Opposition slams Modi government for concealing details of IAF
Opposition leaders have referred to recent media reports quoting Defence Attaché Captain Shiv Kumar to state that his remarks confirm their long-standing concerns.
Rahul Gandhi was absolutely right to call Modi 'Surrender Narender' and Jaishankar 'JJ.'
Captain Shiv Kumar's statement corroborates what the Leader of the Opposition, Rahul Gandhi, had raised long ago.
He had rightly questioned who authorized informing Pakistan, as it is… https://t.co/b0HNAbuVUz — Srivatsa (@srivatsayb) June 30, 2025
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi reiterated that PM Modi's political decisions weakened India's defence posture and accused him of accepting a ceasefire under pressure from former US President Donald Trump.
Read more: India again admits jet losses in Pakistan clash, citing political limits
'Captain Shiv Kumar's statement corroborates what Rahul Gandhi has said all along. It is clear that aircraft were lost due to the political leadership's directive not to engage Pakistani military assets,' said a Congress spokesperson.
The party also called Modi 'Surrender Narender' and criticised External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar as 'JJ', accusing the government of prioritising optics over operational effectiveness.
As shocking as this revelation is, Rahul Gandhi ji was once again right.
There is a reason Trump keeps bringing up the ceasefire thing.
Modi's diplomacy handicapped not only our defence but also our country https://t.co/EK8Zi1f5c6 pic.twitter.com/eUNGUuYDmc — Armaan (@Mehboobp1) June 30, 2025
The remarks in question were made by Captain Shiv Kumar at a seminar titled 'Analysis of the Pakistan–India Air Battle and Indonesia's Anticipatory Strategies from the Perspective of Air Power', held at Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma in Jakarta.
According to Indian media, Kumar acknowledged that the Indian Air Force (IAF) "lost some aircraft" and attributed the losses to operational restrictions imposed by political leaders in New Delhi.
'IAF Lost Fighter Jets to Pak Because of Political Leadership's Constraints': Indian Defence Attachehttps://t.co/ADjPZWN35x — The Wire (@thewire_in) June 29, 2025
In response, the Indian Embassy in Indonesia issued a formal statement rejecting the media's interpretation of Kumar's comments.
'His remarks have been quoted out of context, and the reports are a misrepresentation of the intention and thrust of the presentation,' the statement said.
We have seen media reports regarding a presentation made by the Defence Attache at a Seminar.
His remarks have been quoted out of context and the media reports are a mis-representation of the intention and thrust of the presentation made by the speaker.
The presentation… — India in Indonesia (@IndianEmbJkt) June 29, 2025
The embassy clarified that Kumar's presentation emphasised civilian control over the Indian armed forces and reiterated that Operation Sindoor was a limited, non-escalatory mission targeting terrorist infrastructure, not Pakistani military installations.
The conflicting narratives have further fuelled political tensions in India, with the opposition demanding transparency on the actual scale of losses and decisions made during the 86-hour conflict.
Pakistan-India Ceasefire
Tensions between Pakistan and India escalated on April 22, when an attack in Pahalgam killed 26 people.
India immediately blamed Pakistan for the incident. Pakistan categorically rejected Indian accusations.
India then undertook a series of hostile actions the next day on April 23, suspending the 65-year-old Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), cancelling visas for Pakistani citizens, closing the Wagah-Attari border crossing and ordering the shutdown of the Pakistan High Commission in New Delhi.
Both the countries subsequently reduced diplomatic staff at their respective embassies in the other's territory.
Tensions further escalated in the early hours of May 7, when Indian missile strikes hit six cities in Punjab and Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK), destroying a mosque and killing dozens of civilians, including women, children, and the elderly.
Read More: French intelligence official confirms downing of Rafale by Pakistan
In a swift military response, Pakistan's armed forces shot down Indian warplanes, including three Rafale jets.
The confrontation intensified again in the early hours of May 10, when India targeted several Pakistani airbases with missile strikes.
In retaliation, Pakistan launched Operation Bunyanum Marsoos, damaging Indian military installations, including missile storage sites, airbases and other strategic targets.
On May 10, US President Donald Trump announced that a ceasefire had been reached following intense diplomatic efforts overnight.
Minutes later, the agreement was confirmed separately by Pakistan's Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar and the Indian foreign secretary.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
15 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Senators seek arms licences
Lawmakers in the upper house on Tuesday demanded arms licenses for themselves, prompting Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi to announce that one prohibited-bore license will be issued to every member of parliament. The meeting of the Senate Standing Committee on Interior, chaired by Senator Faisal Saleem, began with prayers for the victims of the Swat tragedy. Lawmakers raised multiple issues, including arms licenses, illegal housing societies in Islamabad, water shortages and security arrangements for Muharram. Senator Palwasha Khan raised the issue of halted arms license issuance to parliamentarians. In response, Naqvi announced that each member of parliament will be issued one license, adding that quota allocations would be increased for areas facing deteriorating law and order situations. He also ordered refunds for individuals who paid fees for licenses during the previous tenure but never received them. During the session, Director General (DG) of Immigration and Passports Mustafa Jamal Qazi came under heavy criticism from committee members. Senator Haji Hidayatullah protested against the DG's alleged unprofessional behaviour, claiming that Qazi ignores his calls and refuses to act on them, while accommodating others for the same requests. "He even said about my leader Aimal Wali Khan, 'Is he greater than the state?', which is an unacceptable insult," Hidayatullah said. Interior Minister Naqvi instructed the Interior Secretary to look into the matter. The committee was also briefed on proposed amendments to the Pakistan Citizenship Bill 2025. DG Qazi explained that overseas Pakistanis who previously had to renounce Pakistani citizenship to acquire foreign nationality would now be eligible to reclaim it, especially those from countries with which Pakistan has bilateral agreements. He argued that this move would help attract investment, philanthropy, and expertise back to Pakistan. However, Senator Palwasha questioned the practical benefits, prompting Qazi to respond: "These individuals are assets. They earn abroad, invest here, and contribute to development and charity in Pakistan."
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Pivoting between geopolitics and geo-economics
Listen to article When Field Marshal Asim Munir walked out of the White House after the recent luncheon with President Trump, it was apparent that the Pak-US relationship was taking another tactical shift. This relationship has seen numerous highs and lows in the past. However, the recent war-like situation between Pakistan and India and President Donald Trump's role in the ceasefire have unfolded events unexpectedly. Lately, Pakistan seems to have navigated its relations well with both the US and China. The country now stands at a crossroads: whether to continue with a familiar path of transactional geopolitics or commit to geo-economics as mentioned in the National Security Policy (2022-2026). Not long ago, Pakistan was almost written off for its strategic importance by the policymakers in Washington, DC, after the fall of Kabul. From being a close ally, Pakistan had overnight become almost insignificant for the Biden administration to give a call back to the Pakistani authorities or even to get a mention in the US's National Security Strategy. So much so that Pakistan had to go through tougher conditions while seeking bailout packages from the IMF and was subject to harsher rhetoric. Nevertheless, the situation has changed significantly after the Indo-Pak military clash of May 2025. On April 22, 2025, a terrorist incident resulted in 26 tourists losing their lives in Pahalgam. Reports also claim that this attack was religiously motivated. Such a tragedy deserves utmost condemnation, and those responsible must be punished for their brutal actions. India's knee-jerk response was that Pakistan was somehow behind this attack, and therefore, the decades-long Indus Water Treaty, which had survived through the worst of the Indo-Pak relations, was suspended. Subsequently, India also launched a series of attacks on several Pakistani cities on the pretext of targeting the terrorist hideouts only. For the next two days, the situation between India and Pakistan remained extremely tense. Both attacked each other's multiple military facilities and neutralised drone incursions, while Pakistan, with the help of Chinese technology, downed multiple Indian fighter jets. Eventually, mediated by the US, both countries reached a ceasefire agreement, but the threat still looms as PM Modi has insisted that Operation Sindoor will continue if there is any other terrorist attack in India. Whether keeping South Asian peace a hostage with such statements is good or bad, one thing is clear: after the ceasefire, Pakistan's profile on the international political front has witnessed a significant rise, something totally against New Delhi's policy of isolating Pakistan internationally. Post-ceasefire, Pakistan's relations with China have reached new highs. For Pakistan, China has emerged as one dependable partner. China, on the other hand, fully supported Pakistan's retaliation against Indian attacks. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi reiterated that Pakistan is an "ironclad friend" and vowed to deepen the "all-weather strategic cooperative partnership." It must also be noted that the use of Chinese defence technology appeared as free marketing, since after the ceasefire, China's defense stocks have surged. Presently, what still remains a matter of concern for both is the security of Chinese personnel and investments in CPEC. Pakistan, therefore, must ameliorate threats from sub-nationalist movements. Pakistan's relations with the US have also taken a stark turnabout. President Trump has taken the credit for the ceasefire a number of times, although India, the US's most allied ally in South Asia, has refuted such claims repeatedly. He then offered to mediate for the long-overdue Kashmir issue, again upsetting India. And lately, the US Department of State issued a travel advisory to "exercise increased caution in India due to crime and terrorism." All these developments, along with President Trump's invitation to Field Marshal Asim Munir, have left the Indian side quite disgruntled. Many argue that the lunch meeting was also crucial because of the Israel-Iran conflict, but whatever the reason may be, Pakistan must be in a state of euphoria over these happenings. One must also recall that Pakistan has served as US strategic partner in the past. During the Cold War, Pakistan was an active member of the capitalist camp against communism in South Asia; it played a crucial role against the Soviet Union's invasion of Afghanistan; and it was the US strategic partner during the war on terror. But as denoted appropriately, the Pak-US relationship has remained 'transactional' in nature, and Pakistan has repeatedly complained of being abandoned as soon as US interests change. Following the same pattern, Pakistan was cast off after the fall of Kabul in 2021, too. Hence, it must remain wary in the future as well. Considering the post-ceasefire events, Pakistan may again be lured to find solutions to its internal and external crises in forming strategic partnerships, especially with the US. Previously, Pakistan has leveraged its geographical location for geopolitical gains, but apart from temporary relief, it has only guided towards much deep-rooted problems. The country gravely suffers from growing poverty, economic inequality, policy discontinuity, unemployment, poor education and healthcare facilities, etc. The current situation presents Pakistan with a dilemma: whether it would keep using its strategic advantage for temporary gains or realise the vision of geo-economics that the country's National Security Policy introduced in January 2022. Becoming a melting pot for global economic interests through strengthening regional connectivity and development partnerships will help Pakistan address its structural problems related to non-traditional security aspects. Additionally, it will also ensure that the country has enough resources in the pool to improve its traditional security apparatus. Certainly, now this is more important because Operation Sindoor is not over yet. Pakistan needs to build its economic muscle against India, which is reportedly set to become the fourth-largest economy in the world. It is also arguably correct that the path to geo-economics will be long, and considering the world today, which has almost become a war theater, Pakistan will have additional hindrances when anchoring geographic location for economic benefits. Nonetheless, with the alternate strategy, Pakistan has tried and failed again and again, and not changing the approach will not help address the deep-rooted structural issues the country has been suffering from since its inception in 1947.
Business Recorder
6 hours ago
- Business Recorder
X, India spar over lawyer's ‘Tom, Dick, and Harry' remark for government officials
NEW DELHI: A lawyer for Elon Musk's X told an Indian court on Tuesday that every 'Tom, Dick, and Harry' government official had been authorised to issue content takedown orders, drawing a sharp rebuke from New Delhi's counsel in the latest clash over content moderation. X has long been at loggerheads with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government over content removal requests. The remarks were made during a hearing on the U.S. firm's challenge to a government-run website it says is a 'censorship portal' that allows officials to issue content removal orders. New Delhi says the website is only to swiftly notify companies of their due diligence obligations. India is a critical growth market for X owner Musk, who is getting closer to launching his other key ventures Starlink and Tesla in the country. Top Indian court scraps JSW Steel's bid to acquire Bhushan Power, case lawyers say During the court hearing, X's lawyer, K. G. Raghavan, said it recently received a notice from the railways department to remove a video in which a car was being driven on a railway track. That was news, but the government found it unlawful, he told the court. 'This is the danger, My Lord, that is done now, if every Tom, Dick, and Harry officer is authorised,' Raghavan told the high court in the southern state of Karnataka. The phrase drew immediate condemnation from India's Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, who said 'officers are not Tom, Dick, or Harry … they are statutory functionaries'. 'No social media intermediary can expect completely unregulated functioning,' Mehta said. India's IT ministry and X did not respond to Reuters queries. In 2021, X, formerly called Twitter, was locked in a stand-off with the Indian government over non-compliance with legal orders to block certain tweets. It later complied, but is still locked in a court fight related to the move.
