
No link between Covid vaccine, deaths: Centre
'Studies by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and National Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) affirm that COVID-19 vaccines in India are safe and effective, with extremely rare instances of serious side effects. Sudden cardiac deaths can result from a wide range of factors, including genetics, lifestyle, pre-existing conditions, and post-COVID complications,' read the health ministry statement.
On Tuesday, Karnataka chief minister Siddaramaiah alleged that the hastily approved and distributed Covid vaccines could also be a reason for sudden deaths. In a post on X, he wrote that more than 20 people had died of heart attacks in the past one month alone in the Hassan district of the state.
ICMR and NCDC have been working together to understand the causes behind sudden unexplained deaths, especially in young adults between the ages of 18 and 45 years. To explore this, two complementary studies were undertaken using different research approaches—one based on past data and another involving real-time investigation.
The first study, conducted by ICMR's National Institute of Epidemiology (NIE), was titled 'Factors associated with unexplained sudden deaths among adults aged 18-45 years in India – A multicentric matched case–control study.' This study was carried out from May to August 2023 across 47 tertiary care hospitals in 19 states and Union Territories. It looked at individuals who appeared to be healthy but died suddenly between October 2021 and March 2023. The findings have conclusively shown that COVID-19 vaccination does not increase the risk of unexplained sudden death in young adults, said the health ministry.
The second study, titled 'Establishing the cause in sudden unexplained deaths in young,' is currently being conducted by the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi with funding and in collaboration with ICMR. This is a prospective study aimed at determining the common causes of sudden deaths in young adults. Early analysis of data from the study indicates that heart attacks, or myocardial infarction (MI), continue to be the leading cause of sudden death in this age group. Importantly, no major changes in the pattern of causes have been observed when compared with previous years. In the majority of the unexplained death cases, genetic mutations have been identified as a possible cause of these deaths. The final results will be shared once the study is complete, said the statement.
'Together, these two studies offer a more comprehensive understanding of sudden unexplained deaths in young adults in India. It has also been revealed that COVID-19 vaccination does not appear to increase the risk, whereas, the role of underlying health issues, genetic predisposition and risky lifestyle choices does play a role in unexplained sudden deaths.'
Scientific experts have reiterated that statements linking Covid vaccination to sudden deaths are false and misleading, and are not supported by scientific consensus. Speculative claims without conclusive evidence risk undermining public confidence in vaccines, which have played a crucial role in saving millions of lives during the pandemic.
'Such unfounded reports and claims could strongly contribute to vaccine hesitancy in the country, thereby adversely impacting public health. The Government of India remains committed to evidence-based public health research to protect the well-being of its citizens,' read the statement.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
MP: SHGs in Neemuch district set an inspiring example of women's empowerment
Neemuch: A women's self-help group from Neemuch district in Madhya Pradesh has set an extraordinary example of women's empowerment by transforming their village economy and lives, through the production of sanitary pads. Supported by the National Rural Livelihood Mission (NRLM), the women of Khor Gram Panchayat have turned a bold idea into a thriving business that champions health, dignity, and self-reliance. It is often said that no work is impossible if one has courage, and the Nari Swabhiman Self-Help Group of Khor village proves exactly that. Formed during the difficult days of the COVID-19 pandemic, this group of determined women not only created their own identity but also set a benchmark for others to follow. Inspired by the film Padman, they began producing sanitary pads to promote menstrual hygiene and women's health in their community, giving themselves—and countless others—a new sense of dignity and self-respect. Named Nari Swabhiman (Women's Self-Respect), the group's journey took flight with the support of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's women-empowerment initiatives and NRLM's mission to provide sustainable livelihoods in rural India. The group received its first major opportunity during the pandemic when they were awarded a contract to make PPE kits, along with financial assistance of Rs 3 lakh. That early success became the foundation for their next big leap. Today, these women produce hygienic, safe, and affordable sanitary pads on a large scale, at prices lower than market rates. Their work doesn't just support their families financially but also raises awareness about menstrual hygiene. Through their 'Nari Swabhiman Sanitary Pads,' they are empowering women to live with confidence and health, breaking age-old taboos in the process. The group's president, Mona Khoiwal, recalls how it all began: 'In 2020, twelve of us from the village came together to form this self-help group. During the Corona period, we started by making PPE kits. Later, with the Rs 3 lakh loan under NRLM, we bought a small machine to manufacture sanitary pads. We then went from village to village, talking to women about menstrual health and the importance of using pads. Akshay Kumar's movie Padman was a big inspiration for us—it showed us what was possible, and we tried to inspire other women too. Now, with bigger machines, we're fulfilling large orders from across India. We're deeply thankful to Modiji for his efforts toward women's empowerment.' The success story doesn't stop there. As demand grew, so did their capacity. The group expanded production by investing in advanced machinery, allowing them to fulfil increasingly large orders coming from various parts of the country. Bharti Nakwal, another dedicated member of the group and a resident of Khor village, shared her experience: 'We manufacture sanitary napkins here under the brand name Nari Swabhiman. Mona Khoiwal is our group's operator. We've been working for 5–6 years now. Initially, we made them by hand, but as demand increased, we upgraded to bigger machines. Every morning, we start the machines and use pulp, stickers, and other materials to produce the pads. Some of us operate the machines, while others weigh and pack the napkins.' Bharti further explained the motivation behind their mission: 'Earlier, women used to use cloth, which often caused infections and diseases. We wanted to change that and protect women's health. That's why we started this napkin business. Around 10–15 women work here every day. We receive orders worth Rs 5–8 lakh that we complete in 8–10 days. We feel so proud doing this work—it's meaningful and helps protect women from diseases.' NRLM is a poverty alleviation project implemented by the Ministry of Rural Development, a branch of the Government of India. This plan is focused on promoting self-employment and the organisation of the rural poor. The idea behind this program is to organise the poor into SHGs and make them capable of self-employment.


Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
Toddlers in India are missing key developmental milestones due to excessive screen time; parents, mental health experts weigh in
In many homes across northern India, toddlers are spending significantly more time in front of screens than experts recommend, often with parents unaware of the developmental risks. A new study published in BMJ Paediatrics Open, based on a survey of 3,624 parents across five Indian states, found that screen exposure among children aged two–five far exceeds the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. 'Parents used screen time for their own rest, to carry out household chores, or to pacify their children,' the study noted. Many believed this was beneficial, but the trade-off was clear: reduced verbal interaction, physical activity, and developmental play. Speech and hearing specialist Priyank Bhutani, a co-author of the study and PhD scholar at Tezpur University, said the research was driven by a lack of Indian data on how screen time affects early development. 'About 13 per cent of children were getting up to eight hours of screen time daily, and 70–80 per cent of parents didn't even know what the guidelines were,' he told This stands in stark contrast to World Health Organization guidelines, which recommend zero screen time for children under 2, and no more than one hour of supervised, high-quality content for ages 2–5. Instead, activities like reading or storytelling with a caregiver are encouraged. 'Screens were being used to feed, soothe, and occupy kids,' Bhutani said. 'Children with higher screen time were found to engage less in talking with parents and peers, had reduced outdoor play and were less likely to participate in creative activities,' the study mentioned. Bhutani describes screens as 'digital helpers' that became indispensable during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. 'They became the easiest way to keep children occupied while parents focused on daily responsibilities.' This resonates with many urban parents. Natasha Puri, a mother of two toddlers aged two and four, admitted, 'With two young kids, a job, and trying to protect my mental health, screen time is a crutch. We're way over the 20-minute recommendation, but it's the best I can manage.' Similarly, Ratish Sreekumar, 41, father to two children aged two and five, said: 'It started with the intention of augmented learning, but yes, I'd be lying if I said entertainment, convenience and simply keeping him occupied didn't play a role.' What makes this trend particularly concerning is how screens are infiltrating critical learning moments. The damage isn't just about time spent on screens, it's about what that time is replacing. 'When a child eats while staring at a screen, they're not experiencing the food –– how it smells, tastes, feels,' Bhutani said. 'Gone is the baby talk: 'Open your mouth, it's yum!' There's no interaction.' This loss of communication is being seen in clinics. 'As a speech and language therapist, I've seen a surge in parents reporting delays in speech and language,' Bhutani said. The underlying issue, he explained, is fundamental: 'Language is a learned behaviour. It doesn't happen automatically. A screen cannot give you two-way communication. You need a social environment to learn.' Mental health professionals are observing similar patterns. Dr Sakshi Mehrotra, an existential humanistic therapist and founder of Mindlogs, noted a rise in toddlers with 'delayed speech, reduced eye contact, poor frustration tolerance, and difficulties engaging in imaginative play or independent exploration, all foundational to healthy emotional and cognitive development.' 'Often, these signs get misread —– parents might assume the child is just shy or independent,' she said. 'Reduced curiosity or playfulness – the child preferring passive screen time over exploring toys, nature, or social spaces – difficulty tolerating boredom, meltdowns when the screen is turned off, inability to self-soothe without digital distraction are all red flags.' Counselling psychologist Rajvi Turakhia describes this as 'digital dysregulation.' Children exposed to fast-paced screen content become desensitised to normal stimuli. 'The brain begins craving the dopamine hit of quick cuts, loud sounds, and instant gratification. Once the screen's off, regular life feels boring or even frustrating.' Many parents are aware of the risks but feel stuck. Neha Popli Dhamija, a teacher and mother of a 4-year-old, said, 'My daughter started mimicking cartoon characters and behaving like them. That's when I cut back and focused on play instead. It made a big difference in her mood and attention span.' She also said, 'In hindsight, too much screen time hindered development, not just for my daughter but many kids around. I've seen cases where children face speech delays or show signs of autism linked to excessive screen exposure.' Abhilasha Daga, mother of a 3-year-old, said, 'On high screen time days, he's more irritable, less responsive, and harder to settle at bedtime. It's like he's overstimulated.' For Sreekumar, the effects were behavioural. 'My 2-year-old becomes more stubborn and unruly after screen time, so we've started capping it and being more selective about the content.' The study found that what children watch is just as important as how long they watch. The WHO guidelines specify that even the permitted hour for two-five year olds should be 'assisted'. Bhutani stressed that screen time must be interactive and supervised. 'It should be co-viewed, not passive,' he said. 'We must pay attention to both duration and content.' Puri noted changes in her son's behaviour depending on what he was watching. 'He was more aggressive when watching angry dinosaurs. I had to ban that content.' Despite widespread awareness that excessive screen time isn't ideal, parents consistently report a lack of practical, accessible guidance. 'I don't think there's enough clear or accessible guidance for Indian parents. Most information is either too technical or hidden behind paywalls/paid subscribers. There's also a lot of conflicting advice online,' said Abhilasha. This echoes the research findings. 'There's a huge gap,' Bhutani said, adding, 'There should be an Indian-based, Indian context on Indian data guidelines. And there should be programmes to train parents what to do if you're not giving a screen.' Turakhia said, 'There's a serious lack of accessible, non-judgemental psychoeducation for parents. Many don't have the information they need to make informed choices or aren't sure what realistic alternatives look like.' Mental health professionals stressed that addressing this issue requires understanding, not condemnation. 'Parents are doing their best with limited tools,' said Dr Mehrotra. 'Many believe that educational apps compensate for real-life interaction, but they don't.' Turakhia points out that modern parenting is uniquely challenging. 'Dual-income homes, limited support, and digital distractions have reshaped the parenting landscape. Rather than strict prohibitions, we need small, sustainable shifts –– like screen-free meals, bedtime routines, or co-viewing on weekends.' The good news is that it's not too late. 'Children's brains are incredibly plastic in the early years,' Turakhia explained. 'Even small changes can yield significant improvements –– if parents have the right tools.' Bhutani emphasises the bigger picture. 'If this continues unchecked, screen exposure could become a public health crisis. We need awareness campaigns, government-led initiatives, and most importantly, support for parents who want to do better but don't know how.' He also said, 'Most parents know there's a problem. They're not in denial, they just need help navigating it.' As India continues its digital transformation, the goal, experts agreed, is to help families make informed choices. The challenge isn't to eliminate screens entirely but to find a sustainable balance. 'It's about slowly reclaiming space for shared, screen-free moments that nurture both parent and child,' Dr Mehrotra said. Swarupa is a Senior Sub Editor for the lifestyle desk at The Indian Express. With a passion for storytelling, she delves into the realms of art & culture, fitness, health, nutrition, psychology, and relationships, empowering her readers with valuable insights. ... Read More


Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
COVID vaccine causing myocarditis epidemic? US' most published Cardiologist reveals chilling 'TRUTH'
The U.S. Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations held a crucial hearing titled "The Corruption of Science and Federal Health Agencies: How Health Officials Downplayed and Hid Myocarditis and Other Adverse Events Associated with the COVID-19 Vaccines." Top medical experts and legal voices testified, including Dr Peter McCullough, Dr Jordan Vaughn, Dr James Thorp, Dr Joel Wallskog, Attorney Aaron Siri and Hawaii Governor Josh Green. Dr McCullough presented findings from a large autopsy series, stating that in 73.9% of examined post-vaccine deaths, mRNA COVID vaccines were considered the likely cause, a claim that has sparked intense debate in the medical community. Show more Show less