
How a pair of Palos Verdes altar boys grew up to be Soviet spies
By the mid-1970s, Boyce was angry about the Vietnam War and Watergate. He was a liberal, a stoner and a lover of falcons. Lee, a doctor's adopted son, was a cocaine and heroin pusher who was spiraling into addiction.
How they became spies for the Soviet Union is a story emblematic of 1970s Southern California, where the state's massive Cold War aerospace industry collided with its youthful anti-establishment currents.
Everyone agrees it should never have been possible.
In the summer of 1974, Boyce, a bright but disaffected 21-year-old college dropout, got a job as a clerk at the TRW Defense and Space Systems complex in Redondo Beach. He won entree through the old-boys network: His father, who ran security for an aircraft contractor and was once an FBI agent, had called in a favor.
Boyce made $140 a week at the defense plant and held down a second job tending bar. TRW investigators had performed only a perfunctory background check. They skipped his peers, who might have revealed his links to the drug culture and to Lee, who already had multiple drug busts and a serious cocaine habit — the white powder that would inspire his nickname.
In 'The Falcon and the Snowman,' Robert Lindsey's account of the case, the author describes Boyce beginning the day by popping amphetamines and winding down after a shift puffing a joint in the TRW parking lot. Falconry was his biggest passion. 'Flying a falcon in exactly the same way that men had done centuries before Christ transplanted Chris into their time,' Lindsey wrote.
Boyce impressed his bosses and was soon cleared to enter the steel-doored fortress called the 'black vault,' a classified sanctum where he was exposed to sensitive CIA communications pertaining to America's network of espionage satellites. The satellites eavesdropped on Russian missiles and defense installations. Among the goals was to thwart a surprise nuclear attack.
Reading CIA communiques, Boyce didn't like what he saw. Among its other sins, he decided, the U.S. government was deceiving its Australian allies by hiding satellite intelligence it had promised to share and meddling in the country's elections.
'I just was in total disagreement with the whole direction of Western society,' Boyce told The Times many years later. He attributed his espionage opportunity to 'synchronicity,' explaining: 'How many kids can get a summer job working in an encrypted communications vault?'
Soon he made his life's 'biggest, dumbest decision.' He told his buddy Lee they might sell government secrets to the Soviets. Lee talked his way into the Soviet Embassy in Mexico City, where Russians fed him caviar and bought classified documents with the toast, 'To peace.'
Lee's KGB handlers devised protocols. When he wanted to meet, he would tape an X to lampposts at designated intersections around Mexico City.
For more than a year, thousands of classified documents flowed from the TRW complex to the Soviets, with Boyce sometimes smuggling them out in potted plants. In exchange, he and Lee received an estimated $70,000.
At parties, Lee showed off his miniature Minox camera and bragged that he was engaged in spycraft. In January 1977, desperate for money to finance a heroin deal, he flouted KGB instructions and appeared unannounced outside the Soviet Embassy. Mexican police thought he looked suspicious and arrested him.
He held an envelope with filmstrips documenting a U.S. satellite project called Pyramider. Under questioning, Lee revealed the name of his co-conspirator and childhood friend, who soon was also under arrest. Boyce had just returned from a hawk-trapping trip in the mountains.
The espionage trials of the two men presented special challenges for the U.S. attorney's office in Los Angeles. The Carter administration was ready to pull the plug on the case if it meant airing too many secrets, but a strategy was devised: Prosecutors would focus on the Pyramider documents, which involved a system that never actually got off the ground.
Joel Levine, one of the assistant U.S. attorneys who prosecuted Boyce and Lee, said only a fraction of what they sold to the Soviets ever came out at trial.
'I was told these other projects should not be revealed. It's too costly to our government, and you can't base a prosecution on them either in whole or in part,' Levine said in a recent interview. 'You just gotta stay away from it.'
For federal prosecutors in L.A., hanging over the case was the memory of a recent humiliation: the collapse of the Pentagon Papers trial, as a result of the Nixon administration's attempt to bribe the presiding judge with a job. It had caught prosecutors by surprise.
'We were afraid it would ruin our reputation forever if something like that were to happen,' Levine said. 'So we made it very, very clear right from the get-go that if we smelled something like that was afoot, we would walk into court and have the case dismissed on our own.'
The defendants had sharply different motives. Lee was in it for the money, Richard Stilz, one of the prosecutors, said in a recent interview. But 'Boyce was totally ideology. He wanted to damage the United States government,' Stilz said. 'He just hated this country, period.'
The defendants got separate trials. A rift that had been growing between them deepened with their mutually hostile defenses. Lee's defense: Boyce had led him to believe he was working for the CIA, feeding misinformation to the Russians. Jurors convicted Lee of espionage, nonetheless, and a judge gave him a life term.
Boyce's defense: Lee had blackmailed him into espionage by threatening to expose a letter he had written, while stoned on hashish, alleging secret knowledge of CIA malfeasance. Jurors convicted Boyce as well, and a judge gave him 40 years.
In January 1980, at a federal prison in Lompoc, Boyce hid in a drainpipe and sprinted to freedom over a fence. He was on the run for 19 months. He robbed banks in the Pacific Northwest until federal agents caught him outside a burger joint in Washington state.
He was convicted of bank robbery and got 28 more years. In 1985, the same year a popular film adaptation of 'The Falcon and the Snowman' was released, Boyce testified on Capitol Hill about the despair attending a life of espionage.
'There was no thrill,' he said. 'There was only depression, and a hopeless enslavement to an inhuman, uncaring foreign bureaucracy.... No American who has gone to the KGB has not come to regret it.'
He spoke of how easily he had been allowed to access classified material at TRW. 'Security was a joke,' he said, describing regular Bacardi-fueled parties in the black vault. 'We used the code destruction blender for making banana daiquiris and mai tais.'
Cait Mills was working as a paralegal in San Diego when she read the Lindsey book and became fascinated by the case. She thought Lee had been unfairly maligned, and she spent the next two decades fighting to win him parole.
She got letters of support from the prosecutors and the sentencing judge attesting that Lee had made strides toward rehabilitation. He had taken classes in prison and become a dental technician. He won parole in 1998.
She turned her attention to freeing Boyce, with whom she fell in love. She wrote to the Russians and asked how much value there had been in the stolen TRW documents and received a fax claiming it was useless. He got out in 2002, and they married. They later divorced but remain close. Both live in central Oregon.
Stilz maintains the damage to America was 'enormous.'
'In a murder case, you have one victim and a person dies,' Stilz said. 'In an espionage case, the whole country is a victim. We were so far advanced over the Russians in spy satellite technology. They leveled the playing field. That's probably the most important point.'
He gives no credence to the Russian government's claim that it derived no value from the secret information. 'Of course they'd say that,' Stilz said. 'What do you think they'd say? 'Oh yeah, it allowed us to catch up with the United States in terms of spying.' They're not gonna say that.'
Cait Mills Boyce said that Boyce and Lee, childhood best friends, no longer speak, and that the silence between them wounds Boyce.
'He said, 'I love that man; I always loved him. He was my best friend.' It hurt him so badly.'
She said Boyce, now in his 70s, lives a solitary life and immerses himself in the world of falconry. 'His entire life, and I kid you not, is falconry,' she said. 'He will die with a falcon on his arm.'
Part of what pushed him into the world of espionage, she thinks, was the challenge. 'I think his uncommon smarts led him down a whimsical path that ended up being a disastrous path, not just for him but for everybody involved,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Tulsi Gabbard's 'treason' allegation triggers a high-wire act from Obama world
To former aides who worked in Barack Obama's White House, the Trump administration's allegations of 'treason' carried the stench of desperation from a president straining to shift the focus from a burgeoning scandal around Jeffrey Epstein. Still, they're grappling with how to contain the unprecedented accusations National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard has leveled, even as they dismiss them as asinine, interviews with more than half a dozen people who worked in Obama's White House or on his campaigns reveal. These people say the events of the last week have turned into a messaging balancing act between unnecessarily giving oxygen to the claims that Obama ordered a false intelligence analysis to show Russia had worked to help Trump win the 2016 election and leaving the potential for unchecked accusations to balloon. Many of those who talked to NBC News were not authorized to speak publicly about strategy. 'The battle now is to play this even to make sure that thoughts don't start to creep into more mainstream' audiences, a former Obama administration official said. That person said it was important to reach "mainstream Republicans," who would listen to editorial boards and those in Congress who deemed the allegations against Obama as "beyond the pale." Some expressed uncertainty over what to expect next from Trump or his lieutenants, charging that the administration could grow more bullish to draw attention away from a string of explosive Epstein stories that Trump is struggling to tamp down. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but it has said there is merit to accusations around Obama. 'I don't know what is ahead, and I don't know what their plans and intentions are,' John Brennan, who was CIA director in the Obama administration, told NBC News. 'I just find all of this very troubling when it is being done by individuals who serve in such important positions and know what they are doing is wrong.' Former National Intelligence Director James Clapper echoed Brennan's ambiguity over the Trump administration's intentions, telling CNN he would 'lawyer up.' National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe leveled claims last week that Obama administration officials manipulated intelligence and conspired to undermine the legitimacy of Trump's electoral victory in 2016. Gabbard posted on social media last Friday that she was making a criminal referral to the Justice Department. Then, this week, she stepped up publicity around the accusations from the White House briefing room. Broadly, the former Obama aides unequivocally say that there is zero merit to the allegations and that they do not believe they will lead anywhere. They point to a 2020 Senate investigation, which endorsed intelligence agencies' assessment that Russia had spread disinformation online and leaked stolen emails from the Democratic National Committee to undermine Hillary Clinton's 2016 candidacy and help Trump. Trump-appointed Secretary of State Marco Rubio was the acting chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee at the time, which endorsed the findings. 'There is no factual basis for the allegations that Tulsi Gabbard is making. She's cherry-picking things from various documents that are out of context and mischaracterized,' Brennan said. 'To me, it's clear either she has not read the intelligence community assessment or she is purposely, willfully lying about the contents,' he added. Obama allies also say the timing of the allegations is suspect. They emerged as Trump has struggled to contend with his own base after his administration announced it would not release more documents tied to Epstein, a convicted sex offender who faced a litany of allegations of abuse of underage women before he died by suicide. On Wednesday, The Wall Street Journal, owned by Rupert Murdoch, reported that Attorney General Pam Bondi told Trump in May that his name appears in the Epstein files — even though he told reporters this month that Bondi had not informed him that he was named. In the midst of a firestorm Trump has yet to shake, the administration brought out the allegations against Obama. Over the weekend, Trump reposted a fake AI-generated video of Obama being arrested on social media. Once Gabbard used the word 'treason,' Obama's team ramped up its messaging, leading Obama's spokesperson to release a carefully worded statement. It denounced Gabbard's accusations without mentioning Epstein, because it was 'below the dignity of the former president,' a former Obama administration official said. 'Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response,' Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush said in a statement this week. 'But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction." Ned Price, who held roles under Obama as a special assistant to the president, a National Security Council senior director and spokesperson and as a CIA senior analyst under Obama and George W. Bush, said he believed it was imperative to reach conservative audiences with a response. On Wednesday, he wrote an opinion piece for Fox News titled: 'Americans should beware of Gabbard's 'dangerous distraction' with revisionist history of 2016 election.' 'This wasn't a piece I would have written for any mainstream or left-of-center outlet. This was designed solely and exclusively for Fox News, because that's where this fire of disinformation is raging,' Price said in an interview. 'I thought it was important ... to inject facts into that very venue in the hope that at least a few people would read it and be exposed to what actually transpired in 2016.'


Los Angeles Times
10 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
L.A. Catholic Church to deliver food, medicine to immigrants affected by ICE raids
Amid a wave of arrests and apprehensions of undocumented immigrants, the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles announced plans to bolster delivery of hot meals, groceries and prescription medicines to parishioners living in fear of deportation and ongoing enforcement raids. The archdiocese's donation-funded Family Assistance Program seeks to assist some of its 4 million congregants throughout its 288 parishes in Los Angeles, Ventura and Santa Barbara counties. Immigrants targeted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids are 'good, hard-working men and women' who are 'making important contributions to our economy,' Los Angeles Archbishop José Gomez said in a statement. 'Now they are afraid to go to work or be seen in public for fear that they will get arrested and be deported,' he said. Money donated directly to the Family Assistance Program will be funneled to parishes with vulnerable members. Donations can be made online or at a local church. Catherine Fraser, the archdiocese's chief development officer, said every dollar contributed would go directly to helping families in need. Most churches already have programs to serve elderly and home-bound congregants that were developed during the interruptions and limitations of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to Yannina Diaz, a spokesperson for the archdiocese. 'We're tapping into what already exists and what already works,' Diaz said. Diaz noted that St. Patrick's Catholic Church in South L.A. boasts a robust program that helps with food, clothing and medicine delivery for homebound individuals. That church's pastor, Monsignor Timothy Dyer, helped come up with the Family Assistance Program. At St. Agatha Catholic Church, also in South Los Angeles, volunteer Azalie Nickleberry founded the St. Agatha's Hands Are Reaching Everywhere, or SHARE, program. The ministry opened in 1980, providing hot meals on Christmas Day, and serves around 2,000 people annually. SHARE typically provides 70 to 80 bags of groceries — containing cereal, pancake mix, canned goods and pasta — to clients monthly. So far in July, that number has already shot up to 150. 'There's a real need for this service, and we're happy for the help,' Nickleberry said. About 2,800 undocumented immigrants have been arrested since ICE began conducting widespread raids in Los Angeles in early June. Those arrests have included hundreds of undocumented immigrants without any criminal record. Some U.S. citizens and immigrants with legal status have also been detained. Many members of the Greater Los Angeles Catholic community are immigrants or have family members who were born outside of the United States, leaving the archdiocese particularly exposed to the raids' impacts. About 58% of people living in the United States who were born abroad consider themselves Christian, according to findings from the Pew Research Center. Of those, 30% identified as Catholics, the largest share of any denomination. In Los Angeles, 28% of all Christians consider themselves Catholic, the highest of any denomination by 12 percentage points, according to Pew. Gomez's announcement of the assistance program comes after Bishop Alberto Rojas of the diocese of San Bernardino issued a dispensation allowing parishioners fearful of deportations to stay home rather than attend Mass. Rojas' decision followed a series of arrests on church property, though the Department of Homeland Security insisted that churches were not targeted — saying those apprehended had fled onto parish grounds. Diaz said she was unaware of any arrests made on L.A. Archdiocese property. She also said Gomez was not considering issuing a dispensation for its congregants. She said she was uncertain if parishes were offering Eucharistic Communion — vital for a Roman Catholic service — to those too afraid to leave their homes. In an open letter, Gomez wrote that he was 'deeply disturbed' by the detentions and called on the government to reform the immigration process. As for the Family Assistance Program, it's already received its share of donations. Businessman Rick Caruso, a former mayoral candidate, donated $50,000 and offered to match another $50,000 in contributions. 'We need to help these families and, working with the archdiocese, we can provide much needed relief at a time when many are struggling to get by,' Caruso said in a statement. The Catholic Assn. for Latino Leadership has donated $10,000, while Vallarta Supermarkets contributed $10,000 in gift cards. The Beverly Hills Teddy Bear Company donated an undisclosed amount, along with stuffed animals for children coping with raids, according to the archdiocese.


New York Post
12 hours ago
- New York Post
Barack Obama's dirty trick destroyed a presidency — and our trust
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard contends that new declassified documents show former President Barack Obama engaged in the plot to create the lie that President Donald Trump had conspired with Russia to steal the 2016 presidential election. Of course he did. We have known for years that in July 2016, then-CIA Director John Brennan briefed Obama on how Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign had sought to 'vilify' Trump by accusing him of collaborating with Russian President Vladimir Putin. We already know that despite having this information in hand, Obama withheld intelligence about Russia from the Trump transition team and ordered agencies to compile an assessment of the situation. Now, typically such an assessment — which brings together intelligence at the highest levels — takes months to gather and analyze. This report, however, was cobbled together in just a few weeks so that the Obama administration could control not only the content but the messaging before the new Trump administration began. To understand how shoddy the assessment was, consider that it included the Steele dossier, an opposition-research document paid for by Democrats, as an annex — but not the views of two senior CIA officers from the Russia mission center who argued there was no evidence that Putin's ham-fisted meddling was intended to boost Trump's fortunes. Indeed, it turns out that numerous career officials expressed skepticism about the claim. It is utterly implausible that Obama did not know that potentially exculpatory evidence regarding Clinton's role in spreading the Russia-collusion hoax was omitted. It is certainly worth asking him. In any event, a responsible report even intimating that a president-elect's campaign may have been involved in a seditious plot should have been undertaken with extra-special care. Instead, it was weaponized. In her very last hour in office Susan Rice, Obama's national security adviser, wrote a transparently self-preserving email to protect the president, claiming she'd attended a meeting in which he stressed to then-FBI Director James Comey that everything in the Trump-Russia investigation should proceed 'by the book.' Why? Why mention this on her last day? Did high-ranking Obama administration officials such as Comey not always conduct their investigations 'by the book?' Of course, they didn't. It was the dirtiest political trick played on the public in US history. As intended, the Russia hysteria paralyzed the incoming presidency. It probably worked even better than those who hatched it could have imagined, as the legacy media took the bait on virtually every anonymously sourced story, no matter how far-fetched. 'Mr. President,' Adam Schiff, then a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said in 2017, 'the Russians hacked our election and interfered. No one disputes this now but you.' Anyone who disputed this characterization was smeared as a shill for a foreign power. Polls found that over 60% of Democrats claimed to believe that the Russians had altered vote tallies. Not one investigation, of course, not even special counsel Robert Mueller's inquiry run by Trump-hating partisans, found any evidence that collusion had taken place. Few events have done more to undermine our trust in our elections and in our officials. Attorney General Pam Bondi has launched a 'strike force' to investigate the declassified findings regarding Obama's role. But Gabbard has already accused the former president of 'treason,' as has Trump. One suspects that Gabbard's piecemeal release of declassified documents was intended to distract from the Jeffrey Epstein mess that was partly created by Trump's administration. This, too, is over-promising. Those imagining Obama being cuffed and marched to the jailhouse in orange overalls are fooling themselves. It would be a miracle if anyone involved was indicted, much less convicted. For one thing, the statute of limitations has expired on most of these events. And Obama, thanks to Trump v. United States, would enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts — even if Bondi could prove criminality, which is doubtful. After all, this brand of corruption can't be explicitly found in any documents. Plotters don't have to have conversations. Everyone understood what was happening. And the system gives intelligence heads tremendous latitude and power. It has long been clear that everyone involved in the Russia hoax abused their position, but indicting a CIA director for, say, excluding certain information from an assessment report would be difficult — if such an action were illegal at all, which seems questionable. None of that is to contend that Obama and his underlings weren't in on the plot. Or that we shouldn't find out the truth. But it will have to be written in the historical record. That's important, too. David Harsanyi is a senior writer at the Washington Examiner. Twitter @davidharsanyi