
Officials in rural Texas are accused of paying campaign worker who told elderly people how to vote: docs
'The people of Texas deserve fair and honest elections, not backroom deals and political insiders rigging the system,' Texas Attorney General Paxton said in a statement Wednesday announcing the arrests. 'Elected officials who think they can cheat to stay in power will be held accountable. No one is above the law.'
The accused include Frio County Judge Rochelle Camacho; former Frio County elections administrator Carlos Segura; Pearsall City Council members Ramiro Trevino and Racheal Garza; Pearsall school district trustee Adriann Ramirez; and campaign worker Rosa Rodriguez.
Candidates for local office allegedly paid a campaign worker named Cheryl Denise Castillo to collect ballots from voters at senior citizens complexes, according to court documents obtained by The Washington Post.
Castillo, who died last year, allegedly prepared ballots for individuals, influenced their voting choices, and assisted individuals who were ineligible for such support under state voting law.
In one December 2023 instance, the campaign worker allegedly told a candidate for sheriff she wouldn't help voters who supported her clients' rivals.
In another instance a few months later, Castillo allegedly told a fellow campaign worker 'that 'honest to God' if you do not go after the elderly disabled, then you will lose your election,' according to the documents.
Investigators reportedly recovered a text message to Castillo during the time of the alleged scheme that read, 'So that means you have stolen ballots from the elderly in elections LMFAO HARD.'
'Several residents confirmed that Castillo picked up their ballots, and in some instances advised them how they should vote their ballot,' police wrote in a search warrant, adding that Castillo had been paid for her work.
Segura, the former county elections administrator, called the allegations 'ridiculous' in an interview with the Post.
The Independent has contacted Camacho and Ramirez for comment, and was unable to reach Rodriguez.
In August 2024, investigators carried out search warrants related to the case in Frio, Atascosa, and Bexar counties, with a grand jury arriving at charges on May 1 of this year.
The investigation dates back to 2022, when a county judge candidate running against Camacho filed a complaint.
Mary Moore told investigators she got a tip that Camacho hired Castillo to collect mail ballots for her, and that upon inspecting the ballots, the campaign worker filled out several without notifying officials she assisted anyone.
Moore later went to Pine Hill Estates II, a nursing home, and allegedly captured video of Camacho, Rodriguez, Ramirez, Castillo walking out of the home with 'what appeared to be carrier envelopes,' according to an affidavit obtained by KSAT.
'Several residents confirmed that Castillo picked up their ballot by mail, and in some instances advised them how they should vote their ballot,' per court records obtained by the outlet.
Records obtained by Texas Scorecard reportedly show a convoluted web of payments for the alleged scheme, in which Rodriguez allegedly paid Camacho in May 2022 and May 2023 for vote-harvesting services.
The funds then allegedly went to Ramirez, who made three Cash App payments in April 2023 to Castillo, according to the outlet.
The six individuals, who face charges ranging from vote harvesting to tampering with evidence, could face up to 10 years in prison with fines up to $10,000.
All suspects turned themselves in, and at least five have been released on bond. An arraignment is scheduled for May 23.
The case comes as both state and national Republicans seek to crack down on alleged vulnerabilities in election security, a cause many Democrats dismiss as tackling a largely non-existent in an effort to disenfranchise certain voters.
The indictment in the vote harvesting case in Texas comes just months after a September 2024 ruling from U.S. District Judge Xavier Rodriguez, who found that the state's SB1 voter security law was vague, overly broad, and violates freedom of speech and the 14th Amendment, Texas Public Radio reports. The decision also found there's little evidence of illegal 'vote harvesting.'
The decision temporarily paused Paxton's investigation, but he appealed, allowing the probe to move forward.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
13 hours ago
- The Sun
Boy, seven, mauled by 13ft shark & has part of leg torn off by beast after jumping into water while playing with friends
A SEVEN-YEAR-OLD boy has been attacked by a 13ft shark who ripped off part of the child's leg. The boy was playing with his friends in shark infested waters when the beast grabbed hold of his body. 1 Horrified witnesses at Taiohae Bay, Nuku Hiva recalled seeing the boy jump from a fisherman's dock moments before being attacked. The child was bitten on his right forearm, left hand and had one of his calves ripped off. He was quickly treated at the scene before being rushed to a local hospital. Doctors decided his injuries were so severe that he was evacuated to the larger Taaone Hospital shortly after arriving. Another shark attack victim was left with similar wounds after her calf was torn off in a Fourth of July mauling. Tabatha Sullivent was one of four people injured in a shark attack on South Padre Island off the southern coast of Texas. Sullivent recalls feeling the beast approach as she tried to kick it to get ot to go away. But the shark suddenly clasped onto her leg and bit off a majority of her left calf. It comes as a luxury Maldives getaway turned into a nightmare when a dentist was mauled by a shark in a terrifying attack. Ekaterina Alexandrova, 30, from Moscow, shared footage of the moment she was attacked while snorkelling with a friend. .


Daily Mail
15 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Patrick Mahomes Sr discovers fate of special Kansas City Chiefs request amid DWI probation
Sr has received the green light from a judge to watch his son's first preseason game for the Kansas City Chiefs next month. The father of the superstar Chiefs quarterback must get permission to leave Texas following his DWI arrest last year, having cut a plea deal with prosecutors for five years' probation with 'intense' supervision for the first 12 months. And according to TMZ Sports, on July 17 Mahomes Sr requested to attend Kansas City's preseason game against the Cardinals in Arizona on August 9, a request which was granted on July 22. The 54-year-old said he will be in Arizona from August 8-10 and plans to stay at a Glendale-area hotel throughout. He also promised to follow the conditions of his probation while on the trip, which includes submitting a urinalysis test upon his return to Texas. Mahomes Sr was previously arrested for driving while intoxicated in 2008 and 2019, and last year was also banned from driving after being found on the roads without a valid license. He spent 10 days in jail before cutting the plea deal. He has previously been given a judge's permission to attend an autograph show in Minnesota and his son's charity golf event in Las Vegas back in May. The former baseball pitcher was also allowed to head to New Orleans in February to watch his son line up in yet another Super Bowl, which ended in defeat against the Philadelphia Eagles. There could well be more requests on the way with the Chiefs set to begin the 2025 NFL season in September, although he will be into the second year of his probation by that point. Mahomes has two other preseason fixtures to come next month, with the second coming away to the Seattle Seahawks on August 15. The Chiefs, who are seeking redemption after their Super Bowl crushing at the hands of the Eagles, then return to Arrowhead Stadium to face the Chicago Bears on August 22. They begin the new NFL season against the Los Angeles Charges in Brazil on September 5, before a rematch with the Eagles takes place in Kansas City on September 14. Road trips to the New York Giants and Jacksonville Jaguars, as well as a home clash against the Baltimore Ravens, make up their first five games of the campaign.


Daily Mail
20 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Trump blasts 'illegal' Beyoncé payout as he accuses Democrats of covering up celebrity bribes
President Donald Trump has suggested he would prosecute Democrats for paying celebrities like Oprah and Beyoncé - claiming they were illegally bribing the A-listers to endorse then-Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 election. The president took to his Truth Social page Saturday night to lament what he called the 'probably illegal' payments the Democratic campaign made to celebrities. Among those he accused of accepting the lucrative payments was Beyoncé, who he said accepted $11 million from the Kamala Harris campaign before she gave a short speech at a campaign rally in Houston, Texas. Trump also claimed that Oprah took $3 million in 'expenses' from the Democrats and 'very low-rated TV "anchor"' Al Sharpton received $600,000 from the Harris campaign. 'These ridiculous fees were incorrectly stated in the books and records,' he said, months after he demanded a 'major investigation' into the former vice president's campaign expenditures. 'YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PAY FOR AN ENDORSEMENT. IT IS TOTALLY ILLEGAL TO DO SO,' Trump argued. 'Can you imagine what would happen if politicians started paying people to endorse them? All hell would break out!' 'Kamala, and all of those that received Endorsement money, BROKE THE LAW,' the president continued. 'They should all be prosecuted!' He claimed on his Truth Social platform the Democrats were illegally bribing the A-listers to endorse then Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 election Trump has made similar claims in the past, writing in December that 'Beyoncé didn't sing, Oprah didn't do much of anything (she called it "expenses") and Al is just a third-rate conman.' But the Harris campaign repeatedly denied that it had engaged in any wrongdoing, with Adrienne Elrod, who served as a senior spokesperson for the campaign, insisting it never paid anyone for their endorsements or campaign activity. 'We have never paid any artist and performer. We have never paid a fee to that person,' he told Deadline in November. Oprah also hit out at the claims, arguing that she did not get 'one dime' from the campaign. Instead, she said, the Harris campaign simply reimbursed her production company, Harpo Productions, for organizing a town hall event. '[M]y production company Harpo was asked to bring in set design, lights, cameras, microphones, crew, producers, and every other item necessary (including the benches and chairs we sat on) to put on a live production,' she wrote. 'I did not take any personal fee,' she said. 'However the people who worked on that production needed to be paid. And were. End of story.' Still, the Chicago Tribune blasted the billionaire former talk show host over her decision to allow her company to accept the payment - suggesting Winfrey should have paid her workers' fees herself. 'Frankly, $1 million is not all that much to Winfrey and so we very much doubt that she was seeking any kind of personal payday from her chosen candidate,' the editorial board wrote in a column. 'But she does own Harpo and serves as its chairwoman and CEO. The production fees should have been a campaign donation.' Meanwhile, MSNBC's Al Sharpton also came under fire when it was revealed his National Action Network had accepted $500,000 from the Harris campaign ahead of a sit-down interview with the then-vice president. Billionaire hedge fund manager and Trump supporter Bill Ackman led the charge, telling Megyn Kelly on her show that the payments were an attempt 'to manipulate the audience.' Then on October 20, Sharpton praised Harris' 'extraordinary historic campaign' in a gushing interview, as he branded Donald Trump 'hostile and erratic.' As the controversy continued, a spokesman for MSNBC said it was 'unaware' of the Harris campaign's donations to National Action Network. 'MSNBC was unaware of the donations made to the National Action Network,' the spokesman told the Free Beacon as he declined to share whether the network would take any actions against the reverend. He said that the company does not comment on 'personnel matters.' It remains unclear where President Trump got the $11 million figure for Beyoncé, but Federal Election Commission records show the Harris campaign did pay her production company, Parkwood Production Media LLC $165,000. Such reimbursements are frequently associated with large event productions and cannot be donated to political campaigns, according to The Hill.