Mahindra's AI is the "fastest in the automotive world"
Mahindra claims to have the most advanced in-vehicle artificial intelligence (AI) system, with its latest vehicle architecture taking a significant leap in using machine learning to transform how cars monitor drivers and interact with their environments.
The Indian automaker, which is also the fifth largest IT provider in India, has introduced a new AI system called MAIA (Mahindra Artificial Intelligence Architecture), which it claims is the 'fastest automotive mind in the world' and can process 51 trillion operations per second, enabling complex real-time analysis of driver behaviour.
As a comparison, a current-generation iPhone 16 Pro Max's A180 Pro chip can complete 35 trillion operations per second. Maia uses a Snapdragon 8295 chip with embedded 5G capabilities.
Its driver occupant monitoring system (DOMS) can detect mobile phone usage, track passenger movements, and recognise potential safety risks – reporting them both inside the vehicle and also to external sources.
'We're learning how to use AI in practical ways,' said the lead engineer. For example, the system utilises five radars and multiple cameras to continuously train its auto park assistant, thereby improving parking accuracy through machine learning algorithms.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. Supplied Credit: CarExpert
Other system capabilities include detecting driver posture, monitoring passenger behaviour, and providing advanced diagnostic information.
Interestingly, AI is also being used in the development process itself. Engineers are now utilising machine learning to generate test cases and verify algorithms, particularly in complex areas such as accent recognition in voice interfaces. CarExpert visited a lab in Chennai, India, where this development was taking place.
Currently, the system focuses on monitoring and data collection rather than direct driving intervention. While not yet controlling the vehicle, the technology represents a significant step towards more adaptive automotive systems.
The architecture enables software partners to integrate new applications more easily, suggesting a more flexible approach to vehicle development in the future.
Mahindra's approach highlights a growing trend in automotive technology: transforming vehicles from simple transportation tools into intelligent, data-driven platforms that can learn and adapt.
As with all other brands, the move toward more data and intelligent overlays opens the door to numerous privacy concerns with vehicles that can not only monitor and record their drivers but also dob on them.
MORE: Everything Mahindra
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
4 hours ago
- Perth Now
Lotus denies plans to close UK factory
British sports car maker Lotus has denied reports it is considering closing its only UK plant, and shifting to the US. Multiple publications, including the BBC, Automotive News and the Financial Times, are reporting Lotus is contemplating closing its plant in Hethel, about 20 minutes south of Norwich. Lotus and parent Geely initially refused to comment on the reports, but on Saturday Lotus put out an official press statement: 'Lotus Cars is continuing normal operations, and there are no plans to close the factory. We are actively exploring strategic options to enhance efficiency and ensure global competitiveness in the evolving market. 'We have invested significantly in R&D and operations in the UK, over the past six years. Lotus remains committed to the UK, and its customers, employees, dealers, suppliers, as well as its proud British heritage.' The company also said 'the UK is the heart of the Lotus brand', while also noting the UK is its 'largest commercial market in Europe'. Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now. Supplied Credit: CarExpert Hethel, the company's only factory in the UK, currently produces the Emira coupe (below) for sale around the world. If Hethel is mothballed, Emira production may be moved to the Volvo's plant in Charleston, South Carolina, which currently underutilised. In a call with investors last week, Feng Qingfeng, CEO of Lotus Technology, said 'localisation [of production in US] is a feasible plan' given President Trump's constantly changing tariff policy on foreign-made cars. Production at Hethel has been paused to since mid-May to manage supply chain issues related to US tariffs, and a halt in shipment of Emiras to the US. The Financial Times believes closure of Hethel could happen as early as 2026, and would see around 1300 people lose their jobs. The company's growing losses saw it already fire 270 people in April this year, following on from multiple rounds of job cuts over the last few years. Despite those job losses, Geely and Lotus said they were committed to the UK. Supplied Credit: CarExpert Moving production from the UK to Volvo's plant in the US would allow Lotus to avoid the wildly fluctuating tariff situation in the US, one of the brand's key markets. Earlier this year President Trump announced tariffs on UK-built cars would rise from 2.5 per cent to 25 per cent, but this was quickly dropped to 10 per cent, but only for the first 100,000 vehicles per year, after the two nations completed a trade deal. Founded in 1952 by Colin Chapman, the company's ethos of simplifying and adding lightness has seen it produce many celebrated sports cars, but the firm has teetered on a financial knife-edge for decades. After Chapman's death, Lotus has been successively owned by GM, Romano Artioli (who at the time also owned Bugatti), and Malaysian automaker Proton. Current ownership of the storied sports car brand is a little complicated. Chinese automaker Geely — which also owns Volvo, Polestar, Lynk & Co, Zeekr, LEVC and Smart — bought a 51 per cent of Lotus from Proton in 2017. Supplied Credit: CarExpert Geely then split the brand in two, with UK-based Lotus Cars responsible for the marque's sports cars, and a new firm Lotus Technology, based in Wuhan, China, in charge of expanding the brand into electric SUVs and sedans. In February 2024 Lotus Technology was floated by merging with a special purpose acquisition company backed by LVMH, the luxury conglomerate that owns Louis Vuitton, Moët & Chandon, Dior, Bulgari, TAG Heuer, and many others. This April, the companies announced Lotus Technology would buy out Geely's 51 per cent stake in Lotus. Supplied Credit: CarExpert Supplied Credit: CarExpert Although the brand's new EVs helped grow the brand's sales to 12,134 last year — a 74 per cent increase over 2023 — Lotus Technology has bled hundreds of millions of dollars in red ink, and its shares are down 84 per cent. Last year the 6862 Chinese-made Eletre SUVs and Emeya sedans (above) found new homes, while sales of the Emira were up 102 per cent to 5272. If Lotus does end manufacturing in Britain, it will follow other car makers in closing factories in the UK. In March this year Vauxhall closed its Luton factory, which once made Bedford vehicles, and most recently made the Opel/Vauxhall Vivaro, Citroen Dispatch, and its many siblings. Prior to this Honda closed its Swindon plant in 2021, and Ford closed its engine factory in Bridgend, Wales in 2020. MORE: Everything Lotus
The Age
15 hours ago
- The Age
Big Smell: Behind the world's fragrances sits a shadowy oligopoly
Damp carpet and old coffee. That is how a perfumier might have described the ' top notes ' – industry speak for the initial olfactory experience – at SIMPPAR, the annual fragrance-ingredient expo held this month in Paris. It is where vendors from Sicilian dynasties to Japanese chemical firms gather to showcase their ingredients. Some are natural. The centifolia rose, a beautifully pungent pink flower harvested at dawn, at its peak potency, makes for excellent marketing material. Less romantic but highly lucrative are the synthetic ingredients. These molecules allow their makers to isolate specific smells, spare the animals once killed for their secretions and give fragrances staying power. Sellers of such raw materials grumble openly about many things. Deepu Nair of Greenleaf Extractions, an Indian supplier, complains that unpredictable weather has ravaged his country's ginger crop. Laura Johnston of Ultra International, a Dutch pedlar of essential oils, laments that regulations aimed at ensuring ingredients' safety and traceability are ever increasing. But few wish to discuss the biggest question hanging over their industry: the fate of the four giants that dominate the business of turning raw materials into flavours and fragrances for brands. America's International Flavours and Fragrances (IFF), Germany's Symrise and Switzerland's dsm-firmenich and Givaudan control some two-thirds of that market. Their haute perfumiers develop the formulas for lines by Yves Saint Laurent, Hugo Boss and others. Their functional perfumiers create scents for Procter & Gamble's laundry detergent. Their flavourists work with Coca-Cola. Meanwhile, their chemists produce in-house synthetic ingredients. Loading To protect their formulas, the four have developed a culture of secrecy. The competition for commissions, or briefs, is fierce – or at least it is meant to be. Over the past two years trustbusters have been poking their noses into all this. In 2023 EU authorities raided the four's offices. Swiss and British antitrust cops have also been investigating. Allegations include price-fixing and divvying up customers. (Givaudan, dsm-firmenich and IFF say they are co-operating; Symrise, which Britain dropped from its probe last month, did not reply to The Economist.) These probes have also encouraged civil lawsuits. In February an American judge declined to toss out a class action against the companies brought by a group of consumers and smaller businesses over alleged anti-competitive behaviour. (The four firms have denied wrongdoing.)
Sydney Morning Herald
15 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Big Smell: Behind the world's fragrances sits a shadowy oligopoly
Damp carpet and old coffee. That is how a perfumier might have described the ' top notes ' – industry speak for the initial olfactory experience – at SIMPPAR, the annual fragrance-ingredient expo held this month in Paris. It is where vendors from Sicilian dynasties to Japanese chemical firms gather to showcase their ingredients. Some are natural. The centifolia rose, a beautifully pungent pink flower harvested at dawn, at its peak potency, makes for excellent marketing material. Less romantic but highly lucrative are the synthetic ingredients. These molecules allow their makers to isolate specific smells, spare the animals once killed for their secretions and give fragrances staying power. Sellers of such raw materials grumble openly about many things. Deepu Nair of Greenleaf Extractions, an Indian supplier, complains that unpredictable weather has ravaged his country's ginger crop. Laura Johnston of Ultra International, a Dutch pedlar of essential oils, laments that regulations aimed at ensuring ingredients' safety and traceability are ever increasing. But few wish to discuss the biggest question hanging over their industry: the fate of the four giants that dominate the business of turning raw materials into flavours and fragrances for brands. America's International Flavours and Fragrances (IFF), Germany's Symrise and Switzerland's dsm-firmenich and Givaudan control some two-thirds of that market. Their haute perfumiers develop the formulas for lines by Yves Saint Laurent, Hugo Boss and others. Their functional perfumiers create scents for Procter & Gamble's laundry detergent. Their flavourists work with Coca-Cola. Meanwhile, their chemists produce in-house synthetic ingredients. Loading To protect their formulas, the four have developed a culture of secrecy. The competition for commissions, or briefs, is fierce – or at least it is meant to be. Over the past two years trustbusters have been poking their noses into all this. In 2023 EU authorities raided the four's offices. Swiss and British antitrust cops have also been investigating. Allegations include price-fixing and divvying up customers. (Givaudan, dsm-firmenich and IFF say they are co-operating; Symrise, which Britain dropped from its probe last month, did not reply to The Economist.) These probes have also encouraged civil lawsuits. In February an American judge declined to toss out a class action against the companies brought by a group of consumers and smaller businesses over alleged anti-competitive behaviour. (The four firms have denied wrongdoing.)
