logo
Republicans Issued Warning on 2026 Midterms

Republicans Issued Warning on 2026 Midterms

Newsweek3 days ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Republicans have been warned that the party's recent passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act could have dramatic repercussions in the 2026 midterm elections.
Karl Rove, a longtime GOP strategist, said on Fox News's America's Newsroom: "I think it'll have a huge impact on 2026, because, remember, as these changes, particularly the Medicaid changes come into effect, they're going to have, people are going to be losing their coverage."
Why It Matters
President Donald Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, a taxation and spending package, narrowly passed the House of Representatives on Thursday by 218 votes against 214, having been approved by the Senate earlier in the week thanks to vice president JD Vance's tiebreaking vote. Trump signed the bill into law on Friday.
The flagship legislation contains an array of tax and spending measures. Tax cuts Trump introduced in 2017 would be made permanent, while state and local tax deductions would increase from $10,000 to $40,000—primarily benefiting those living in high-tax states. The bill also includes additional funding for border security and the military and cuts to Medicaid and food stamps. It also raises the national debt ceiling and the Congressional Budget Office projects it will add $2.4 trillion to the U.S. federal debt.
What To Know
Republicans advanced sweeping policy changes with the bill, imposing 80-hour-per-month work requirements on able-bodied Medicaid recipients and introducing stricter eligibility checks. The legislation will reduce federal funding for Medicaid and food assistance, which is likely to result in millions losing coverage.
Overall, Rove backed the legislation, commenting: "The able-bodied—think about it, there was an interesting study done of able-bodied people on Medicaid, and … you know what their No. 1 activity was if they weren't working? It was watching television. And No. 2 was playing online games."
The GOP strategist praised work requirements but cautioned Republican leaders that "the work is just beginning," urging continued advocacy to justify these changes to voters.
Rove said: "Medicaid was meant for poor seniors, for children in poor families, and for the disabled, and we should not be paying for health care for people who are able-bodied, and can work, and are refusing to work. This is why they got to go on the offense. But yeah, it's going to be a big impact."
Meanwhile, Democrats and critics warn the cuts could energize opposition and threaten Republican lawmakers' control of Congress in closely divided districts.
What People Are Saying
Speaking to Newsweek Gianno Caldwell, a conservative commentator and Fox News contributor, said: "BBB [Big Beautiful Bill] is what the American people have been demanding for decades. Putting the American People First, less taxes, support of the working and middle classes and cutting taxes for every American. Trump kept his promise and the American people won."
Mark Shanahan, an American politics expert who teaches at the University of Surrey in the U.K., told Newsweek: "The cuts to America's safety net may bite hardest. While the tightening of the rules around SNAP won't come into play until 2028, Democrats have the chance to weaponize the changes in Medicaid around work requirements, six-month reenrolments, and, especially, the cut in provider tax.
"At an individual level, millions of poorer Americans—many firmly in the MAGA camp—will see their benefits cut, while, at community level, we're likely to see a slew of rural hospital closures. There are many more Americans on Medicaid than there are billionaires, and this bill skews heavily against the poor. The White House may have calculated that these people don't vote anyway, but history says Americans vote on how healthy their wallet feels. By November 2026, for many, their wallets may be on life support."
File photo: President Donald Trump speaks to journalists aboard Air Force One on July 4, 2025.
File photo: President Donald Trump speaks to journalists aboard Air Force One on July 4, 2025.
BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/GETTY
Dafydd Townley, a U.S. focused political scientist at the University of Portsmouth in southern England, told Newsweek: "The Big Beautiful Bill could prove costly to the Republican Party if the promised tax cut benefits are not felt universally. Concerns over Medicaid and the closure of rural hospitals are also unlikely to be welcomed but Republicans in close-fought districts. While there is likely to be some pushback against the incumbent party, the Republicans have a tiny majority in the House and will be determined to minimize this. If the House does flip to the Democrats in 2028, there will undoubtedly be two years of political stalemate as it's unlikely there will be any bipartisan collaboration, much like the last two years of the first Trump administration."
Matt Terrill, a managing partner at consultancy firm Firehouse Strategies, told Newsweek: "This will be an asset to President Donald Trump and Republicans given this is the president delivering on the promises he made on the campaign trail—from tax cuts, to border security, etc., and those who voted for the president and congressional Republicans expected them to deliver on these core campaign promises.
"In addition, this bill, particularly the tax cuts component, was crucial with respect to providing the president the ability to execute his economic agenda. Without this bill, he would not have been able to do so, and the upcoming midterm elections will primarily be about the economy.
"However, for this to be a sustained win for the White House and for the GOP, particularly heading into the midterm elections, it comes down to where the economy will be over the next few months. Heading into the midterms, if the economy is strong, this bill will not just be a micro win but a macro win as well."
What Happens Next
The next midterm elections are scheduled to take place on Tuesday, November 3, 2026. Currently, the Republicans have a narrow majority in both the Senate and House and losing either would make it significantly more difficult to pass President Donald Trump's policy agenda.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Netanyahu Backs Trump's Vision for Redeveloping Gaza
Netanyahu Backs Trump's Vision for Redeveloping Gaza

Time​ Magazine

time11 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Netanyahu Backs Trump's Vision for Redeveloping Gaza

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday backed a proposal by President Donald Trump to relocate Palestinians from Gaza and turn the war-ravaged coastal enclave into a luxury waterfront development—a plan that has drawn international condemnation and could further complicate fragile cease-fire talks between Israel and Hamas. 'It's called free choice,' Netanyahu told reporters before a private dinner with the President in the White House. 'If people want to stay, they can stay. But if they want to leave, they should be able to leave.' Netanyahu added that Israel was working 'very closely' with the United States to identify countries that would be willing to accept displaced Palestinians from Gaza, and suggested that discussions with several nations were already 'getting close' to fruition. Trump, seated across from the Israeli leader, said that 'we've had great cooperation' from countries surrounding Israel and added that 'something good will happen.' Netanyahu's comments marked the most explicit endorsement yet of a controversial idea Trump first floated earlier this year: that Gaza could be emptied of its Palestinian population and redeveloped into what he once called the 'Riviera of the Middle East.' The proposal was met with quick backlash from U.S. allies, Arab leaders, and human rights organizations, who said it amounted to ethnic cleansing under the guise of economic development. The White House later attempted to walk back elements of Trump's language. But Netanyahu's renewed support for the vision—paired with his insistence on rejecting the creation of a Palestinian state—offers a stark preview of the kind of 'peace' he and Trump may ultimately seek: one in which the Palestinian population is displaced or resettled abroad. It also represents a sharp break from decades of U.S. policy, which has long held that the path toward peace in the Middle East must include a two-state solution—an independent Palestinian state existing alongside Israel. Netanyahu made clear that any peace deal to end the war with Hamas should not include the recognition of a Palestinian state.x 'I think the Palestinians should have all the powers to govern themselves, but none of the powers to threaten us,' Netanyahu said. 'And that means that certain powers like overall security will always remain in our hands.' 'We'll work out a peace with our Palestinian neighbors, those who don't want to destroy us,' he added, 'and we'll work out a peace in which our security, the sovereign power of security, always remains in our hands. Now, people will say, 'It's not a complete state, it's not a state. It's not that — we don't care.' Negotiators will meet in Doha later this week for cease-fire and hostage talks. Though Trump has said he believes a deal could be reached 'during the coming week,' Netanyahu's endorsement of mass relocation could deepen mistrust among Palestinian negotiators and potentially derail progress. 'It shouldn't be a prison,' Netanyahu said of Gaza, which had a pre-war population of 2 million. 'It should be an open place.' The war in Gaza, now in its 21st month, began after Hamas launched a terror attack on October 7, 2023, killing some 1,200 people and taking more than 250 hostages. Since then, Israel's military campaign has killed over 57,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health officials, and displaced more than 80% of the population. U.N. agencies warn that half a million people face imminent famine. The Prime Minister's remarks echoed a growing sentiment within his far-right coalition, where calls to permanently remove Palestinians from Gaza have become more open in recent months. The private dinner capped a day of closed-door diplomacy for Netanyahu, who also met earlier with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Trump's foreign envoy Steve Witkoff. Netanyahu is scheduled to meet with House Speaker Mike Johnson on Tuesday. The two leaders appeared to use the dinner to take a victory lap after the United States and Israel carried out coordinated airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities last month. Before taking questions from reporters, Netanyahu said that he had nominated Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize.

Female cyclist defends ‘taking a stand' on women's sports by refusing to take podium with trans winner
Female cyclist defends ‘taking a stand' on women's sports by refusing to take podium with trans winner

New York Post

time12 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Female cyclist defends ‘taking a stand' on women's sports by refusing to take podium with trans winner

Veteran cyclist Julie Cutts Peterson told Fox News' 'America Reports' about why she refused to take the podium for the medal ceremony after losing to a trans competitor. 'At the finish line I was upset. I said 'I did not want to race against a man,'' Peterson said, recalling her frustration at the event and the way the audience gasped at her comment. 'In my mind I was like, 'I can say that, I have freedom of speech.' I was raised believing in the Bible where men are created by God and God created women from men, I was born and raised in America, where I learned my pronouns, and I took science classes that taught me about XX and XY and I believe that most Americans and people worldwide would support men not being in women's categories.' Peterson came in second place to transgender opponent, Kate 'KJ' Phillips – born a biological male – who took the gold medal last Tuesday at the Lyons Masters National Championships in Wisconsin. She is one of multiple veteran female cyclists who are speaking out against USA Cycling after they claim the organization failed to disclose the participation of a transgender athlete in a recent race. 3 'At the finish line I was upset. I said 'I did not want to race against a man,'' Peterson said, recalling her frustration at the event. ICONS Peterson recalled the final sprint of the race where Debbie Milne was the only competitor ahead of her until 'out of nowhere' came Phillips. 'I knew at that sprint that that was a man's sprint,' she said, noting her extensive experience riding among both men and women. Peterson went on to argue transgender ideology is not scientifically sound, declaring, 'There is no amount of makeup, money, or marketing that can change that Y-chromosome, and that's why we are taking a stand.' 3 'I knew at that sprint that that was a man's sprint,' she said, noting her extensive experience riding among both men and women. The cyclist claimed further that the transgender competitor's name was not even included on the registration list, 'which means that we were not given the information that he would be racing in our category before the race started.' 'Apparently we're hearing that from other athletes as well,' 'America Reports' co-anchor Sandra Smith said, sharing a clip of Milne claiming that Phillips' registration was completely hidden from competitors. 'Catherine Phillips, KJ's name, was not on that list. And I checked it up all the way to the point of closure when we couldn't register online anymore,' Milne said last Thursday on 'Fox & Friends.' According to Milne, neither she nor Peterson believe the omission of Phillips' name was accidental, referring to the incident as 'deception.' She said Peterson later got confirmation Phillips had been registered since mid-June, long before the online list closed. The cyclist added that, had she known, she might have reconsidered spending hundreds of dollars and traveling over 400 miles to compete. 3 The cyclist claimed further that the transgender competitor's name was not even included on the registration list. Instagram / k8nevergivesin Smith also noted that Fox News Digital had reached out to USA Cycling, who responded by providing their transgender eligibility policy. Smith relayed that as she understood it, the policy as it stands is, 'Quite simply it's just providing a written and signed declaration to the cycling technical director that their gender identity is female.' Peterson agreed, claiming she has a photo of how the registration appeared June 19th at 4:48 P.M., arguing that USA Cycling and Bike Reg had plenty of time to show the transgender competitor's name there but decided not to, an increasingly growing pattern. Fox News' Madison Colombo contributed to this report.

Outrage on social media over liberal figures politicizing Texas flood disaster
Outrage on social media over liberal figures politicizing Texas flood disaster

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Outrage on social media over liberal figures politicizing Texas flood disaster

Some liberals may end up regretting their social media posts politicizing the disastrous flooding in Texas after getting major backlash this week. Multiple liberal figures on social media, along with major Democratic Party figures, took serious heat this week after blaming the damage and deaths caused by flooding in Texas this week on President Donald Trump and the Republican Party. Even some other prominent liberals condemned the political attacks over the flooding. "It takes a serious lack of humanity to see children die in a natural disaster and respond with something along the lines of 'that's what they voted for,'" former Bernie Sanders campaign co-chair Nina Turner said in response to one viral post. Texas Flood Survivors Share Harrowing Stories, Search Continues For Those Still Missing At least 91 people, including children and counselors at a girls' camp, were killed in central Texas in flash flooding that began early on the morning of the Fourth of July, the White House said on Monday. The toll is expected to rise with dozens more missing as of Monday. The National Weather Service sent several flash flood warnings early Friday morning, followed by several flash flood emergency notices. Read On The Fox News App Some critics of Trump wasted little time, saying his cuts to the federal government – namely staffing cuts at the National Weather Service (NWS) – hampered the state's natural disaster response preparedness and led to destruction and loss of life. In a post from over the weekend, editor-in-chief Ron Filipkowski wrote, "The people in Texas voted for government services controlled by Donald Trump and Greg Abbott. That is exactly what they [are] getting." The commentator appeared to have deleted the post shortly after sharing it. Turner called Filipkowski's post "shameful." Texas pediatrician Christina Propst shared a social media post wishing that "MAGA" people affected by the flooding should reap the effects of what they voted for, while expressing hope that "non-MAGA voters and pets be safe and dry." "Kerr County MAGA voted to gut FEMA. They deny climate change. May they get what they voted for," she said, adding, "Bless their hearts." Click2Houston reported Sunday that Propst's employer, Blue Fish Pediatrics, condemned the statement and announced she was no longer employed. Deadly Texas Flood Exposes 'Neglected' Weather Alert System Trump Aims To Modernize "The individual is no longer employed by Blue Fish Pediatrics. As we previously mentioned in our original statement, we strongly condemn the comments that were made in that post. That post does not reflect the values, standards, or mission of Blue Fish Pediatrics. We do not support or condone any statement that politicizes tragedy, diminishes human dignity, or fails to clearly uphold compassion for every child and family. We continue to extend our full support to the families and the surrounding communities who are grieving, recovering, and searching for hope," the post read. The official account for "The Democrats" shared a screenshot of a headline Sunday, which stated, "As Floods Hit, Key Roles Were Vacant at Weather Service Offices in Texas." The account commented, "Reminder: The staffing shortages at the National Weather Service's San Angelo and San Antonio offices doubled under the Trump administration. These jobs are meant to coordinate disaster response and save lives." Other social media users hammered the post. Meteorologist Chris Martz replied with an Associated Press report citing National Weather Service office meteorologist Jason Runyen's assessment that his office had extra staffers at the time of the flooding. "The National Weather Service office in New Braunfels, which delivers forecasts for Austin, San Antonio and the surrounding areas, had extra staff on duty during the storms, Runyen said. Where the office would typically have two forecasters on duty during clear weather, they had up to five on staff," the AP stated. Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., pointed fingers at the GOP as well, posting on Saturday, "Accurate weather forecasting helps avoid fatal disasters. There are consequences to Trump's brainless attacks on public workers, like meteorologists." Conservative commentator Carmine Sabia trashed Murphy, stating, "As they are searching for the bodies of babies. You should be ashamed but you have no shame." Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., is calling for an investigation into whether NWS cuts played a role in the response to the catastrophic flooding. CBS Austin meteorologist Avery Tomasco insisted that the National Weather Service was functional at the time of the flooding. "All I'll say is this. The National Weather Service issued a flood watch for Kerr County more than 12 hours ahead of the catastrophic flood. A flash flood warning was issued for Hunt & Ingram 3 HOURS before the Guadalupe started to climb. They did their job and they did it well," he wrote on X on Friday. In another X post, Nina Turner provided some fact-checking of her own regarding Trump's budget cuts, stating, "The GOP's budget cuts to NOAA are set to take effect at the start of fiscal year 2026, which begins on October 1, 2025. Anyone making the deaths of the children in Texas about partisan politics is morally bankrupt. Please reflect." "Multiple things can be true at the same time: 1. the funding cuts are bad. 2. the tragedy in Texas was a tragedy. Not being able to hold those two beliefs and jumping to 'they got what they voted for' will absolutely not move us towards any resolution." White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson ripped liberals blaming Trump's cuts. "It's shameful and disgusting that in the wake of tragedy, the left's first instinct is to lie and politicize a disaster to target their political opponents," she told Fox News Digital. "False claims about the NWS have been repeatedly debunked by meteorologists, experts, and other public reporting. The NWS did their job, even issuing a flood watch more than 12 hours in advance. The Trump Administration is grateful to the first responders who sprang into action to save hundreds lives during this catastrophe, and will continue to help the great state of Texas in their recovery efforts." At Monday's press briefing, press secretary Karoline Leavitt added that any media outlets or Democrats blaming Trump for the flooding should feel ashamed of article source: Outrage on social media over liberal figures politicizing Texas flood disaster

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store