
Fearing defeat, oppn raising poll boycott threat: NDA
Union minister of state for home, Nityanand Rai, said the RJD already is fearing defeat and its leader Tejashwi Prasad Yadav has already started looking for an excuse. "Tejashwi knows very well that in the upcoming assembly elections, RJD is going to be defeated again and the public is going to bless the NDA again," Rai said.
The Union minister said in a democratic process, it is the decision of a party whether or not to participate in the election.
"The Grand Alliance has been constantly trying to mislead the people, who, in fact, are participating in the ongoing correction in the voter list. So, Tejashwi is nervous about this," Rai added.
Rashtriya Lok Morcha (RLM) chief Upendra Kushwaha said the opposition has no agenda and they are trying to make whatever they think could be a poll issue. "Chunav ke baad munh chupane ki jagah dhoond rahe hai ki is karan se haar gaye.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Top 15 Most Beautiful Women in the World
Topgentlemen.com
Undo
Bhumika bana rahe hain pehle se kyonki unki haar nischit hai (they are staring at defeat and trying to find an excuse)," said Kushwaha, who met Hindustani Awam Morcha (HAM) patron and Union minister Jitan Ram Manjhi in Delhi a day before.
JD(U) also took a swipe at the opposition boycott threat. JD(U) state chief spokesperson and MLC, Neeraj Kumar, said the opposition has become a political "rudali" nowadays. "There is a tradition of rudali in Rajasthan, where women are called to cry when someone dies.
The opposition is playing a similar role," Kumar said.
Kumar said RJD leader Tejashwi and the entire opposition is insulting the Constitution and the Election Commission of India (ECI), which is a constitutional body. "The Supreme Court is also hearing the cases on SIR. So, creating a ruckus and disrupting the House proceedings on this issue is an insult to constitutional institutions," he added.
BJP leader and road construction department minister Nitin Nabin said if Tejashwi trusts Bangladeshi infiltrators, he should contest elections in Bangladesh. "The opposition uproar over the SIR and subsequent talk of boycotting elections clearly reflects their loss of faith in democracy. In reality, they are rattled by the development agenda of the NDA govt and has now resorted to baseless allegations and undemocratic rhetoric in frustration," Nabin said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
23 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump Birthright Order Blocked Again in Fresh Legal Setback
President Donald Trump's executive order limiting birthright citizenship was blocked nationwide for the third time in less than a month, the latest sign that a US Supreme Court decision restricting 'universal injunctions' is having little impact on the dispute. The injunctions set up what is likely to be yet another set of appeals that could reach the Supreme Court, which has largely backed Trump in his broad crackdown on immigration. The justices haven't yet taken up the question of whether Trump's birthright citizenship order is constitutional. A federal judge in Boston ruled on Friday that an injunction pausing Trump's order nationwide is the only way to offer full protection to the Democratic-led states the filed the suit. The judge said his actions are in line with the Supreme Court's findings. US Judge Leo Sorokin said in his ruling that he could not narrow his injunction in part because Justice Department lawyers hadn't offered useful details about how such a ruling would work. 'With stakes this high, the court simply cannot adopt the defendants' blasé approach to the details and workability of a more limited injunction,' the judge said. A nationwide injunction protecting all affected babies was granted in a class-action suit in New Hampshire on July 10, while a federal appeals court this week upheld a similar block in a suit brought by four Democratic-led states. The new ruling comes in a suit brought by 18 states. A judge in a separate class-action suit is weighing another potential injunction. The Fight Over Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order: QuickTake Trump's order would restrict citizenship to babies with at least one parent who is a US citizen or green card holder. Critics say it violates a provision of the Constitution that grants citizenship to virtually every baby born in the US. The government says the directive closes a loophole that encourages illegal immigration. Trump's order was initially put on hold nationwide months ago in three separate cases. But the Supreme Court on June 27 paused those orders after ruling that judges generally can't issue nationwide injunctions that block federal policies outright. The justices returned the cases to the lower courts to weigh whether their injunctions needed to be narrowed or amended so that they provide relief only to the people or groups that sued. Sorokin held a hearing on the matter earlier this week. The Supreme Court's opinion, hailed as a major victory by the Trump administration, hasn't stopped judges from finding that broad injunctions against the president's birthright citizenship order are still necessary to protect US-born children of migrants while the cases proceed. In their request to maintain a nationwide injunction, the Democratic-led states said the Supreme Court's finding on so-called universal injunctions 'has no bearing on this case.' The states argue that a nationwide injunction is the only way to prevent harm that they say would be caused by allowing the executive order to take effect in some states, creating a chaotic patchwork of citizenship. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
In Delhi, Fadnavis Pitches ₹10,000 Crore Fertiliser Plant for Vidarbha
Nagpur: Maharashtra chief minister Devendra Fadnavis has proposed a ₹10,000 crore fertiliser plant in Nagpur district, positioning it as a game-changing investment to revive Vidarbha's agrarian economy. The proposed project, a joint venture between GAIL, the department of fertilizers, and the state government, will have an annual production capacity of 12.7 lakh tonnes. During a meeting with Union health minister JP Nadda in Delhi, Fadnavis—who is on a two-day visit to the national capital—requested central subsidy and policy clearance. "This will be a transformative project for Vidarbha," the CM said, highlighting its dual impact on rural employment and fertiliser availability. Nadda responded by instructing the state to submit a cabinet proposal. Fertilizers secretary Ratak Kumar Mishra was also present at the meeting. Fadnavis' visit included a series of high-level meetings to accelerate approvals for major infrastructure and environmental projects. In a meeting with finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman, he sought clearance from the ministry of economic affairs for five international funding proposals. These included ₹8,651 crore from the Asian Development Bank to connect villages with concrete roads, ₹4,326 crore for coastal protection, and another ₹4,326 crore to treat municipal wastewater for industrial reuse. Two additional proposals, routed through the World Bank, were also discussed. Sitharaman, acknowledging Maharashtra's financial discipline, assured full cooperation. "Maharashtra has maintained strong economic indicators on every front," she said. Finance secretary Anuradha Thakur, chief economic advisor to the CM Praveen Pardeshi, and principal secretary Ashwini Bhide attended the meeting. Fadnavis also pushed for a ₹22,490 crore rural road network project covering 14,000 km under the ministry of rural development. These 25-year maintenance-free roads, supported by ADB funding, are expected to ease transportation for farmers. Union agriculture minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan praised the plan and lauded the state's performance in housing schemes. "The central govt has sanctioned a record 30 lakh homes for the state," he noted. At NITI Aayog, Fadnavis discussed projects worth ₹4,326 crore each, including the use of artificial intelligence for non-communicable disease (NCD) screening and bamboo-based industrial clusters. He also presented progress updates on the ₹8,651 crore Marathwada Water Grid, the Damanganga-Godavari river-link project, and a skill development plan linking ITIs with private industry. The commission assured timely clearances. "Despite the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) limit of 25%, Maharashtra has stayed within 18%," said CEO BVR Subrahmanyam, commending the state's fiscal prudence.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
J&K an exception, no delimitation exercise prior to 2026 Census: SC
NEW DELHI: Acknowledging an exception carved out for Jammu and Kashmir , the Supreme Court on Friday said delimitation exercises for other states cannot be conducted prior to publication of data of first census after 2026 as that would be against the mandate of Article 170(3) of the Constitution. "The delimitation process is, by design, a legislative and executive function. If the SC were to compel carrying out of delimitation exercise (in a particular state) through a judicial fiat, it would likely be construed as an interference in the policy-making prerogative of the Executive," said a bench of Justices Surya Kant and N K Singh. Writing the judgment for the bench, Justice Kant said, "The Constitutional edifice carefully balances institutional roles, and any disruption of that equilibrium would undermine both the legitimacy and functional integrity of the democratic process." The bench said the constitutional mandate under Article 170(3) bars any delimitation exercise concerning states of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana or any other state. It dismissed a writ petition challenging the Centre's decision to conduct delimitation only for J&K and not for Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, saying the constitutional mandate - delimitation exercise based on first census after 2026 - does not apply to UTs. The petitioner's counsel Rao Ranjit said that though J&K Reorganisation Act was passed in 2019, the delimitation exercise was carried out under the 2020 notification, but even though the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act was passed in 2014, the delimitation exercise had not been carried out for these two states even after a decade. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Blood cancer is taking our curious baby away from us! Donate For Health Donate Now Undo Solicitor general Tushar Mehta along with ASG K M Nataraj for the Centre said as per the mandate of Articles 80 and 170 of the Constitution, no readjustment of seats or divisions of states into territorial constituencies can be undertaken until the relevant data from first census conducted after 2026 is published. For the Election Commission, senior advocate Maninder Singh said the EC has no jurisdiction to opine on the validity of delimitation exercise as its role is only to facilitate implementation of the process. The SC accepted the Centre's stand and said the AP Reorganisation Act is subject to the constitutional provisions, as expressly provided in the Act itself. If delimitation exercise is allowed to be carried out in some states, then it would open a flood gate of similar demands from the other states, he said. The bench said the petitioner cannot seek to draw delimitation parity between states of AP and Telangana with that of the Union Territory of J&K, to which Article 170(3) has no application. Though it acknowledged legitimate expectations of people of the two states for delimitation exercise, it ruled that such expectations cannot override constitutional mandate.