President's Rule for another 6 months in Manipur, Amit Shah to move resolution in Rajya Sabha today
It states: 'That this House approves the continuance in force of the Proclamation dated the February 13, 2025 in respect of Manipur, issued under article 356 of the Constitution by the President, for a further period of six months with effect from August 13, 2025.'
This move to extend President's Rule comes even as the state's Meitei and Naga NDA MLAs have been conducting a months-long campaign pushing for the restoration of a popular government in the state.
President's Rule had been imposed in Manipur on February 13, days after former Chief Minister N Biren Singh stepped down from the position, primarily as a result of political pressure from other BJP MLAs from the Meitei community who were dissenting against his leadership.
In the last Parliament session, Shah had said that the move to introduce President's Rule had been taken as no one had staked a claim to lead the government after Singh's resignation. However, since April, NDA MLAs – including Singh, legislators close to him, as well as those who dissented against him – have been pushing for the restoration of a 'popular' government, citing the lack of support for President's Rule and the perception that there has not been enough movement towards the restoration of normalcy in the state.
The move to extend President's Rule in the state is likely to cause further discontent among the Meitei and Naga MLAs.
There have been months of relative peace in the foothill areas where the Meitei-majority Valley meets the Kuki-Zo majority hills, which had been among the worst-affected parts of Manipur in the ongoing conflict. The last major cycle of violence between the communities had taken place in November last year.
In the past month, there have been three significant weapons recoveries by security forces in the state, and the government has expressed its intent to facilitate the return to their homes of a large section of people displaced by the violence by the end of the year. However, more than 26 months since the start of the conflict, there has been no significant headway on dialogue between stakeholders of the Meitei and the Kuki-Zo communities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
27 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump Birthright Order Blocked Again in Fresh Legal Setback
President Donald Trump's executive order limiting birthright citizenship was blocked nationwide for the third time in less than a month, the latest sign that a US Supreme Court decision restricting 'universal injunctions' is having little impact on the dispute. The injunctions set up what is likely to be yet another set of appeals that could reach the Supreme Court, which has largely backed Trump in his broad crackdown on immigration. The justices haven't yet taken up the question of whether Trump's birthright citizenship order is constitutional. A federal judge in Boston ruled on Friday that an injunction pausing Trump's order nationwide is the only way to offer full protection to the Democratic-led states the filed the suit. The judge said his actions are in line with the Supreme Court's findings. US Judge Leo Sorokin said in his ruling that he could not narrow his injunction in part because Justice Department lawyers hadn't offered useful details about how such a ruling would work. 'With stakes this high, the court simply cannot adopt the defendants' blasé approach to the details and workability of a more limited injunction,' the judge said. A nationwide injunction protecting all affected babies was granted in a class-action suit in New Hampshire on July 10, while a federal appeals court this week upheld a similar block in a suit brought by four Democratic-led states. The new ruling comes in a suit brought by 18 states. A judge in a separate class-action suit is weighing another potential injunction. The Fight Over Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order: QuickTake Trump's order would restrict citizenship to babies with at least one parent who is a US citizen or green card holder. Critics say it violates a provision of the Constitution that grants citizenship to virtually every baby born in the US. The government says the directive closes a loophole that encourages illegal immigration. Trump's order was initially put on hold nationwide months ago in three separate cases. But the Supreme Court on June 27 paused those orders after ruling that judges generally can't issue nationwide injunctions that block federal policies outright. The justices returned the cases to the lower courts to weigh whether their injunctions needed to be narrowed or amended so that they provide relief only to the people or groups that sued. Sorokin held a hearing on the matter earlier this week. The Supreme Court's opinion, hailed as a major victory by the Trump administration, hasn't stopped judges from finding that broad injunctions against the president's birthright citizenship order are still necessary to protect US-born children of migrants while the cases proceed. In their request to maintain a nationwide injunction, the Democratic-led states said the Supreme Court's finding on so-called universal injunctions 'has no bearing on this case.' The states argue that a nationwide injunction is the only way to prevent harm that they say would be caused by allowing the executive order to take effect in some states, creating a chaotic patchwork of citizenship. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Myanmar refugees to face deportation if convicted of drug offences: Mizo group
Aizawl: Young Mizo Association (YMA) sub-headquarters in Champhai district, bordering Myanmar, has issued new directives to Myanmar refugees residing in the area. The guidelines state that any refugee convicted of drug trafficking or possession will be deported to Myanmar after serving their jail term. This week, the YMA sub-headquarters outlined rules prohibiting refugees from forming associations or groups based on sub-tribes. The move aims to ensure uniform guidelines and equal access to support and maintenance. "They (refugees) should enrol themselves in the respective YMA units of their localities or villages and submit their Myanmar identity cards to YMA leaders. Whoever violates the local social guidelines are liable to be punished," the directives said. If a refugee intends to relocate, the current YMA unit must notify the new unit in advance. Refugees are barred from running businesses that require govt permits or from owning land or buildings. On Wednesday, the Aizawl-based NGO coordination committee — a coalition of major civil society groups and student organisations — expressed deep concern over the emergence of sub-tribe sentiments among refugees amid ongoing ethnic conflicts in Myanmar and Manipur. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Up to 70% off | Libas Purple Days Sale Libas Undo At a meeting held in Aizawl, the committee underscored that Mizoram has long been a haven of peaceful coexistence among Zo ethnic tribes. It urged the public and refugees to prevent the rise of divisive, tribe-based thinking that could threaten state harmony. The statement follows recent armed clashes in Myanmar's Chin state between Chin sub-tribes, which forced hundreds of refugees into Mizoram. In neighbouring Manipur, tensions remain high, primarily involving the Meitei community and the Kuki and Zomi groups — ethnic communities closely tied to the Mizos. Past episodes have shown that political divisions can cause friction even between culturally aligned groups like the Kuki and Zomi. Champhai district police officials said nearly 4,000 refugees who had entered Zokhawthar village — fleeing violence in Khawmawi, Rihkhawdar, and nearby Chin state villages — have now returned, following signs of peace.
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Cong, BJP allege conspiracy, security lapse
Kochi/Thrissur: Alleging a conspiracy behind the jailbreak of rape-and-murder case convict Govindachamy, opposition leader V D Satheeshan on Friday said the criminal received assistance from inside and outside Kannur Central Prison. Satheeshan said it was unbelievable that a person with one hand could cut through the jail cell window bars, climb out and escape over such a high wall using a cloth. Such an incident hasn't been seen even in Tarzan movies, he said. He said the jailbreak incident was an embarrassment for state govt. "Jail authorities came to know of Govindachamy's escape only at 5am and police were informed by 7am. It was the vigilance of ordinary people that led to the fugitive's capture," he said. "Opposition repeatedly highlighted security lapses in Kannur central jail. Criminals, including those accused in the TP murder case, are being provided with all kinds of assistance by govt and jail authorities there. The accused in TP case are given parole and food of their choice. These prisoners themselves decide the jail menu. Alcohol and drugs are readily available there. Additionally, these inmates run drug trafficking and gang operations from within the jail. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 15 Amazing Hotel Swimming Pools Learn More Undo They use the latest phones. Kannur central jail has become a haven for criminals," he alleged. BJP demands judicial probe Meanwhile, BJP state general secretary M T Ramesh alleged that a powerful mafia, with links to ruling CPM, was controlling the affairs of Kannur central jail and Govindachamy was able to escape from that high-security prison with the mafia's help. He demanded a judicial probe into the operations of mafias in state jails and into the circumstances that led to Govindachamy's jailbreak. "It is clear that Govindachamy received help from within the jail and outside. The incident is a clear manifestation of the failure of jail department controlled by chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan," he said.
