
UK government blocked own Islamophobia advisers from consulting Muslim organisations
The working group, which was set up by the government in February, is being overseen by a former public affairs officer for the pro-Israel Board of Deputies of British Jews, who has also worked for an arms industry trade association and gone on trips to Israel with an organisation accused of operating in illegal settlements.
Government sources with knowledge of the matter said that the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG), headed by Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, told the group it could not consult the MCB because the government has a policy of 'disengagement' with the organisation.
The MCB is the largest umbrella group claiming to represent Muslim organisations, with over 500 affiliates, including mosques, schools, local and county councils, professional networks and advocacy groups.
However, the working group consulted two prominent figures who have been accused of Islamophobia, Trevor Phillips and John Jenkins, on whether an Islamophobia definition would be helpful.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
MEE understands the government has had a veto over who the working group consults.
The group interviewed the Community Security Trust, which monitors antisemitism. It also invited the neoconservative think tank Policy Exchange - which has also faced accusations of promoting Islamophobia - for a consultation, but Policy Exchange declined, sources told MEE. Policy Exchange did not respond to a request for comment by the time of publication.
By contrast, the government told the working group it could not consult the Centre for Media Monitoring (CfMM), a watchdog that focuses on media coverage of Muslims. The CfMM was set up by the MCB but says it has now become an independent entity.
How the Muslim Council of Britain was left out in the cold Read More »
However, MEE understands that the government said the group could not engage with the CfMM because of its links to the MCB.
Successive governments have mostly refused to engage with the MCB since 2009 when the then-Labour government suspended ties after the organisation's deputy secretary general signed a declaration in support of Palestinians' right of resistance following Israel's three-week war in Gaza, known as Operation Cast Lead, between December 2008 and January 2009.
Labour restored ties before its defeat in the 2010 general election, and MCB officials held a number of meetings with Liberal Democrat ministers during the Conservative-led coalition government that followed until 2015. But Conservative Party ministers refused to meet MCB officials between 2010 and 2024.
Board of Deputies strategist
Sources said the working group had consulted groups including the National Secular Society and Humanists UK, which have criticised a previous Islamophobia definition adopted by Labour.
An MCB spokesperson told MEE: 'We can confirm that neither the communities ministry nor its appointed working group members proactively reached out to the Muslim Council of Britain to participate in this call for evidence. We are mobilising our grassroots membership to share their views anyway.'
They added: 'Britain's diverse faith communities don't need petty cancel culture politics driven by the whims of right-wing think tanks and legacy media outlets - we need a Government brave enough to lead with authenticity and common sense.'
The working group, led by Dominic Grieve, a former Conservative MP who was attorney general between 2010 and 2014, is set to hold an event in parliament on Thursday at which MPs and members of the House of Lords are invited to give their thoughts on how Islamophobia should be defined.
Joel Salmon, who has been the Anti-Muslim Hatred and Antisemitism Policy team leader in the communities ministry since March, oversees the working group.
In 2016, Salmon argued in a column for Jewish News that the Jewish community 'must be able to define for ourselves what antisemitism is'.
Between 2016 and 2019, he was a public affairs officer at the Board of Deputies of British Jews (BoD), a heavily pro-Israel organisation.
In that role, he worked in 'political strategy, engaging Ministers & Parliamentarians and influencing legislation', according to his LinkedIn profile. He was also 'responsible for policy development and acted as media spokesperson' for the organisation.
Downing Street consults former Boris Johnson advisor who said Islamophobia 'exaggerated' Read More »
In 2015, Salmon said he 'went on trips with' Aish HaTorah, an international Jewish Orthodox organisation which was reported in 2008 by The Atlantic to have operatives 'in the radical belt of Jewish settlements just south of Nablus, in the northern West Bank'.
Ronn Torossian, a spokesperson for Aish HaTorah in New York, told The Atlantic: 'I think we should kill a hundred Arabs or a thousand Arabs for every one Jew they kill.'
Between September 2019 and 2021, Salmon worked as a senior public affairs adviser at ADS, an arms industry trade association which counts major weapons companies among its members, including Elbit Systems, Israel's largest arms manufacturer, Boeing, BAE Systems and Lockheed Martin.
According to the Campaign Against Arms Trade (CAAT), ADS holds an annual dinner to 'bring politicians together with representatives from [the] world's biggest arms companies'.
A spokesperson for the communities ministry said: "We will not tolerate Islamophobia of any form and will seek to stamp it out wherever it occurs.
"The Working Group's work to develop a definition of Anti-Muslim Hatred/Islamophobia is aimed at improving understanding of unacceptable treatment and prejudice against Muslim communities – supporting wider and ongoing government-led efforts to tackle religiously motivated hate crime and foster cohesion. As part of this it engages with a wide range of faith communities and organisations."
Consulting the accused
Earlier this year, the Labour government set up a working group to draw up an official definition for anti-Muslim discrimination. It was given a six-month timeframe in which to deliver a report.
This suggested the government was rowing back plans to adopt the definition proposed in 2018 by the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) for British Muslims.
Adopted by Labour in opposition, the definition characterises Islamophobia as 'a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness'.
The new working group has reportedly consulted Trevor Phillips, who was suspended from Labour when Jeremy Corbyn was leader in March 2020 following allegations of Islamophobia, which he denied. His suspension was lifted in July 2021 under Keir Starmer's leadership, a move which was criticised by some Muslim Labour MPs and members.
MP Zarah Sultana said that 'the party must at the very least require a full retraction and apology. Anything less makes a mockery of the idea that the party takes Islamophobia seriously'. The Labour Muslim Network warned that 'quietly readmitting [Phillips] behind closed doors, without apology or acknowledgement, will only cause further anxiety and hurt among Muslims.'
Phillips had previously said that British Muslims are a 'nation within a nation'. He has denied accusations of Islamophobia.
The working group also consulted the former British ambassador to Saudi Arabia John Jenkins, who was in March last year accused of endorsing social media posts that are 'Islamophobic', 'defend Islamophobia' or that peddle in 'propaganda against Muslims'. MEE contacted Jenkins for comment at the time but did not receive a response.
Grieve, the working group's chair, asked Jenkins 'whether a definition [of Islamophobia] would be helpful'.
UK: British ex-diplomat probing Tower Hamlets accused of endorsing Islamophobia Read More »
Last month, the Spectator magazine published Jenkins' lengthy response, which included references to 18th-century politics and 'social constructivism', to Grieve's request.
In his response, Jenkins strongly criticised the working group for all its five members apart from Grieve being Muslim.
'I am concerned that the Working Group may have begun its work with its conclusions pre-determined,' he wrote.
Jenkins said regarding the adoption of 'any definition' of Islamophobia: 'I have heard it described as potentially the most retrograde step in this country since Sir Robert Walpole's government in 1737 granted the Lord Chamberlain's office powers to licence theatrical scripts.'
To drive his argument home, he also argued that the question of Islamophobia requires 'expertise in European law and jurisprudence (which must be the operational framework for such issues), Islamic jurisprudence (which is highly complex and varied but provides a context for some of the more extravagant claims in this area), the philosophy of liberty and the history of both western and Islamic political thought – plus a healthily sceptical attitude to critical theory and an intellectually rigorous approach to both social constructivism and what Marxists used to call 'reification'.'
Jenkins appeared to imply that none of the working group's members have the multi-disciplinary academic expertise which he believes they need.
Working group's members
Besides Grieve, there are four members of the working group. One is Akeela Ahmed, the co-chair of the British Muslim Network (BMN), which launched in February and has since kept a low profile.
MEE had revealed before its launch that the BMN had lost much of its Muslim support and was being backed by a charity set up by disgraced former archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby.
Also on the working group is Professor Javed Khan, managing director of Equi, an influential new think tank which says it was 'born out of the UK Muslim community'.
'Potentially the most retrograde step in this country since Sir Robert Walpole's government in 1737 granted the Lord Chamberlain's office powers to licence theatrical scripts'
- John Jenkins
At the parliamentary launch of an Equi report in February, Khan told parliamentarians and civil society figures that the think tank was 'seeing engagement' from the Labour government, including ministers and special advisers.
Baroness Shaista Gohir, a crossbench peer and CEO of Muslim Women's Network UK (MWNUK), is another member of the working group.
MEE revealed in late February that an MWNUK event in parliament in March celebrating the 'cultural contribution of Muslims in the UK' was supported by TikTok, the social media giant accused of censoring content on human rights abuses faced by Uyghur Muslims in China.
Aisha Affi, an independent consultant, is also named as a member of the working group.
Criticism of APPG definition
Grieve wrote the foreword to the contentious APPG report on Islamophobia in 2018, calling it 'food both for thought and positive action'.
UK: Board of Deputies of British Jews suspends vice-chair for Gaza protest letter Read More »
But the APPG definition has since been heavily criticised.
Lord Wajid Khan, Labour's faith minister, said late last year that 'the definition proposed by the APPG is not in line with the Equality Act 2010, which defines race in terms of colour, nationality and national or ethnic origins'.
In January 2019, the Jewish Chronicle reported that staff from the Board of Deputies, including Salmon - who is now overseeing the working group on Islamophobia - had attended meetings with members of the APPG on British Muslims, including Baroness Sayeeda Warsi and Labour MP Wes Streeting, who was then a co-chair of the APPG.
The BoD reportedly came close to backing the APPG's Islamophobia definition, although it eventually did not do so.
The BoD denounced the Jewish Chronicle's report as a 'mixture of innuendos, half-truths, and outright falsehoods', and said it felt 'it wasn't the right time' to endorse any Islamophobia definition.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Middle East Eye
28 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Mahmoud Abbas says Hamas will not rule post-war Gaza during meeting with Tony Blair
Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas told reporters on Sunday that Hamas will not rule Gaza after Israel ends its 21-month-long war on the besieged enclave. During a meeting with former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair in the Jordanian capital, Amman, Abbas also said Hamas must hand over its weapons to the PA and "engage in political work under a unified legal system - one authority, one law, and one legitimate weapon". Abbas, 89, and his administration are deeply unpopular among ordinary Palestinians due to allegations of corruption and their close ties with Israel. Since the start of the year, PA security forces have intensified a crackdown on armed groups in the occupied West Bank, killing dozens of fighters opposed to Israel. Earlier this year, in a development first reported by Middle East Eye, Abbas visited Lebanon, where he agreed to a framework under which Palestinian factions would disarm. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Palestinian groups have argued that bearing arms is essential due to threats posed by Israel and continued political marginalisation. At Sunday's meeting with Blair, Abbas said the only viable solution after the war was for a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, with the PA assuming full responsibility of the territory - supported by Arab countries and the international community. He also called for an international conference to be held in New York to implement a two-state solution based on the Arab Peace Initiative. In March, Arab states endorsed a 91-page proposal for the future of Gaza, with a $53bn budget for reconstruction over a five-year period. The initiative, led by Egypt, was presented as an alternative to a plan to forcibly expel Palestinians from Gaza proposed by US President Donald Trump. Cairo's plan states that for the first six months, the territory would be run by a non-partisan technocratic committee, overseen by the PA. Hamas, which has controlled Gaza since 2007, has reiterated in recent months that it is not interested in being part of any administrative structure in post-war Gaza. Tony Blair Institute mired in controversy The Palestinian president's meeting with the former UK premier comes just days after the Tony Blair Institute (TBI) was linked to a project widely condemned for proposing the ethnic cleansing of Gaza. The vision, outlined in a slide deck titled "The Great Trust", was created by a group of Israeli businessmen with support from consultants at Boston Consulting Group (BCG). BCG's plan assumed that at least 25 percent of Palestinians would leave "voluntarily", with most never returning. While it remains unclear whether Palestinians would have any choice in the matter, the proposal has been widely condemned as ethnic cleansing of Gaza's population. The project aimed to transform the enclave, which has been reduced to rubble by Israeli bombardment, into a lucrative investment hub. Central to the proposal were blockchain-based trade schemes, special economic zones with low taxes, and artificial islands modelled after Dubai's coastline. Although TBI insists it neither endorsed nor authored the slide deck, two of its staff members participated in discussions related to the initiative.


Middle East Eye
28 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
Former Israeli prime minister calls Gaza ‘humanitarian city' a concentration camp
Israel's plan to forcibly confine more than 2 million Palestinians to a small area in the southern Gaza Strip amounts to a "concentration camp", former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert has said. "It is a concentration camp. I am sorry," the 79-year-old told The Guardian on Sunday, when asked about a plan outlined by Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz last week, which would see an initial 600,000 Palestinians held in an area built on the ruins of Rafah city. According to Katz, Palestinians in the area would undergo security screenings and would not be allowed to leave. Eventually, the entire civilian population would be concentrated in the same location. Katz also said Palestinians would then be encouraged to "voluntarily" leave the Gaza Strip for other countries as part of an "emigration plan". Responding to the proposal, Olmert said: "If [Palestinians] will be deported into the new 'humanitarian city', then you can say that this is part of an ethnic cleansing," adding that ethnic cleansing was the "inevitable interpretation" of the plan. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters 'When they build a camp where they 'clean' more than half of Gaza, then the inevitable understanding of the strategy of this [is that] it is not to save [Palestinians]," he said. "It is to deport them, to push them and to throw them away. There is no other understanding that I have, at least," he added. Israel's newspaper of record, Haaretz, reported last week that Katz's plan has the backing of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. As of 14 July, it remains unclear when construction for the proposed city would begin or whether it could proceed without international backing. Katz envisaged that, if conditions permitted, the city would be built during a two-month pause in hostilities. Such a ceasefire is currently being negotiated between Israel and Hamas through intermediaries, but remains far from agreement. 'Concentration camp': Israel's planned new city in Rafah, explained Read More » International law and genocide experts told Middle East Eye last week that the plans would violate multiple provisions of international law. Under the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, populations in occupied territories "shall at all times be humanely treated" and may only exceptionally be placed under assigned residence or internment when there are "imperative reasons of security". "A blanket decision to enclose hundreds of thousands of people in a concentration camp or zone clearly falls well outside the lawful exception and would entail an unlawful deprivation of liberty in breach of IHL and of human rights law," Eitan Diamond, a senior legal expert based in Jerusalem with the Diakonia International Humanitarian Law Centre, told MEE. Experts also said that Katz's so-called "voluntary emigration" plan - a manifestation of US President Donald Trump's proposal to ethnically cleanse the enclave - was far from "voluntary". "There is nothing voluntary about any emigration scheme that Israel devises in these circumstances," Martin Shaw, a prominent sociologist and author of several books on the subject of genocide, told MEE. "The people of Gaza have been bombed out of their homes, lost their loved ones, starved and shot at when they try to get food. "Israel will be using all this cruelty to force people to leave and to remove their right to return, as they have from previous generations of Palestinians." Olmert says he is 'ashamed and heartbroken' Olmert spoke to The Guardian on the same day that funerals were held in the occupied West Bank for two Palestinian men, including a US citizen, killed by Israeli settlers. "[It is] unforgivable. Unacceptable. There are continuous operations organised, orchestrated in the most brutal, criminal manner by a large group," the former premier said. "There is no way that they can operate in such a consistent, massive and widespread manner without a framework of support and protection which is provided by the [Israeli] authorities in the [occupied Palestinian] territories." Olmert said that extremist figures within Israel's cabinet, who have backed violence in the occupied West Bank and Gaza and authorised settlement expansion, are more dangerous for Israel's long-term security than any external foes. "These guys are the enemy from within," he said. He added that growing anger at Israel internationally could not all be dismissed as antisemitism. 'I cannot refrain from accusing this government of being responsible for war crimes committed' - Ehud Olmert, former Israeli prime minister "In the United States, there is more and more and more expanding expressions of hatred to Israel," he said. "We make a discount to ourselves, saying: 'They are antisemites.' I don't think that they are only antisemites, I think many of them are anti-Israel because of what they watch on television, what they watch on social networks. "This is a painful but normal reaction of people who say: 'Hey, you guys have crossed every possible line'." Olmert called for stronger international pressure on Israel in the absence of any serious opposition in Israel. He also criticised Israel's media for failing to report on Israeli violence against Palestinians. He said he initially backed Israel's war following Hamas' surprise attack on 7 October, which killed around 1,200 people. But he later became "ashamed and heartbroken" by the Israeli government's actions, which he says amount to war crimes. "What can I do to change the attitude, except for number one, recognising these evils, and number two, to criticise them and to make sure the international public opinion knows there are [other] voices, many voices in Israel?" he said. He said Israeli commanders had looked away as actions were taken that would "cause the killing of a large number of non-involved people". "That is why I cannot refrain from accusing this government of being responsible for war crimes committed." Israeli forces have killed more than 58,000 Palestinians since the war on Gaza began in October 2023, and wounded at least 138,500 more.


The National
44 minutes ago
- The National
'The sea is ours': Gaza's last refuge sealed off under Israeli ban
For decades, the shores of the Mediterranean have been Gaza's lifeline, its source of food and income, but also a place of refuge and escape from the realities of Israeli occupation. But now, after 21 months of war, even that last refuge has been sealed off. Israel has issued military orders banning Palestinians in the enclave from one of their last sources of joy – the sea. Gazans are forbidden by new directives from swimming in the waters, while fishermen are prohibited from setting out to sea. "The forces will deal with any violation to these restrictions," Israeli military spokesman Avichay Adraee said in a post on X. 'We urge fishermen, swimmers and divers to refrain from entering the sea. Entering the sea along the strip puts you at risk." 'We live off the sea' The decision not only ruins the already collapsing fishing industry but also cuts off one of the last remaining spaces where Gazans could breathe, bathe and briefly forget about the daily devastation that surrounds them. 'We live off the sea. If there's no fishing, we don't eat,' Munthir Ayash, 52, a fisherman from Gaza city, told The National. 'Me, my five sons and their families – 45 people in total – depend entirely on the sea. With it closed, we face starvation.' Mr Ayash has been fishing since childhood. Like thousands of others, he has braved sniper fire, naval raids and aerial bombardment just to reach Gaza's nearshore waters, never more than 700 metres from land, due to Israeli-imposed limits. 'Even that short distance was dangerous," he said. "The army fires sound bombs, smoke grenades and bullets. But we kept going. It's our only way to survive.' But now, even that risk is no longer possible. The Israeli army has officially declared Gaza's coastal waters off-limits. For Mr Ayash and many others, this is a telling blow. Zakaria Bakr, head of the Palestinian Fishermen's Syndicate in Gaza, believes the move is not a security measure but a deliberate war strategy. 'Since the war began, the sea has been under siege like everything else in Gaza,' Mr Bakr said. 'We were only allowed to fish up to 700 metres, a useless range. And any attempt to go further was met with live fire. Many were killed or injured.' Now, with a full closure in place, Mr Bakr said more than 6,000 people working in the fishing sector will lose their livelihoods. More than 210 have been killed since the war began in October 2023, including 60 fishermen. About 95 per cent of boats and fishing equipment have already been destroyed by Israeli naval and air attacks.' Fish production is zero now, he said. "It used to be 3,500 tonnes a year. Nothing moves in the sea any more. This isn't just about fishing, it's about food security. Two million people in Gaza depended on fish to survive.' Mr Bakr calls the ban part of a broader, systematic effort to starve Gaza. 'This is not about security. It's economic, social and psychological warfare, a weapon of slow, deliberate suffocation.' The sea was not only for fishing, it was for living, Ibrahim Dawla, 26, a displaced Palestinian from Gaza's Al Zaytoun neighbourhood, now living in a tent near the shore, told The National. "I used to go every day. The sea was where I bathed, where I relaxed, where I ran from the horror of war. Now even that's gone.' 'Where we felt human again' Mr Dawla, like many Gazans, depended on the sea for basic hygiene in the absence of clean water. It was also one of the few open spaces left where people could gather to talk, swim, or sit, shaded from the destruction. 'People here die a million times every hour, We needed the sea just to feel human again, even if only for a few minutes. And they knew that. That's why they shut it down,' he said of the Israelis. Even before the official closure, Israeli gunboats regularly opened fire on beachgoers. Still, people came. 'We called it our last breathing space. We knew it was dangerous, but it was the only place we had left.' Now, he says, the beach is empty. 'I haven't gone for two days. None of my friends have either. We're all afraid we'll be shot just for standing there.' For Gaza's fishermen, the war has not only destroyed their boats, it has erased a culture, a livelihood passed from father to son for generations. Mr Ayash recalls how even during past escalations, they could always fall back on the sea. 'We could always find a way to fish. It gave us hope. But this time, they want to take everything. They want to erase us.' He pauses, eyes scanning the shoreline. 'But the sea is ours. The land is ours. No matter how hard they try, it will stay ours.'