True extent of Kate's cancer battle revealed
On June 15 last year Kate, The Princess of Wales really put the 'trooper' into Trooping the Colour and appeared at the annual celebration of the sovereign's birthday, despite being in the middle of chemotherapy.
She wore a suitably formal hat and waved with her signature aplomb. But what no one knew at the time was that underneath her Jenny Packham dress there was a port in her chest.
A port is a medical device used to draw blood and give treatments, including intravenous fluids, blood transfusions, or drugs such as chemotherapy and antibiotics.
Now, new details have come out about how 'serious' the princess' 2024 health battle was with it being claimed she 'is fortunate' to have survived.
Holy hell.
Buckle up - the word 'serious' is going to appear in this story a lot.
Until now, the severity of Kate's 2024 fight has never been revealed, with details hither too thin to the point of non-existence.
Kensington Palace has remained firmly tight-lipped about what sort of cancer she had and it was only in January that the world learnt she had been a patient at Chelsea's Royal Marsden Hospital.
(During an emotional visit there in January she talked about the 'secrecy' of her treatment and having to use side doors for 'so many quiet visits'.)
Kate at Trooping in 2024 might have looked as we have always seen her - perfectly turned out and doing some Olympic-level smiling but behind the scenes, she was reportedly going 'to hell and back'.
On Tuesday the Daily Mail 's royal editor Rebecca English published a shocking report offering details about what the princess was privately enduring.
Even before the dreaded 'c' word entered the picture, per English, the mother-of-three was 'seriously unwell' in the 'run-up' to having 'serious' abdominal surgery in January.
In March, as Kate herself announced that testing 'after the operation found cancer' and that she was having chemotherapy.
And then comes a bit of a blank in the Kate story. It would be six months before she and husband Prince William and their kids filmed a dreamy video meditation on life, love and the healing power of family and a nice old gnarled oak, in which she announced she had finished her treatment.
The Mail's new report offers details about those mystery months and the severity of what Kate faced.
According to English, when she began treatment last year, she 'was fitted with a semi- permanent 'port' into her chest.
'This small device was inserted under the skin and kept in place until her treatment (delivered via the port through a special needle and a thin tube in vein close to the heart) was over, several weeks later.'
It was, the veteran royal editor writes, 'a literal lifeline - which offers no cast-iron guarantee of success, even if you are a royal.'
The princess, per English 'is fortunate to even be speaking of recovery' today.
The severity of Kate's illness has not been detailed before.
This startling new report comes a week after the princess reportedly triggered 'chaos' and 'panic' inside the palace after pulling out of Ascot only half an hour before she was set to arrive at the generally set-down-in-stone event.
Royal staffers, The Daily Beast 's Tom Sykes reported, were left 'bewildered and worried' by the dramatic change with rumours briefly swirling around that Kate 'either needed to see a doctor or had been rushed to the hospital.'
The Princess of Wales' withdrawing from the event, a source told English on Tuesday, 'is a good reminder that she was really seriously ill last year and underwent a significant period of chemo…It can take years [to recover]'.
Similarly a 'well-connected' source has told the Beast's Sykes that the Ascot mini-debacle was 'a wake-up call, not a one-off' and that Kate 'is recalibrating her entire life' after a 'horrific' few years.
What that practically means is that Kate is 'expected Kate to dramatically scale back her public appearances for the rest of the year,' per the Beast.
Expect the princess to be seen at Wimbledon, starting June 30, and during the French state visit in July, but we could be in for a very Kate-lite year.
English reports that while an overseas tour 'cannot entirely be ruled out' it seems unlikely.
In November Willliam will be off to Rio de Janeiro for his Earthshot Prize awards but he could well be travelling solo.
The princess possibly going is officially still 'TBC', she reports, 'but my gut feeling is probably not.'
As English reported earlier this year, the Princess of Wales has 'been to hell and back'.
But what has become clear in the wake of the Ascot mess is that there is 'back' and there is 'back'.
How long until the princess is ready to return to anything like per-cancer workload is the great unknown.
We will next see her courtside at All England Lawn Tennis Club and after that toasting the Macrons but after that, the next Queen is set for a hopefully unbothered Wordsworthian summer stint in Norfolk and Scotland of long walks and lounging about in appropriately elasticised trousers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
15 hours ago
- News.com.au
Cheeky 12pm habit Aussies need to stop
A recent study has shown that napping during certain hours of the day could be associated with an increased risk of death. According to the research published in the journal Sleep, data from wearable activity trackers showed that nap duration and timing were related to increased all-cause mortality among middle-aged and older adults. Specifically, naps taken around the middle of the day were linked to a higher risk of death. This development brings scientists closer to understanding whether certain napping habits should raise concerns about a person's health. 'Our study fills a gap in knowledge by showing that not just whether someone naps, but how long, how variable, and when they nap during the day may be meaningful indicators of future health risk,' said lead study author Chenlu Gao, PhD, a postdoctoral research fellow at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, told Health. 'Past studies have relied on self-reported nap habits, which are subject to recall bias.' Study links naps with mortality According to Mrs Gao, numerous studies have explored the link between night-time sleep and mortality. However, she and her colleagues have 'long been interested in understanding daytime napping and its impact on health'. 'We saw a critical need to investigate whether objectively assessed napping behaviours are associated with longevity,' she explained. The team analysed data from 86,565 non-shift working adults, aged 43 to 79 (with an average of 63), who were part of the UK Biobank, a comprehensive biomedical database. Fifty-seven per cent of these participants were women. They wore a device that tracked their rest and activity levels for seven days, with napping defined as any sleep occurring between 9am and 7pm. During the 11-year follow-up period, 5819 of the study participants had died. Researchers identified a higher risk of death associated with three factors: longer naps, greater day-to-day variability in nap length, and more naps around noon and early afternoon. These associations remained true even after adjusting for factors such as body mass index, alcohol consumption, smoking habits, and overnight sleep duration. While the study established a correlation between different napping habits and mortality, it is crucial to note that it did not prove that napping causes an increased risk of death. It is also uncertain whether these findings apply to the general population. Why might napping be linked to mortality? Currently, as there is no definitive evidence that naps directly cause increased mortality, sleep experts are examining the research for clues — and some suggest that the underlying reasons for napping may be more relevant. Sleep disorders such as sleep apnoea or medical conditions that drain energy, like heart disease, could actually be the underlying cause of the nap-mortality connection. The study did attempt to account for lifestyle factors, but it remains difficult to control for undiagnosed medical conditions. Other experts propose that long, irregular midday naps could influence health by disrupting circadian rhythms, which are the body's internal sleep-wake cycles. This disruption could affect various factors that influence mortality, such as inflammation, metabolism, and cardiovascular health. Should we nap? If you feel the need to nap, experts recommend aiming for less than 30 minutes, as this allows you to feel refreshed and energised without experiencing grogginess. Napping earlier in the day can also help prevent your nap from interfering with your ability to sleep at night. If you find yourself napping more frequently or for longer periods, you should consult your doctor.

News.com.au
a day ago
- News.com.au
Itching, swelling and burning after sex may be signs of a common allergy
Itchy genitalia, a burning sensation, and feeling breathless are all considered normal after sex. But for a growing number of women, these symptoms could be a sign of seminal plasma hypersensitivity (SPH) — an allergy to semen. While it's considered a rare allergy, it's also underdiagnosed. Michael Carroll, associate professor in reproductive science at Manchester Metropolitan University, explained it isn't triggered by sperm cells, but the fluid that carried the sperm. 'First documented in 1967, when a woman was hospitalised after a 'violent allergic reaction' to sex, SPH is now recognised as a type 1 hypersensitivity, the same category as hay fever, peanut allergy and cat dander,' he said, according to The Sun. Writing for The Conversation, Associate Professor Carroll said symptoms of SPH can range from mild to severe. While some women experience local reactions, such as burning, itching, redness and swelling of the vulva or vagina, others develop full-body symptoms such ashives, wheezing, and even anaphylaxis. He added: 'Until 1977, SPH was thought to affect fewer than 100 women globally. 'But a study led by allergist Jonathan Bernstein found among women reporting post-coital symptoms, nearly 12 per cent could be classified as having probable SPH. 'I conducted a small, unpublished survey in 2013 and found a similar 12 per cent rate. The true figure may be higher still. 'Many cases go unreported, misdiagnosed, or dismissed as STIs, yeast infections, or general 'sensitivity'. 'One revealing clue: symptoms disappear when condoms are used.' The main allergen, according to Carroll, is prostate-specific antigen — a protein produced by cells in the prostate gland. And cross-reactivity is a possibility, for example, f5, a protein found in dog dander, is structurally similar to PSA. So a woman allergic to dogs may also be allergic to semen too. Also, woman may not be the only ones affected, said Carroll. It's possible some men be allergic to their own semen too. A paper published in American Journal of Case Reports described a 22-year-old was consumed by sneezing, watery eyes, stomach cramps, muscle pain and deep fatigue in the hours after climaxing. The condition is known as post-orgasmic illness syndrome (POIS). While SPH doesn't cause infertility directly, it can complicate conception. Carroll said: 'Avoiding the allergen – usually the most effective treatment for allergies – isn't feasible for couples trying to conceive. Treatments include prophylactic antihistamines (antihistamine medications taken in advance of anticipated exposure to an allergen, or before allergy symptoms are expected to appear to prevent or reduce the severity of allergic reactions), anti-inflammatories and desensitisation using diluted seminal plasma. In more severe cases, couples may choose IVF with washed sperm, bypassing the allergic trigger altogether.


7NEWS
3 days ago
- 7NEWS
Princess Kate: The true extent of the royal's cancer battle revealed, Catherine's return to duties delayed
Kate Middleton's cancer battle has sent her 'to hell and back'. But the Princess of Wales's slow and careful return to the public eye is no accident; it's part of a deliberate effort to rebuild both her health and her sense of balance, according to one insider who understands the full extent of her battle. At 43, Princess Kate is said to be in remission following an intense, months-long battle with cancer. Friends and palace insiders say her recovery is far from over. 'She is fortunate to even be speaking of recovery,' said a source, adding, 'as anyone who has been through that experience will tell you, you can feel very unwell for a long time afterwards. It can take years (to recover)'. The princess was seriously unwell in the lead-up to her planned abdominal surgery in January 2024, which later led to the discovery of her illness. During treatment, she underwent chemotherapy at the Royal Marsden Hospital and a source has now revealed that the Princess of Wales had a port inserted under her skin to deliver the medication directly to a vein near her heart. Like many patients, she became emotionally 'attached' to the device, an invisible but constant reminder of the high-stakes treatment she was enduring, the Daily Mail reported. 'It offers no cast-iron guarantee of success, even if you are a royal.' While the public has seen a glowing Princess at several recent events such as Trooping the Colour and the Order of the Garter ceremony, palace aides are quietly reminding onlookers that her full return is a 'work in progress.' Her recent last-minute withdrawal from Royal Ascot, which she announced just minutes after her name appeared on the official carriage list, was a stark reminder that she is still pacing her return. Kensington Palace said the carriage list was released in error and only confirmed that the princess was 'disappointed' not to attend and 'has to find the right balance as she fully returns to public-facing duties.' Behind the scenes, sources say that balance is everything. 'She wants to find the right balance and work with a greater degree of flexibility than before,' one insider said. 'This is a woman who plays a very important role in the monarchy... but in order for her to do it, both now and in the future, she needs to get this right.' The past year has also brought mental clarity. 'She knows more than ever what is important to her — and that she won't be rushed on her journey back to full health,' a friend said. Looking ahead, Princess Kate is expected to make a few key appearances this summer, including her role as patron at Wimbledon and at Windsor Castle on July 8 for a French state visit, the outlet reports. Whether she will attend the state banquet remains unclear. Following those engagements, she and Prince William will retreat to Anmer Hall in Norfolk with their children — Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis — for a summer of cycling, sailing, and time away from the public gaze. They will later travel to Balmoral to join the King and Queen for the traditional royal summer in Scotland. 'She's quite strict now at working out what she needs to be at and what she doesn't,' one source said. There are also family decisions ahead, including the schooling of Prince George and Princess Charlotte. One long-standing expectation is that Prince George will follow Prince William to Eton, and Princess Charlotte to Marlborough, Princess Kate's alma mater. As for travel, a foreign tour this year is said to be 'not expected,' though the door hasn't been closed entirely. A UK-based program of royal visits is more likely, with the princess reportedly keen to do more regional engagements after her low-key trip to the Inner Hebrides in April. Even when she is not seen publicly, royal insiders say that she remains highly engaged behind the scenes with her staff and her lifelong commitment to early childhood development. Comparisons to the King's more visible schedule have emerged in recent months, with some observers noting that Charles, also battling cancer, has maintained a full calendar. But those close to both royals caution against making direct comparisons. 'Every patient is different... and people have no way of absolutely knowing what is going on behind the scenes.'