logo
One electrocuted, 3 injured during Muharram preparation in Giridih

One electrocuted, 3 injured during Muharram preparation in Giridih

Time of Indiaa day ago
1
2
Bokaro: A youth died and three others sustained serious burn injuries when a Tazia came in contact with a 11,000-volt high tension wire while they were preparing for Muharram procession in Giridih district on Sunday.
The incident occurred around 11.30 am at Changosingha village.
The deceased was identified as Mohammad Azad.
"Some people were placing the Tazia when it came in contact with the high-tension wire. A person was killed and three others were injured," Giridih deputy commissioner Ramnivas Yadav told PTI.
Dhanwar's block development officer, Devender Kumar Das said that the administration will extend support to the families. "This is an unfortunate event," he said.
"Probe will be conducted to find out if the wire was installed at a safe height. Also, the height of Tazia need to be probed," said an official.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Abu Salem told to approach SC for clarity on remission in 1993 blasts case
Abu Salem told to approach SC for clarity on remission in 1993 blasts case

Hindustan Times

time7 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Abu Salem told to approach SC for clarity on remission in 1993 blasts case

MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court on Monday directed gangster Abu Salem to approach the Supreme Court for clarification on whether he is entitled to remission while serving a life sentence in two Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) cases, including the 1993 Mumbai serial bombings. Mumbai : Underworld don Abu Salem walks out of the Sessions Court after a hearing in Mumbai on Wednesday. PTI Photo by Mitesh Bhuvad (PTI1_18_2012_000148A) (PTI) {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} A division bench of Justice Ajey Gadkari and Justice Rajesh Patil was hearing Salem's plea seeking early release on the grounds that he would complete 25 years of imprisonment by March 31, 2025. Salem argued that his release was mandated under the terms of his 2005 extradition from Portugal, in which the Indian government had given a solemn assurance to Portuguese authorities that he would not be sentenced to death or imprisoned for more than 25 years. {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} The confusion stems from the fact that Salem was arrested in one case on October 11, 2005, and in another on October 24, 2005. He was later convicted in both cases on February 25, 2015, and September 7, 2017, respectively. In July 2024, he had moved a special TADA court seeking a tentative date of release, but the court declined to consider remission, citing the grave nature of the offences. {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} In July 2022, while deciding Salem's appeals against convictions in both cases, the Supreme Court observed that Salem's sentence must be computed from October 12, 2005, the date of his arrest, and that he was entitled to release upon completing 25 years in custody. The apex court also stated that the Centre would be bound to advise the President under Article 72 of the Constitution once this term was completed. {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} In July 2022, while deciding Salem's appeals against convictions in both cases, the Supreme Court observed that Salem's sentence must be computed from October 12, 2005, the date of his arrest, and that he was entitled to release upon completing 25 years in custody. The apex court also stated that the Centre would be bound to advise the President under Article 72 of the Constitution once this term was completed. {{/usCountry}} Read More {{^usCountry}} On Monday, however, additional solicitor general Anil Singh contended that Salem was conflating separate conviction periods to claim that he had already completed 24 years and nine months of detention by the time he approached the TADA court. Singh submitted that, as per the Ministry of Home Affairs' calculation, Salem had only completed 19 years, five months, and 21 days of imprisonment. {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} On Monday, however, additional solicitor general Anil Singh contended that Salem was conflating separate conviction periods to claim that he had already completed 24 years and nine months of detention by the time he approached the TADA court. Singh submitted that, as per the Ministry of Home Affairs' calculation, Salem had only completed 19 years, five months, and 21 days of imprisonment. {{/usCountry}} {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} Salem's counsel, senior advocate Rishi Malhotra, insisted that both sentences were running concurrently and, taking into account his pre-trial custody, time served, and jail-earned remission, Salem had effectively completed 25 years on March 31, 2025. 'They are not considering my jail-earned remission,' Malhotra told the court. Remission can be granted on various grounds, including good behaviour and completion of a portion of the sentence. However, the high court pointed out that the Supreme Court's 2022 ruling made no mention of remission. 'Do you want us to say something that the Supreme Court has not said?' the bench asked. 'This clarification needs to come from the Supreme Court,' it added. The bench admitted Salem's petition but declined interim relief, stating that it would be heard in due course. {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON

Hyderabad Family Of 4 Dies After Vehicle Collides With Truck During US Vacation
Hyderabad Family Of 4 Dies After Vehicle Collides With Truck During US Vacation

News18

time2 hours ago

  • News18

Hyderabad Family Of 4 Dies After Vehicle Collides With Truck During US Vacation

Last Updated: All four died at the scene, said officials, adding that arrangements are being made to bring their bodies back to Hyderabad for the last rites. A family of four from Hyderabad died in a car accident in the United States after their vehicle was hit by a truck and caught fire. The victims — Tejaswini, Sree Venkat, and their two children — were on vacation in Dallas and were returning from visiting relatives in Atlanta when the accident occurred. All four died at the scene, said officials, adding that arrangements are being made to bring their bodies back to Hyderabad for the last rites. In a separate incident, two Indian students from Cleveland State University died in a road accident in New York, the Indian Consulate confirmed on Tuesday. The students were identified as Manav Patel (20) and Saurav Prabhakar (23), according to a report by news agency PTI. The Lancaster County Coroner's Office said the crash took place on May 10 in East Cocalico Township. Prabhakar, who was driving, and Patel died at the scene. Another passenger seated in the front was injured and taken to a local hospital. CCTV footage showed the car leaving the road, hitting a tree, and crashing into a bridge. 'Deeply saddened to learn about the unfortunate road accident in which two Indian students from Cleveland State University, Manav Patel and Saurav Prabhakar, lost their lives," the Indian Consulate posted on X. First Published:

Police detains owner of rottweiler dog that attacked old woman in Dehradun
Police detains owner of rottweiler dog that attacked old woman in Dehradun

The Print

time3 hours ago

  • The Print

Police detains owner of rottweiler dog that attacked old woman in Dehradun

The woman was rushed to the hospital where her condition remains critical. Devi, a resident of Kishan Nagar, was attacked by two ferocious dogs on Sunday morning when she was going to a temple near her house as usual. Hearing the screams of the old lady, her neighbours came out and somehow rescued her from the clutches of the dogs. Dehradun, Jul 7 (PTI) Police on Monday detained the owner of the dangerous rottweiler dogs that attacked an old woman in Jakhan of Rajpur area here and seriously injured her. Dehradun Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Ajay Singh said that acting on the complaint given by Umang Nirwal, the son of 75-year-old Kaushalya Devi, a case was registered against the dog owner Nafees (40) under relevant sections. During investigation, police said it was found that Nafees had not taken any license from the municipal corporation for keeping 'dangerous' breeds of dogs. Nafees was taken into custody by the police and he is being questioned, the SSP said. The dog owners are accused of not coming out to save the woman during the attack. Police will collaborate with the municipal corporation to ensure strict action is taken against those who keep 'dangerous' breeds of dogs without a licence, he said. Responding to complaints of people being attacked, some killed, by 'dangerous breed' of dogs, the central government has banned the import, breeding, purchase and sale of 23 foreign breed dogs, including rottweilers, pitbulls and american bulldogs. Singh has requested people to inform police control room number 112 or municipal corporation office if there are any such dogs around them. PTI DPT AMJ SKY SKY This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store