
Do foldables need Apple more than Apple needs foldables?
This is how a foldable iPhone could look like. | Image credit – Apple Insider
According to a new report, Apple might finally be gearing up to launch its first foldable iPhone in 2026 – a timeline that's already been floating around for a while. But the surprising bit is the price. This time, the rumor suggests it could land somewhere between $1,800 and $2,000.
That might sound steep, but it's actually lower than previous estimates (some suggested $2,400 or more), and more importantly, it's in line with what Samsung, Google and others are already charging. And to me, that says a lot. Apple isn't looking to sit above the foldable market – it wants to compete directly with it. Foldables are everywhere, but still not for everyone
Samsung just launched the new Z Fold 7 . | Video credit – PhoneArena We've already seen the Galaxy Z Fold 7 launch with a $100 price bump over last year's model. Just before that, Honor unveiled the Magic V5 in China, vivo dropped the X Fold 5 there, too and Oppo kicked off the year with the Find N5. The Pixel 10 Pro Fold from Google is expected next month. So, the space is packed – at least on the Android side.But while we get better hardware, refined designs and slicker software with each new phone, most of these foldables still hover around the $1,800+ mark. That keeps them in luxury phone territory – a tough sell for anyone who isn't a die-hard early adopter.
And to be fair, when we first heard Apple was working on a foldable iPhone , those rumors about a $2,400+ price tag seemed totally believable. After all, Apple has a long history of coming in late and charging more.
But this time, the game looks different. Foldables aren't some untapped market. They are a small but growing niche and Apple might not want to position itself too far outside it. Especially after the Vision Pro lesson: $3,500 for a headset was a bit too much for most people and sales reportedly fell short of expectations.
So if Apple really launches its foldable at the same $1,800 - $2,000 price range as its biggest rivals, that's a statement. It's not trying to be the Ferrari of foldables. It's showing up to play – in the same league as Samsung's Fold series and Google's Pixel Fold line. If Apple matches the price, it also sets the tone
And let's be real – if Apple drops a foldable at $2,000, that basically cements the price floor for premium foldables. Brands like Honor, OnePlus and Oppo might still go a bit lower to stand out, but don't expect Samsung or Google to blink. If anything, Apple's entry gives them cover to keep their own prices high – now it's 'just what foldables cost.' But here is where I think things really get interesting: perception.Right now, a lot of people don't even think about buying a foldable. $2,000 for a phone that folds? Especially if it's from a brand they don't fully trust yet? It's a hard sell. But once Apple steps in, that might change.
People who would never consider a $2,000 Android phone might take a second look if it has an Apple logo on it. Carriers will push it harder. Retailers will make more space for foldables. Developers – finally – will have a strong reason to build better apps for foldable screens. That ripple effect is what Apple brings to the table. The real innovation Apple offers might not be hardware If the price rumor is true, Apple won't just be dipping a toe into foldables – it'll be diving in. And that could shift the entire category more than any thinner hinge, brighter screen or faster chip ever could.
Because while Samsung and others have led the way on foldable tech, it might take Apple to actually normalize it. Secure your connection now at a bargain price!
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Phone Arena
19 minutes ago
- Phone Arena
NFL Sunday Ticket is suddenly cheaper on YouTube TV, but only for some
Receive the latest Google news Subscribe By subscribing you agree to our terms and conditions and privacy policy The fact that some users are getting exclusive discounts only after canceling has raised questions. There's no formal opt-in or visible banner on YouTube TV's platform promoting these deals. Instead, they seem to be part of an unannounced retention effort, sent quietly via email. That could leave many loyal subscribers feeling left out or frustrated that they aren't eligible for the same savings. As someone who subscribed to YouTube TV back when it launched, I can relate to those deciding to cancel. The service once stood out as an affordable and flexible cable alternative. Over the years, though, prices have climbed steadily. Today, it's often more expensive than some traditional TV bundles, especially when adding premium sports content like NFL Sunday Ticket. The decision to offer steep discounts only to lapsed users also doesn't sit well with everyone. It may encourage users to cancel just to receive a better deal later. And for subscribers who stick around year after year, the lack of similar offers can feel like a penalty for staying loyal. Ideally, streaming platforms like YouTube TV would focus on upfront transparency and equal treatment across their user base. Until then, the NFL Sunday Ticket deal might be a nice bonus—if you're lucky enough to receive it. The fact that some users are getting exclusive discounts only after canceling has raised questions. There's no formal opt-in or visible banner on YouTube TV's platform promoting these deals. Instead, they seem to be part of an unannounced retention effort, sent quietly via email. That could leave many loyal subscribers feeling left out or frustrated that they aren't eligible for the same someone who subscribed to YouTube TV back when it launched, I can relate to those deciding to cancel. The service once stood out as an affordable and flexible cable alternative. Over the years, though, prices have climbed steadily. Today, it's often more expensive than some traditional TV bundles, especially when adding premium sports content like NFL Sunday decision to offer steep discounts only to lapsed users also doesn't sit well with everyone. It may encourage users to cancel just to receive a better deal later. And for subscribers who stick around year after year, the lack of similar offers can feel like a penalty for staying loyal. Ideally, streaming platforms like YouTube TV would focus on upfront transparency and equal treatment across their user then, the NFL Sunday Ticket deal might be a nice bonus—if you're lucky enough to receive it. Grab Surfshark VPN now at more than 50% off and with 3 extra months for free! Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer Some YouTube TV users who canceled their subscriptions are now seeing offers in their inboxes for discounted NFL Sunday Ticket plans. According to a Reddit post, a former subscriber reported getting an email from YouTube TV offering $96 off the NFL Sunday Ticket package. This lowers the price to $282 for existing YouTube TV subscribers. The user said they had canceled their service earlier this year after March Madness ended. Based on their post, it seems YouTube TV may be targeting users who left after major sports events wrapped Reddit commenters mentioned they received smaller discounts, such as $48 off. However, there is no consistent pattern across the reports. That suggests the discount amounts might vary based on account history, subscription length, or cancellation timing. So far, YouTube has not confirmed that it's running an official promotion, and it's unclear how many former users are getting these NFL Sunday Ticket costs $378 per season for current YouTube TV subscribers. For those without an active subscription, the standalone version runs $480 annually. Prices go up if users add RedZone access or choose monthly billing. While this year's pricing remains the same as last season, some viewers still see the package as too expensive for what's offered.


GSM Arena
an hour ago
- GSM Arena
Google officially reveals when it's unveiling the Pixel 10 family
Ever since early June, Google has been rumored to hold its grand unveiling event for the Pixel 10 family on August 20, and today the company itself has officially confirmed the date. Of course, Google hasn't mentioned whether it had initially chosen August 13 and then changed its mind and postponed the event by exactly one week, as we have heard from rumors, so we'll never know if that was true. But the 'new' date itself was accurate, as is so often the case with rumors related to Google (and especially the Pixel line, which just can't seem to stop leaking). We are expecting the Pixel 10, Pixel 10 Pro, Pixel 10 Pro XL, Pixel 10 Pro Fold, and Pixel Watch 4 to all be introduced during the August 20 event, perhaps joined by the Pixel Buds 2a. The phones should all have macro capabilities built into their telephoto cameras alongside their ultrawides, and support for "Pixelsnap" magnetic accessories, but unfortunately only through cases - the magnets apparently won't be built into the handsets themselves, iPhone-style. Otherwise, the entire range will be powered by the Tensor G5 SoC, Google's first that will be built by TSMC and not Samsung. Source


Phone Arena
an hour ago
- Phone Arena
Pixel Watch 4 might handle AI much better thanks to a key spec upgrade
Google Pixel Watch 4might stick to the Snapdragon W5 Gen 1 chipset, but it is set to get an updated co-processor. The new chip, called M55, is said to introduce major improvements to the AI abilities of the smartwatch. A new report from Android Headlines claims that the M55 co-processor might be capable of handling 'five times the AI workload at a fraction of the power' used by previous versions. All previous Pixel Watch models have used the M33 co-processor, which was released by Arm in 2016. The goal of that chip is to handle specific tasks, such as per-second heart rate measurements. The Cortex-M55, which might be featured in the Pixel Watch 4 , was released in 2020, and Arm describes it as its most AI-capable Cortex-M chip. Arm, July 2025 The list of specs is completed by 2GB of RAM and 32GB of storage. Those numbers are similar to those on previous models, so there's nothing surprising about them. Google might also upgrade the brightness of the Pixel Watch 4 's display. The upgrade might be to 3,000 nits, which is a significant upgrade from the Pixel Watch 3's 2,000 nits peak brightness. If that turns out to be true, Google's watch will match the brightness of the Apple Watch Ultra 2 and the brand new Samsung Galaxy Watch 8. The battery might also improve significantly, leading to an increase in estimated battery life. The 41mm model might last up to 30 hours with always-on display turned on and up to 48 hours in battery saver mode. On the 45mm model, the numbers are up to 40 hours with AOD and up to 72 hours with Battery Saver. I think the upgrades to the Pixel Watch 4 sound great, especially for owners of older watches. While the chipset will stay the same, that's still Qualcomm's latest smartwatch chip, so Google doesn't have much of a choice about it. However, the battery life and display improvements sound significant enough to get excited about. Pairing that with the rumored introduction of Gemini to the Pixel Watch 4 , and we get a decent refresh. The Pixel Watch 4 is likely to be introduced along the Pixel 10 series. The next Made by Google event is on August 20 and it's where the company might introduce the Pixel 10 , Pixel 10 Pro, Pixel 10 Pro XL, Pixel 10 Pro Fold, and the new smartwatch. All devices might be released on August 28. Secure your connection now at a bargain price! We may earn a commission if you make a purchase Check Out The Offer