After Iran, Trump Aims to End War in Gaza
After brokering a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran, Donald Trump is urging Israel and Hamas to make a deal that would stop the 20-month-long war in Gaza that has killed more than 50,000 Palestinians and over a thousand Israelis.
'MAKE THE DEAL IN GAZA. GET THE HOSTAGES BACK!!!' the U.S. President posted on Truth Social early Sunday.
[time-brightcove not-tgx='true']
Trump told reporters on Friday that an agreement could be reached within the next week. On Saturday evening Trump said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is 'right now in the process of negotiating a Deal with Hamas, which will include getting the Hostages back,' in a post slamming the corruption proceedings against Netanyahu. An Israeli court on Monday postponed this week's hearings in Netanyahu's trial after he made a request based on classified diplomatic and security reasons.
'How is it possible that the Prime Minister of Israel can be forced to sit in a Courtroom all day long, over NOTHING (Cigars, Bugs Bunny Doll, etc.). It is a POLITICAL WITCH HUNT, very similar to the Witch Hunt that I was forced to endure,' Trump wrote. 'This travesty of 'Justice' will interfere with both Iran and Hamas negotiations.'
Read More: Trump Tries to 'Save' Netanyahu as Israeli PM Faces Challenges at Home
An Israeli official told the Associated Press that Ron Dermer, a top adviser to Netanyahu, will visit Washington this week for ceasefire talks. Netanyahu met with his security Cabinet on Sunday evening and plans are being made for him to visit Washington in coming weeks, the official said.
Trump's shift in focus towards Gaza comes after Iran and Israel agreed to a tenuous ceasefire on June 23, ending the so-called '12 Day War' ignited by Israel's attack on Iran's nuclear program. Arab mediators, Egypt and Qatar, renewed a ceasefire push for Gaza after the U.S. and Israel bombed Iran's nuclear facilities. Hamas has told mediators that it is ready to resume talks but reiterated that any deal must include an end to the war and Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, a Hamas official told Reuters.
Call for ceasefire comes as Israel escalates war
At the same time that Trump called for a deal, Israel continued to escalate its military bombardment of Gaza. The Israeli military ordered a mass evacuation of Palestinians in northern Gaza, where hundreds of thousands of people live in eastern and northern Gaza City and the Jabaliya refugee camp. The Israeli Defense Forces' attacks will expand westward to Gaza City center, the order said. People are ordered to evacuate to Mawasi in southern Gaza, which Israel has designated as a humanitarian area.
Uprooting their lives at a moment's notice has become routine for Palestinians in Gaza over the last nearly two years of war. Humanitarian organizations have criticized Israel's sweeping evacuation orders in the past as being unpredictable and having short deadlines that are virtually impossible for many, including the sick and disabled. On Sunday, Palestinians in Gaza City were yet again forced to load their children and essentials onto donkey carts before the military's attacks, the AP reported. United Nations officials have said that nowhere in Gaza is safe. At least five people were killed in an Israeli airstrike on a tent encampment in Khan Younis near Mawasi, the designated safe area, over the weekend, medics said.
'A month ago, they told us to go to Al-Mawasi and we stayed there for a month, it is a safe zone,' Palestinian Zeyad Abu Marouf told Reuters. Three of his children were killed and a fourth wounded in the airstrike, he said.
'Families have been displaced again and again—and are now confined to less than one-fifth of Gaza's land,' U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres said on Friday. 'Even these shrinking spaces are under threat. Bombs are falling—on tents, on families, on those with nowhere left to run.'
Roadblocks remain over a deal
In spite of Trump's optimism, skepticism over a deal remains.
Hamas has accused Israeli leaders of purposely delaying a deal. Hamas official Mahmoud Mardawi reportedly said on Telegram on Sunday that Netanyahu set 'impossible conditions aimed at thwarting the possibility of reaching a ceasefire agreement and a deal on the hostages.'
Hamas has reportedly offered Israel a deal that includes the release of all hostages in exchange for a full withdrawal of Israel's military from Gaza and an end to the war. But Mardawi said Netanyahu has insisted on a temporary agreement that releases only 10 hostages. 'Netanyahu lies when he claims he is not involved in choosing the names of the hostages,' Mardawi wrote. 'He does not want a deal.'
Netanyahu spokesperson Omer Dostri did not address Mardawi's claims but said, 'Hamas was the only obstacle to ending the war,' according to the AP. Israel has said it will only agree to end the war in exchange for the full dismantlement and exile of Hamas.
While Trump has repeatedly urged a ceasefire in Gaza, he's also suggested a U.S. takeover that turns the territory into 'a freedom zone' and proposed that Jordan and Egypt take in Palestinians as part of a 'clean out' of the Gaza Strip.
In February, Trump said the U.S. could take a 'long-term ownership position' over Gaza, 'level it out, create an economic development that will supply unlimited numbers of jobs and housing for the people of the area.' That month, he also shared an AI-generated video on Truth Social of 'Trump Gaza,' showing a reconstructed Gaza Strip with skyscrapers, luxury cars, and Trump drinking by a pool with Netanyahu.
Even if a deal is reached, it's unclear whether it will last. Israel and Hamas reached a multi-phase ceasefire agreement in January, just as Trump was taking office. But Israel broke the ceasefire in March when it launched surprise airstrikes on Gaza before declaring that it was resuming the war.
Since then, pressure has been mounting on Netanyahu to agree to a ceasefire, both from within and outside Israel. Pro-Palestinian protesters around the world turned out over the weekend to call for an end to the war. And earlier this month, the U.N. adopted a resolution demanding an immediate, unconditional, and permanent ceasefire, with Russian Ambassador Vasily Nebenzya saying that it is the international community's responsibility to stop the 'slaughter' in Gaza.
Protests in Israel also resumed after a two-week pause during the Israel-Iran war, with demonstrators demanding a deal that would free the hostages still in Gaza. 'There's a deal on the table and what prevents it is Netanyahu's refusal to end the war,' said Einav Zangauker, the mother of one of the hostages, at the rally.
Earlier this month, former Prime Minister of Israel Ehud Barak wrote in a TIME essay calling for Netanyahu to back a Trump-brokered ceasefire: 'In the coming few days, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will face a defining choice between a politically motivated 'war of deception' in Gaza and a deal to release all hostages while ending the war. He must choose between his extreme-right ministers—Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich—or aligning with Donald Trump.'
Netanyahu said at the Sunday security meeting that 'many opportunities have opened up' after Israel's 'victory' in Iran, and for one of the first times he appeared to prioritize hostage exchange over the defeat of Hamas, potentially signaling appetite for a ceasefire deal: 'Firstly, to rescue the hostages,' he said. 'Of course, we will also need to solve the Gaza issue, defeat Hamas, but I believe we will achieve both tasks.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
Rep. Greg Steube says passing Trump megabill in the House will likely ‘be a challenge'
Rep. Greg Steube (R-Fla.) said on Monday passing President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' in the House will likely 'be a challenge.' 'I do think you're gonna have some challenges on the House side. We can only lose three votes,' Steube told NewsNation's Blake Burman on 'The Hill.' 'You've got 218 you got to get to, we can only lose three, if we lose four the bill's dead, and you've got things in here that moderates don't like, and you've got things in here that conservatives don't like. So, it is certainly going to be a challenge.' House moderate Republicans and hard-line conservatives have recently expressed rising opposition to the Senate's version of the 'big, beautiful bill' only days before the lower chamber is set to consider the legislation. Democrats have already expressed their own vehement distaste for the bill, with members like Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) calling it a 'big bad betrayal bill' and Rep. Maxwell Frost (D-Fla.) saying it is an 'evil bill.' 'If Republicans pass this big bad betrayal bill, they are quite literally ensuring that more poor Americans will DIE so that billionaires and giant corporations can get a tax cut,' Jayapal said in a post on the social platform X Monday. Former close Trump ally Elon Musk said Monday he would support primary challengers to any Republicans who backed Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!' Musk said on X.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats fail to overturn ruling that tax cuts in GOP megabill don't add to deficit
The Senate voted along party lines Monday that making the expiring 2017 tax cuts permanent as part of President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' could be scored as deficit neutral and therefore comply with the Byrd Rule, allowing the bill to pass with a simple-majority vote. Democrats failed to defeat the ruling by the Senate chair, which Republicans control, that the chamber's 940-page One Big, Beautiful Bill Act does not violate the 1974 Congressional Budget Act by using a controversial 'current policy' baseline to score the extension of President Trump's expiring tax cuts as not adding to the deficit. If the tax portion of the bill were scored on a 'current law' baseline, which assumes the 2017 Trump tax cuts would expire at the end of 2025, then it would add an estimated $3.5 trillion to federal deficits between 2025-34 and would add to deficits after 2034 — beyond the 10-year budget window allowed by the Byrd Rule. Scored this way, the Republican bill would fail the rule, which governs what legislation is eligible to pass the Senate with a simple-majority vote on the reconciliation fast track, and Republicans would be forced to rewrite large parts of the measure. But when scored with a 'current policy' baseline, the Congressional Budget Office projects the tax cuts in the Finance Committee's section of the bill would increase deficits by not more than $1.5 trillion between 2025-34 and would not increase on-budget deficits after 2034. Democrats argued a current policy baseline had never been used before in a budget reconciliation bill, and had never been used to score an extension of expiring tax cuts as not adding to future deficits, and therefore was not in compliance with the Senate's Byrd Rule. And Democrats highlighted over the weekend that most of the Republican reconciliation package uses a 'current law' baseline to project the cost of the legislation. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) accused Republicans of 'deploying fake math and budgetary hocus-pocus to make it seem like their billionaire giveaways don't cost anything.' Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) accused Republicans of 'going nuclear' to blow up the Senate rules so they can make Trump's 2017 tax cuts permanent. 'This is the nuclear option. It's just hidden behind a whole lot of Washington, D.C., lingo,' Wyden said on the floor. Wyden pointed out through a parliamentary inquiry that the Finance portion of the bill used two different baselines, current policy and current law. Senate Democrats had tried to schedule a meeting with Republican Budget Committee staff and with the parliamentarian to discuss whether using a current policy baseline violated Senate precedent and the Byrd Rule, but Republicans 'flat-out refused' to participate in such a meeting, according to a person familiar with the conversations. Senate Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said Monday morning that Republicans are not overruling the parliamentarian and asserted the parliamentarian has said it is up to him as Budget chair to set the baseline. And he argued Democrats in the past have supported the use of a current policy baseline to project the cost of legislation, although it hasn't been done before for a budget reconciliation package. He noted former Democratic Budget Committee Chair Kent Conrad (N.D.) used a current policy baseline for a past farm bill. Republicans also point out former President Obama's budget office supported using a current policy baseline to score the extension of the expiring tax cuts from the George W. Bush era at the end of 2012. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said on the floor Monday that former Obama Director of the Office of Management and Budget Jeff Zients supported using the current policy baseline for the 2012 fiscal cliff deal. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'How Is This Legal?': Critics Say Trump's Latest 'Grift' Literally Stinks
Donald Trump's critics smelled something fishy on Monday as the president unveiled his latest product: a new line of fragrances for men and women that come in a gold-colored Trump statuette. Trump wrote on his Truth Social website: The Victory 45-47 scents ― one for men, one for women ― sell for $249 per 100ml bottle, with a $50 discount per bottle for those who purchase two or more. The women's perfume is described as 'a sophisticated, subtly feminine scent that's your go-to signature for any occasion,' while the men's cologne is advertised as having 'rich, masculine notes with a refined, lasting finish.' Trump also hawked a 'Fight, Fight, Fight' set of fragrances last year, named for his words after an assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania. Those are currently selling for $199 a bottle. While Trump is promoting the fragrances, and likely pocketing a hefty licensing fee as a result, a note on the website states: 'Trump Fragrances are not designed, manufactured, distributed or sold by Donald J. Trump, The Trump Organization or any of their respective affiliates or principals.' The new fragrance already has some reviews on the Fragrantica website. While many are jokes, one of the few serious reviews said it 'isn't bad' but 'nothing impressive' and 'boring,' adding that similar scents can be found for about $26 at discount stores such as Ross. Trump's critics on social media said the whole thing stinks: How is this legal? — Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) June 30, 2025 This can't be real! Is it? He must just be trying to distract us from the awful bill which unnecessarily gives a tax break to the wealthiest Americans while cutting healthcare and food for some of the most needy, all while exploding the largest deficit in the history of… — Tom Suozzi (@RepTomSuozzi) June 30, 2025 new frontiers of grifting — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 30, 2025 I hope that it doesn't smell like Trump, because that would be — Socrates2023 (@SocratesSword) June 30, 2025 Brings a whole new meaning to the term "eau de toilette"... — Cole (@bn_thr_dn_tht) July 1, 2025 A) Ew. B) Everything is a grift. C) Imagine the freakout if Obama did this.D) Ew. — The Tennessee Holler (@TheTNHoller) June 30, 2025 16 million Americans are about to lose their healthcare, but go buy my gross perfume… — Jessica Tarlov (@JessicaTarlov) July 1, 2025 The new Jim Jones: You don't drink the kool-aid, you spritz it on all over. — Kevin Taylor (@KTaylorWrites) July 1, 2025 😬 — The Great Gig in the Sky (@thegreatgig8) June 30, 2025 MAGA explain how this is different from Hunter Biden's artwork please — Lib Dunk (@libdunkmedia) July 1, 2025 👃 Top Notes: Cold McDonalds grease, month-old hairspray, and that weird fog that comes out of a tanning bed💨 Heart Notes: Golf cart exhaust, Diet Coke sour breath mist, and the faint aroma of Epstein island💀 Base Notes: Leather chair farts, synthetic patriotism, & a whisper… — RockyMountainVibes🏔️ (@justjenniferkay) July 1, 2025 I'm old enough to remember when the Constitution's Emoluments Clause was a thing. The good old days. — shannon esposito (@soesposito) June 30, 2025 A reminder that then-candidate Jimmy Carter divested from his peanut farm because he was concerned about it being a conflict of interest. — Rodericka Applewhaite (@Rodericka) July 1, 2025 Why does it look like a Dundie Award — Alex Eliasof (@AlexEliasof) July 1, 2025