logo
Donald Trump's F-Bomb Meltdown Over Iran-Israel Sparks MAGA Cheers, Critics' Horror

Donald Trump's F-Bomb Meltdown Over Iran-Israel Sparks MAGA Cheers, Critics' Horror

Yahoo6 days ago

President Donald Trump on Tuesday morning lashed out at both Israel and Iran for breaking the cease-fire agreement that he had triumphantly announced just hours earlier.
'We basically have two countries who have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the fuck they're doing,' Trump told reporters as he departed the White House.
'You understand that?' he added, before abruptly turning and walking toward Marine One, the presidential helicopter.
President Trump on Israel and Iran: "We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the fuck they're doing." pic.twitter.com/xrztmebALZ
— CSPAN (@cspan) June 24, 2025
Trump's profane remark immediately prompted an outpouring of support from his MAGA supporters. 'Inject this straight into my veins,' posted Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) on social media, who has been a fierce critic of Trump's decision to bomb Iran.
Critics, though, condemned the president's comments as crude, undiplomatic and potentially dangerous as tensions continue to escalate in the Middle East.
'Seems like @realDonaldTrump doesn't know what the fuck he's doing, either,' suggested conservative attorney George Conway.
Others argued Trump was annoyed because his ego had taken a hit.
Seems like @realDonaldTrump doesn't know what the fuck he's doing, either. https://t.co/Wn0Vn03lOL
— George Conway 👊🇺🇸🔥 (@gtconway3d) June 24, 2025
His mastery of the deep intricacies of international relations continues to boggle the mind. https://t.co/WBwuDlpORl
— Daniel W. Drezner (@dandrezner) June 24, 2025
So then why the fuck did you get us involved? https://t.co/TPDvEUBBbS
— Democrats (@TheDemocrats) June 24, 2025
A reminder: this isn't Trump being tough on Israel. This is Trump being mad about his ego. https://t.co/XhlDXW1nsU
— Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) June 24, 2025
What an embarrassment. Constantly. And so unhelpful. https://t.co/PK4V7HQzsG
— Paul Rieckhoff🇺🇸🇺🇦 (@PaulRieckhoff) June 24, 2025
Here you have it. Our Presidential President. Disgraceful.
— margaretnordlinger (@ukriomarg) June 24, 2025
Trump Admin Slammed For Backing 'Downright Sadistic And Inhumane' Plan
Marjorie Taylor Greene Flips Out Over 'Dirty Rumors' About Her And Trump
Kayleigh McEnany's 'Go Viral' Dare Boosting Trump Ends In Mockery
From 'Real Fear' To Heartbreak: GOP-Led Campaign Spotlights How Trump Is Wrecking Lives

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thune heads into a perilous vote-a-rama
Thune heads into a perilous vote-a-rama

Politico

time20 minutes ago

  • Politico

Thune heads into a perilous vote-a-rama

IN TODAY'S EDITION:— Senate amendment fights to watch— House readies mid-week megabill vote— Don Bacon, Dusty Johnson to announce House exits The Senate's 'big, beautiful' vote-a-rama starts in just over four hours — and nobody knows how it's going to end. Senate Majority Leader John Thune can only lose one more vote with Sens. Rand Paul and Thom Tillis already opposed. As Senate GOP leaders scramble to strike deals to keep the bill on track, House Republicans are drawing red lines, with fiscal hawks threatening to tank the bill over the Senate's budget framework and moderates balking at the provider-tax crackdown. Here are the big fights we're watching when amendment votes kick off at 9 a.m., leading to a final vote on passage late tonight or early Tuesday: Medicaid: Sen. Rick Scott's proposal to curb a key Medicaid funding mechanism after 2030 has Thune's support as part of a deal struck to get the Florida senator and a handful of other holdouts to advance the megabill to debate. If it fails, it could cost leadership some fiscal hawks, though Sens. Scott and Ron Johnson refused to go there Sunday night, our Jordain Carney writes in. If it passes, it could alienate so-called Medicaid moderates. One of them, Sen. Susan Collins, filed an amendment that would double the stabilization fund for rural hospitals to $50 billion, and pay for it by adding a 39.6-percent bracket on earners making over $25 million. Medicaid moderates could also try to further water down the bill's cut to the provider tax. Keep an eye on Tillis, now unburdened by a reelection bid, who slammed the Medicaid cuts in a fiery floor speech Sunday and might jump in again. Another key player to watch is Sen. Lisa Murkowski and whether her support slips after the parliamentarian derailed Medicaid-payment provisions aimed at winning over the Alaskan. The parliamentarian also, as of early this morning, had yet to rule on food-aid waivers for Alaska that could affect Murkowski's vote. Green credits: Moderates including Tillis and Sen. John Curtis could offer amendments to soften the bill's deep cuts against wind and solar energy, including its crackdown on IRA credits and a new excise tax, our Josh Siegel writes in. That could provoke a fight with House conservatives and the White House, which have pushed for aggressive rollbacks. AI: Commerce Chair Ted Cruz and Sen. Marsha Blackburn are pitching a plan to cut the megabill's 10-year moratorium on state enforcement of AI laws in half and make accommodations for internet protections, our Mohar Chatterjee writes in. The grand finale could be a manager's amendment that House GOP leaders are pushing for to further resolve differences between the chambers and speed the bill to Trump by Friday. The House is scheduled to vote as soon as Wednesday at 9 a.m. GOOD MONDAY MORNING. You bring the snacks, we'll bring the live vote-a-rama coverage at Email us at lkashinsky@ and mmccarthy@ THE SKED The House is out but will hold a pro forma session at 2 p.m. The Senate is in session and will begin voting on amendments for the megabill at 9 a.m. The rest of the week: The House plans to vote on the megabill as soon as Wednesday morning. THE LEADERSHIP SUITE Jeffries declines to endorse Mamdani House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Sunday he's not ready to endorse Zohran Mamdani, who won the New York Democratic mayoral primary last week. The Brooklyn Democrat said he doesn't know Mamdani well and that their districts don't overlap, but added that he's hoping to sit down and 'discuss his vision for moving the city forward.' Mamdani, who identifies as a democratic socialist, has been criticized for his pro-Palestine positions and comments about Israel, a concern Jeffries addressed. 'With respect to the Jewish communities that I represent,' Jeffries said, 'I think our nominee is going to have to convince folks that he is prepared to aggressively address the rise in antisemitism in the city of New York, which has been an unacceptable development.' POLICY RUNDOWN FARM FIGHT IN THE MEGABILL — Dozens of agriculture groups are urging senators to oppose an amendment from Sen. Chuck Grassley that would limit income thresholds of farmers who can receive federal aid, Meredith Lee Hill reports. A host of farm-state GOP senators also oppose Grassley's push, three people granted anonymity told Meredith. Some are concerned that liberal senators could join with conservative fiscal hawks to pass the amendment. CHAMBER OPPOSES CLEAN-ENERGY TAX — The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Solar Energy Industry Association are slamming a new addition to the megabill that would tax solar and wind projects that have components from foreign sources, including China. 'Taxing energy production is never good policy, whether oil & gas or, in this case, renewables,' Chamber executive vice president and chief policy officer Neil Bradley wrote on X. 'Electricity demand is set to see enormous growth & this tax will increase prices.' Some manufacturer interests including the Coalition for a Prosperous America and First Solar are supporting the provision, which they see as a measure to crack down on Chinese manufacturing. Best of POLITICO Pro and E&E: CAMPAIGN STOP TILLIS SHAKES UP SENATE MAP — Democrats are eyeing a prime new pickup opportunity in North Carolina as Tillis retires. Their potentially most formidable candidate, former Gov. Roy Cooper, is expected to decide this summer whether he'll run for the seat. Former Rep. Wiley Nickel is already in the race. The possible Republican field includes Lara Trump, who is considering a campaign; RNC Chair Michael Whatley, whom the White House considers a strong candidate; and Rep. Pat Harrigan, whom some in Trump's orbit are also promoting, Lisa reports with our Nicholas Wu, Elena Schneider and Dasha Burns. BACON, JOHNSON TO ANNOUNCE HOUSE EXITS — Rep. Don Bacon is expected to announce his retirement today, two people familiar with his plans told Meredith. The centrist Republican's Nebraska seat is a prime pickup opportunity for Democrats; it's one of only three GOP-held districts Kamala Harris won in 2024. Douglas County Sheriff Aaron Hanson has spoken with GOP operatives about the race, per Meredith. Rep. Dusty Johnson is expected to announce a bid for South Dakota governor today, two people familiar with his planning told Meredith. He'll be the eighth House Republican to run for higher office in 2026. POTENTIAL MASSIE CHALLENGER INCOMING — White House officials will host Kentucky state Sen. Aaron Reed in the coming weeks to discuss a primary campaign against Rep. Thomas Massie, Lisa scooped with our Rachael Bade and Ben Jacobs. Massie endorsed Reed's run for state Senate in 2021, and Reed in return called the representative 'one of America's greatest Congressmen.' CONNOLLY AIDE WINS SNAP PRIMARY — James Walkinshaw, a former top aide to the late Rep. Gerry Connolly, won the Democratic nomination to succeed his longtime boss, making him the favorite to win the suburban Virginia district. As our Giselle Ruhiyyih Ewing reported over the weekend, Connolly's social media accounts and campaign email list posthumously promoted Walkinshaw's campaign — one of several instances of lawmakers posting from the grave. THE BEST OF THE REST Lindsey Graham Swayed Trump on Striking Iran. Here's What's Next. from Siobhan Hughes, Eliza Collins and Meridith McGraw at The Wall Street Journal 'Multiple full-time jobs': Inside the life of young parents in Congress, from Cami Mondeaux at Deseret News JOB BOARD Claire Trokey, a policy adviser for House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, is leaving to join LinkedIn's U.S. public policy team. Trokey will lead the company's engagement with the Trump administration and congressional Republicans. Adam Taylor, the former military legislative assistant and legislative director for Rep. Scott Peters, is now his Washington chief of staff. John Crews will serve as deputy assistant secretary for Treasury's Office of Financial Institutions Policy. Prior to joining Treasury, he served as a policy adviser to Scalise and covered economic and financial services policy. Before that, Crews was policy director of the Senate Banking Committee. Connor Dunn will serve as deputy assistant secretary for Treasury's Office of Legislative Affairs, covering banking and finance. Prior to joining Treasury, Dunn was at FS Vector, a strategic consulting firm. He's an alum of the Senate Banking and House Financial Services committees. Spencer Hurwitz will serve as deputy assistant secretary for Treasury's public affairs office, covering terrorism and financial intelligence. He previously served as director of comms and senior adviser to Sen. Marsha Blackburn, a member of the Senate Finance Committee. HAPPY BIRTHDAY Blake Nanney of the American Cleaning Institute … Kyle Plotkin … former Rep. Barbara Comstock … Dan Leistikow … Dan Judy of North Star Opinion Research … Kara Adame … Zack Christenson … Eve Sparks of Rep. Jeff Crank's office … Adam Kennedy TRIVIA FRIDAY'S ANSWER: Jeff Jenks correctly answered that the House Agriculture Committee celebrated its 200th birthday in 2020. TODAY'S QUESTION, from Mia: What is the highest number of roll call votes that have been offered during a vote-a-rama and in what year? The first person to correctly guess gets a mention in the next edition of Inside Congress. Send your answers to insidecongress@

The Tension Between Trump, Israel and Iran — Last Week in Your Words
The Tension Between Trump, Israel and Iran — Last Week in Your Words

Newsweek

time35 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

The Tension Between Trump, Israel and Iran — Last Week in Your Words

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. We're back with another look at the standout comments you shared over the past week. One story dominated the headlines: President Donald Trump and the conflict between Israel and Iran. The topic sparked fierce debate and fueled a wide range of opinions and discussions. Once again, Newsweek is proud to highlight your voices. Your comments continue to add depth to the conversation—offering insight, challenge, and thoughtful reflection. U.S. President Donald Trump stops and talks to the media before he boards Marine One on the South Lawn at the White House on June 15, 2025 in Washington, DC. U.S. President Donald Trump stops and talks to the media before he boards Marine One on the South Lawn at the White House on June 15, 2025 in Washington, DC. Tasos Katopodis/Getty Here are some of your highlighted comments: On Elon Musk's Controversial Comments About Manned Aircraft Original Article: B-2 Strikes on Iran Expose Limits of Elon Musk's 'Drone Swarms' Background: The strike, using B-2 Spirit bombers, reaffirmed the value of manned stealth aircraft at a time when some of the biggest Silicon Valley voices are calling them obsolete relics. Original Comment: "Did anyone believe Musk when he said that manned military aircraft are obsolete? As successful as he's been, he doesn't seem to grasp that government isn't a business, and everything isn't about the bottom line." - Jeffjeffries43 What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter taps into skepticism surrounding Elon Musk's views on military strategy and challenges his vision of an unmanned future. They cut to the core of the debate: are tech moguls overreaching into areas they don't fully understand? On Iran and Their Response to Trump's Strikes on Nuclear Sites Original Article: Iran Admits Heavy Nuclear Damage as Israel Backs Trump Background: President Trump had said the strike resulted in "total obliteration" of the Fordow facility, which is deep underground inside a mountain. Original Comment: "Would anyone expect Iran to say anything else- especially if they actually still have nuclear capability in the near future?" - jimmy_mcgill What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter raised questions about the credibility of Iran's official statements following the strike. They suggest that, especially if Iran still retains nuclear capabilities, it would be expected to downplay or deny the extent of damage. Continuing the Discussion in the Same Article Original Comment: "So basically Iran agrees with US/Israel claims, then proceeds to arrest hundreds of possible spies and goes quiet, no talks, no deal and just we've stopped them for say a year but... Now we're back to where we started as diplomacy was the only way to get insight into their future plans. That's DOA at this point." - bigcheezer What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter highlighted the potential fallout from the strikes, particularly their impact on diplomatic efforts and intelligence gathering. Their perspective echoed a widespread concern shared by many readers. Original Article: Trump Bombed Iranian Nuclear Sites—Was It a Good Idea? Newsweek Contributors Debate Background: Newsweek contributors debate whether the strikes a good idea and whether the United States should seek regime change in Tehran. Original Comment: "Donald Trump's Approval Rating Plunges in Multiple Polls. Apparently most Americans don't think it was a good idea." - Reality What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter connects public opinion data to the broader debate, implying that military action may be politically unpopular. It adds a real-world consequence to the theoretical discussion over the strikes. On Pete Hegseth's Remarks and Questions of Leadership Original Article: Pete Hegseth Trashing Former Fox News Colleague Sparks Fury from Critics Background: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth publicly criticized his former colleague Jennifer Griffin during a press briefing, taking issue with her reporting and line of questioning on the administration's recent strikes against Iran. Original Comment: "Hegseth calling someone else "about the worst". Seriously? The US has never had a defense secretary with so little experience, either with the military or with a massive budget. What does it take for someone like this to genuinely feel embarrassment?" - ninetynine What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter expresses sharp criticism of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's public remarks, highlighting widespread skepticism about his qualifications and experience. Their comment reflects broader concerns about leadership credibility during a tense geopolitical moment. Thank you for continuing to engage in the discussions and debates that shape our world. Your voices are being heard—and they will continue to be shared. Stay tuned for more highlighted comments in the weeks to come.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store