VK imposes guv rule in Chakma council for six months
The decision has been taken by Singh in response to the frequent changes in leadership resulting in political instability and persistent maladministration that have hampered effective governance in the CADC.
A BJP leader said an inquiry commission is also likely to be constituted under Para 14 of the Sixth Schedule to investigate the functioning and administrative irregularities of the CADC.
CADC BJP president Durjya Dhan Chakma told TOI over phone that BJP welcomes this bold and timely decision.
"It is a much-needed step to restore transparency, accountability, and stable governance in the Chakma Autonomous District Council — paving the way for renewed development and the welfare of the people," he said.
Political instability raised its head during mid-June when the BJP ruled CADC led by chief executive member Molin Kumar Chakma was voted out of power in a no trust vote on June 16 after 12 BJP members of district council (MDCs) in the 20-member CADC switched loyalty to the Zoram People's Movement (ZPM) ruling the state.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
22 minutes ago
- The Hindu
When will PM Modi breaks silence: Congress after Donald Trump repeats ‘stopped India-Pak conflict' claim
The Congress on Tuesday (July 8, 2025) said U.S. President Donald Trump has for at least the 21st time repeated his claims on bringing about a "ceasefire" between India and Pakistan, and asked when will Prime Minister Narendra Modi break his "silence" on this issue. In his remarks on Monday (July 7, 2025), Mr. Trump repeated the claim that he stopped the war between India and Pakistan by telling the two neighbours that Washington would not do trade with them if they continued the fighting. Congress general secretary in-charge communications Jairam Ramesh said, "For at least the 21st time in the last 59 days, President Trump has said that he "stopped the four-day India-Pakistan war in May; the war was about to escalate into a nuclear conflict." Mr. Trump has stated that India and Pakistan agreed to a ceasefire because the carrot-and-stick of trade with the U.S. was used by him, Mr. Ramesh said. "In other words, his message was: stop the war at once or face the real prospects of losing American markets (and presumably investment)," he said. 'President Trump has trumpeted all this just as he was also announcing that a US trade deal with India and Pakistan was about to be declared very soon,' Mr. Ramesh said. "When will Narendra Modi — once described by his senior colleague Ghanshyam Tiwari as the BJP's 'trump card' - break his silence on this issue?" the Congress leader said. Mr. Trump on Monday (July 7, 2025) said the U.S. is close to making a trade deal with India. "Now, we've made a deal with the United Kingdom, we've made a deal with China. We're close to making a deal with India. Others we met with and we don't think we're going to be able to make a deal, so we just send them a letter. If you want to play ball, this is what you have to pay," Mr. Trump said. Repeating his claim about bringing about a ceasefire between India and Pakistan, Trump said, "We did a job with India and Pakistan, Serbia, Kosovo, Rwanda and the Congo, and this was all over the last three weeks or so and others that were ready to fight." "And we stopped a lot of fights. I think the very big one, frankly, a very, very big one, was India and Pakistan. And we stopped that over trade," he said. "We said we're not going to be dealing with you at all if you're going to fight. And they were maybe at a nuclear stage. They're both nuclear powers. And I think stopping that was very important," Mr. Trump added. Since May 10, Mr. Trump has repeated his claim several times that he helped settle the tensions between India and Pakistan and that he told the nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours that America will do a lot of trade with them if they stop the conflict. India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting terrorist infrastructure in territories controlled by Pakistan in response to the Pahalgam terror attack. The strikes triggered four days of intense clashes that ended with an understanding on stopping the military actions on May 10. New Delhi has been maintaining that India's fierce counter-attack that day forced Pakistan to plead for ending the hostilities.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
34 minutes ago
- First Post
‘Rafales, in the plural…absolutely not correct': India's defence secretary dismisses Pakistan claim
Indian Defence Secretary RK Singh has denied Pakistan's claim on shooting down Indian fighter planes. He said that it was 'absolutely not correct' that Pakistan shot down more than one Indian fighter planes in Operation Sindoor. read more Rafale fighter jet is seen parked on the tarmac during its induction ceremony at an air force station in Ambala, India, September 10, 2020. File Image/Reuters Indian Defence Secretary RK Singh said on Monday that Pakistan's claim of shooting down multiple Rafale fighter planes is incorrect. In the four-day India-Pakistan conflict in May, Pakistan has claimed to have shot down five Indian fighter planes, including three Rafales. While refusing to go into the specifics, Singh told CNBC-TV18, 'You have used the term Rafales in the plural, I can assure you that is absolutely not correct. Pakistan suffered losses many times over India in both human and material terms and more than 100 terrorists.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Singh's remarks appear to confirm a previous statement by Eric Trappier, the CEO of Rafale-manufacturer Dassault Aviation, that India lost one Rafale fighter plane — Singh said that Indian loss of Rafales was not 'plural' (more than one). In remarks published in French outlet Avion De Chasse on June 25, Trappier said that India lost one Rafale aircraft 'at an altitude of over 12,000 metres during an extended training mission with no enemy involvement or hostile radar contact'. What all India has said about losses in Operation Sindoor Singh further said that no political constraints were imposed on the armed forces during the conflict with Pakistan on May 7-10. 'No political constraints on our armed forces and they have full operational freedom in conflict,' said Singh. The remarks were an apparent reaction to a statement by Captain Shiv Kumar, India's Defence Attache to Indonesia, last month at a seminar that said India lost fighter planes because of the rules of engagement set by the political leadership in the beginning of the conflict. 'We did lose some aircraft, and that happened only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack the military establishments and their air defences,' said Kumar. In the first round of strikes under Operation Sindoor on the night of May 6-7, India struck only terrorist facilities in Pakistan and Pakistan Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (POJK). India began striking Pakistani military facilities only after Pakistani military attacked India after Indian airstrikes on terrorist sites. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While India has confirmed that it lost fighter planes formally, it has not confirmed the numbers and has consistently downplayed the numbers presented by Pakistan. Last month, Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan said that Pakistan's claim of shooting down six Indian fighter planes was 'absolutely incorrect'. Singh told Bloomberg that the numbers were not important but the fact that India figured out and corrected its mistake to achieve superiority was important. 'The good part is that we are able to understand the tactical mistake which we made, remedy it, rectify it, and then implement it again after two days and flew all our jets again, targeting at long range,' said Chauhan.
The Hindu
38 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Jamiat chief moves Delhi HC to seek stay on release of film on Kanhaiya Lal murder case
A petition has been filed before the Delhi High Court seeking to stay the release of 'Udaipur Files', claiming that the movie based on tailor Kanhaiya Lal murder case has potential to inflame communal tensions and disrupt public order in the country. The petition has been filed by Maulana Arshad Madani, Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind president and principal of Darul Uloom Deoband, and is likely to come up for hearing on Wednesday. Madani has claimed in the petition that a trailer of the movie, released on June 26, 2025 was replete with dialogues and instances that had led to communal disharmony in 2022, and carries every potential to again stoke the same communal sentiments. "The movie, in fact unabashedly depicts court scenes, the statement made by a sitting chief minister supporting one party in the case and also explicitly mentions the controversial statement made by a politician - Nupur Sharma - which had resulted in communal violence and, in turn, the gruesome murder of Kanhaiya Lal," the petition claimed. It said that a mere viewing of the trailer as released leaves no manner of doubt as to the plot of the movie as the trailer itself seeks to portray an entire community in a prejudicial manner, thereby violating the right to live with dignity for the members of the community. "The trailer itself is sufficient to demonstrate its highly provocative nature, capable of creating a wedge between the communities which may cause serious disturbance to public peace and public order across the country, which had demonstrably happened with the same set of statements that are now being repeated in the movie," it said. The petitioner said that while the murder of Kanhaiya Lal was carried out by two fanatics, the trailer seeks to falsely portray the same as being carried out with the complicity of the religious heads/leaders of the community. "The release of the film Udaipur Files has the potential to inflame communal tensions and disrupt public order," the petition claimed. The film's release may result in "vilifying an entire religious community, foster hatred and severely undermine the fabric of religious harmony in the country which amounts to a direct contravention of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution of India, as it promotes discrimination, and threatens the right to life with dignity and security for an entire community", it alleged. The petition also claimed that the film violates the constitutional morality by weaponising the freedom of expression to weaken the constitutional vision of a plural, inclusive, and secular India, and instead attempts to mainstream narratives that deepen social and religious divisions. "Artistic expression, no matter how evocative, cannot be permitted to become a vehicle to crush fraternity and uproot the ethical foundations of the nation as enshrined in the Constitution," it said.
