LDP's Mio Sugita loses upper house seat after backlash over discriminatory remarks
The 58-year-old ran for the first time in the upper house proportional representation race, where 50 seats were up for grabs, as a candidate for the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP). Despite campaigning on issues such as strengthening the national security policy, preserving traditional Japanese values and amending the Constitution, questions were raised about her qualifications as a lawmaker.
Sugita had previously been elected three times in the lower house proportional representation bloc. However, she was suspended from party positions for six months in April 2024 due to her involvement in a slush fund scandal within LDP factions. She later withdrew her candidacy for the lower house election in October that year.
Sugita has been the subject of controversy for discriminatory online posts about South Korean residents in Japan and the indigenous Ainu people.
At the U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women held in Switzerland in 2016, she took photos of participating South Korean and Ainu women without their permission and posted the images on her blog with comments including "old women cosplaying in ethnic costumes" and "frankly speaking, they're shabby."
In 2023, the Osaka and Sapporo legal affairs bureaus recognized her statements as human rights violations. As a result, her endorsement by the LDP in the latest upper house election sparked protests from civil society groups.
LDP President and Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said during a House of Councillors Budget Committee session in March 2025 that he felt "a strong sense of discomfort" about Sugita's past discriminatory remarks. However, he suggested there was no problem with her endorsement, saying, "It's ultimately my call."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asahi Shimbun
16 minutes ago
- Asahi Shimbun
EDITORIAL: Established political parties must reconnect with the public
The ruling coalition of the Liberal Democratic Party and Komeito has lost its majority in the Upper House, just as it did in the Lower House last October. It goes without saying that this is an extremely harsh evaluation by voters of the administration of Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba. Meanwhile, the main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan only managed to maintain the number of seats it held before the election, while new parties, such as the Democratic Party for the People and Sanseito, made significant gains. The election outcome can be seen as a defeat for the established political parties. Voters appear to believe that they have not adequately addressed the public dissatisfaction and distrust that have been growing under more than 30 years of economic stagnation. At a news conference on July 21, Ishiba reiterated his intention to remain in office, saying, 'Political stagnation cannot be allowed even for a moment.' The prime minister may have judged that it would be inadvisable to announce an immediate resignation given the imminent deadline of the Japan-U.S. tariff negotiations on Aug. 1. Still, staying in power cannot be said to be in line with the will of voters. Ishiba clearly said he is not considering expanding the coalition framework at this point. He said he would discuss individual policy issues with opposition parties, as he has done so far. However, as he failed to gain public trust in both the Lower House and Upper House elections, it remains to be seen how much cooperation opposition parties will extend. It is nothing short of a 'thorny path,' as Ishiba himself put it. Komeito, which shares responsibility for the administration as a member of the ruling coalition, won a record-low eight seats, losing three seats each in electoral districts and the proportional representation portion. Among the opposition bloc, only the Japanese Communist Party lost seats. The party won only three seats, down from its seven seats up for re-election. Despite their long histories and established organizations, both parties have been in decline in recent years due to the aging of supporters, among other factors. They will continue to be challenged to develop new support bases using methods that adapt to the changing times. In contrast to the established parties, the DPP and Sanseito, both founded five years ago, have risen. The DPP, which appeals to the working generations with its slogan of increasing take-home pay, garnered 17 seats, up from its four seats up for re-election. Sanseito, which advocates 'Japanese First' policies, gained 14 seats, although it had only one seat up for grabs. The two parties share a common strategy of expanding their support base by taking advantage of social media to criticize the established parties. Sanseito's antiforeign rhetoric has often sparked intense debates on social media and become a source of conflict and division. Still, simply frowning upon the public discontent that sometimes erupts violently will not resolve the problem. It is the role of political parties to explore the background of such 'public sentiment,' bring it to the table for discussion and present effective solutions. If that channel has been blocked, it must be urgently reconnected. The established parties must start by confronting the reality of being shunned, reflecting on what is lacking and determining what needs to be done to regain the public's trust. --The Asahi Shimbun, July 22
Asahi Shimbun
16 minutes ago
- Asahi Shimbun
VOX POPULI: Study suggests xenophobia as the ‘default' is a conformity issue
Voters listen to a speech at Sanseito's street rally in Tokyo's Setagaya Ward on June 21. (Akari Sugiyama) While researching overseas cases of 'haigai shugi' (xenophobia), I realized that this word, which literally means 'exclusion of foreigners and foreign things,' can be substituted with other expressions in English. The strongest expression is 'hatred against foreigners' ('gaikokujin keno' in Japanese) but "anti-foreign sentiment" ("hangaikokujin kanjo") and 'contempt for immigrants' ('imin besshi') are also often used. There are fewer expressions that emphasize 'exclusion' ('haijo') or 'ostracization' ('haiseki'). Is there any Japanese word or phrase that explicitly conveys discriminatory thoughts? I wondered about that when I saw, in the July 20 Upper House election coverage, this comment by a supporter of the opposition Sanseito party: 'Since this is Japan, putting the Japanese people first is common sense, isn't it?' Obviously, this person has embraced the 'Japanese First' concept with total ease. Realizing that the wave of populism that's rising around the world has arrived in Japan, I felt down. And it also made me sense that something just doesn't add up. Compared to Europe and the United States, the number of foreigners Japan has let in is extremely small. And yet, the Japanese people are vociferously rejecting foreigners. Why? In 'Kashika Sareru Sabetsu' (Discrimination brought to visualization), author Akira Igarashi presents the results of a very interesting experiment. When Japanese test subjects were asked whether they supported or opposed restricting the number of foreign workers coming to Japan, their comments were more xenophobic if their answers could be seen by other people. This, according to Igarashi, is the opposite of what is normally the case in Europe and the United States, where test subjects tend to hide, out of guilt, their honest anti-foreigner feelings when their answers can be viewed by other people. Igarashi theorizes that there exists a 'standard' in Japanese society that creates the illusion that people must act xenophobically. They are made to believe that since xenophobes are a majority, they must conform. In the background, Igarashi explains, is Japan's greater tolerance toward xenophobic celebrities and politicians, who would be severely condemned in other countries. If a single xenophobic statement can spread by feeding on people's frustrations and anxieties, that is really alarming. Xenophobia is unmistakably the same thing as discrimination against foreigners. —The Asahi Shimbun, July 22 * * * Vox Populi, Vox Dei is a popular daily column that takes up a wide range of topics, including culture, arts and social trends and developments. Written by veteran Asahi Shimbun writers, the column provides useful perspectives on and insights into contemporary Japan and its culture.
2 hours ago
Akazawa Starts 8th U.S. Visit for Tariff Talks
News from Japan Jul 22, 2025 12:34 (JST) Washington, July 21 (Jiji Press)--Japan's economic revitalization minister Ryosei Akazawa on Monday kicked off his eighth visit to the United States for tariff talks with the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump. The bruising defeat of Japan's Liberal Democratic Party-led ruling coalition in Sunday's election for the House of Councillors, the upper chamber of the country's parliament, is shaking the foundation of Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's administration, and the development may affect the bilateral tariff negotiations, political watchers said. Attention is being paid to whether Tokyo, which is calling on the U.S. side to review its automobile tariffs, and Washington, which is urging Japan to open its markets further to reduce the U.S. trade deficit with the Asian nation, can compromise with each other. "We will continue talks energetically so that the two sides can find common ground and reach an agreement," Akazawa, Japan's chief negotiator on tariff issues with the United States, told reporters after arriving at Washington Dulles International Airport. He said he does not think that the Upper House election result will negatively affect the negotiations. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.] Jiji Press
