logo
For the sake of his party and country, Schumer should step aside

For the sake of his party and country, Schumer should step aside

The Hill8 hours ago
Halfway through 2025, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) is the embodiment of the kind of leader that his party's base clearly does not want.
A new Reuters-Ipsos poll found that 62 percent of self-identified Democrats agreed that 'the leadership of the Democratic Party should be replaced with new people.' And key findings from that survey indicate that Schumer is the party's most out-of-step leader.
The poll showed that a large majority of Democrats want elected officials to reduce 'corporate influence,' while a whopping 86 percent 'said changing the federal tax code so wealthy Americans and large corporations pay more in taxes should be a priority.'
But Schumer's record is the epitome of corporate influence. For decades, he has given priority to protecting the financial interests of the wealthy and of large corporations.
Schumer vowed not to step aside after he infuriated the vast bulk of congressional Democrats with his vote for President Trump's spending bill in March. That vote also incensed grassroots Democrats across the country, to the point that he felt compelled to abruptly call off an imminent, long-planned publicity tour for his new book that month.
In effect, Schumer has become persona non grata among his party's voters in many blue states. More than three months after his 'postponed' book tour, it has not been rescheduled — the Senate's top Democrat is evidently wary of photo ops of protests against him by Democrats around the country. He remains the top Democrat in the Senate at a time when he is deeply unpopular among voters eager for leadership to put up a fight against the Trump administration.
If Senate Democrats are serious about reversing their party's tailspin and improving its public image, they should insist on ending Schumer's stint as minority leader. It is time for Democratic colleagues to put their foot down instead of deferring to New York's senior senator.
Schumer's behavior stands in sharp contrast to the example set by Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.). When Democrats lost control of the House in January 2023, causing Pelosi to lose the Speaker's gavel, she could have taken the post of minority leader but instead chose to step aside.
But when Democrats lost control of the Senate in early January of this year, dislodging Schumer as majority leader, he chose to become minority leader. Now, by clinging to that post, Schumer is damaging the party's ability to rebound from its setbacks last fall and its current abysmal approval ratings.
Schumer's unwelcome nickname — 'the senator from Wall Street' — is longstanding and well-earned. He reached new heights as corporate America's champion on Capitol Hill during the 2008 financial crisis, when he 'became one of the first officials to promote a Wall Street bailout,' as reported by The New York Times. Schumer was playing 'an unrivaled role in Washington as beneficiary, advocate and overseer of an industry that is his hometown's most important business.'
By fall 2009, more than 15 percent of the year's contributions from Wall Street to all senators had gone to Schumer himself.
Schumer has since remained closely aligned with the very corporate interests that most Democratic voters don't want party leaders to serve. Meanwhile, sectors such as banking, real estate, finance and the tobacco industry have sent floods of appreciative donations into Schumer's campaign coffers.
At the end of 2024, Schumer's campaign committee reported a six-year donor haul of nearly $43 million. More than one-quarter of that total came just from securities and investment companies, real estate interests, law firms and lawyers.
While those patrons and other major backers are presumably happy with Schumer's capacity to sway legislation, many of his own constituents want him out of Senate leadership. A Marist poll in April found that 53 percent of New Yorkers think he should relinquish his minority leader position.
Here is how the grassroots pro-Democratic group Pass the Torch described him earlier this year: 'Chuck Schumer is unwilling and unable to meet the moment. His sole job is to fight MAGA's fascist takeover of our democracy — instead, he's directly enabling it. Americans desperately need a real opposition party to stand up to Trump.'
Schumer is the most powerful symbol of how the current Democratic Party has lost touch with its base of voters who will be crucial for making gains in the midterm election next year and recapturing the White House in 2028. Continuing to enshrine him as the biggest spokesperson for Senate Democrats is a way of telling voters that catering to the personal ambition of a timeworn politician is a higher priority than being responsive to the party's constituents.
Every two years, we hear how the results of federal elections will hinge on turnout. Yet the fact that Schumer remains entrenched as the top Democrat in the Senate indicates that the party is willing to depress its voter turnout rather than shake up its power structure in Congress.
As long as the likes of Schumer are running the Democratic show on Capitol Hill, the party of Trump has little to worry about.
Norman Solomon is cofounder of RootsAction and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. His book 'War Made Invisible: How America Hides the Human Toll of Its Military Machine' was published in 2023.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Summers: No economist ‘without a strong political agenda' says Trump bill good for economy
Summers: No economist ‘without a strong political agenda' says Trump bill good for economy

The Hill

time31 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Summers: No economist ‘without a strong political agenda' says Trump bill good for economy

Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers railed against President Trump's massive tax and spending bill, saying no objective economist would characterize the legislation as a boon to the economy. 'There is no economist anywhere, without a strong political agenda, who is saying that this bill is a positive for the economy. And the overwhelming view is that it is probably going to make the economy worse,' Summers told ABC News's George Stephanopoulos in a Sunday interview on 'This Week.' 'Think about it this way,' he continued. 'How long can the world's greatest debtor remain the world's greatest power? And this is piling more debt onto the economy than any piece of tax legislation in dollar terms that we have ever had.' Trump on Friday signed into law his potentially legacy-setting policy bill, encompassing a wide array of campaign promises and agenda items, from military and immigration measures, to major cuts to national healthcare, to numerous industrial incentives. The heart of the bill, however, is an extension of the 2017 tax cuts. Without those tax cuts, the bill is expected to cut deficits by $500 billion over 10 years, according to The Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation. But with those cuts included in the accounting, the cost is $3.3 trillion, or about 9.1 percent of the total U.S. debt stock of $36 trillion. This number does not include additional interest costs necessary to pay for the debt. Revenues from tariffs are expected to offset a significant portion of the cost at about $2.5 trillion, not counting macroeconomic and debt-service costs, but are still less than the overall cost of the bill. The White House, however, has argued that the economic growth sparked by the bill will alleviate the costs. The White House Council of Economic Advisers issued a report projecting up to approximately $11 trillion in deficit reduction from growth, higher tax revenue and savings on debt payments. Asked in the interview to respond to that report, Summers said, 'It is respectfully nonsense.' 'None of us can forecast what's going to happen to economic growth,' he added. 'What we can forecast is that when people have to hold government debt instead of being able to invest it in new capital goods, new machinery, new buildings, that makes the economy less productive,' he continued. 'What we can forecast is that when we're investing less in research and development, investing less in our schools, that there is a negative impact on economic growth.'

Musk has gone 'off the rails," Trump says
Musk has gone 'off the rails," Trump says

Politico

time35 minutes ago

  • Politico

Musk has gone 'off the rails," Trump says

'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it! When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,' Musk wrote. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' Trump clearly didn't agree with Musk on the need for another political party. 'The one thing Third Parties are good for is the creation of Complete and Total DISRUPTION & CHAOS,' Trump wrote in his Truth Social post, 'and we have enough of that with the Radical Left Democrats, who have lost their confidence and their minds! Republicans, on the other hand, are a smooth running 'machine,' that just passed the biggest Bill of its kind in the History of our Country.' Trump spent the lion's share of his message attributing Musk's change of heart toward him to his own financial interests. 'It is a Great Bill but, unfortunately for Elon, it eliminates the ridiculous Electric Vehicle (EV) Mandate, which would have forced everyone to buy an Electric Car in a short period of time. I have been strongly opposed to that from the very beginning,' Trump said. Trump, in June, had offered a similar complaint about Musk: 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Musk, who was brought in to the Trump administration early on to improve the functioning of the federal government, has been arguing that the megabill, which Trump signed Friday, is a disaster. 'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country! Utterly insane and destructive,' he wrote June 28 on X. 'It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.' Two days later, he threatened to create his own party. 'Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store