Pentagon used UFO conspiracies to hide secret weapon programs: Report
In a review of a 2024 Pentagon report on UFO sightings, The Wall Street Journal claimed that some of the most common theories regarding UFOs, including reports about aliens being held at Nevada's Area 51, were directly encouraged by the Pentagon to hide details on various secret weapon programs.
According to The Wall Street Journal, evidence based on interviews with roughly two dozen U.S. military contractors, scientists, and officials and thousands of pages of documents, emails, text messages, and recordings reportedly show that the U.S. government engaged in efforts to encourage UFO conspiracies since the 1950s.
The Wall Street Journal reported that the Pentagon's 2024 report indicated that a Nevada bar owner near Area 51 was given fake photos of flying saucers near Area 51 by an Air Force colonel in the 1980s. The Air Force colonel told the Pentagon's investigators that he was given a mission at the time to share disinformation and protect the true objective of Area 51, which was to test the F-117 Nighthawk stealth airplane.
READ MORE: Video: Pentagon whistleblower says gov't restricting UFO retrieval info
According to The Wall Street Journal, the U.S. military determined that its secret weapon and technology programs could be hidden from the Soviet Union during the Cold War by encouraging UFO conspiracy theories.
The Wall Street Journal reported that Sean Kirkpatrick, the former director of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, found multiple examples of the Pentagon spreading disinformation regarding UFO sightings, including an incident that involved the Air Force hazing multiple military members by introducing them to a fake unit allegedly responsible for investigating alien aircraft. The outlet noted that Kirkpatrick also determined that the government intentionally withheld information from the public regarding documented sightings of secret military projects.
In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Robert Salas, a former Air Force captain, said, 'This is a gigantic cover-up.'
In a statement obtained by The Wall Street Journal, the Department of Defense said, 'The department is committed to releasing a second volume of its Historical Record Report, to include AARO's findings on reports of potential pranks and inauthentic materials.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Hegseth abruptly pulls Pentagon officials from 'globalist' Aspen conference
Secretary Pete Hegseth pulled senior Defense Department officials from the Aspen Security Conference for promoting the "evil of globalism." Military commanders were set to speak at the conference, which begins on Tuesday, as has been tradition through Republican and Democratic administrations. But Pentagon spokesperson Kingsley Wilson told Just the News the secretary's office believes the conference "promotes the evil of globalism, disdain for our great country, and hatred for the President of the United States." Wilson added that DoD "has no interest in legitimizing an organization that has invited former officials who have been the architects of chaos abroad and failure at home." The forum will host other Trump administration officials: Adam Boehler, presidential envoy for hostage response, and Tom Barrack, U.S. ambassador to Turkey and Syria. It will also hear from some contentious Biden administration officials – Jake Sullivan, former national security advisor, and Brett McGurk, a former National Security Council coordinator. Mark Esper, Trump's former acting defense secretary, and David Petraeus, who was briefly CIA director under President Barack Obama, will also be speaking, along with Condoleezza Rice, a national security advisor and secretary of state during the Bush years. "Senior Department of Defense officials will no longer be participating at the Aspen Security Forum because their values do not align with the values of the DoD," chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement. "The Department will remain strong in its focus to increase the lethality of our warfighters, revitalize the warrior ethos, and project Peace Through Strength on the world stage. It is clear the ASF is not in alignment with these goals." The Aspen Institute said in a statement on the Pentagon withdrawal: "For more than a decade, the Aspen Security Forum has welcomed senior officials – Republican and Democrat, civilian and military – as well as senior foreign officials and experts, who bring experience and diverse perspectives on matters of national security." "We will miss the participation of the Pentagon, but our invitations remain open."
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Adios, isolationism: Trump embraces role as global cop
During his first term, President Trump memorably declared that 'we more and more are not wanting to be the policemen of the world. We're spending tremendous amounts of money for decades policing the world, and that shouldn't be the priority.' His MAGA base may justifiably have thought that America, loaded shotgun in hand, was going to hunker down behind its border wall and tariff barriers during a second Trump term. It hasn't worked out that way so far. Instead, Trump is doing what U.S. presidents have done since the end of World War II — policing the world. In just six months, American diplomats helped to negotiate a peace agreement in the decades-long conflict between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Republic of Rwanda, claimed credit for 'preventing and ending' a war between India and Pakistan and are trying to broker a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. Trump ordered a devastating attack on Iran's nuclear facilities, which even internationalist presidents like Obama and Biden had refrained from doing, and a military operation against the Houthis in Yemen to protect shipping in the Red Sea. In 2022, then-Senate candidate JD Vance (R-Ohio) staked the isolationist flag by saying, 'I don't really care what happens to Ukraine one way or the other.' Trump just announced that 'we're sending weapons to Ukraine' in connection to funding from NATO, an organization Trump is suddenly warming to. 'It's not a rip-off,' the president added. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, suddenly sounding like a Cold War internationalist, reassured America's Asian allies at a security forum in Singapore that, 'No one should doubt America's commitment to our Indo-Pacific allies and partners.' And Trump just took his global police role to another level by attempting to modify how a major economic power conducts not its foreign policy, but its internal affairs. He threatened Brazil with 50 percent tariffs unless it dropped criminal charges against far-right former President Jair Bolsonaro over his alleged attempt to overturn the 2022 election. This isn't to say that Trump is an effective global policeman or is even acting in the national interest. Iran may still possess the ability to build a nuclear weapon despite Trump's boast of having caused 'complete and total obliteration.' Wars still rage in Gaza and Ukraine, and the Houthis are still sinking ships in the Red Sea. The Brazil tariffs also defy economic logic — the U.S. runs a trade surplus with Brazil — and appear driven by Trump's inexhaustible sense of grievance over his own criminal indictments. Meanwhile, your Starbucks order may soon have a surcharge because the chain imports 20 percent of its coffee beans from Brazil. Nor is there any assurance that this outburst of internationalism is here to stay, because Trump's policies often have the shelf life of yogurt. Flattery from that foreign leader or a lack of gratitude from this one, and presto — a new policy. If Trump resumes pressure to annex Greenland and the Panama Canal, he'll look more like a 19th-century imperialist than a 21st-century internationalist. Can an American president be an effective global leader, whose power depends heavily on building and maintaining alliances, while conducting a tariff war against American allies? Twice in the previous century America looked inward as successive world wars broke out. Twice it was forced to send millions of U.S. soldiers overseas to fight anyway. Until Trump came along, every president since 1945, Democrat and Republican, recognized that, to quote President John Quincy Adams, while the U.S. should not 'go abroad in search of monsters to destroy,' there will always be 'monsters' on the prowl for us. Whether Trump understands that is the question of the day.
Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
NATO Spy Planes Make Pincer Move Over Russia
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. American and British reconnaissance aircraft flew from England toward Russia, approaching the country from two sides on the same day, according to flight data. A Newsweek map shows the planes' route amid tensions between NATO and Moscow. On Monday, the Boeing Royal Air Force (RAF) aircraft RC-135W flew from its base in the U.K. and circled off the coast of the Russian city of Murmansk before heading back. It happened the same day as the U.S. Air Force (USAF) aircraft RC-135V left a different U.K. base and circled the Russian exclave of Kaliningrad that borders NATO's eastern flank members, Lithuania and Poland. There is no suggestion that Russian airspace was breached. Why It Matters The Boeing-built aircraft gather signals intelligence and are crewed by more than 30 people, including electronic warfare officers and intelligence operators. The latest sorties come amid growing tensions between Moscow and the bloc following Russian aircraft buzzing NATO airspace and pledges by the U.S. and the alliance to provide more military help for Ukraine to fight Russian President Vladimir Putin's aggression. What To Know Data from Flightradar24, mapped by Newsweek, shows that the RAF RC-135W took off from the RAF base at Waddington, Lincolnshire, England at 8:11 a.m. on Monday. The aircraft headed past Norway, Sweden and Finland before turning southeast toward Russia. Its route took it across the Barents Sea and almost parallel with Murmansk, Russia's Arctic port city, before it returned to the U.K. along the Scandinavian coast and landed at Waddington at 6:38 p.m. Also on Monday, the USAF RC-135V Rivet Joint, identified by the call sign "JAKE17," took off at 7:08 a.m. from Mildenhall, Suffolk, located further south in England. The aircraft went on a seven-hour flight that took it across the Netherlands, Germany, Poland and Lithuania before it circled Kaliningrad, the Russian exclave that would be the front line of any hostilities between Moscow and the alliance. This image from May 5 shows an RC-135W Rivet Joint and two F-35 Lightnings flying over The Mall during a flypast on Victory in Europe Day in London. This image from May 5 shows an RC-135W Rivet Joint and two F-35 Lightnings flying over The Mall during a flypast on Victory in Europe Day in days ago, the USAF reconnaissance and intelligence-gathering aircraft skirted around Kaliningrad after it crossed Europe and the three Baltic states. The Rivet Joint usually flies around NATO's eastern flank and also on the edge of the Black Sea near Russian-controlled Crimea, which Moscow seized from Ukraine in 2014. Olli Suorsa, an assistant professor in homeland security at the Rabdan Academy in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, previously told Newsweek that the USAF's fleet of RC-135s were "hard pressed of late" because of demands for signals intelligence collection at the U.S.-Mexico border, East Asia, Eastern Europe and the Middle East. The U.K.'s RAF operates its own Rivet Joint fleet, often sending its reconnaissance aircraft around Kaliningrad and the broader eastern flank of NATO. At the end of last month, the aircraft traveled to and from the Black Sea after circling Kaliningrad. What People Are Saying User @MeNMyRC1, a security analyst, wrote on X, formerly Twitter, next to the map of the RAF RC-135W: "All the way up into the Barents Sea. This area used to get a lot more attention when the Soviet Union had a Navy and Air Force." What Happens Next NATO continues to conduct regular aerial surveillance of Russia's western border regions, and Russia is likely to continue facing accusations that it is buzzing alliance airspace as part of hybrid measures that add to security concerns for the region known as the "NATO lake."
