Minnesota suspect gave wife 'bailout plan,' according to affidavit
June 21 (UPI) -- The Minnesota man facing federal and state charges in the shootings of two state legislators and their spouses one week ago gave his wife a "bailout plan" to be used, according to unsealed court documents.
Vance Boelter, 57, is in federal custody in the deaths of one couple and injuries of two others in separate incidents on June 14.
Jenny Boetler told the investigators they were "preppers," meaning they should "prepare for major or catastrophic events" by stockpiling materials, according to an affidavit filed by an FBI agent and obtained by WCCO-TV and KARE-TV.
Boelter told his wife to go to her mother's home in southwestern Wisconsin, the investigator said.
After the shootings were reported, law enforcement pulled over Boelter's wife and four children while leaving their home near Lake Mille Lacs. She said they were visiting friends northwest of the metro area.
She consented to a search of their car where investigators found two handguns, passports and about $10,000 in cash, according to the affidavit.
Her husband posted in a family group text "they needed to get out of the house and people with guns may be showing up."
"Dad went to war last night ... I don't wanna say more because I don't wanna implicate anybody," one text from Boelter to members of his family read, according to a federal complaint.
Boelter's wife apparently didn't know about her husband's alleged plans to attack the lawmakers, and she has not been charged with any crime. Initially, the family members were in custody for possible deportation but a judge had them released.
At roughly 9 a.m., after the shootings, Boelter visited a bank in Robbinsdale and withdrew all $2,200, according to the affidavit. Another person drove Boelter from the bank.
"Witness 1" also sold Boelter an electric bike and Buick sedan, which was found during the 43-hour manhunt.
Investigators discovered empty rifle cases, gun-cleaning supplies and a bike in a rented storage unit, according to the warrant.
Investigators discovered "voluminous writings" in Boelter's home and car, acting U.S. Attorney Joseph Thompson said.
The notebooks contained the names of more than 45 Minnesota state and federal public officials, "mostly or all Democrats," according to the complaint.
Boelter faces six federal charges -- two counts each for murder, stalking and firearms offenses in district court in St. Paul. The Justice Department could make it a death sentence case.
Minnesota doesn't have the death penalty. The state charges are two counts of murder in the second degree and attempted murder in the second degree in Hennepin County in Minneapolis.
He is being held on $5 million should federal authorities relinquish custody.
State Rep. Melissa Hortman, 55, and her husband, Mark, died at their home. They live about 5 miles from a husband and wife who also were shot.
Yvette Hoffman, who was shot eight times, was released from the hospital Thursday night while John, a state senator, suffered nine gunshot wounds and is in serious but stable condition.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
31 minutes ago
- Politico
Democrats 'seem to think that poor people are stupid,' Scott Bessent says
President Donald Trump signed his sweeping domestic megabill, which included more than $1 trillion in health care cuts, into law Friday. Work requirements are a key component of the savings needed to extend trillions in tax cuts Trump pushed over the line during his first term in 2017. But Democrats and advocates worry the administrative toll could prove cumbersome both for low-income Americans looking to prove their eligibility and for the officials doing the verification. Richard Besser, president and CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, on Sunday pointed to Arkansas as an example. Thousands lost coverage when the state implemented a work requirement program, he told ABC's George Stephanopoulos. 'And it not only affects those individuals, which is bad enough, but rural hospitals across America depend on Medicaid dollars to stay in existence,' Besser said on 'This Week.' 'It's predicted that there could be hundreds of rural hospitals that close. Those hospitals are also a driver for businesses. Businesses don't want to move into a community without a hospital.' Bessent told Bash the economy he and Trump are building will afford job-seekers with ample opportunity to exit the program by finding new work in the manufacturing sector. 'No, there are no change in benefits,' he said. 'There's a change in requirements to get the benefits. And what we are doing, we are bringing back manufacturing jobs. We are bringing back working-class jobs by securing the border. We have seen, already seen working class wages move up. So we are creating jobs. People can get off Medicaid and get a job that has good health care benefits.'
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
For the sake of his party and country, Schumer should step aside
Halfway through 2025, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) is the embodiment of the kind of leader that his party's base clearly does not want. A new Reuters-Ipsos poll found that 62 percent of self-identified Democrats agreed that 'the leadership of the Democratic Party should be replaced with new people.' And key findings from that survey indicate that Schumer is the party's most out-of-step leader. The poll showed that a large majority of Democrats want elected officials to reduce 'corporate influence,' while a whopping 86 percent 'said changing the federal tax code so wealthy Americans and large corporations pay more in taxes should be a priority.' But Schumer's record is the epitome of corporate influence. For decades, he has given priority to protecting the financial interests of the wealthy and of large corporations. Schumer vowed not to step aside after he infuriated the vast bulk of congressional Democrats with his vote for President Trump's spending bill in March. That vote also incensed grassroots Democrats across the country, to the point that he felt compelled to abruptly call off an imminent, long-planned publicity tour for his new book that month. In effect, Schumer has become persona non grata among his party's voters in many blue states. More than three months after his 'postponed' book tour, it has not been rescheduled — the Senate's top Democrat is evidently wary of photo ops of protests against him by Democrats around the country. He remains the top Democrat in the Senate at a time when he is deeply unpopular among voters eager for leadership to put up a fight against the Trump administration. If Senate Democrats are serious about reversing their party's tailspin and improving its public image, they should insist on ending Schumer's stint as minority leader. It is time for Democratic colleagues to put their foot down instead of deferring to New York's senior senator. Schumer's behavior stands in sharp contrast to the example set by Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). When Democrats lost control of the House in January 2023, causing Pelosi to lose the Speaker's gavel, she could have taken the post of minority leader but instead chose to step aside. But when Democrats lost control of the Senate in early January of this year, dislodging Schumer as majority leader, he chose to become minority leader. Now, by clinging to that post, Schumer is damaging the party's ability to rebound from its setbacks last fall and its current abysmal approval ratings. Schumer's unwelcome nickname — 'the senator from Wall Street' — is longstanding and well-earned. He reached new heights as corporate America's champion on Capitol Hill during the 2008 financial crisis, when he 'became one of the first officials to promote a Wall Street bailout,' as reported by The New York Times. Schumer was playing 'an unrivaled role in Washington as beneficiary, advocate and overseer of an industry that is his hometown's most important business.' By fall 2009, more than 15 percent of the year's contributions from Wall Street to all senators had gone to Schumer himself. Schumer has since remained closely aligned with the very corporate interests that most Democratic voters don't want party leaders to serve. Meanwhile, sectors such as banking, real estate, finance and the tobacco industry have sent floods of appreciative donations into Schumer's campaign coffers. At the end of 2024, Schumer's campaign committee reported a six-year donor haul of nearly $43 million. More than one-quarter of that total came just from securities and investment companies, real estate interests, law firms and lawyers. While those patrons and other major backers are presumably happy with Schumer's capacity to sway legislation, many of his own constituents want him out of Senate leadership. A Marist poll in April found that 53 percent of New Yorkers think he should relinquish his minority leader position. Here is how the grassroots pro-Democratic group Pass the Torch described him earlier this year: 'Chuck Schumer is unwilling and unable to meet the moment. His sole job is to fight MAGA's fascist takeover of our democracy — instead, he's directly enabling it. Americans desperately need a real opposition party to stand up to Trump.' Schumer is the most powerful symbol of how the current Democratic Party has lost touch with its base of voters who will be crucial for making gains in the midterm election next year and recapturing the White House in 2028. Continuing to enshrine him as the biggest spokesperson for Senate Democrats is a way of telling voters that catering to the personal ambition of a timeworn politician is a higher priority than being responsive to the party's constituents. Every two years, we hear how the results of federal elections will hinge on turnout. Yet the fact that Schumer remains entrenched as the top Democrat in the Senate indicates that the party is willing to depress its voter turnout rather than shake up its power structure in Congress. As long as the likes of Schumer are running the Democratic show on Capitol Hill, the party of Trump has little to worry about. Norman Solomon is cofounder of RootsAction and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. His book 'War Made Invisible: How America Hides the Human Toll of Its Military Machine' was published in 2023.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Republicans just cut Medicaid. Will it cost them control of Congress?
'The other side is going to use Medicaid as an issue,' he said, even as he voted for the megabill. 'And I think the Senate [version of the bill] gives them a little more leverage to do so.' Republicans are walking a tightrope as they return to their districts to start selling the sweeping policy package. They're going to lean into the megabill's popular provisions, like eliminating taxes on tips, while trying to escape unpopular reductions to safety-net programs. The final bill slashes spending by $1.7 trillion. Voters broadly dislike the megabill; some recent polling shows a 2-to-1 margin of disapproval, according to surveys conducted by Quinnipiac University , The Washington Post , Pew Research and Fox News . Nearly half of voters want more federal funding for Medicaid, while just 10 percent want less, according to Quinnipiac. 'What we know from past elections is that messing with people's healthcare coverage is very problematic for politicians. And it has, in the past, yielded some very, very negative views about the people who supported it,' said Republican pollster Whit Ayres. Meanwhile Democrats are rushing to capitalize on the controversy and plan to make it a centerpiece of their midterm messaging . House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries spoke on the floor for eight hours and 45 minutes, reading letters from constituents of vulnerable GOP lawmakers who could lose access to both programs. Democratic candidates followed up with post-vote statements blasting the Republicans they're looking to unseat for effectively kicking people in their districts off their health care plans. Their campaign arms and allied super PACs have already released several rounds of ads hammering vulnerable Republicans and say they plan to keep up the pace. Republicans are trying to figure out how to fight back. Their early salvos have focused on painting Democrats as supportive of tax hikes since they opposed a bill that would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts and eliminate federal taxes on tips and overtime. Republicans also argue they're protecting the 'most vulnerable' Medicaid recipients by removing undocumented immigrants and others they say shouldn't have access to the program anyway. But in a tacit acknowledgment of the potential electoral fallout, some Republicans have pledged to try to reverse provisions such as the provider tax drawdown before they take effect in 2028. 'To the extent that there's reform, and … you can legitimately argue it's the waste, fraud, abuse, that's a good position to be in,' said Rep. Russ Fulcher (R-Idaho). 'If it's just strictly a situation where you say, 'We're just cutting and spending' and it's not cognizant as to how and where, that's where we get into trouble.'
