Police Probe Alleged Haj Scam Involving 47 Malaysian Pilgrims
Bukit Aman Commercial Crime Investigation Department acting director Datuk Seri Muhammed Hasbullah Ali said an investigation paper had been opened under Section 420 of the Penal Code following three reports lodged by the victim's next of kin, two in Mantin, Negeri Sembilan, and one in Ayer Hitam, Johor.
'It is too early to confirm a cross-border fraud. We are gathering statements and evidence to determine whether the syndicate is operating with certain agents or not.
'We are waiting for the victims to return to record their statements and take further action,' he said in a statement today.
Muhammed Hasbullah said the police will also work with the Companies Commission of Malaysia (SSM), Lembaga Tabung Haji (TH), and the Ministry of Tourism, Arts, and Culture (MOTAC) to blacklist companies offering haj packages without approval, stressing that they are committed to taking firm action against those involved in such scams to protect the people from becoming victims.
At the same time, Muhammed Hasbullah expressed his appreciation for the media's cooperation in helping to disseminate information and raise public awareness that only individuals with an official haj visa are to perform the pilgrimage.
Yesterday, a media report cited that 47 Malaysian pilgrims had allegedly fallen victim to a haj scam by a local agent involving a well-known religious figure.
The daughter of one of the victims, who claimed that her parents and aunt, who left for Saudi Arabia with the agent on May 9, were forced to trek through dangerous routes from Jeddah to Makkah without proper documents, food, or water, allegedly to avoid detection by Saudi authorities.
The group of pilgrims also claimed that they were locked in a dark, cramped room and were told to pay an additional RM9,000 to retrieve belongings they had left behind, despite already having paid RM30,000 for the haj package.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Express
an hour ago
- Daily Express
Cases of trio for remention on September 23
Published on: Wednesday, August 06, 2025 Published on: Wed, Aug 06, 2025 By: Cynthia D Baga Text Size: Yusof and Andi talking to their counsels before entering the courtroom. Kota Kinabalu: Assemblymen Datuk Andi Muhammad Suryady Bandy, Datuk Dr Yusof Yacob and a businessman – charged separately with receiving and giving bribes amounting RM350,000 over mineral exploration licences in Sabah – will have their cases re-mentioned on Sept 23. Sessions Court Judge Jason Juga fixed the date for Andi, 44, who is State Industrial Development and Entrepreneurship Assistant Minister, Sindumin Assemblyman Dr Yusof, 69, businessman Datuk Tei Jiann Cheing, 37, whose cases were brought for pre-trial case management, Tuesday. Advertisement Tei, also known as Albert Tei, participated via Zoom. Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Nurul Izzati Sapifee together with DPP Rustam Sanip, served the relevant documents to the defence but requested for further case management as several documents are still pending. Nurul and Rustam said among the pending documents were Forensics report, Telco report and verification from the Immigration Department. The defence team had no objection for the delay but asked for a shorter time. Andi who is also Tanjung Batu Assemblyman is accused of receiving RM150,000 bribe from Tei as an inducement to assist in the processing of Sinaran Hayat Sdn Bhd's application for a Prospecting Licence for minerals in Sabah. Advertisement He allegedly committed the offence at 11pm on May 12, 2023, at his residence in Jalan Pantai, Sembulan, near here. Yusof allegedly accepted RM200,000 bribe also from Tei as an inducement to assist in processing the Prospecting Licence for Nusa Kini Sdn Bhd also to explore for minerals in Sabah. The offence allegedly took place at 2pm on March 6, 2023, at the Rooftop Bar & Grill @ Hilton here. It is believed that Syarikat Nusa Kini Sdn Bhd and Syarikat Sinaran Hayat Sdn Bhd, based in Sabah, are owned by Tei's business partners. Andi and Yusof were charged separately under Section 16(a)(A) of the MACC which carries a jail term of up to 20 years, and fine of not less than five times of the amount involved, or RM10,000, or which one is higher, on conviction. Tei is facing two charges of giving bribes to Andi and Yusof for the same purpose at the same places and time. He was charged under Section 16(b)(A) of the MACC Act 2009, punishable under Section 24(1) of the same Act. Counsel Datuk Ram Singh, Rizwandean Bukhary M Borhan, Shahlan Jufri, Datin Jaharah Patimbangi, Elhanan James, Prem Elmer Ganasan defended Andi and Yusof, while Tei was represented by Edward Paul, Batholomew Jingulam and Jul Hamri Jumhani. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Influencers' crude food stunt now under MCMC probe
CYBERJAYA: The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) has launched an investigation following public outrage over a viral clip showing a group of individuals, believed to be influencers, giving food scraps to a homeless person. In a statement issued yesterday, the MCMC reiterated its firm position against the creation and distribution of content that exploits marginalised groups for the sake of cheap entertainment and view generation while also causing public distress. 'The spread of content that degrades or humiliates individual dignity is not only unethical but also leads to the normalisation of inhumane culture within society. 'The investigation into the content is being conducted under existing legal provisions, and stern action will be taken against any parties found guilty,' the statement read. MCMC also reminded members of the public not to disseminate or upload any provocative content that could disrupt public order. It also warned that any sharing of extremely offensive, false, or threatening content can result in action under Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act (CMA) 1998, with offenders facing fines of up to RM500,000, imprisonment of up to two years, or both, if found guilty. 'MCMC is committed and firm in ensuring that cyberspace is not misused, in line with efforts to uphold the rule of law and societal harmony,' it added. Last week, three influencers sparked public outrage after uploading a video that appeared to show them feeding chicken bones wrapped together with rice to a homeless man. Following a wave of backlash from Internet users, the trio issued an apology in a separate video on Monday, in which they spoke in Mandarin about the background leading to the video's filming. They claimed the man had been informed about the filming beforehand and had consented to it. They also clarified that the chicken bones and rice were not intended as his actual meal. 'We had already given him a proper meal, including rice and two pieces of chicken, before filming, and he agreed to participate in the filming. 'We hope Malaysians can forgive us. We are truly sorry,' they said as they bowed. The controversial video has since been removed from their social media platforms.
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Mechanic, HR manager recount how they were duped by impersonators
KUALA LUMPUR: What started as a casual day at work 10 years ago ended on a sour note for a mechanic who lost RM10,000 in a phone scam. The man in his 40s, who wanted to be known only as Johnson, said he remembered how he had been cheated. "I received a call from a man claiming to be from a bank's credit card centre. He told me that RM4,000 was charged to my card," he told the New Straits Times. "They asked me to verify the payment and I was in shock because I had not applied for a card with that bank. "When I told them that, the caller told me not to panic and proceeded to transfer my call to a 'policeman'." He said the caller told him that such incidents often happen and he would be provided with a bank account to transfer his funds. "This way, my funds would remain safe should the bank freeze my account if identity theft was involved. "I did not think anything of it and immediately transferred my money to the account provided. It was about RM10,000. "The caller told me they would contact me again for an update, but I did not hear from him again." When he realised something was amiss, he lodged a report. Human resources manager Rachel, 39, said her ordeal happened seven years ago. "Back then, I did not even know what a Macau scam or phone scam was. I received a call from a man claiming that my car was involved in a drug trafficking case. "They even told me that my MyKad was found at the scene. I freaked out because I had actually lost it at that time." She told the caller that her car had been sold, but he insisted on transferring the call to a man whom he claimed was a police personnel. She said the second man on the line sounded aggressive, and he shouted and threatened to arrest her at her workplace or home unless she paid a certain sum to settle the case. "I started to panic. I did not want anything to affect my family or my job. "I told the man that I did not have a lot of money and the man recited my bank account number and the exact balance in the account, as well as my personal details." She added that the man accused her of lying and became even more aggressive. Out of fear and believing that the man on the other end was a policeman, she transferred RM2,000 to the account given to her. "It was only after I spoke to my boyfriend that I realised I had been scammed."
