Trump ‘big beautiful' bill gives top 1% biggest tax cuts in these states
The legislation would give the top 1% of U.S. households an average tax cut of about $66,000, or about 2.4% of their income, in 2026, according to ITEP, a left-leaning think tank. (These households have incomes of $917,000 or more per year, averaging about $2.7 million, it said.)
Some households stand to get a much bigger tax benefit.
The wealthiest households in three states — Wyoming, South Dakota and Texas — would see their annual tax bills fall by more than $100,000, ITEP found.
In Wyoming, the top 1% would see their taxes fall most: by an average of about $133,000 (or 3% of income) in 2026, it said. The average income of the top 1% in the state is about $4.5 million.
"The bill is most advantageous to conservative-leaning states that have a lot of very wealthy people living within their borders," said Carl Davis, ITEP's research director.
These states also don't levy personal income taxes, he said.
Wyoming and Texas "are classic examples of states with a lot of wealthy people and which tax those wealthy people incredibly lightly," Davis said.
Senate Republicans passed the legislation, originally called the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, on Tuesday with the slimmest of margins. House Republicans are poised to pass the bill Thursday and send it to the president for his signature.
The legislation offers more than $4 trillion of net tax cuts over a decade, with most benefits accruing to higher-income households, analyses have found. It also slashes the social safety net, cutting billions of dollars from programs like Medicaid and food stamps meant to help lower earners.
More from Personal Finance:Top five tax changes for the wealthy in Trump megabillTrump tax deductions may not carry large benefits for low earnersTrump megabill axes $7,500 EV tax credit after September
The centerpiece of the bill is an extension of 2017 tax cuts enacted during President Trump's first term in office.
Overall, the legislation lowers income tax rates, exempts a larger share of wealthy estates from taxation and offers tax breaks to business owners. These are among the core ways the GOP bill benefits high-income households, Davis said.
It also caps the amount of state and local income taxes and property taxes that households can deduct from their taxable income each year, at $40,000.
That "SALT" policy doesn't negatively impact wealthy residents in states like Wyoming, South Dakota and Texas, where residents don't owe state income tax, Davis said. But it has a large impact on states with high state and local income taxes and property taxes.
In other words, high-income residents of Wyoming, South Dakota and Texas generally get most of the tax upside and not much downside, he said.
Conversely, the highest earners in California and New Jersey would see a smaller tax cut in 2026, averaging about $34,000 and $21,000, respectively, ITEP found. That represents about 1% of their income in each state.
Separate analyses have found that the wealthiest households will reap the largest financial benefits from the GOP bill.
The top 20% of U.S. households (earning more than $217,000 a year) would get a tax cut equivalent to 3.4% of their after-tax income in 2026, according to the Tax Policy Center. Meanwhile, the bottom 20% would get a 0.8% tax cut.
Its analysis only examined the tax portions of the legislation.
Overall, more comprehensive analyses that also account for cuts to programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the lowest earners would be worse off, according to analyses by the Budget Lab at Yale University and the Congressional Budget Office, which modeled similar legislation passed by the House last month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
31 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump says tariff letters to 12 countries signed, going out Monday
U.S. President Donald Trump said he had signed letters to 12 countries outlining the various tariff levels they would face on goods they export to the United States, with the "take it or leave it" offers to be sent out on Monday. Trump, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One as he traveled to New Jersey, declined to name the countries involved, saying that would be made public on Monday. Trump had earlier on Thursday told reporters that he expected a first batch of letters to go out on Friday, a national holiday in the United States, though the date has now shifted. In a global trade war that has upended financial markets and set off a scramble among policymakers to guard their economies, Trump in April announced a 10% base tariff rate and additional amounts for most countries, some ranging as high as 50%. However, all but the 10% base rate were subsequently suspended for 90 days to allow more time for negotiations to secure deals. That period ends on July 9, although Trump early on Friday said the tariffs could be even higher — ranging up to 70% — with most set to go into effect August 1. "I signed some letters and they'll go out on Monday, probably twelve," Trump said, when asked about his plans on the tariff front. "Different amounts of money, different amounts of tariffs." Trump and his top aides initially said they would launch negotiations with scores of countries on tariff rates, but the U.S. president has soured on that process after repeated setbacks with major trading partners, including Japan and the European Union. He touched on that briefly late on Friday, telling reporters: "The letters are better ... much easier to send a letter." He did not address his prediction that some broader trade agreements could be reached before the July 9 deadline. The shift in the White House's strategy reflects the challenges of completing trade agreements on everything from tariffs to non-tariff barriers such as bans on agricultural imports, and especially on an accelerated timeline. Most past trade agreements have taken years of negotiations to complete. The only trade agreements reached to date are with Britain, which reached a deal in May to keep a 10% rate and won preferential treatment for some sectors including autos and aircraft engines, and with Vietnam, cutting tariffs on many Vietnamese goods to 20% from his previously threatened 46%. Many U.S. products would be allowed to enter Vietnam duty free. A deal expected with India has failed to materialize, and EU diplomats on Friday said they have failed to achieve a breakthrough in trade negotiations with the Trump administration, and may now seek to extend the status quo to avoid tariff hikes.
Newsweek
32 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Republicans Issued Warning on 2026 Midterms
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Republicans have been warned that the party's recent passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act could have dramatic repercussions in the 2026 midterm elections. Karl Rove, a longtime GOP strategist, said on Fox News's America's Newsroom: "I think it'll have a huge impact on 2026, because, remember, as these changes, particularly the Medicaid changes come into effect, they're going to have, people are going to be losing their coverage." Why It Matters President Donald Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, a taxation and spending package, narrowly passed the House of Representatives on Thursday by 218 votes against 214, having been approved by the Senate earlier in the week thanks to vice president JD Vance's tiebreaking vote. Trump signed the bill into law on Friday. The flagship legislation contains an array of tax and spending measures. Tax cuts Trump introduced in 2017 would be made permanent, while state and local tax deductions would increase from $10,000 to $40,000—primarily benefiting those living in high-tax states. The bill also includes additional funding for border security and the military and cuts to Medicaid and food stamps. It also raises the national debt ceiling and the Congressional Budget Office projects it will add $2.4 trillion to the U.S. federal debt. What To Know Republicans advanced sweeping policy changes with the bill, imposing 80-hour-per-month work requirements on able-bodied Medicaid recipients and introducing stricter eligibility checks. The legislation will reduce federal funding for Medicaid and food assistance, which is likely to result in millions losing coverage. Overall, Rove backed the legislation, commenting: "The able-bodied—think about it, there was an interesting study done of able-bodied people on Medicaid, and … you know what their No. 1 activity was if they weren't working? It was watching television. And No. 2 was playing online games." The GOP strategist praised work requirements but cautioned Republican leaders that "the work is just beginning," urging continued advocacy to justify these changes to voters. Rove said: "Medicaid was meant for poor seniors, for children in poor families, and for the disabled, and we should not be paying for health care for people who are able-bodied, and can work, and are refusing to work. This is why they got to go on the offense. But yeah, it's going to be a big impact." Meanwhile, Democrats and critics warn the cuts could energize opposition and threaten Republican lawmakers' control of Congress in closely divided districts. What People Are Saying Speaking to Newsweek Gianno Caldwell, a conservative commentator and Fox News contributor, said: "BBB [Big Beautiful Bill] is what the American people have been demanding for decades. Putting the American People First, less taxes, support of the working and middle classes and cutting taxes for every American. Trump kept his promise and the American people won." Mark Shanahan, an American politics expert who teaches at the University of Surrey in the U.K., told Newsweek: "The cuts to America's safety net may bite hardest. While the tightening of the rules around SNAP won't come into play until 2028, Democrats have the chance to weaponize the changes in Medicaid around work requirements, six-month reenrolments, and, especially, the cut in provider tax. "At an individual level, millions of poorer Americans—many firmly in the MAGA camp—will see their benefits cut, while, at community level, we're likely to see a slew of rural hospital closures. There are many more Americans on Medicaid than there are billionaires, and this bill skews heavily against the poor. The White House may have calculated that these people don't vote anyway, but history says Americans vote on how healthy their wallet feels. By November 2026, for many, their wallets may be on life support." File photo: President Donald Trump speaks to journalists aboard Air Force One on July 4, 2025. File photo: President Donald Trump speaks to journalists aboard Air Force One on July 4, 2025. BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/GETTY Dafydd Townley, a U.S. focused political scientist at the University of Portsmouth in southern England, told Newsweek: "The Big Beautiful Bill could prove costly to the Republican Party if the promised tax cut benefits are not felt universally. Concerns over Medicaid and the closure of rural hospitals are also unlikely to be welcomed but Republicans in close-fought districts. While there is likely to be some pushback against the incumbent party, the Republicans have a tiny majority in the House and will be determined to minimize this. If the House does flip to the Democrats in 2028, there will undoubtedly be two years of political stalemate as it's unlikely there will be any bipartisan collaboration, much like the last two years of the first Trump administration." Matt Terrill, a managing partner at consultancy firm Firehouse Strategies, told Newsweek: "This will be an asset to President Donald Trump and Republicans given this is the president delivering on the promises he made on the campaign trail—from tax cuts, to border security, etc., and those who voted for the president and congressional Republicans expected them to deliver on these core campaign promises. "In addition, this bill, particularly the tax cuts component, was crucial with respect to providing the president the ability to execute his economic agenda. Without this bill, he would not have been able to do so, and the upcoming midterm elections will primarily be about the economy. "However, for this to be a sustained win for the White House and for the GOP, particularly heading into the midterm elections, it comes down to where the economy will be over the next few months. Heading into the midterms, if the economy is strong, this bill will not just be a micro win but a macro win as well." What Happens Next The next midterm elections are scheduled to take place on Tuesday, November 3, 2026. Currently, the Republicans have a narrow majority in both the Senate and House and losing either would make it significantly more difficult to pass President Donald Trump's policy agenda.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Unusual Social Security email touts Trump bill. Here's what to know.
Social Security beneficiaries are accustomed to getting occasional emails from the program about matters like a benefits statement, but many were perplexed to get a different kind of message from the Social Security Administration late in the evening on Thursday, July 3. "The Social Security Administration (SSA) is celebrating the passage of the One Big, Beautiful Bill, a landmark piece of legislation that delivers long-awaited tax relief to millions of older Americans," the email, reviewed by USA TODAY, said. The message is referring to the legislative package of Trump's priorities for cuts to taxes and spending on social programs that was passed by the House of Representatives earlier that day. The agency also published a news release titled "Social Security Applauds Passage of Legislation Providing Historic Tax Relief for Seniors" that mirrored the email. Issuing an overtly political statement is unusual for the agency that oversees Social Security, which makes monthly payments to 73 million retirees, their survivors, and people with disabilities. "It's completely unprecedented," said Alex Lawson, executive director of Social Security Works, a left-leaning advocacy organization focused on retirement benefits. "It's an enormous breach of trust." Lawson contends that the email praising Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" violates the Hatch Act, a law against partisan political activity by federal government employees. The Social Security Administration did not immediately respond to inquiries seeking clarification. The White House referred USA TODAY's request to SSA. During his campaign, Trump promised to eliminate income taxes on Social Security benefits. Instead, the just-passed bill − which Trump will sign in the late afternoon on July 4 − creates a $6,000 federal income tax deduction for Americans 65 and older. Since Social Security benefits are often a large part of seniors' income, some portion of those benefits will now be untaxed for those who qualify for the deduction. "It reduces the amount of Social Security benefits subject to tax, but it's not just for Social Security," explains Garrett Watson, senior policy analyst at the Tax Foundation, a center-right think tank. 'This is a historic step forward for America's seniors,' said Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano, a former Wall Street executive appointed by Trump. 'For nearly 90 years, Social Security has been a cornerstone of economic security for older Americans. By significantly reducing the tax burden on benefits, this legislation reaffirms President Trump's promise to protect Social Security and helps ensure that seniors can better enjoy the retirement they've earned." There are many Social Security recipients and seniors who won't get a tax cut, however. About 5% of retired Social Security beneficiaries are ages 62 to 64. There are also deceased workers' survivors and disabled workers who are younger than 65. Among those 65 and older, many have incomes below the standard deduction of $14,600 per person or $29,200 per couple, so they already aren't paying income taxes anyway. At the other end of the spectrum, the deduction phases out for individuals making more than $75,000 or couples earning more than $150,000. "Lower-income earners benefit less than middle and upper-middle income households," Watson said. On average, seniors in the bottom 20% income will save just 0.1% on their tax bill, according to the Tax Policy Foundation's analysis, about one-tenth of what those in the middle of the income distribution will save. "It's been marketed as tax relief for seniors, but a lot of seniors are going to be surprised when they find out it doesn't apply to them," Watson said. "I'm getting asked all the time by folks what this actually means for their tax situation." And while some will soon benefit from lower taxes, the lost tax revenue could trigger a future automatic benefit cut for all beneficiaries. That's because Social Security benefits aren't taxed like normal income. Instead of being used as general revenues, they go specifically into the trust funds that provide a backstop for Medicare and Social Security. The Social Security and Medicare Hospital Insurance trust funds were on track to be depleted by 2033, but now that date will be moved up to 2032, because the senior citizen tax deduction will lop an estimated $30 billion per year off the tax revenues those trust funds collect, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. That, in turn, will trigger a future automatic benefit cut of 24% to all recipients, the centrist think tank projects. Those problems will only grow worse, Watson noted, if Congress renews, increases or makes permanent the senior tax deduction, when it expires in 2028. "It's a mixed bag for seniors, because some seniors will get some tax relief; the cost of that, though, is borne by the entire Social Security system," Lawson said. Critics are pouncing on the message arriving at a time when the Social Security Administration has been suffering from problems with customer service. The Trump administration has reduced the agency's staff and instituted new rules on identification for applicants, resulting in average wait times that have ballooned to 90 minutes. In June, the agency stopped making public real-time performance metrics about how long they will have to wait to reach a live person on the phone, and how long applications for new benefits take to be approved, USA TODAY reported on June 26. Multiple times, USA TODAY reporters called Social Security's 1-800 line they did not reach a live person before the line disconnected with no warning. Contributing: Sarah D. Wire This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Unusual Social Security Administration email touts Big, Beautiful Bill
