
A new treaty could stabilize Canada's relationship with the U.S.
Thomas d'Aquino is the founding CEO of the Business Council of Canada and author of Private Power Public Purpose - Adventures in Business, Politics and the Arts.
Prime Minister Mark Carney has rightfully and boldly laid out a vision for Canada to achieve greater economic and security resilience in the face of an 'existential threat' from the United States. This demands a posture of greater independence from our southern colossus. It also requires a high degree of sang froid and diplomatic finesse in protecting Canada's national interest. The hard reality is that we cannot fully decouple ourselves from our economic and security interdependence with the Americans even as we vigorously pursue new partnerships around the world. So how best can we achieve a higher degree of certainty in our bilateral relationship while having to come to terms with a transactional president?
Ever since Mr. Carney and President Donald Trump conducted their first telephone conversation on March 28 and spoke of a comprehensive economic and security package – conversations that have been since ongoing – I have been mulling the idea of a bilateral treaty binding our two countries. Radical? Counterintuitive? By all means. But here's why it merits consideration.
According to Article VI of the U.S. Constitution, '...all treaties...under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land.' A Canada-United States Economic and Defence Treaty, endorsed by two-thirds of the U.S. Senate, would give the bilateral relationship a higher degree of formality and recognition. Of far more consequence than an agreement or pact, it would also provide Canada with more certainty during and after the Trump presidency, assuming, of course, that the terms of the treaty would be advantageously negotiated by Canada.
From a Canadian perspective, what might be a plausible pitch to the President? I have tried to answer this question by imagining what I would say in the opening of the conversation.
Opinion: Diversify from the U.S. for defence? This must include diversifying from Big Tech
Opinion: Mark Carney is walking a high-stakes foreign-policy tightrope between Canada's values and interests
Mr. President, one of the most important elections in Canadian history has just concluded. Buoyed by a surge of patriotism not seen since the Second World War, our citizens have affirmed their love of country and confidence in our future as a proud and independent people. Our confidence is rooted in the knowledge that we possess powerful democratic institutions, a respected judiciary, an enormous land mass rich in resources and surrounded by three oceans, and one of the most diverse and skilled populations on earth. We have also been blessed to share a continent with our long-time friend and ally, the United States of America.
In a conversation you and Mr. Carney had on March 28, it was agreed 'to begin comprehensive negotiations about a new economic and security relationship immediately following the election.' The Canadian election now behind us, here are some preliminary ideas on how new life can be breathed into this refreshed relationship.
You are well aware of the highly integrated nature of our two economies. It has yielded great mutual benefits in terms of growth and jobs. As a businessman, you appreciate the staggering achievement of our two countries exchanging nearly US$1-trillion annually in goods and services. We are indispensable customers of each other. You are also well aware of our mutual commitment to the defence of North America. In the troubled and dangerous world, Canadians, and I believe, Americans, would welcome rock-solid, mutually beneficial commitments to our common future.
With this in mind, I am interested in exploring with you the negotiation of a historic Canada-United States Economic and Defence Treaty that would benefit from your leadership and the support of Canada's Parliament and the Congress of the United States. The cornerstones of this treaty would be the affirmation of our eternal friendship, the respect of our territorial sovereignty, and our mutual embrace of the rule of law, including the binding resolution of disputes. The focus of the treaty would be on joint approaches to competitiveness, economic development, and defence and security cooperation, keeping in mind the fundamental principle of reciprocity that you are championing - reciprocity beginning with the immediate clearing away of tariffs between our two countries.
The treaty would:
The treaty is not meant to be a substitute for the United States- Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) – an initiative that you took the leadership in successfully negotiating in your first term. A renegotiated USMCA will no doubt continue to serve all three countries, especially in areas where our continental supply chains are closely integrated.
In proposing Canada-United States cooperation beyond the USMCA, Canada is mindful that the sovereignty of the United States and Canada must be respected. Canadians and Americans would expect nothing less. The treaty would acknowledge the independence of each of our countries in the domains of foreign policy and international commerce while respecting the long tradition of consultation between our two governments.
As for China, I appreciate your concerns about the failure of the Chinese government to adhere to World Trade Organization liberalization protocols and to respect the principles of trade reciprocity. Canada will work with like-minded allies to press for reforms within China to alleviate these imbalances.
In the defence domain, there is overwhelming public support in Canada for bolstering our armed forces. In addition to our new F-35 fleet, we will move forward on new submarine and icebreaker capability as well as surface combat vessels, artillery, radar, and drones. Canada's commitment to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), of which we are a founding member, is unequivocal. Mr. Carney has said Canada will meet its 2 per cent of GDP expenditure in defence spending this year and has expressed interest in partnering on the U.S. anti-missile defence shield. Canada's involvement would be consistent with our long-time commitment to NORAD and to protecting the continent's northern approaches from potential hostile attack.
Mr. President, each of your predecessors in modern times has spoken of the uniqueness of the Canada-United States relationship. Among the most memorable are these words from John F. Kennedy: 'Geography has made us neighbours. History has made us friends. Economics has made us partners. And necessity has made us allies.' In the troubled and dangerous world of today, these truths resonate more than ever. Let's seize this opportunity and shape a new and exciting chapter in the historic relationship between our two peoples. The result will be a stronger Canada and a stronger America.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
28 minutes ago
- CTV News
140 years later: Artifacts from the North-West Resistance
The first cannon fired by the North-West Field Forces at Batoche, Saskatchewan. 1885. James Peters, Library and Archives Canada, based on e011156617_s1; C-03464. Among the armed conflicts that have involved the Canadian government, the 1885 North-West Resistance may not be the most well-known, but preserved artifacts from across the prairies serve as a reminder of the fatal conflict. The North-West Resistance was fought between the Canadian government and the Métis along with First Nations, triggered by concerns over land rights, starvation and other grievances stemming from westward expansion. 'This was a huge mistake,' said Will Goodon, Manitoba Métis Federation Minister of Housing and Identity Protection, 'when [Canada] went to war against its own citizens.' Between March and June of 1885, concerns escalated into armed resistance centred across modern-day Saskatchewan and part of Alberta—then the North-West Territories. 95th Manitoba Grenadiers at Fort Qu'Appelle, Saskatchewan 95th Manitoba Grenadiers at Fort Qu'Appelle, Saskatchewan, 1885. University of Winnipeg Archives, Western Canada Pictorial Index, Gerry Dupont and Carla Davidson Collection (North-West Resistance Photographs) (uw_21-004_001_0001_005). Leading up to the conflict Before the conflict, petitions and letters were sent to Ottawa addressing these grievances in hopes of a resolution. 'These people were Canadian citizens by now, and they looked to their country to protect them. And if their country is not going to protect them, who will? And so, the outlook was more and more bleak,' said Goodon. The Métis eventually brought Louis Riel—founder of the province of Manitoba and central figure in the 1869-70 Red River Resistance—back to the Canadian prairies in 1884. Portrait of Louis David Riel, taken between 1870-1873. H. Noverre, Library and Archives Canada, Jean Riel fonds, based on e011156648. Portrait of Louis David Riel, taken between 1870-1873. H. Noverre, Library and Archives Canada, Jean Riel fonds, based on e011156648. Riel would later state at his trial that upon his return to the Northwest, he viewed the Métis as 'deprived of their public liberties,' getting further malnourished by the day and that they were 'deprived of responsible government.' On March 19, 1885, the Provisional Government of Saskatchewan was established with Riel as leader and Gabriel Dumont as adjutant general. Crossfire began one week later between the Métis and the North-West Mounted Police near Duck Lake, approximately 80 kilometres northeast of Saskatoon, Sask. Over 5,000 troops sent by the federal government Prime Minister John A. MacDonald would respond publicly that week in the House of Commons, saying that troops would be called upon and dispatched by the Canadian Pacific Railway. 95th Manitoba Grenadiers at Portage la Prairie, Man. 95th Manitoba Grenadiers at Portage la Prairie, Man., 1885. Archives of Manitoba, Guards Association in Canada fonds, PR1977-63, P5255/6. More than 5,000 troops are documented to have served on the federal government's side during the conflict from across the country. Battalions were also raised in Winnipeg, including the 92nd Winnipeg Light Infantry, the 90th Winnipeg Rifles, and the Winnipeg Field Battery of Artillery. Several battles ensued over the following months, including the Battle of Fish Creek, the Battle of Cut Knife, the Frog Lake Massacre, and the Battle of Batoche, which ultimately led to the collapse of the provisional government. One hundred and forty years later, the Royal Canadian Artillery (RCA) Museum in Shilo, Man., still holds a gun that was used at the time by Canadian government forces. The nine-pounder rifled muzzle loading (RML) gun was one of four used by 'A' Battery at the Battle of Fish Creek and the Battle of Batoche, according to Andrew Oakden, RCA Museum director. Nine-pounder rifled muzzle loading gun Nine-pounder rifled muzzle loading gun at the Royal Canadian Artillery Museum in Shilo, Man. (RCA Museum) On loan from the RCMP, the RML gun has a range of approximately three kilometres and lacks a recoil mechanism—requiring repositioning after each shot. 'They were outmatched at the end, just on the sheer modernity of the weaponry,' said Goodon, adding that a Gatling gun from the U.S. was also used on the government's side. 'Near the end, the Métis had no bullets. They were melting down cutlery, putting rocks in their muskets.' Meanwhile, in Saskatchewan, the Gabriel Dumont Institute has a rusted 12-gauge double-barreled shotgun, pistol fragments, and a knife fragment among their collection of Métis artifacts, which were recovered from the battlefields. Images courtesy of the Gabriel Dumont Institute / Dennis and Jean Fisher Collection A double-barreled shotgun (left), pistol fragments and a knife fragment retrieved from battlefields of the North-West Resistance in Sask. Images courtesy of the Gabriel Dumont Institute / Dennis and Jean Fisher Collection. ( The institute also has a nine-pound projectile which may have come from the RML gun now at the RCA Museum. The cannon projectile was retrieved from a battlefield at Batoche in 1968, prior to Parks Canada acquiring the land for the present-day historic site. Nine-pound cannon projectile Nine-pound cannon projectile retrieved from a battlefield in Batoche, Sask. Image courtesy of the Gabriel Dumont Institute / Dennis and Jean Fisher Collection. ( Over 100 people died during the conflict, according to the Canadian War Museum. 'We lost a lot of young people who were just fighting for their homes, fighting for their families,' said Goodon. One of the medical equipment kits that was used by an assistant surgeon with the 92nd Winnipeg Light Infantry is on display at the Fort Battleford National Historic Site. Medical equipment of Stephen Thomas Macadam Medical equipment of assistant surgeon Stephen Thomas Macadam with the 92nd Winnipeg Light Infantry. (Fort Battleford National Historic Site) The Métis forces were eventually defeated by government troops, with Riel being arrested and put on trial for high treason. He was found guilty by a jury and hanged in Regina, Sask., on Nov. 16, 1885. 'We all know that we have one of the best countries in the world, but it has made mistakes in the past,' said Goodon.


CTV News
28 minutes ago
- CTV News
Israeli strikes kill at least 62 people in Gaza as ceasefire prospects move closer
DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip — Israeli strikes killed at least 62 people across Gaza overnight and into Saturday, health workers said, as ceasefire prospects were said to be improving. Three children and their parents were killed in an Israeli strike on a tent camp in Muwasi near the southern city of Khan Younis. They were struck while sleeping, relatives said. 'What did these children do to them? What is their fault?' said the children's grandmother, Suad Abu Teima, as others knelt to kiss their bloodied faces and wept. Some placed red flowers into the body bags. Also among the dead were 12 people near the Palestine Stadium in Gaza City, which was sheltering displaced people, and eight more in apartments, according to staff at Shifa Hospital. More than 20 bodies were taken to Nasser Hospital, according to health officials. A midday strike killed 11 people on a street in eastern Gaza City, and their bodies were taken to Al-Ahli Hospital. A strike on a gathering at the entrance to the Bureij refugee camp in central Gaza killed two, according to Al-Awda hospital. Hopes for a ceasefire agreement in the coming week U.S. President Donald Trump says there could be a ceasefire agreement within the next week. Taking questions from reporters on Friday, he said, 'We're working on Gaza and trying to get it taken care of.' An official with knowledge of the situation told The Associated Press that Israeli Minister for Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer will arrive in Washington next week for talks on a Gaza ceasefire, Iran and other subjects. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media. Indirect talks between Israel and Hamas have been on again, off again since Israel broke the latest ceasefire in March, continuing its military campaign in Gaza and furthering the territory's dire humanitarian crisis. Some 50 hostages remain in Gaza, fewer than half believed to still be alive. They were among 251 hostages taken when Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, sparking the 21-month war. Over 6,000 killed since latest ceasefire ended The war has killed over 56,000 Palestinians, according to the Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and combatants. It says more than half of the dead were women and children. It said the dead include 6,089 killed since the end of the latest ceasefire. Israel says it only targets militants and blames civilian deaths on Hamas, accusing the militants of hiding among civilians because they operate in populated areas. There is hope among families of hostages that Trump's involvement in securing the recent ceasefire between Israel and Iran might lead to more pressure for a deal in Gaza. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is riding a wave of public support for the Iran war and its achievements, and he could feel he has more space to move toward ending the war in Gaza, something his far-right governing partners oppose. Hamas has repeatedly said it is prepared to free all the hostages in exchange for an end to the war in Gaza. Netanyahu says he will end the war only once Hamas is disarmed and exiled, something the group has rejected. Hundreds have been killed while seeking food Meanwhile, hungry Palestinians are enduring a catastrophic situation in Gaza. After blocking all food for 2 1/2 months, Israel has allowed only a trickle of supplies into the territory since mid-May. More than 500 Palestinians have been killed and hundreds more wounded while seeking food since the newly formed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation began distributing aid in the territory about a month ago, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Palestinian witnesses say Israeli troops have opened fire at crowds on roads heading toward the sites. The Israeli military says it has only fired warning shots and that it was investigating incidents in which civilians had been harmed while approaching the sites. Thousands of Palestinians walk for hours to reach the sites, moving through Israeli military zones. Separate efforts by the United Nations to distribute limited food have been plagued by armed gangs looting trucks and by crowds of desperate people offloading supplies from convoys. By Wafaa Shurafa and Sam Mednick. Mednick reported from Tel Aviv, Israel.


National Post
41 minutes ago
- National Post
New laws against blocking access to places of worship, schools coming, Fraser says
OTTAWA — Justice Minister Sean Fraser says the Liberal government will press ahead with plans for new criminal provisions against blocking access to places or worship, schools and community centres. Article content The measures, promised during the recent federal election campaign, would also create a criminal offence of wilfully intimidating or threatening people attending events at these venues. Article content Article content Article content The minister's statement comes as civil libertarians point to existing provisions intended to curb such behaviour and push back against the idea of new measures that could infringe on freedom of expression and assembly. Article content Article content Tensions have risen in Canadian communities over public protests, many prompted by the ongoing hostilities in the Middle East. Article content Several Canadian municipalities have taken steps recently to mandate 'bubble zones' that restrict protest activity near such places as religious institutions, schools and child care centres. Article content 'It's not lost on me that there will be different levels of government that try to address this challenge in different ways,' Fraser said, adding that the federal government has an opportunity _ where behaviour crosses a criminal threshold — to legislate in that space. Article content 'We clearly have seen challenges when it comes to certain religious communities in Canada who are facing extraordinary discrimination — antisemitism, Islamophobia, and other forms of hate,' Fraser said in a recent interview. Article content Article content 'People need to know that in Canada they are free to pray to the God of their choice and to, at the same time, freely express themselves, but not to the point where you threaten the protected Charter rights of a religious minority.' Article content James Turk, director of the Centre for Free Expression at Toronto Metropolitan University, said he questions the need for new provisions and suggests politicians are proposing penalties simply to appear to be doing something. Article content He said existing laws against mischief, nuisance and interfering with religious celebrations can be used to deal with the kinds of behaviour the federal government wants to address. Article content 'I haven't heard a single thing that isn't already illegal, so it's a waste of time. It adds confusion to the Criminal Code and it suggests that they're only engaged in performative activity,' Turk said. Article content 'They want to be seen to be doing something about this pressure they're under.' Article content Anais Bussieres McNicoll, director of the fundamental freedoms program at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, also said she wonders about the scope of the proposed new federal provisions 'and if they are necessary or simply duplicative of existing criminal offences.'