juncture. It is important to note that the president of Taiwan cannot officially visit the US, as the United States does not recognise Taiwan's government. However, Taiwanese leaders have historically used 'transit stops" in the US to meet top US administration officials outside Washington DC. As recently as 2023, then-Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen visited New York and Los Angeles during a transit stop. At that time, Joe Biden was the US president, committed to defending Taiwan militarily against any attack from the People's Republic of China. Biden approved over $500 million in defence support to Taiwan before leaving office. Donald Trump, however, prioritises America First, and Taiwan's independence is no longer a priority—a stark contrast to his previous term, when he reinstated a posture of strong deterrence in the Taiwan Strait with increased arms sales to Taiwan. During his first term, US trade policy towards China helped Taiwanese companies diversify across Asia. Diplomatically, Trump signed the Taiwan Travel Act in March 2018, ending several restrictions on official exchanges since the 1979 diplomatic breakup. But now, Trump's transactional diplomacy prioritises the sensitive US-China trade talks, raising critical questions for Taiwan's future. How much pressure will be placed on Taiwan to increase its military spending? Can Taiwan continue to benefit from the trade and technology disputes between the US and China? And what is the future of Taipei without Trump's support? view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
Did Trump just bow to Beijing? Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te snubbed as US blocks New York visit
Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te planned to stop in New York and Dallas on August 4—about 10 days before his trip to Paraguay, Guatemala, and Belize – all diplomatic allies of Taiwan. However, the Trump administration denied him permission to stop in New York after China raised objections, as per the report by Financial Times. Lai's office then said he had 'no plans to travel overseas in the near future', citing Taiwan's typhoon recovery and ongoing tariff talks with the US. But insiders say this public reason came after he was privately told by the US he couldn't visit New York. Trade talks & summit pressure The White House did not respond to media requests for comment. China and the US are currently in trade negotiations, and the Trump team reportedly froze export control plans to avoid upsetting Beijing. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years IC Markets Learn More A summit between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping is being discussed, and Trump wants it to happen smoothly. Some US officials fear Trump may be going soft on China to make this summit happen. Trump posted on Truth Social that he might visit China, but only at Xi's invitation, which he said had been extended, as stated in the report by Financial Times. ALSO READ: Minnesota storms knock out power for 72,000+ again — Xcel Energy sends crews, warns of more outages Live Events Is history repeating? Bonnie Glaser, a Taiwan expert, said this shows Trump wants to avoid angering China while summit plans are underway. She recalled how Trump had delayed arms sales to Taiwan and got angry when a US official visited Taiwan during his first term. Glaser warned that making Taiwan 'negotiable' weakens US strength and emboldens China. Critics slam Trump's move Randy Shriver, ex-US official, called the decision a 'mistake' and said it reminded him of past times the US backed off Taiwan to please China. Nancy Pelosi, who visited Taiwan in 2022, said Trump's move sends a 'dangerous signal' and shows Beijing can bully the US. 'This is a victory for Xi,' she wrote, and warned it might show a 'dangerous change' in US policy. Background on diplomatic tensions In 2023, President Tsai Ing-wen was allowed to stop in New York during a similar trip by the Biden administration. China sees Taiwan as part of its territory and hates when Taiwanese leaders visit the US. China has called Lai a 'separatist' and 'parasite', and it often stages military drills near Taiwan after US visits. When Pelosi visited Taiwan in 2022, China responded with huge military action around the island, as per the report by Financial Times. Global pressure mounts Taiwan's Foreign Ministry insisted there was no 'cancellation or US obstruction' and said they will seek a new time for the trip. Paraguay's President, who was preparing to host Lai, is now not expecting his visit next week. Taiwan's trade officials are currently in Washington for talks, trying to avoid a 32% tariff threat. Lai's travel plan changes were also confirmed by Reuters and Financial Times. ALSO READ: Privateer Rum CEO Andrew Cabot was abroad while wife Kristin caught in Coldplay 'Kiss Cam' scandal — here's what we know All Taiwan's presidents since the 1990s have done US stopovers en route to other countries. But sometimes, denied stopovers show diplomatic tensions. In 2006, President George W. Bush denied a stopover to Taiwan's then-president Chen Shui-bian due to pro-independence remarks. Lai's New York and Dallas stops would have been his first visits to mainland US since becoming president. In December, Lai visited Hawaii and Guam, after which China sent out its largest naval deployment in years, as per the reports. What experts are saying Laura Rosenberger, ex-US diplomat, said putting Taiwan into negotiations sends a bad message to Beijing. She said now is the time for the US to show clear support for Taiwan, not shift goalposts under China's pressure. Taiwan's domestic politics are also tense – Lai recently survived an opposition effort to unseat lawmakers, but with low approval ratings, according to the report by Bloomberg. The Trump administration's refusal to let Taiwan's president visit New York has sparked backlash, raised fears of US-China trade compromise, and questioned America's support for Taiwan. The situation remains tense, and it's unclear if Lai will be allowed to visit late FAQs Q1. Why did the US block Taiwan President Lai Ching-te from visiting New York? The Trump administration blocked Lai's stopover after China objected and to avoid disrupting US-China trade talks. Q2. Is the US changing its Taiwan policy under Trump? Critics say Trump is softening on Taiwan to please China and push for a summit with Xi Jinping.
