It is permissible for Muslims to attend celebrations without any religious rituals, says MKI
KUALA LUMPUR: It is permissible for Muslims to attend invitations or events for non-Islamic celebrations without any religious rituals, says the Chairman of the Muafakat Committee, National Council for Islamic Religious Affairs Malaysia (MKI) Datuk Dr Nooh Gadot.
He stated that this includes open house events or dinner gatherings in conjunction with non-Islamic celebrations and the like, provided that the food served is halal and there is no entertainment or activities prohibited by Islamic law.
"However, scholars from the four schools of thought, namely Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i and Hambali, have unanimously agreed that it is haram and completely forbidden for Muslims to attend ritual ceremonies of non-Islamic religious celebrations.
"This prohibition includes non-Islamic religious rituals held in places of worship as well as in other venues where such rituals are commonly performed," he said in a statement on Thursday (May 15).
According to him, respecting followers of other religions does not mean supporting or participating in their worship, but participation in any form of other religious celebrations or rituals, whether directly or indirectly, is contrary to Islamic teachings and can undermine faith.
"The participation of Muslims in non-Islamic religious practices brings negative consequences such as undermining the belief in monotheism, violating legal boundaries and references to valid fatwas, creating liberal thoughts without guidance from Islamic law, as well as undermining Islamic identity in society, besides causing confusion among the younger generation," he said.
Nooh stated that the Muslim community in Malaysia can refer to the notification regarding "Muslims Also Celebrate the Religious Holidays of Non-Muslims" published by the Department of Islamic Development Malaysia (Jakim) in 2005, as well as the legal guidelines and state fatwas on this matter.
At the same time, he emphasised that maintaining faith is the responsibility of every Muslim and that the Islamic community should avoid any form of participation in the religious rituals of other religions, even for cultural or symbolic reasons.
"Educational institutions, mosques, and the media need to strengthen the proper education of faith based on the beliefs of Ahli Sunnah Wal Jamaah. All parties, including parents, teachers, community leaders, and authoritative bodies, must act wisely to guide the community so that they do not get caught up in the confusion of values between religion and culture.
"The general public is also advised to always preserve their faith and religious sensitivity by not participating in any ceremonies, parades, or religious rituals of non-Islamic faiths. Such participation is feared to cause confusion, spark polemics and jeopardise the harmony of the multi-religious society in this country," he said. – Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
2 hours ago
- New Straits Times
US strikes set up 'cat-and-mouse' hunt for missing uranium
The United States and Israeli bombing of Iranian nuclear sites creates a conundrum for United Nations (UN) inspectors in Iran: how can you tell if enriched uranium stocks, some of them near weapons grade, were buried beneath the rubble or had been secretly hidden away? Following last weekend's attacks on three of Iran's top nuclear sites — at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan — President Donald Trump said the facilities had been "obliterated" by US munitions, including bunker-busting bombs. But the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which monitors Teheran's nuclear programme, has said it's unclear exactly what damage was sustained at Fordow, a plant buried deep inside a mountain that produced the bulk of Iran's most highly enriched uranium. IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said yesterday it was highly likely the sensitive centrifuges used to enrich uranium inside Fordow were badly damaged. It's far less clear whether Iran's nine tonnes of enriched uranium — more than 400kg of it enriched to close to weapons grade — were destroyed. Western governments are scrambling to determine what's become of it. Olli Heinonen, previously the IAEA's top inspector from 2005 to 2010, said the search would probably involve complicated recovery of materials from damaged buildings, as well as forensics and environmental sampling. This will take a long time. "There could be materials which are inaccessible, distributed under the rubble or lost during the bombing," said Heinonen, who dealt extensively with Iran while at the IAEA and now works at the Stimson Centre think-tank in Washington. Iran's more than 400kg of uranium enriched to up to 60 per cent purity — a short step from the roughly 90 per cent of weapons grade — are enough, if enriched further, for nine nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick. There are indications Iran may have moved some of its enriched uranium before it could be struck. IAEA chief Grossi said Iran informed him on June 13, the day of Israel's first attacks, that it was taking measures to protect its nuclear equipment and materials. While it did not elaborate, he said that suggested it was moved. A Western diplomat said most of the enriched uranium at Fordow would appear to have been moved days in advance of the attacks, "almost as if they knew it was coming". US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved it. Trump has also dismissed such concerns. A second Western diplomat said it would be a major challenge to verify the condition of the uranium stockpile, citing a long list of past disputes between the IAEA and Teheran, including Iran's failure to credibly explain uranium traces found at undeclared sites. "It'll be a game of cat and mouse." Before Israel launched its 12-day military campaign, the IAEA had regular access to Iran's enrichment sites and monitored what was inside them around the clock as part of the 191-nation Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) aimed at preventing the spread of nuclear weapons, to which Iran is a party. Now, rubble and ash blur the picture. What's more, Iran has threatened to stop working with the IAEA. Last Wednesday, Iran's parliament voted to suspend cooperation. Teheran says a resolution last month passed by the IAEA's 35-nation Board of Governors declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations paved the way for Israel's attacks, which began the next day, by providing an element of diplomatic cover. The IAEA denies that. Iran has repeatedly denied that it has an active programme to develop a nuclear bomb. And US intelligence had said there was no evidence Teheran was taking steps towards developing one. However, experts say there is no reason for enriching uranium to 60 per cent for a civilian nuclear programme, which can run on less than five per cent enrichment. As a party to the NPT, Iran must account for its stock of enriched uranium. The IAEA can and does receive intelligence from member states, which include the US and Israel, but says it takes nothing at face value and independently verifies tip-offs. "If the Iranians come clean with the 400kg of HEU (highly enriched uranium) then the problem is manageable, but if they don't then nobody will ever be sure what happened to it," said a third Western diplomat.
The Sun
5 hours ago
- The Sun
Iran decries ‘destructive' conduct by IAEA chief
TEHRAN: Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian told his French counterpart Emmanuel Macron that Tehran halted cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog due to what he called the agency chief's 'destructive' behaviour towards the Islamic republic, his office said Monday. 'The action taken by parliament members... is a natural response to the unjustified, unconstructive, and destructive conduct of the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency,' Pezeshkian told Macron in a phone call late Sunday, according to a presidency statement. On Wednesday, Iranian lawmakers voted in favour of a bill to suspend cooperation with the IAEA, citing Israel's June 13 attack on the Islamic republic and later strikes by the United States on nuclear facilities. A ceasefire between Iran and Israel took hold on June 24. Since the start of the war with Israel, Iranian officials have sharply criticised the agency for failing to condemn the strikes. Iran has also criticised the watchdog for passing a resolution on June 12 accusing it of non-compliance with its nuclear obligations. In a Sunday post on X, Macron said he called for 'respect for the ceasefire' and a return to negotiations to address 'ballistic and nuclear issues.' He further called for 'the swift resumption of the IAEA's work in Iran to ensure full transparency.' On Monday, France, Germany, and Britain condemned what they called 'threats' against the IAEA chief Rafael Grossi after Iran rejected its request to visit nuclear facilities bombed during the war. None specified which threats they were referring to, but Iran's ultra-conservative Kayhan newspaper recently claimed documents showed Grossi was an Israeli spy and should be executed. Iran has said Grossi's request to visit bombed sites signalled 'malign intent' but insisted that no threats were posed against Grossi or the agency's inspectors. On Monday, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei said the Iranian parliament's decision to halt cooperation with the IAEA reflected the 'concern and anger of the Iranian public opinion.' He further criticised the United States and European powers for maintaining what he described as a 'political approach' toward Iran's nuclear programme during his weekly press conference. Baqaei also questioned how the safety of IAEA inspectors could be ensured while the extent of the damage to Iran's nuclear facilities -- targeted by Israel and the United States during the 12-day war -- remains unknown. 'One aspect of this issue is how to ensure the safety and security of the agency's inspectors, in a situation where there is still no accurate assessment of the severity of the damage,' he said.
New Straits Times
6 hours ago
- New Straits Times
After Iran, pressure mounts on Netanyahu to end Gaza war
ISRAELI Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's rise in popularity during the war with Iran may already be fading, as pressure mounts at home to end the conflict in Gaza. Netanyahu claimed victory over the Islamic republic in the 12-day war that ended with a ceasefire last week, after President Donald Trump ordered US warplanes to join in bombing Iranian nuclear sites. Political scientist Assaf Meydani, in a column on Israeli website Ynet on Saturday, said that alongside a "victory for both Trump and Netanyahu" in Iran, the Israeli leader "will have to explain a series of failures." Most notable among them, according to Meydani, is Netanyahu's "failure to end the campaign in Gaza", where Israel has been fighting to crush the Palestinian resistance group Hamas since October 2023. "Hamas, though battered, has not been destroyed, and 'Swords of Iron' has become prolonged attrition," Meydani said, using Israel's name for its military campaign in the Gaza Strip. "The people of Israel are strong, but tensions are simmering." Israelis fearful of the threat of a nuclear Iran rallied behind Netanyahu as he led the campaign against Israel's longtime rival. Now that that war is over, domestic and international pressure has resumed to secure an end to the fighting in Gaza. A public opinion poll published by Israel's Kan public broadcaster the day after Tuesday's ceasefire with Iran suggested a rise in support for Netanyahu. But while his approval ratings went up compared to previous polls, 52 per cent of respondents in the Kan survey still said they wanted Netanyahu – Israel's longest-serving prime minister – out of office. Nearly two-thirds of those surveyed said they wanted the Gaza war to end, compared to 22 per cent who favoured continuing the fighting. Israeli newspaper Maariv said Friday that its polling showed a "surge" for Netanyahu immediately after the ceasefire with Iran had "evaporated almost entirely" within days. In the coastal hub of Tel Aviv on Saturday, thousands of people gathered to demand a ceasefire deal that would bring home the dozens of hostages still held in Gaza since Hamas's October 7, 2023 attack that triggered the war. Liri Albag, who was released from captivity in January under a short-lived truce, told the crowd that Netanyahu and Trump "made brave decisions on Iran. Now make the brave decision to end the war in Gaza and bring (the hostages) home." Trump wrote on Saturday on his Truth Social platform that "Netanyahu is negotiating a deal with Hamas that will include the release of the hostages." On Sunday, he added: "MAKE THE DEAL IN GAZA. GET THE HOSTAGES BACK!!!" On the same day, Netanyahu said that the war with Iran had created "opportunities" to free the remaining hostages. Netanyahu has also faced renewed pressure from one of his political rivals, former prime minister Naftali Bennett. Criticising the Netanyahu government's "inability to decide" on Gaza, Bennett called for "a comprehensive agreement that includes the release of all the hostages" to end "the terrible impasse and political confusion." "Netanyahu must step down. He has been in power for 20 years... that's far too long", Bennett told Israel's Channel 12 in an interview that aired on Saturday. "The people want change, they want calm," added Bennett, who is widely expected to run for office again in the next elections, scheduled for late 2026. Gil Dickman, a prominent activist demanding action by Israel to secure the release of the hostages, said that while "the operation in Iran was a success", Netanyahu had "failed" to "make people forget his responsibility" for failing to prevent Hamas's unprecedented 2023 attack. Dickman, whose cousin Carmel Gat was killed in captivity and her body retrieved from Gaza in August, told AFP that Netanyahu's "terrible failures and the abandonment of the hostages will not be forgotten." Expressing "cautious optimism" after Trump's recent remarks, Dickman said there was "apparently an opportunity to end the war." "We couldn't save my cousin, but we can still save those who are still alive in Gaza."
