logo
The Tension Between Trump, Israel and Iran — Last Week in Your Words

The Tension Between Trump, Israel and Iran — Last Week in Your Words

Newsweek11 hours ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
We're back with another look at the standout comments you shared over the past week. One story dominated the headlines: President Donald Trump and the conflict between Israel and Iran.
The topic sparked fierce debate and fueled a wide range of opinions and discussions. Once again, Newsweek is proud to highlight your voices. Your comments continue to add depth to the conversation—offering insight, challenge, and thoughtful reflection.
U.S. President Donald Trump stops and talks to the media before he boards Marine One on the South Lawn at the White House on June 15, 2025 in Washington, DC.
U.S. President Donald Trump stops and talks to the media before he boards Marine One on the South Lawn at the White House on June 15, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Tasos Katopodis/Getty
Here are some of your highlighted comments:
On Elon Musk's Controversial Comments About Manned Aircraft
Original Article: B-2 Strikes on Iran Expose Limits of Elon Musk's 'Drone Swarms'
Background: The strike, using B-2 Spirit bombers, reaffirmed the value of manned stealth aircraft at a time when some of the biggest Silicon Valley voices are calling them obsolete relics.
Original Comment: "Did anyone believe Musk when he said that manned military aircraft are obsolete? As successful as he's been, he doesn't seem to grasp that government isn't a business, and everything isn't about the bottom line." - Jeffjeffries43
What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter taps into skepticism surrounding Elon Musk's views on military strategy and challenges his vision of an unmanned future. They cut to the core of the debate: are tech moguls overreaching into areas they don't fully understand?
On Iran and Their Response to Trump's Strikes on Nuclear Sites
Original Article: Iran Admits Heavy Nuclear Damage as Israel Backs Trump
Background: President Trump had said the strike resulted in "total obliteration" of the Fordow facility, which is deep underground inside a mountain.
Original Comment: "Would anyone expect Iran to say anything else- especially if they actually still have nuclear capability in the near future?" - jimmy_mcgill
What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter raised questions about the credibility of Iran's official statements following the strike. They suggest that, especially if Iran still retains nuclear capabilities, it would be expected to downplay or deny the extent of damage.
Continuing the Discussion in the Same Article
Original Comment: "So basically Iran agrees with US/Israel claims, then proceeds to arrest hundreds of possible spies and goes quiet, no talks, no deal and just agrees...sure we've stopped them for say a year but...
Now we're back to where we started as diplomacy was the only way to get insight into their future plans. That's DOA at this point." - bigcheezer
What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter highlighted the potential fallout from the strikes, particularly their impact on diplomatic efforts and intelligence gathering. Their perspective echoed a widespread concern shared by many readers.
Original Article: Trump Bombed Iranian Nuclear Sites—Was It a Good Idea? Newsweek Contributors Debate
Background: Newsweek contributors debate whether the strikes a good idea and whether the United States should seek regime change in Tehran.
Original Comment: "Donald Trump's Approval Rating Plunges in Multiple Polls. Apparently most Americans don't think it was a good idea." - Reality
What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter connects public opinion data to the broader debate, implying that military action may be politically unpopular. It adds a real-world consequence to the theoretical discussion over the strikes.
On Pete Hegseth's Remarks and Questions of Leadership
Original Article: Pete Hegseth Trashing Former Fox News Colleague Sparks Fury from Critics
Background: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth publicly criticized his former colleague Jennifer Griffin during a press briefing, taking issue with her reporting and line of questioning on the administration's recent strikes against Iran.
Original Comment: "Hegseth calling someone else "about the worst". Seriously? The US has never had a defense secretary with so little experience, either with the military or with a massive budget.
What does it take for someone like this to genuinely feel embarrassment?" - ninetynine
What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter expresses sharp criticism of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's public remarks, highlighting widespread skepticism about his qualifications and experience. Their comment reflects broader concerns about leadership credibility during a tense geopolitical moment.
Thank you for continuing to engage in the discussions and debates that shape our world. Your voices are being heard—and they will continue to be shared. Stay tuned for more highlighted comments in the weeks to come.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration sues Los Angeles over sanctuary city policy
Trump administration sues Los Angeles over sanctuary city policy

CNN

time22 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump administration sues Los Angeles over sanctuary city policy

The Justice Department is suing the city of Los Angeles over its so-called 'sanctuary city' policy passed in the weeks following Donald Trump's 2024 presidential election victory that prevents city resources from going toward immigration enforcement. The city's laws, DOJ says, 'interfere with and discriminate against the Federal Government's enforcement of federal immigration law,' according to the lawsuit filed Monday. 'The practical upshot of Los Angeles' refusal to cooperate with federal immigration authorities has, since June 6, 2025, been lawlessness, rioting, looting, and vandalism. The situation became so dire that the Federal Government deployed the California National Guard and United States Marines to quell the chaos,' the complaint states. In announcing the law's passage in November, LA's City Council said the 'newly adopted ordinance permanently enshrines sanctuary policies into municipal law and prohibits the use of City resources, including property and personnel, from being utilized for immigration enforcement or to cooperate with federal immigration agents engaged in immigration enforcement.' 'Critically,' the Los Angeles release stated, 'the Ordinance also prohibits the direct and indirect sharing of data with federal immigration authorities – an important gap to close in our city's protections for immigrants.' The Justice Department says that the law prevents LA officials from assisting federal agents, sharing information and otherwise obstructing their efforts, all of which, they say, runs counter to the Constitution. 'Sanctuary policies were the driving cause of the violence, chaos, and attacks on law enforcement that Americans recently witnessed in Los Angeles,' Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a press release announcing the lawsuit Monday. 'Jurisdictions like Los Angeles that flout federal law by prioritizing illegal aliens over American citizens are undermining law enforcement at every level – it ends under President Trump.'

Polls show Americans largely oppose Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' but are more split on Medicaid, immigration specifics

time23 minutes ago

Polls show Americans largely oppose Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' but are more split on Medicaid, immigration specifics

As the "One Big Beautiful Bill" tax and policy bill championed by President Donald Trump winds its way through votes in Congress, polling taken across the past month shows Americans largely disapprove – but are more split when it comes to their views on some of its provisions. Trump has emphasized that he believes Americans support his bill as emblematic of the agenda he campaigned on. He told reporters at a promotional event on Thursday, "Almost every major promise made in the 2024 campaign already will have become a promise kept. That's very important." A wide-ranging Quinnipiac University poll published on Thursday that was taken in late June found that a small majority of registered voters oppose the bill, but are more split on a provision that would create new requirements to be insured through Medicaid. Fifty-five percent of voters said that they oppose the bill, while 29% said they support it and 16% were unsure. Among Republicans, 67% said they support the act while a larger 87% of Democrats oppose it. The bill would impose new work requirements on able-bodied Medicaid recipients who don't have dependents. Asked about how they feel about the Medicaid provisions, voters were largely split – 47% of registered voters said they support them and 46% said they oppose them, effectively a dead heat. A separate poll of registered voters from Fox News taken in mid-June found similar results. 59% of registered voters said they oppose the bill, while 38% of them favored it. (However, around 4 in 10 voters said they don't understand the bill very much or at all.) A smaller plurality of voters – 49% – told Fox News they think the legislation will hurt their families, while 23% said it would help and 26% said it would make no difference. Meanwhile, a poll of American adults taken in early June by the Washington Post and Ipsos found a plurality of adults, 42%, opposing the bill, and 23% supportive of it. But at that time, 34% of American adults said they had no opinion about it, and separately, 66% said they had heard only a little or nothing at all about the bill. However, 49% of Americans told the Washington Post and Ipsos back then that they would support extending the tax cuts from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, a provision of the bill -- although their support spiked to 71% when asked if they'd support or oppose those tax cuts for people who have incomes lower than $100,000, and dropped underwater when asked about individuals with incomes above $400,000 or business corporations. The Pew Research Center, in an early June poll, also found around half – 49% – of Americans opposing the bill and 29% supporting it. Separately, 54% of Americans also felt the bill would have a "mostly negative effect on the country," while 3 in 10 felt it would have a "mostly positive effect." But similar to the Washington Post's poll, Pew found that around half of Americans would favor creating work requirements for Medicaid, with 32% opposed. A provision on money for border security enforcement – which Pew framed as increased funding for detaining and deporting undocumented immigrants – split American adults. 45% said they are opposed and 41% said they favor. The nonprofit health policy research group KFF, meanwhile, found in an early June poll that a larger majority of American adults, 64%, had an unfavorable view of the bill, while 35% had a favorable view of it. Only 17% of respondents felt that the bill would help them and their families, and 44% said it would hurt, although almost 1 in 4 did not think it would make much difference. The poll separately found a lot of support for Medicaid more generally as a program, with 79% of Americans saying they think it is the government's responsibility "to provide health insurance coverage to low-income Americans who cannot afford it."

Coinbase Bets on Tech to Drive Growth and Stay Ahead of Trends
Coinbase Bets on Tech to Drive Growth and Stay Ahead of Trends

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Coinbase Bets on Tech to Drive Growth and Stay Ahead of Trends

Technology and development spending is an important part of Coinbase Global's COIN long-term growth strategy, reflecting its focus on innovation, platform scalability, and gaining a competitive edge. In the dynamic digital asset space, ongoing investments in technology and development enable Coinbase to develop secure, efficient, and user-centric infrastructure that serves both retail and institutional clients. Such expenditures support upgrades to core systems like the trading engine, wallet solutions, blockchain integrations, and overall platform resilience, key to retaining existing users and attracting new ones. Technology and development expenses were 17% of total revenues in the first quarter of emphasis on technology and development ensures that it remains aligned with fast-changing industry trends, including decentralized finance (DeFi), staking, derivatives, and NFTs. These initiatives help broaden revenue sources beyond transaction fees and position the crypto leader to meet evolving user demands. Tools such as Coinbase Cloud and Base, its Ethereum Layer-2 network, reflect this innovation, targeting advanced users and and development spending enhance Coinbase's responsiveness to regulatory, security, and technological shifts. As the digital asset sector faces heightened global scrutiny and cybersecurity risks, Coinbase's proactive efforts in compliance automation and infrastructure development reinforce trust among users and regulators. In the long run, such spending concretizes Coinbase's position in the maturing digital asset ecosystem. Technology and development expenses are essential to Robinhood Markets' HOOD long-term growth, supporting platform stability, expanding product offerings, and enhancing user experience. Continued innovation investment enhances scalability, strengthens security, and helps the company maintain a competitive edge in the fast-changing fintech and digital asset Brokers Group, Inc. IBKR, long-term growth relies heavily on technology and development expenses, which help maintain a high-speed, low-cost trading platform for active and institutional investors. Continued investment in innovation strengthens platform stability, supports global expansion, and enables the introduction of sophisticated tools and automation across multiple asset classes. Shares of COIN have gained 42.3% year to date, outperforming the industry. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research COIN trades at a price-to-earnings value ratio of 57.1, above the industry average of 15.8. But it carries a Value Score of F. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The Zacks Consensus Estimate for COIN's second-quarter and third-quarter 2025 EPS has moved up 10.3% and 7.1%, respectively, over the past 30 days. The same for full-year 2025 and 2026 has increased 22.8% and 2.7%, respectively. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The consensus estimate for COIN's 2025 and 2026 revenues indicates a year-over-year increase. While the consensus estimate for COIN's 2025 EPS indicates a decline, the same for 2026 EPS reflects an increase. COIN stock currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) : Free Stock Analysis Report Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) : Free Stock Analysis Report Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store